What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

QB Cam Newton, Retired (1 Viewer)

Is this the same Ted Johnson who threw Belichick under the bus for concussions sustained in practice?  And now nurses from the teat of local sports media?  The input from marginal QBs is like hearing Chris Sims talk about QBs (see for example his recent interview about why Taysom Hill should start over Jameis Winston).

Less confrontationally, it seems the majority of "football insiders" see Cam as the lead horse.  In the end, that may or may not be a good thing.  Only time will tell.


Yes...it is Ted Johnson...the one who was a very good LB for the Pats...are you saying he doesn't know what he is talking about?

I would say the consensus is Cam will start the season but Mac will take over and put us out of the misery that is the Cam Newton era...the sooner it happens the quicker this franchise can begin playing real football on the offensive-side of the ball. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
What's the deal with teams like the Pats and Jags so willing to cut quality backups? I was wondering if maybe the Pats had some kind of handshake deal with Cam where, if he wasn't the starter, they would let him seek opportunities elsewhere, but even that doesn't make sense. It's not like he's going to be able to start anywhere else short term. Meanwhile, the Pats go into the first-ever 17-game season with a rookie QB who has never played anywhere close to that many games in a season, and their backup is ... Stidham? Hoyer? (I'll admit I haven't stayed on top of the Pats QB3 situation.)

 
Patriots released QB Cam Newton. 

The Mac Jones era begins in New England after the team's shocking release of Newton, who drew continuous praise from head coach Bill Belichick during his sting with the team. The unvaccinated Newton missed a critical week of joint practices after a COVID-19 testing mixup prevented him from entering the team facility. Jones then took all the Pats' first-team reps and perhaps established himself as the unquestioned starter. Jones will head into the regular season without the threat of Newton taking goal line carries -- a boon for both Jones, Damien Harris, and the rest of the team's skill position players. 

- Tom Pelissero, Twitter
Stunning.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Indy, pitt or balt didnt want to trade for him?
If we go back to last off season, Cam only wanted to be a starter. I guess if he went to PIT to potentially take over for Big Ben that would have been a potential landing spot. But 31 teams passed on him last year when he was willing to sign for the league minimum.

 
Guess this makes some Patriots draftable again in my auction tonight. Cam looked horrible, wasn't planning on touching any of those players.

 
What's the deal with teams like the Pats and Jags so willing to cut quality backups? I was wondering if maybe the Pats had some kind of handshake deal with Cam where, if he wasn't the starter, they would let him seek opportunities elsewhere, but even that doesn't make sense. It's not like he's going to be able to start anywhere else short term. Meanwhile, the Pats go into the first-ever 17-game season with a rookie QB who has never played anywhere close to that many games in a season, and their backup is ... Stidham? Hoyer? (I'll admit I haven't stayed on top of the Pats QB3 situation.)


Pretty sure Cam and Minshew are good backups, but too much of a distraction from the current roster / team, as well as the media. Lawrence struggles, MINSHEW MANIA COME ON. Mac struggles- COME ON PUT CAM in.

I think these teams want to focus on the development of their rookies, and trade away distractions. I'm not saying they are real distractions, but last year's players probably have an affinity for Cam and Minshew.

Cam and Minshew also deserve better in some aspect, due to veteran respect as well as Minshew showing flashes but got replaced. 

 
Pretty sure Cam and Minshew are good backups, but too much of a distraction from the current roster / team, as well as the media. Lawrence struggles, MINSHEW MANIA COME ON. Mac struggles- COME ON PUT CAM in.

I think these teams want to focus on the development of their rookies, and trade away distractions. I'm not saying they are real distractions, but last year's players probably have an affinity for Cam and Minshew.

Cam and Minshew also deserve better in some aspect, due to veteran respect as well as Minshew showing flashes but got replaced. 
I sincerely doubt, after their performances last year, that either fan base is pining for Cam/Minshew. Also, when you make your first-round rookie QB the week 1 starter, you're saying that you're going to stick with him through thick and thin. Zero chance either of those guys get benched this year.

But if they get injured, their teams are pretty screwed. Maybe that doesn't matter a whole lot for Jax, but Pats are a potential playoff contender. If they need to use Stidham for a couple games that could be disastrous.

 
I sincerely doubt, after their performances last year, that either fan base is pining for Cam/Minshew. Also, when you make your first-round rookie QB the week 1 starter, you're saying that you're going to stick with him through thick and thin. Zero chance either of those guys get benched this year.

But if they get injured, their teams are pretty screwed. Maybe that doesn't matter a whole lot for Jax, but Pats are a potential playoff contender. If they need to use Stidham for a couple games that could be disastrous.


Fan bases are incredibly fickle and irrational- you have too much faith in the average football fan to be intelligent and make the right football / coaching moves. Fan bases would absolutely call for a change if the starter is downright horrible, because that's what the average NFL fan does.

Having these players on the roster are a distraction. They could be good enough to be a starter on another team (or at least have a chance to be a starter.) Cam and Minshew deserve that opportunity to be given a chance to be a starter somewhere else, hence why they are traded and released. The odds are against these two ever being starters, but still. 

 
Houston seems like a possibility, no?
If they sign him before Week 1 his salary for the entire year becomes guaranteed because he is a vested veteran. Would Houston do that? Seems unlikely. His non-vaccinated status also makes it more difficult for teams that would want to get him in quickly to learn the system and get prepared.

 
I've always like Cam -- I was hoping the Bills would draft him when he came out.  

I could easily see this being the end of the road for him.  He looked really awful last year.

 
Cam has sucked for years. Fell off a cliff as a passer. 7-16 in his last 23 starts. Like the move by the Patriots. Already been problem off the field in preseason. Not worth the hassle if he'll accept role as backup 

 
What's the deal with teams like the Pats and Jags so willing to cut quality backups? I was wondering if maybe the Pats had some kind of handshake deal with Cam where, if he wasn't the starter, they would let him seek opportunities elsewhere, but even that doesn't make sense. It's not like he's going to be able to start anywhere else short term. Meanwhile, the Pats go into the first-ever 17-game season with a rookie QB who has never played anywhere close to that many games in a season, and their backup is ... Stidham? Hoyer? (I'll admit I haven't stayed on top of the Pats QB3 situation.)
I think its so you don't have a situation like last year with the Dolphins. Once you draft and make Jones the starter you can't go back and demote him. You don't want him looking over his shoulder or the rest of the team wanting Newton in every time Jones has a bad game.

 
I think its so you don't have a situation like last year with the Dolphins. Once you draft and make Jones the starter you can't go back and demote him. You don't want him looking over his shoulder or the rest of the team wanting Newton in every time Jones has a bad game.
Jones isn't that fragile that it'd bother him though, and I honestly don't think BB would care about that. I mean Hoyer's a vet too; no matter what if Jones plays poorly someone will be waiting in the wings.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Cam has sucked for years. Fell off a cliff as a passer. 7-16 in his last 23 starts. Like the move by the Patriots. Already been problem off the field in preseason. Not worth the hassle if he'll accept role as backup 
I was not a fan of Cam, but over the past 3 seasons, for QBs that played in at least 30 game, he ranked as the #17 fantasy QB. He ranked higher than Stafford, Rivers, and Carr.

 
Jones isn't that fragile that it'd bother him though, and I honestly don't think BB would care about that.
Yeah it's kind of funny that on the one hand people are talking about how cold blooded Belichick is, and on the other hand people seem to think that he's so concerned with his QB's fragile ego that he can't keep a viable backup on the roster. (It's even more ridiculous to think that's what's going on in Jacksonville. I'm sure Trevor Lawrence has a lot of things on his mind right now, but the specter of Gardner Freakin' Minshew is not one of them.)

When you're a GM/head coach, your job is to win football games, and one of the ways you do that is by contingency planning in case your starters get hurt. I don't understand why so many teams seem to be punting on their backup QBs, but I don't buy for a second that it's because they need to protect the QB1's widdle feewings.

 
Yeah it's kind of funny that on the one hand people are talking about how cold blooded Belichick is, and on the other hand people seem to think that he's so concerned with his QB's fragile ego that he can't keep a viable backup on the roster. (It's even more ridiculous to think that's what's going on in Jacksonville. I'm sure Trevor Lawrence has a lot of things on his mind right now, but the specter of Gardner Freakin' Minshew is not one of them.)

When you're a GM/head coach, your job is to win football games, and one of the ways you do that is by contingency planning in case your starters get hurt. I don't understand why so many teams seem to be punting on their backup QBs, but I don't buy for a second that it's because they need to protect the QB1's widdle feewings.


The Pats have been happy with Brian Hoyer and types like him as their backup QB for years, even when they were legit Super Bowl contenders/favorites.

If Lawrence goes down the Jags are a 2 win team with or without Minshew.

 
The Pats have been happy with Brian Hoyer and types like him as their backup QB for years, even when they were legit Super Bowl contenders/favorites.

If Lawrence goes down the Jags are a 2 win team with or without Minshew.
OK, now do the Steelers, Cowboys and Ravens. All three are legit playoff contenders. Two of them have had recent seasons tanked because of season-ending injuries to their QB1s which caused them to rely on atrocious backups. And yet they are relying on Dwayne Haskins, Cooper Rush and Tyler Huntley, respectively, as their backups this year. The Colts, another contender who know all about losing their QB1, backed up their injury-prone, question-mark QB1 with Jacob Eason. Oh, and the Jets, who obviously don't have playoff aspirations but do have a raw rookie QB who could probably use some mentoring, have Mike White (no, not the creator of "White Lotus").

Like I said, I have no idea why so many teams are doing this. But I feel very confident that it's not to protect anyone's feelings.

 
OK, now do the Steelers, Cowboys and Ravens. All three are legit playoff contenders. Two of them have had recent seasons tanked because of season-ending injuries to their QB1s which caused them to rely on atrocious backups. And yet they are relying on Dwayne Haskins, Cooper Rush and Tyler Huntley, respectively, as their backups this year. The Colts, another contender who know all about losing their QB1, backed up their injury-prone, question-mark QB1 with Jacob Eason. Oh, and the Jets, who obviously don't have playoff aspirations but do have a raw rookie QB who could probably use some mentoring, have Mike White (no, not the creator of "White Lotus").

Like I said, I have no idea why so many teams are doing this. But I feel very confident that it's not to protect anyone's feelings.
Cowboys said to have at least some interest in Cam.

 
OK, now do the Steelers, Cowboys and Ravens. All three are legit playoff contenders. Two of them have had recent seasons tanked because of season-ending injuries to their QB1s which caused them to rely on atrocious backups. And yet they are relying on Dwayne Haskins, Cooper Rush and Tyler Huntley, respectively, as their backups this year. The Colts, another contender who know all about losing their QB1, backed up their injury-prone, question-mark QB1 with Jacob Eason. Oh, and the Jets, who obviously don't have playoff aspirations but do have a raw rookie QB who could probably use some mentoring, have Mike White (no, not the creator of "White Lotus").

Like I said, I have no idea why so many teams are doing this. But I feel very confident that it's not to protect anyone's feelings.
Cam sucks. Dalton is better than he is, and Dallas only won 6 games last year without Dak. How many do they win with Cam instead, 5? No friggin way do they even sniff the playoffs with him starting, so why bother?

With the cap (and dearth of QB talent) teams just don't have the luxury of having a very good back up QB unless it's a cheap draft pick. Teams hope they never have to use their #2 QB unless it's mop up duty, if your starter gets knocked out for the year the season is essentially over.

I mean sure, Cam is probably better than most back-up QBs, but that's far from the only factor. Cost, off field issues/distractions, etc. all factor in, and most times it's just not worth it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Cam sucks. Dalton is better than he is, and Dallas only won 6 games last year without Dak. How many do they win with Cam instead, 5? No friggin way do they even sniff the playoffs with him starting, so why bother?

With the cap (and dearth of QB talent) teams just don't have the luxury of having a very good back up QB unless it's a cheap draft pick. Teams hope they never have to use their #2 QB unless it's mop up duty, if your starter gets knocked out for the year the season is essentially over.

I mean sure, Cam is probably better than most back-up QBs, but that's far from the only factor. Cost, off field issues/distractions, etc. all factor in, and most times it's just not worth it.
If Mike Nolan didn’t suck so horrifically bad they Cowboys would have won the division walking away last year, even with the red :lipstick: at the helm.

I don’t even like Cam but I’ll take him as my backup. I don’t think his arm was fully healthy last year.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
ignatiusjreilly said:
OK, now do the Steelers, Cowboys and Ravens. All three are legit playoff contenders. Two of them have had recent seasons tanked because of season-ending injuries to their QB1s which caused them to rely on atrocious backups. And yet they are relying on Dwayne Haskins, Cooper Rush and Tyler Huntley, respectively, as their backups this year. The Colts, another contender who know all about losing their QB1, backed up their injury-prone, question-mark QB1 with Jacob Eason. Oh, and the Jets, who obviously don't have playoff aspirations but do have a raw rookie QB who could probably use some mentoring, have Mike White (no, not the creator of "White Lotus").

Like I said, I have no idea why so many teams are doing this. But I feel very confident that it's not to protect anyone's feelings.


I think most teams know that if their QB goes down their season is pretty much shot anyway, so they'd rather spend that money on someone else that might actually help them when their QB is healthy and they're still a Super Bowl contender.

Ironically of the few stories of a team overcoming a starting QB injury to go to the Super Bowl in the relatively modern era, the majority of them came from guys who would have been considered inexperienced, bad backup QBs.  Excepting Nick Foles, the other 4 of the last 5 backup QBs to make the Super Bowl had a combined 2 career starts between all of them prior to that season.

Even setting the money aside you can almost make the argument that you're better off hoping to catch lightning in a bottle with some random unknown like Kurt Warner or Tom Brady than you are hoping your entire otherwise mediocre team suddenly starts playing well enough to propel a low end known veteran to the Super Bowl.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
humpback said:
Cam sucks. Dalton is better than he is, and Dallas only won 6 games last year without Dak. How many do they win with Cam instead, 5? No friggin way do they even sniff the playoffs with him starting, so why bother?
I wasn't making the case for Dallas or anyone else to sign Cam. Just saying that it was weird so many teams are punting on their QB2. A few posters (don't think you were one of them) suggested it was to avoid the distraction of a QB controversy, and I said I didn't think that made any sense at all. 

humpback said:
With the cap (and dearth of QB talent) teams just don't have the luxury of having a very good back up QB unless it's a cheap draft pick. Teams hope they never have to use their #2 QB unless it's mop up duty, if your starter gets knocked out for the year the season is essentially over.
Nick Foles says hi.

Also, who said the QB1 has to be out for the year? Sometimes it may just be for a couple starts. Saints were sure glad they had Bridgewater/Taysom the past couple years when Brees went down. And ask KC fans how they would have felt in the divisional round if, instead of Chad Henne, they had needed to convert that fourth down play with Ben DeNucci or Dwayne Haskins.

Maybe it is a function of the declining cap numbers. But still, a veteran backup isn't that expensive in relative terms. Chad Henne makes less than $3M a year.

I just find it inexplicable.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I can see him being an upgrade as a spot filler over some of the backups in the league but yikes. I watched a lot of Cam last year and it was.. tough to watch. Once that throwing motion starts to break down it's just real, real bad. Had fun the first few games with the read-option stuff then it just got painful.

I don't have a grasp on the talent level of the backups but wouldn't be surprised if more than half of them could outplay him as a passer. I would rather have Rivers shot-putting it out there than watching Cam bounce passes off the turf or throw your guys into a safety.

 
I'm listening to ESPN Radio, and they made a good suggestion of where Cam Newton should go: the Texans.  I mean, think about it: if and when they decide to trade Deshaun Watson, Cam Newton would make perfect sense to be the starter in Houston.  Am I wrong?

 
STEADYMOBBIN 22 said:
If Mike Nolan didn’t suck so horrifically bad they Cowboys would have won the division walking away last year, even with the red :lipstick: at the helm.

I don’t even like Cam but I’ll take him as my backup. I don’t think his arm was fully healthy last year.
Unless Cam is a defensive coordinator I don't see how this is relevant. The point is, replacing Dalton with Cam last year would not have improved things one iota, likely would have done the opposite.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I wasn't making the case for Dallas or anyone else to sign Cam. Just saying that it was weird so many teams are punting on their QB2. A few posters (don't think you were one of them) suggested it was to avoid the distraction of a QB controversy, and I said I didn't think that made any sense at all. 

Nick Foles says hi.

Also, who said the QB1 has to be out for the year? Sometimes it may just be for a couple starts. Saints were sure glad they had Bridgewater/Taysom the past couple years when Brees went down. And ask KC fans how they would have felt in the divisional round if, instead of Chad Henne, they had needed to convert that fourth down play with Ben DeNucci or Dwayne Haskins.

Maybe it is a function of the declining cap numbers. But still, a veteran backup isn't that expensive in relative terms. I just find it inexplicable.
I don't think it's weird at all. Again, teams only have so much money they can spend, the more they allocate to a player they hope never sees the field the less they'll have to allocate towards players who will see the field for them. You also have other considerations, like off field issues/distractions, vaccination status, leadership, personality (willing to be a back-up/mentor), etc.

There are always going to be outliers, but for every Nick Foles you have several times the number of teams that were essentially eliminated when their QB got hurt. Wentz was cheap (on his rookie contract) and Foles was relatively cheap as well. Overall they allocated less $ to the QB position than most teams.

Yes, there is a "sweet spot", where a back up only has to play a game or two, but what is it worth and is it going to make a difference? Is Cam Newton going to win you those ~2 games but Ben DeNucci won't? I'm not arguing that he wouldn't give them a better chance, but that doesn't mean it would end up any different, and again, at what cost? Does having a better back up QB for 2 games give you a better chance than having a better starting O-lineman for 16 games (17 now), or whatever position that you'd have to downgrade if you spent the extra $ on a back up QB?

What I'm saying is there is a lot more that goes into it than just "talent". All else being equal sure, who wouldn't want a better back up QB? All else isn't equal though.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm listening to ESPN Radio, and they made a good suggestion of where Cam Newton should go: the Texans.  I mean, think about it: if and when they decide to trade Deshaun Watson, Cam Newton would make perfect sense to be the starter in Houston.  Am I wrong?
I think its a great idea.  But given they are rolling with Tyrod, it looks like they are trying to scrape together what wins they can (3?) by playing small ball on offense and playing defense in a phone booth.  Philosophically speaking, Tyrod and Cam are THE two ends of the spectrum.  Cam would certainly fill more seats, and I think give them a few incremental wins, but I don't think Houston will be able to reason all this out.

 
Unless Cam is a defensive coordinator I don't see how this is relevant. The point is, replacing Dalton with Cam last year would not have improved things one iota, likely would have done the opposite.


Well you hypothetically placed Cam on last years team so I figured since we're playing hypothetical, I might as well replace the DC.

The point is, Cam is better than Cooper Rush and possibly, cheap as dirt. I'll take a former league MVP as my backup. 

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top