Agreed.Agreed. Sometime we overthink things and get cute. No way I roll Jimmy G or Dalton over Lamar. No matter the matchup. You drafted Lamar as your starting QB . You start him.Whatever. Even if both outperform Lamar this week it's still overthinking the situation IMO.It all depends on your options.Not loving the matchup in week 4 @CLE. That D looks legit.
Could be a long day especially if all these starters aren't back from injury.
Drafted LJ to avoid a weekly QB carousel, but I'm at least going to peek at WW options.
Crickets.
A little concerned. His track record against CLE isn't the greatest and this D looks legit.
He's still too loose with the ball and this offense is far from clicking.
Not sure I have any other options. More importantly, I'm not sure I have the coconuts to sit him.
Not sexy, but:
* Jimmy G (if healthy) @LAC
* A. Dalton @MN
Both of those secondaries are horrendous.
Thirded. I wonder how many people tried to get cute and bench Chase this past week because of his first two weeks of poor performances and the obviously hobbled Burrow. I know I was very close to being in that boat and remembered elite players are elite, regardless of matchups. Would have lost this week if he wasn't in my starting lineup. If you were deciding between Lamar or Goff/Cousins I could see it more. But considering the Red Rocket over him just feels.... bad.
This time of the year where we are now just approaching the first quarter of the season is not the time to start following small trends of performance or applying match up information yet.
That time will come in another week or two, but for now your better off just sticking to your guns on these start/sit decisions.
Absolutely the right thing to do. Still feel like a serious clunker is coming and in hindsight this is the game we should have sat him.
Stafford is tempting me @Indy.
Somebody just dropped D. Jones, but he's not going to clear waivers. That would have really tempted me.