BINGBING
Footballguy
So his worst turnover game in 40 starts...seems logical.Lamar leaves a lot of room passing-wise for another QB to make an impact imo.
I'll see your Huntely/Bears game and raise you Lamar's week 12.
So his worst turnover game in 40 starts...seems logical.Lamar leaves a lot of room passing-wise for another QB to make an impact imo.
I'll see your Huntely/Bears game and raise you Lamar's week 12.
So his worst turnover game in 40 starts...seems logical.
You took the worst game from 40 starts. I took the worst game from two starts. Good luck using that logic to predict future success.You picked Huntley's worst game right?
Seems fair.
Um, partially agree in that Roman's WR routes are virtually the same and have not changed but this isn't a copy of the 49er offense and Lamar isn't Kap who had MULTIPLE injuries his last two years and Ty should never be viewed as a Lamar equal.Guy hasn’t really tried an offense other than Greg Roman’s. Greg Roman’s offense hasn’t really changed much since kaepernick and 49ers. His offense failed in SF and again on Bills with tyrod and he was booted. Lamar is the only reason his scheme still works.
I like Huntley but I will point out he's like a RB with fresh legs who gets a start late in the season and blows up and everyone falls over themselves thinking they've discovered the latest version of Adrian Peterson. He has made moves 'with his legs' that have extended drives and bought time for his receivers to get open.Huntley first Raven QB in history to run for 2 TDs and pass for 2 TDs in the same game. The kids has some skills. I like him a little better than Lamar because he does not give up on the pass until the last second, Lamar bails way too early at times.
You took the worst game from 40 starts. I took the worst game from two starts. Good luck using that logic to predict future success.
Agreed. He was incredible in 2019, and is still capable of having an all-world game at any time, but his numbers across the board have declined since 2019. His 2020 numbers weren't as good as 2019, which to be fair, was not that significant considering how off the charts his 2019 numbers were, but now his 2021 numbers aren't as good as 2020. You don't want your 4th year QB regressing. He should be getting better, not worse, and you throw in the injury issues he is now having and the fact that a lot of his greatness is built around the threat of him running which makes him more prone to injury than the average QB, and there are red flags everywhere.point is, i would be completely against handing a monster deal to this guy.
someone folds his knee, your franchise is done for YEARS. and when you run on 1/2 the plays, it'll happen.
if this kid could throw, it's a no brainer. his athleticism is top 3 in the league, and he may not be 2 or 3.... but nope. im not hanging 2-300M on him
point is, i would be completely against handing a monster deal to this guy.
someone folds his knee, your franchise is done for YEARS. and when you run on 1/2 the plays, it'll happen.
if this kid could throw, it's a no brainer. his athleticism is top 3 in the league, and he may not be 2 or 3.... but nope. im not hanging 2-300M on him
Speaking Wednesday, John Harbaugh told reporters that he expect Lamar Jackson (ankle) to return to practice on Wednesday.
Jackson hasn't practiced since being carted off against the Browns in Week 14. His return to practice, even for a limited session, give him a good chance to return in Week 17. Head coach John Harbaugh stated that he is hopeful Jackson will be able to play on Sunday. Tyler Huntley and Josh Johnson have both impressed in relief of Jackson, but Jackson's return would still be a huge boost for the Ravens as they attempt to keep pace with the Rams. Jackson is a QB1 if he is able to suit up for Week 17.
RELATED:
Tyler Huntley
SOURCE: Jeff Zrebiec on Twitter
Dec 29, 2021, 11:45 AM ET
You’re in the same situation as me. Have you thought about Taysom Hill at all?As somebody who picked up Huntley (and now has Lance), please sit Lamar.
Lamar who can't run no good. Wait for your return until after this hobby has run its course for the year.
Hill N/A.You’re in the same situation as me. Have you thought about Taysom Hill at all?
Struggling to rank Lance, Huntley, Hill.
How much draft value would each QB have in a trade? They might find more suitors for Huntley, given his low salary.We are gearing up for a league wide QB shuffle this off season. With Huntley's recent performances Lamar just got himself on the edge of being involved in that shuffle. Imagine getting draft picks to keep a similar QB and lower your cap substantially.
That’s today, Tyler didn’t practice Wednesday. Let’s say Lamar continues to be a LP the next two days and Huntley practices in full. You know how Harbough rolls, we’re not getting any advance information from him. It’s almost surely going to be a Sunday decision bc we won’t know for sure until 11:30 EST.Huntley off the Covid list.
Another piece to the Lamar vs. Huntley vs. Lance puzzle falls into place.
Starting L-Jax if he is active because you know Harbaugh will. If he is out and Huntley is Active then he's my pivot.That’s today, Tyler didn’t practice Wednesday. Let’s say Lamar continues to be a LP the next two days and Huntley practices in full. You know how Harbough rolls, we’re not getting any advance information from him. It’s almost surely going to be a Sunday decision bc we won’t know for sure until 11:30 EST.
Rams are giving up the 27th most FF pts to QBs (IOW only 5 teams are giving up fewer.)
You feel comfortable making that call?
If you’re thinking about Huntley you probably experienced a variation of what I went through last week…
After the way he played Week 13-14 I was pretty amped about starting Huntley in the Semis. NOPE. OK, then Taysom. NOPE. OK, Fields…maybe? NOPE. OK, Tua. Let’s just say I’m glad I had a 96% win probability going into MNF.
I’m debating Hill/Tua/Fieids in that order. Dropped Huntley yesterday. But waivers clear in one day so I could get Tyler back this weekend. Dicey prop, though.
_______________
Ain’t nobody starting LJax, right? He has looked awful since the Miami game.
That’s today, Tyler didn’t practice Wednesday. Let’s say Lamar continues to be a LP the next two days and Huntley practices in full. You know how Harbough rolls, we’re not getting any advance information from him. It’s almost surely going to be a Sunday decision bc we won’t know for sure until 11:30 EST.
Rams are giving up the 27th most FF pts to QBs (IOW only 5 teams are giving up fewer.)
You feel comfortable making that call?
If you’re thinking about Huntley you probably experienced a variation of what I went through last week…
After the way he played Week 13-14 I was pretty amped about starting Huntley in the Semis. NOPE. OK, then Taysom. NOPE. OK, Fields…maybe? NOPE. OK, Tua. Let’s just say I’m glad I had a 96% win probability going into MNF.
I’m debating Hill/Tua/Fieids in that order. Dropped Huntley yesterday. But waivers clear in one day so I could get Tyler back this weekend. Dicey prop, though.
_______________
Ain’t nobody starting LJax, right? He has looked awful since the Miami game.
Its reverse...27th fewest means that only 5 teams give up fewer points to the position....so yes they are a very tough matchup.LAR is 27th? I thought that D was good with Ramsey, Donald and gang? I need to look at the LAR game logs a bit more.
Yup. I pivoted from Lamar to Huntley to Ryan. Lucky to survive.
Sorry, it’s easy to misinterpret.LAR is 27th? I thought that D was good with Ramsey, Donald and gang? I need to look at the LAR game logs a bit more.
Yup. I pivoted from Lamar to Huntley to Ryan. Lucky to survive.
Its reverse...27th fewest means that only 5 teams give up fewer points to the position....so yes they are a very tough matchup.
Sorry, it’s easy to misinterpret.
Rams are giving up the 27th most FF pts to QBs (IOW only 5 teams are giving up fewer.)
26 teams give up more?
It’s are a red light matchup.
Surprised to see your leaning Fields over Huntley potentially.That’s today, Tyler didn’t practice Wednesday. Let’s say Lamar continues to be a LP the next two days and Huntley practices in full. You know how Harbough rolls, we’re not getting any advance information from him. It’s almost surely going to be a Sunday decision bc we won’t know for sure until 11:30 EST.
Rams are giving up the 27th most FF pts to QBs (IOW only 5 teams are giving up fewer.)
You feel comfortable making that call?
If you’re thinking about Huntley you probably experienced a variation of what I went through last week…
After the way he played Week 13-14 I was pretty amped about starting Huntley in the Semis. NOPE. OK, then Taysom. NOPE. OK, Fields…maybe? NOPE. OK, Tua. Let’s just say I’m glad I had a 96% win probability going into MNF.
I’m debating Hill/Tua/Fieids in that order. Dropped Huntley yesterday. But waivers clear in one day so I could get Tyler back this weekend. Dicey prop, though.
_______________
Ain’t nobody starting LJax, right? He has looked awful since the Miami game.
Yes a tough matchup, but if Baltimore falls behind and if Huntley is playing we can get what happened in Baltimore the last few weeks, heck even the 3rd string QB who was signed off the street had 300 yards last week having to play catchup....I like the upside despite the matchup.That's what I figured. Yikes.
Don't love that at all.
Lance is going to be soooo tempting if he's in and Jimmy is out.
Wish the BALT game was later in the afternoon or Sunday night/Monday. Could wait until 4 o'clock games to understand a bit more if I need to swing for the fences or not.
I’m not. I have 3 on my roster, Huntley was tossed back on the WW (made a couple moves this week to block WR + DST fm my OPP)Surprised to see your leaning Fields over Huntley potentially.
I think I’d rank them:
Huntley, Lance, Fields, Tua, Hill
Curious where you throw Lance in that order. I’m a favorite as well but not hugeI’m not. I have 3 on my roster, Huntley was tossed back on the WW (made a couple moves this week to block WR + DST fm my OPP)
I will probably reverse the transaction this weekend (Chicago for Huntley)
Lance is not an option so I have them:
Hill, Huntley, Tua, Fields
if I get Tyler back
but I’m more interested in floor than upside since I’m a heavy favorite
Just trying to do no harm
to go along w what i said... the sad part is he's "earned" his next contract, imo. the guy was an MVP. but id still be very wary of giving it. one you start paying him, who you gonna stop paying?
Jackson will get a new contract, but it does not have to be from Baltimore. If you can get pretty much equal or better QB play from a guy who makes 75% less that is huge in todays NFL. that is how Seattle won with Wilson. wilson got a big deal and seattle has been downward ever since.
Right now Ravens can get a nice deal for Jackson and without a doubt should consider it.
Jackson is under contract through next season. I think common terminology would be to characterize that as him having 1 year left on his contract. But agree they have that year and could tag him twice, so they could keep him a total of 3 years without giving him a new contract.Jackson has 2 years left on his contract and with the way Huntley has played there is no need to address a new deal. With 2 year left and a possible TAG Raven can keep Jackson for 3 more years if they choose.
I think it would be extremely difficult to trade Jackson for much, for multiple reasons:How much draft value would each QB have in a trade? They might find more suitors for Huntley, given his low salary.6 hours ago, scothawk said:
We are gearing up for a league wide QB shuffle this off season. With Huntley's recent performances Lamar just got himself on the edge of being involved in that shuffle. Imagine getting draft picks to keep a similar QB and lower your cap substantially.
Expand
Maybe, but Huntley is young has has more upside as a passer.Jackson is under contract through next season. I think common terminology would be to characterize that as him having 1 year left on his contract. But agree they have that year and could tag him twice, so they could keep him a total of 3 years without giving him a new contract.
I think it would be extremely difficult to trade Jackson for much, for multiple reasons:
- His cap hit jumps from $3M in 2021 to $23M in 2022, so he will no longer be offering the same bargain value.
- After his first season (2022) on a prospective new team, he is a UFA, so the team either lets him walk, goes through a likely ugly franchise tag scenario, or gives him a new contract that he will accept, which would presumably place him in the top 5-ish QBs in average cap hit.
- Baltimore has tailored its entire offense around him, which is what needs to be done for him. Most teams don't have the offensive scheme (or willingness to change), coaching, and personnel to fit him as well as Baltimore.
- His performance is trending negatively. Since his MVP season in 2019, his metrics are worse pretty much across the board:
Traditional metrics: completion percentage, YPA, TDs and TD percentage, interceptions and interception percentage, passer rating, QBR, sacks and sack percentage, rushing attempts, rushing yards, YPC, rushing TDs are all down from 2019 and most have trended down from 2019 to 2020 to 2021
- PFF: all grades (overall, passing, running) have trended down from 2019 to 2020 to 2021; his "big time throw" percentage is down and his "turnover worthy plays" are up
I absolutely agree it would be easier to trade Huntley.
I don't really understand your comment. I said I thought it would be easier to trade Huntley. Is the point of your comment that Baltimore would rather trade Jackson and move to Huntley as their starter? I think that is questionable, and I also think it doesn't matter much, since I don't think there are many (any?) teams that would trade for Jackson.Maybe, but Huntley is young has has more upside as a passer.
LJ in Wednesday’s practice - yeah that dude is not playing this weekLamar DNP today
Fire up your Huntleys
With that pass D Balt has now, they will probably be chasing points all game. I would have no problem starting Huntley over Lance, Tua, etc.Yes a tough matchup, but if Baltimore falls behind and if Huntley is playing we can get what happened in Baltimore the last few weeks, heck even the 3rd string QB who was signed off the street had 300 yards last week having to play catchup....I like the upside despite the matchup.
NFL Network's Ian Rapoport Reports Lamar Jackson (ankle) is not expected to play in Week 17 against the Rams.
Jackson got in a very limited practice on Wednesday before being held out the next two days. Rapoport didn't say he had officially been ruled out yet but that seems like a formality at this point. Tyler Huntley will draw his third start of the year. Huntley has completed 69 percent of his passes for three scores and one interception this season. He also adds some rushing production, putting him in the QB1 conversation.
RELATED:
Tyler Huntley
SOURCE: Ian Rapoport on Twitter
Jan 2, 2022, 8:22 AM ET
ESPN's Jamison Hensley reports Lamar Jackson is expected to exceed $40 million annually on his next contract.
Patrick Mahomes is the league's highest paid quarterback at $45 million per season. An extension over the $40 million average would place Jackson in the top three at quarterback, with Jackson looking to pass Dak Prescott's four-year, $160 million deal with Dallas last offseason. The Ravens want to extend Jackson before free agency in March, but there's no set deadline with Jackson representing himself in contract talks. Baltimore has Jackson signed through 2022 and can use the franchise tag the next two seasons for under $40 million annually, making it possible the Ravens go year-to-year with Jackson, who's coming off a season-ending injury and has more hits than any quarterback since 2018. Ravens GM Eric DeCosta said the team is comfortable carrying Jackson’s $23 million cap hit if an extension can’t be reached before training camp.
SOURCE: ESPN
Feb 5, 2022, 12:09 PM ET
The Athletic's Jeff Zrebiec believes it "no longer feels like a given" the Ravens extend Lamar Jackson before training camp.
"There’s obviously a gap that exists," Zrebiec wrote on the state of contract talks. Jackson has reportedly spoken with the team "five or six times" about a new deal. Ravens GM Eric DeCosta said negotiations have been going at "Lamar's pace" and that Jackson is “comfortable” with where the sides are at, suggesting it's possible Jackson plays this season under his fifth-year option ($23M) if the Ravens are unwilling to meet his $40 million per year asking price. Signing an extension before the start of free agency would free cap space for Baltimore, but with the franchise tag to fall back on, the Ravens have the option of going year-to-year with Jackson.
SOURCE: The Athletic
Feb 10, 2022, 9:55 AM ET
Asked about Lamar Jackson's contract situation Tuesday, Ravens owner Steve Bisciotti "we'll pay him when he's ready."
Biscotti also called Lamar's approach to a deal "unique as hell" and noted that he doubts a deal gets done this year. Yes, that's a direct quote. Jackson will be making $23 million this year on the fifth-year option. "Life sucks" as an owner with bad quarterback play, Bisciotti added. It sure sounds like the Ravens are content to play the game Jackson wants them to play, however that unfolds for them.
SOURCE: Jeff Zrbiec on Twitter
Mar 29, 2022, 4:04 PM ET
OverTheCap.com's Jason Fitzgerald believes Lamar Jackson could play under the Ravens' franchise tag for "multiple" years.
“If I were to put money on it, I’d say this is the ideal situation that ends up in multiple franchise tags before a deal gets done,” Fitzgerald told The Athletic's Sheil Kapadia. Jackson is headed into the final year of his rookie deal, and seems content biding his time before negotiating with Baltimore for a long-term extension. Team officials, including head coach John Harbaugh, have expressed unwavering confidence that they can keep Jackson for the long run. Playing under two consecutive franchise tags -- known as the Kirk Cousins Approach -- would make Jackson a free agent headed into his age-28 season in 2025. Assuming good health, there would be more than a few franchises ready and willing to sell the proverbial farm for Jackson's services. L-Jax will certainly be the Ravens quarterback for at least the next few years.
SOURCE: The Athletic
Apr 11, 2022, 10:28 AM ET
Thanks. For these, can you please include the link to the source article or tweet? Thanks.Asked about Lamar Jackson's contract situation Tuesday, Ravens owner Steve Bisciotti "we'll pay him when he's ready."
Biscotti also called Lamar's approach to a deal "unique as hell" and noted that he doubts a deal gets done this year. Yes, that's a direct quote. Jackson will be making $23 million this year on the fifth-year option. "Life sucks" as an owner with bad quarterback play, Bisciotti added. It sure sounds like the Ravens are content to play the game Jackson wants them to play, however that unfolds for them.
SOURCE: Jeff Zrbiec on Twitter
Mar 29, 2022, 4:04 PM ET
Done! I made edits to the last two Lamar Jackson posts.Thanks. For these, can you please include the link to the source article or tweet? Thanks.