What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

QB Lamar Jackson, BAL (4 Viewers)

As an Andrews owner I don’t like this one bit. Lamar was bad last week. Thought it was his annual illness and hoped it was one week. Now this
 
Interesting graph showing team taking the clock down to 3 seconds or under the most snapping the ball.
Hmmmn.
Could be plays getting in late or Jackson taking long looks reading the defense, but it would allow defenses to 'time' the snap.
----------------
Jonas Shaffer@jonas_shaffer

In light of recent events, I looked at how often teams snap the ball with 3 seconds or fewer on the play clock. Guess which bar is the Ravens’ bar.
LINK to chart
 
He's injured and this 'probably' wouldn't have come out if the twitter clash hadn't happened.
It is obvious that 'something' is off after his scintillating hot start.
The way people have gotten down on him and have dragged him is reason enough to release this injury. Teams tend to keep this sort of thing under wraps.
He's been dealing with injuries that 'probably' have been impacting his play.
I bet he wanted it known after taking a PR hit when he snapped back at someone who took a shot at him.
Ravens' Lamar Jackson leaves practice with quadriceps injury
...This is the third straight week that Jackson has been on the injury report. He missed a practice two weeks ago due to illness and was sidelined for a practice last week because of a hip injury.
Jackson has proven to be extremely durable, missing four games in his five-year career due to injury. He was sidelined for the last four weeks last season because of an ankle injury.
...This latest injury comes days after Baltimore's frustrating loss to the Jacksonville Jaguars. After the game, a Twitter used tagged Jackson in a tweet that read: "someone asking for over $250 million guaranteed like [Jackson] ... games like this should not come down to [kicker] Justin Tucker."

Jackson snapped back shortly afterward with a profane reply, ...
 

Lamar Jackson (knee) left the Ravens' Week 13 game against the Broncos.​

Jackson, who has struggled with quad and hip issues over the past month, took a big hit on the Ravens' second possession and soon after entered the blue medical tent with Baltimore trainers. He was seen limping to the locker room after exiting the tent, walking gingerly and appearing dejected. Tyler Huntley, who started four games for the Ravens in 2021, has taken Jackson's spot under center.
RELATED:
Dec 4, 2022, 1:39 PM ET
 

Ravens head coach John Harbaugh said Lamar Jackson's knee injury is not season ending.​

Harbaugh said the injury could means Jackson is out for "days to weeks." NFL Network's Ian Rapoport said Jackson's injury is believed to be a sprain. Jackson left the Ravens' Week 13 game against Denver in the first quarter after taking a big hit from behind. Tyler Huntley came in and played well, rushing for 41 yards and the game-winning touchdown with 30 seconds to go in the contest. It sounds like Huntley could be under center for Week 14 against the Steelers -- a tough spot for the Ravens backup.
RELATED:
SOURCE: Ian Rapoport on Twitter
Dec 4, 2022, 4:25 PM ET
 

Ravens head coach John Harbaugh said Lamar Jackson (knee) is unlikely to play in Week 14 against the Steelers.​

After yesterday's win over the Broncos, Harbaugh suggested Jackson could be out "days to weeks." On Monday, Harbaugh said of Jackson, "I would say it's kind of week to week. It's probably less likely for this week, but it's not impossible. And then after that, it'll become more and more likely." Those banking on Jackson's services in Week 14 will be wise to come up with a backup plan now, which could come in the form of his backup, Tyler Huntley. Huntley has been a serviceable fantasy quarterback in the past and threw for 187 yards and one interception against the Broncos while also rushing for 41 yards and a touchdown. Huntley could be a high-end QB2 next week against the Steelers.
RELATED:
SOURCE: Tom Pelissero on Twitter
Dec 5, 2022, 2:39 PM ET
 

ESPN's Adam Schefter reports that Lamar Jackson (knee) has a sprained PCL.​

Reading between the lines of John Harbaugh saying that Jackson is "less likely" for this week, we would not be surprised if Jackson did not get on the field in Week 14. Schefter notes that the average recovery time for PCL injuries is "1-to-3 weeks." It's possible Jackson will miss more than just one week. Zach Wilson sprained his PCL last season and missed Weeks 8-11. Jackson drafters should make finding a short-term replacement a priority on waivers this week.
SOURCE: Adam Schefter on Twitter
Dec 6, 2022, 1:24 PM ET
 
Be interested to see what the Ravens pay him after this season...

Back-to-back seasons with less than 100% availability. Has to play a role.

Jackson is exciting to watch, but his style has led to injury after injury. Problem is Jackson would be middle of the pack or even lower as a drop back passer. So to be effective he has to risk his body breaking down and he is not built like Newton or Allen. I would not want the Lions to sign Jackson to a Watson type mega-deal.

Ravens should try and trade Jackson and roll the dice with the cheaper Huntley.
 
Be interested to see what the Ravens pay him after this season...

Back-to-back seasons with less than 100% availability. Has to play a role.

Jackson is exciting to watch, but his style has led to injury after injury. Problem is Jackson would be middle of the pack or even lower as a drop back passer. So to be effective he has to risk his body breaking down and he is not built like Newton or Allen. I would not want the Lions to sign Jackson to a Watson type mega-deal.

Ravens should try and trade Jackson and roll the dice with the cheaper Huntley.

Lots of concensus around this opinion. The delays in the contract make me think the ravens are thinking the same...
 

Lamar Jackson (knee) did not practice Thursday.​

It would qualify as a surprise if Jackson was able to get cleared ahead of Week 14's game against the Steelers after two straight DNPs. Tyler Huntley will likely be the Ravens starter this week against Pittsburgh and makes for a decent superflex QB2 streamer. Jackson could very well miss multiple weeks.
SOURCE: Jamison Hensley on Twitter
Dec 8, 2022, 2:15 PM ET
 

Lamar Jackson (knee) did not practice Tuesday.​

Given the 1-3 week timeline Adam Schefter put on this, it's not surprising. He's now missed four practices in a row. Lamar would have to really get going in a hurry here if the Ravens were to get him active for Saturday night against the Browns. It seems more likely that they'll start Tyler Huntley or Anthony Brown.
SOURCE: Jamison Hensley on Twitter
Dec 13, 2022, 2:38 PM ET
 

Lamar Jackson (knee) will not play in Baltimore's Week 15 game against the Browns.​

Jackson didn't practice at any point this week and should be considered questionable for Week 16 as well. His PCL strain was expected to cost him "1 to 3 weeks" per Adam Schefter, and this will make a second straight week with Jackson absent. We'd be surprised if he didn't at least get some practice sessions in next week, but that's not a guarantee that he actually plays. Tyler Huntley will likely start for Baltimore.
Dec 15, 2022, 2:41 PM ET
 

NFL Network's Ian Rapoport reports the Ravens hope to have Lamar Jackson (knee) back for Week 16.​

The Ravens expect Jackson to return to practice next week. That would set him up to return on Christmas Eve against Atlanta. Jackson was expected to miss 1-3 weeks with his sprained PCL, putting this on the early side of his timetable. Tyler Huntley will start for the Ravens against the Browns in Week 15.
SOURCE: NFL Network
Dec 17, 2022, 10:58 AM ET
 

Ravens head coach John Harbaugh was unwilling to commit to Lamar Jackson (knee) returning in Week 16.​

Harbaugh said he would "climb behind the barricade" of not disclosing plans for Jackson for competitive reasons. Harbaugh will have to release an injury report later in the week, but it's possible we won't know more on Jackson's status until then. A Week 16 return has been viewed as the target date for Jackson and the Ravens, but how his knee has responded to recent treatment will likely dictate whether or not he's on the field this Saturday against the Falcons. If he's active, Jackson is a must-start for fantasy purposes and can be viewed as a top-12 option.
Dec 19, 2022, 3:45 PM ET
 
Ravens should try and trade Jackson and roll the dice with the cheaper Huntley
They have had a preview of life without Lamar. Tough couple weeks.

I don't think he should be worried about the next contract.
They've also had a preview of life with him, 1 career playoff win, and they're 7-4 with him this year, 2-1 without.

He shouldn't be worried about the next contract because it's going to be a ton of money, just not nearly as much as he thought it was going to be.

The comparison isn't him vs. Huntley, that's a weak strawman. It's him vs. whoever they replace him with at QB and multiple #1 draft picks and likely multiple very good players they could use that money on instead. Anyone who thinks Lamar's case has gotten stronger this year is borderline delusional IMO.
 
The comparison isn't him vs. Huntley, that's a weak strawman. It's him vs. whoever they replace him with at QB and multiple #1 draft picks and likely multiple very good players they could use that money on instead. Anyone who thinks Lamar's case has gotten stronger this year is borderline delusional IMO
I didn't make a Huntley comparison, and I didn't say his case was stronger this year. Other than that, strong take.
 
The comparison isn't him vs. Huntley, that's a weak strawman. It's him vs. whoever they replace him with at QB and multiple #1 draft picks and likely multiple very good players they could use that money on instead. Anyone who thinks Lamar's case has gotten stronger this year is borderline delusional IMO
I didn't make a Huntley comparison, and I didn't say his case was stronger this year. Other than that, strong take.

Jackson should have taken the deal that was offered. It was not a Watson deal but the Browns had to overpay, but it was a dam good deal for an often injured QB

135 million was guaranteed even if he had a career ending injury, 250 million if he played the contract out for 6 seasons or 41 million a season. Since he is 26 that would only take him to 32.

Have to think Jackson plans on playing until at least 32. Unless foolish pride plays a role I think he would take that same deal if offered right now.
 
The comparison isn't him vs. Huntley, that's a weak strawman. It's him vs. whoever they replace him with at QB and multiple #1 draft picks and likely multiple very good players they could use that money on instead. Anyone who thinks Lamar's case has gotten stronger this year is borderline delusional IMO
I didn't make a Huntley comparison, and I didn't say his case was stronger this year. Other than that, strong take.
You quoted a post that did make that comparison, and I didn't say you said his case was stronger this year. Other than that, strong take.
 
Put his body on the line for the team when others stated he should stop running to protect himself. Now he is going to get lowballed. Good form, Baltimore.
 
The only case that can be made here is that Baltimore's management sucks total ***. They had one legit WR, and while he was healthy, Lamar was an absolute stud. Literally, as soon as Bateman went out, that whole offense tanked.
 
Put his body on the line for the team when others stated he should stop running to protect himself. Now he is going to get lowballed. Good form, Baltimore.
I have a lot of respect for Lamar for betting on himself and not taking the "Murray" contract and shooting for the "Watson" deal.

He didn't put his body on the line for the team he did it for himself, any benefit for the team also benefitted him.

Bottom line is, after a scorching three game start to the 2022 season he has been average at best, and that is being generous by many measures.

He's a career 64% passer so he has the argument that he isn't entirely dependent on his legs and we can argue the Ravens didn't help him in the WR department this season and what they had got injured. However, what I have seen this season as a whole does not make a strong argument for even the "Murray" deal, although he'll get that as a baseline for sure, and he needs to accept the "Watson" deal is off the table from the Ravens.

I wouldn't blame the Ravens if the franchised him and shopped him. He's a very good QB but he doesn't seem to have the makeup of a Mahomes, Allen, Burrow type and, if he was going to be Hurts or Watson (guys who can move and hit 67% of their throws...that extra 3% is huge in the NFL) it probably would have happened already.

But after that Herbert is the only QB, I think, I would 100% take as my guy over Lamar, so he still has tremendous value and the Ravens shouldn't simply dish him unless they get a kings ransom for him. But I also wouldn't want to count on him for six seasons, particularly once his legs start to go.
 
The only case that can be made here is that Baltimore's management sucks total ***. They had one legit WR, and while he was healthy, Lamar was an absolute stud. Literally, as soon as Bateman went out, that whole offense tanked.
This is a fair point, the Ravens have not supported Lamar by building a strong receiving corps behind Bateman.

Then again the Chiefs replaced Tyreek with JuJu. I am actually a big JuJu fan but a zero dropoff after losing Tyreek?

Not saying Mahomes should be the bar for Lamar but if he wants the Watson deal I wouldn't blame the Ravens for opting to let another team give it to him.
 
The only case that can be made here is that Baltimore's management sucks total ***. They had one legit WR, and while he was healthy, Lamar was an absolute stud. Literally, as soon as Bateman went out, that whole offense tanked.
I don't think they suck total ***. They've historically had a terrible record drafting WR's, and a pretty good record everywhere else.
 
Lamar has nothing to prove. Bateman hurt. Andrews hurt. RB's were hurt. O-Line decimated and was not their usual dominant self early in the season. The league has seen what he can do and with weapons he can beat any team, including those with Allen, Mahomes, Burrow, Hurts etc. It is a business and I get it. There is risk signing running QBs to long term deals after their rookie contract. It will happen with Hurts. It will happen with Fields. So Lamar is going to have to accept some sort of discount based on that - or do a shorter term deal and try to get paid again. But it shouldn't be far off of Watson/Murray.

Herbert and Lawrence are the next two prototypical pocket QBs who will break the bank
 
Put his body on the line for the team when others stated he should stop running to protect himself. Now he is going to get lowballed. Good form, Baltimore.
Decent chance this is schtick but I'll take the bait.

Lamar "put his body on the line" for himself. He turned down an absolutely insane amount of money because it wasn't enough for him. He won't hire an agent and uses his mom as an advisor, presumably so he can keep every nickel of his contract for himself. He skipped offseason workouts, has reportedly not put in the work in the film room or locker room, and acted the fool on social media.

He bet on himself and he lost (so far). He hasn't played anywhere near the level of contract that he thinks he's worth and is now hurt, highlighting the many reasons why some feel he shouldn't get a record breaking contract. Quite frankly Baltimore should lower their offer based on what they've seen this year. I seriously doubt they do however, and you might want to actually see what they do before calling them out.
 
Lamar has nothing to prove. Bateman hurt. Andrews hurt. RB's were hurt. O-Line decimated and was not their usual dominant self early in the season. The league has seen what he can do and with weapons he can beat any team, including those with Allen, Mahomes, Burrow, Hurts etc. It is a business and I get it. There is risk signing running QBs to long term deals after their rookie contract. It will happen with Hurts. It will happen with Fields. So Lamar is going to have to accept some sort of discount based on that - or do a shorter term deal and try to get paid again. But it shouldn't be far off of Watson/Murray.

Herbert and Lawrence are the next two prototypical pocket QBs who will break the bank
It should be far off the Watson deal. That deal was both insane and stupid. It was insupid! The Ravens would be insane and stupid to match that. If Lamar insists on that deal he should expect to be franchised and hope the Ravens find an different owner to make an insane and stupid offer.
 
It should be far off the Watson deal. That deal was both insane and stupid. It was insupid! The Ravens would be insane and stupid to match that. If Lamar insists on that deal he should expect to be franchised and hope the Ravens find an different owner to make an insane and stupid offer.
Yes, yes, YESSSSSSSSS. Trade him.
Everyone knows league MVPs grow on trees.
 
It should be far off the Watson deal. That deal was both insane and stupid. It was insupid! The Ravens would be insane and stupid to match that. If Lamar insists on that deal he should expect to be franchised and hope the Ravens find an different owner to make an insane and stupid offer.
Yes, yes, YESSSSSSSSS. Trade him.
Everyone knows league MVPs grow on trees.
And only 2 Heisman winning quarterbacks have won The Super Bowl
 
Last edited:
It should be far off the Watson deal. That deal was both insane and stupid. It was insupid! The Ravens would be insane and stupid to match that. If Lamar insists on that deal he should expect to be franchised and hope the Ravens find an different owner to make an insane and stupid offer.
Yes, yes, YESSSSSSSSS. Trade him.
Everyone knows league MVPs grow on trees.
Keeping him would be ideal for the Ravens but not on a Watson deal. If Lamar refuses to compromise and accept only :rolleyes: 150 million guaranteed then, yes trading him is the smarter move. If they can get multiple first round picks from a team like the Colts, Saints, Panthers or Falcons? Yeah, they should do that.

If they can get him to accept a Murray type deal then they should keep him.
 
Last edited:
He skipped offseason workouts, has reportedly not put in the work in the film room or locker room, and acted the fool on social media.
I like your style.
Baltimore should trade him.
Sincerely, the rest of the AFCN.
Don't you mean to sign that "Cleveland Browns fan"?

Nice try, but the Ravens are a much better organization so they won't be taking your crown for awful decisions at the QB position.
 
Pretty sure it's a lot easier to simply trade away your QB when you aren't going to lose your job if your next choice at QB sucks. People are casually mentioning trading him, when if they draft Kyle Wilson 2.0, they might all lose their jobs in two years. Keeping Lamar means job security.

The Ravens have two years of franchise tags they can use before Lamar can just walk. This seems early for trade talk. I may be wrong.

It's tough to tell, because like I said before, we don't really know what discussions are, we have rumors. There is no agent leaking news.
 
The problem with trading for Lamar is you will have to completely retool your offense to play to his strengths. That was the biggest factor that the Ravens did to capitalize on his talents. Not every coach will be willing to do that so if he did get traded to a coach that won't make those changes it will likely look like a terrible trade and that Lamar is not all he was cracked up to be.
 
Pretty sure it's a lot easier to simply trade away your QB when you aren't going to lose your job if your next choice at QB sucks. People are casually mentioning trading him, when if they draft Kyle Wilson 2.0, they might all lose their jobs in two years. Keeping Lamar means job security.

The Ravens have two years of franchise tags they can use before Lamar can just walk. This seems early for trade talk. I may be wrong.

It's tough to tell, because like I said before, we don't really know what discussions are, we have rumors. There is no agent leaking news.
That's a great point a trade is only truly viable for a firmly entrenched, consistently successful coaching staff. Fortunately the Ravens have one of those.

Maybe a high profile new hire could get away with it, say Sean Payton.
 
The problem with trading for Lamar is you will have to completely retool your offense to play to his strengths. That was the biggest factor that the Ravens did to capitalize on his talents. Not every coach will be willing to do that so if he did get traded to a coach that won't make those changes it will likely look like a terrible trade and that Lamar is not all he was cracked up to be.
Plus it would also require a backup QB suitable to that customized system like Baltimore has done.
 
It should be far off the Watson deal. That deal was both insane and stupid. It was insupid! The Ravens would be insane and stupid to match that. If Lamar insists on that deal he should expect to be franchised and hope the Ravens find an different owner to make an insane and stupid offer.
Yes, yes, YESSSSSSSSS. Trade him.
Everyone knows league MVPs grow on trees.
Keeping him would be ideal for the Ravens but not on a Watson deal. If Lamar refuses to compromise and accept only :rolleyes: 150 million guaranteed then, yes trading him is the smarter move. If they can get multiple first round picks from a team like the Colts, Saints, Panthers or Falcons? Yeah, they should do that.

If they can get him to accept a Murray type deal then they should keep him.
$150M guaranteed is chump change now for elite QB’s
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top