What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

QB Lamar Jackson, BAL (2 Viewers)

It is funny how the new standard of being a high-end QB is excellence with anything other than a championship meaning you are a failure and it is all on you regardless of what you are surrounded by.
1-3 playoff record. Back to back seasons only playing 12 games. Unable to suit up for his team in the playoffs this past season. I do know at least one standard for being a high end QB is actually being available to play in your team's games.

I agree with that point and if the Ravens have durability concerns about him that is a legit reason to be leery of a monster deal…it is also a tangent to the overall point about being judged about playoff success….two different things.

I agree with the Ravens. I agree with Lamar. If I'm the Ravens I'm franchising him and/or trading him. If I'm Lamar I'm asking for the Watson deal or really close to it and I'm not playing on a tag. Both sides can be right.
 
Teams that would be happy to give up their late first rounder this year to steal Lamar:
(16) Deadskins, (18) Lions, (19) Bucs, (20) Seahawks, (26) Giants, and maybe (30) Niners
Adam Thompson
@BookiesAdam

Lamar Jackson 2023 Team Odds, via
@bookies
Atlanta Falcons +300
Carolina Panthers +450
Las Vegas Raiders +500
Baltimore Ravens +550
New York Jets +750
Chicago Bears +750
Miami Dolphins +1200
The Field +650
 
Ravens would be fools to think they could give him the non-exclusive tag and pay him just $32 MM in 2023. Multiple teams would be racing to the podium to hand them the two first rounders and Lamar his Brinks truck. Ravens aren't fools. Exclusive tag and trade seems like the most likely scenario here, unless they can bridge the contract gap and keep him for themselves.

"Our current guess is that, unless the exclusive franchise tender dips below $40 million, the Ravens will be inclined to go the non-exclusive route.

In lieu of waiting for someone who drafts lower in round one signing Jackson to an offer sheet (or having him sign an offer sheet after the 2023 draft, putting 2024 and 2025 first-round picks in play), the Ravens could accept a top-10 pick and maybe a second-rounder or a third-rounder in 2023, or perhaps a conditional pick in 2024 based on Jackson's playing time in 2023." - Mike Florio

Late first rounders aren't anywhere near the same value as early first rounders. Teams that would be happy to give up their late first rounder this year to steal Lamar:

(16) Deadskins, (18) Lions, (19) Bucs, (20) Seahawks, (26) Giants, and maybe (30) Niners
I think you have to factor in the ability to pay him the contract he wants. I know the Bucs can't. Don't think the Giants or Niners can either.

If I'm the Lions I'm really happy where my franchise is at the moment, and don't want to touch a player like this.

Redskins feel like a perfect fit. So does a team like Atlanta.
 
Teams that would be happy to give up their late first rounder this year to steal Lamar:
(16) Deadskins, (18) Lions, (19) Bucs, (20) Seahawks, (26) Giants, and maybe (30) Niners
Adam Thompson
@BookiesAdam

Lamar Jackson 2023 Team Odds, via
@bookies
Atlanta Falcons +300
Carolina Panthers +450
Las Vegas Raiders +500
Baltimore Ravens +550
New York Jets +750
Chicago Bears +750
Miami Dolphins +1200
The Field +650

I listed those teams more as an illustration of how the Ravens would be foolish to use the non-exclusive tag, as they could easily end up with nothing more than a late 1st rounder this year and if LJax and his new team perform, just one more late 1st in 2024. Seems like they could do a lot better than that if they shop him around for actual trades.
 
Is Lamar's 1-3 playoff record the primary factor in determining whether or not the Ravens should keep him or move on. It is constantly thrown out there as a counter to the argument that Lamar is a 70.7% winning QB (including playoffs).

Reasons I don't think the Ravens should give Jackson a $50M+ APY contract that is fully or mostly guaranteed:
  1. While he is one of the best QBs in the league, he is not one of the best passing QBs in the league. Much of his value is tied to him being the best running QB in the NFL. It is reasonable to believe his running effectiveness will decline more rapidly than his passing effectiveness, and that could definitely happen during the span of his next contract.
  2. His MVP season was remarkable, but that was in 2019. In 3 seasons since then, he has not played as well. If his expected level of play is his 2019 level of play, then he deserves a top of market contract. If his expected level of play is more like his aggregate play in 2020-2022, he doesn't.
  3. He has been injured in each of the past two seasons, which raises a concern about future durability/availability, especially given that he runs a lot, which can expose him to more/different kinds of hits than most QBs.
  4. Personally, I think Cleveland made a mistake with Watson's contract, and I don't think a well run franchise like Baltimore should make a similar mistake.
None of that references his playoff record.
 
Last edited:
Is Lamar's 1-3 playoff record the primary factor in determining whether or not the Ravens should keep him or move on. It is constantly thrown out there as a counter to the argument that Lamar is a 70.7% winning QB (including playoffs).

Reasons I don't think the Ravens should give Jackson a $50M+ APY contract that is fully or mostly guaranteed:
  1. While he is one of the best QBs in the league, he is not one of the best passing QBs in the league. Much of his value is tied to him being the best running QB in the NFL. It is reasonable to believe his running effectiveness to decline more rapidly than his passing effectiveness, and that could definitely happen during the span of his next contract.
  2. His MVP season was remarkable, but that was in 2019. In 3 seasons since then, he has not played as well. If his expected level of play is his 2019 level of play, then he deserves a top of market contract. If his expected level of play is more like his aggregate play in 2020-2022, he doesn't.
  3. He has been injured in each of the past two seasons, which raises a concern about future durability/availability, especially given that he runs a lot, which can expose him to more/different kinds of hits than most QBs.
  4. Personally, I think Cleveland made a mistake with Watson's contract, and I don't think a well run franchise like Baltimore should make a similar mistake.
None of that references his playoff record.
Reason #4 is the biggest one I think. The last 20 years of Browns teams vs Ravens teams isn't because of luck. The Ravens don't seem like they are going to do something just because another team did, especially when that team was the Browns.

Teams that would be happy to give up their late first rounder this year to steal Lamar:
(16) Deadskins, (18) Lions, (19) Bucs, (20) Seahawks, (26) Giants, and maybe (30) Niners
Adam Thompson
@BookiesAdam

Lamar Jackson 2023 Team Odds, via
@bookies
Atlanta Falcons +300
Carolina Panthers +450
Las Vegas Raiders +500
Baltimore Ravens +550
New York Jets +750
Chicago Bears +750
Miami Dolphins +1200
The Field +650
I'd be shocked if the Panthers made a move like that, not with a new HC, and cap issues.

Falcons and Raiders both make a ton of sense, though I'm not sure I'd wanna give up much more than just their top-8 picks. Really like Atlanta, as they have the 2nd most cap space in the NFL, and that division is super winnable with Brady gone. Hell, the Falcons likely would have won the division last year, with even mediocre QB play, that running game was humming.

Bears would just be throwing money away. No way they'd trade for Lamar. More likely to go QB at #1, and even more likely to do nothing.
 
Teams that would be happy to give up their late first rounder this year to steal Lamar:
(16) Deadskins, (18) Lions, (19) Bucs, (20) Seahawks, (26) Giants, and maybe (30) Niners
Adam Thompson
@BookiesAdam

Lamar Jackson 2023 Team Odds, via
@bookies
Atlanta Falcons +300
Carolina Panthers +450
Las Vegas Raiders +500
Baltimore Ravens +550
New York Jets +750
Chicago Bears +750
Miami Dolphins +1200
The Field +650
I might be delusional but I’d bet against the Panthers here. Reich as OC is enough reason for me to go after a QB like Carr, Jimmy, etc or take my chances in the draft.
Lamar fits the falcons offense very well imo.
 
That's a tool answer.

Look, the best thing for the on field performance of the Ravens is probably not the same thing as the best thing for Lamar, financially.

The Ravens will franchise him, even tho that probably isn't the best thing for the team, to have their QB playing on a one year deal he isn't thrilled about.

But that's leverage they have, and they are using it. Lamar is using the leverage he has. This is the crappy business side of the sport. Lamar is not under contract, he doesn't have to sign anything he doesn't want to. Lamar played his contract all the way out, including the 5th year option, and he still won't hit free agency, because the rules state they can franchise him for two more years. He is getting leverage for the first time in his career, and now he's the villain.

It's laughable, like people's understanding of the business side of football hasn't improved since they were in high school.

First of all, if I was the Bengals I couldn't back the Brinks truck up to Burrow's door and empty it fast enough (I would pay that man whatever he asked).

I have not been ignoring Lamar's postseason record, I have mentioned it multiple times prior to today. What I wonder is why is that such a defining characteristic for a 26 year old QB? So many people are acting like that means his career has been written in stone based on that metric.

It is funny how the new standard of being a high-end QB is excellence with anything other than a championship meaning you are a failure and it is all on you regardless of what you are surrounded by.
A few examples showing why some of us don't think some in the "pay Lamar" camp are interested in having an honest conversation about things. Essentially no one is saying he's the villain, that his career in the post-season has been written in stone, or that anything other than a championship means you're a failure and it is all on you regardless of what you are surrounded by. They're absurd strawmen that do nothing to promote reasonable conversation.

I'd reiterate what's been said in here over and over about how I think he's a very good QB who I'd like the Ravens to give a huge just not record breaking guaranteed contract to but you'd likely just ignore it and spin it into something entirely different again so why bother?

Sorry but that is an honest conversatio…you just have your mind up already which is fine.
So you're sticking with what you said, that the new standard is anything other than a championship meaning you are a failure and it is all on you regardless of what you are surrounded by? Seriously? No one has even alluded to that, you can't be serious.
 
I might be delusional but I’d bet against the Panthers here. Reich as OC is enough reason for me to go after a QB like Carr, Jimmy, etc or take my chances in the draft.
Lamar fits the falcons offense very well imo.
I have no idea or reason to believe the Panthers are in play for him, but:

I was listening to the Athletic football podcast, and they had the Panthers guy on. The new owner, Tepper, basically has told the front office/coaches he wants to win, and isn't afraid of bold moves. He threw some money around for the all-star coaching staff, and if you were looking for an owner to fully guarantee a deal, it might be the new owner who has Eff you money, and isn't scared of Jones and Kraft.

And thinking more about it, if I was Frank Reich, I am not sure a good-enough QB would be on my wish list, :<_<:

Dude basically got fired because the Colts kept going with band-aid QBs. One of them was his guy, I know, but nonetheless.
 
I might be delusional but I’d bet against the Panthers here. Reich as OC is enough reason for me to go after a QB like Carr, Jimmy, etc or take my chances in the draft.
Lamar fits the falcons offense very well imo.
I have no idea or reason to believe the Panthers are in play for him, but:

I was listening to the Athletic football podcast, and they had the Panthers guy on. The new owner, Tepper, basically has told the front office/coaches he wants to win, and isn't afraid of bold moves. He threw some money around for the all-star coaching staff, and if you were looking for an owner to fully guarantee a deal, it might be the new owner who has Eff you money, and isn't scared of Jones and Kraft.

And thinking more about it, if I was Frank Reich, I am not sure a good-enough QB would be on my wish list, :<_<:

Dude basically got fired because the Colts kept going with band-aid QBs. One of them was his guy, I know, but nonetheless.
I hear that, but Lamar just doesn’t seem to play Reich’s style. But then, he never had a Lamar 🤷
 
I might be delusional but I’d bet against the Panthers here. Reich as OC is enough reason for me to go after a QB like Carr, Jimmy, etc or take my chances in the draft.
Lamar fits the falcons offense very well imo.
I have no idea or reason to believe the Panthers are in play for him, but:

I was listening to the Athletic football podcast, and they had the Panthers guy on. The new owner, Tepper, basically has told the front office/coaches he wants to win, and isn't afraid of bold moves. He threw some money around for the all-star coaching staff, and if you were looking for an owner to fully guarantee a deal, it might be the new owner who has Eff you money, and isn't scared of Jones and Kraft.

And thinking more about it, if I was Frank Reich, I am not sure a good-enough QB would be on my wish list, :<_<:

Dude basically got fired because the Colts kept going with band-aid QBs. One of them was his guy, I know, but nonetheless.
I agree that Reich likely doesn't want a "good enough" QB, I just think Carolina is a lot more likely to turn to the draft, than a trade or a FA. I'm not really buying them for Carr either.
 
It is funny how the new standard of being a high-end QB is excellence with anything other than a championship meaning you are a failure and it is all on you regardless of what you are surrounded by.
1-3 playoff record. Back to back seasons only playing 12 games. Unable to suit up for his team in the playoffs this past season. I do know at least one standard for being a high end QB is actually being available to play in your team's games.

I agree with that point and if the Ravens have durability concerns about him that is a legit reason to be leery of a monster deal…it is also a tangent to the overall point about being judged about playoff success….two different things.
I think both are valid.

Watching those playoff games, Lamar's limitations become evident. When a good team decides to remove him from the game, they can.
 
I think people view Jackson’s playing style as more health adverse.
Ravens Rank Last in Strength Coaching, Average Overall in NFLPA Survey
a grade of F- is alarming for the team's strength coaches,...
--------------
@Kwen_C
Baltimore having terrible strength and conditioning coaches def explains why they have had so many players get injured

Carl Davis Jr.@Trenchwork94
I was def a victim of the strength coaches. Two Labrums and multiple pec strains twitter.com/CordellWoodlan…
-----------------------------------------
LINK to screenshot of more tweets
 
Last edited:
I think people view Jackson’s playing style as more health adverse.
Ravens Rank Last in Strength Coaching, Average Overall in NFLPA Survey
a grade of F- is alarming for the team's strength coaches,...
--------------
@Kwen_C
Baltimore having terrible strength and conditioning coaches def explains why they have had so many players get injured

Carl Davis Jr.@Trenchwork94
I was def a victim of the strength coaches. Two Labrums and multiple pec strains twitter.com/CordellWoodlan…
-----------------------------------------
LINK to screenshot of more tweets
Seems like only yesterday the Ravens were letting it known they thought Lamar should be playing through his injury, and people were quite comfortable letting the accusation of faking an injury hang out there.
 
Jamison Hensley
@jamisonhensley

Calais Campbell: Lamar Jackson wants to get a deal done with the Ravens.
The deadline for the franchise tag is Tuesday.
Full story here: >>> LINK
------------------------------
... Baltimore would have to place the franchise tag on Jackson by Tuesday at 4 p.m. ET to keep him from becoming an unrestricted free agent...
 
Going back to Lamar’s playoff record..

You can never look at these kind of records and make a sweeping statement without going into all the details of each game and situation. Lions fans that hated Stafford used to beat him with a stick of never won a playoff game, not good enough to win a playoff game…

Young Stafford surrounded by mostly **** and Calvin on road to Brees Saints

Stafford on road to Cowboys, very close game with questionable referee decisions

Stafford on road to Seahawks with a finger injury and a team that had lost steam in last few weeks of season.

YET, taken in isolation people would have you believe that he wasn’t as good a QB as Brock Osweiler who won a playoff game for the Texans at home to a Carr-less Raiders.

Then he moves to the Rams and, you know, wins a few playoff games in a row


Playoff records are about the QB but about so much more than just the QB
 
Last edited:
My question is will there be bad blood remaining after a deal is done? Will the Ravens or Lamar feel differently about one another? I think they will tag him with the exclusive tag which buys them time but I can not see this relationship getting better even after a deal is done. I think the Ravens need to seriously consider other options that are available right now before they are not available. When the first QB domino falls the others should also start falling quickly. Or the Ravens need to just get the deal done and bury their feelings. Just get it done or move on. The question for me at this point is which is better? I have been in the Lamar camp but as this continues maybe it is better that there is a split. A lot of times "Divorce" is the correct option. The trade compensation will not be any higher than right now. Once the QB free agents start signing the trade compensation changes. NOW is the time to make a move if you are going to.
 

ESPN's Jeremy Fowler reports the Ravens "have strongly considered using the non-exclusive franchise tag on quarterback Lamar Jackson."​

The non-exclusive tag would allow other teams to make contract offers to Jackson. The Ravens then have the choice of matching the contract or declining it in exchange for a pair of first-round picks. This puts the onus on Jackson to go out and find a contract he deems fitting. The non-exclusive tag is also far cheaper than the franchise tag, coming in at roughly $32 million for a quarterback. Baltimore clearly wants to bring Jackson back, but they haven't shown a willingness to meet his demands. Placing the non-exclusive tag on Jackson would likely garner offers from other teams, though it could further damage the already fragile relationship between the Ravens and their star quarterback.
SOURCE: ESPN
Mar 5, 2023, 10:57 AM ET
 
I think people view Jackson’s playing style as more health adverse.
Ravens Rank Last in Strength Coaching, Average Overall in NFLPA Survey
a grade of F- is alarming for the team's strength coaches,...
--------------
@Kwen_C
Baltimore having terrible strength and conditioning coaches def explains why they have had so many players get injured

Carl Davis Jr.@Trenchwork94
I was def a victim of the strength coaches. Two Labrums and multiple pec strains twitter.com/CordellWoodlan…
-----------------------------------------
LINK to screenshot of more tweets
Yeah. Feels like their Defense gets decimated yearly. The RB also seems more inured than usual.
 
I think people view Jackson’s playing style as more health adverse.
Ravens Rank Last in Strength Coaching, Average Overall in NFLPA Survey
a grade of F- is alarming for the team's strength coaches,...
--------------
@Kwen_C
Baltimore having terrible strength and conditioning coaches def explains why they have had so many players get injured

Carl Davis Jr.@Trenchwork94
I was def a victim of the strength coaches. Two Labrums and multiple pec strains twitter.com/CordellWoodlan…
-----------------------------------------
LINK to screenshot of more tweets

The fact that strength and conditioning coaches, and the connection to a concern about injury - is relevant to your QB... pretty much lays out the concern perfectly. No other DE/DT's critique in this area will ever be associated with the team's QB.

The guy simply is a freak athlete playing QB. When the freak becomes less freakish (inevitable by age or injury)... he becomes a liability.
 
Last edited:
Going back to Lamar’s playoff record..

You can never look at these kind of records and make a sweeping statement without going into all the details of each game and situation. Lions fans that hated Stafford used to beat him with a stick of never won a playoff game, not good enough to win a playoff game…

Young Stafford surrounded by mostly **** and Calvin on road to Brees Saints

Stafford on road to Cowboys, very close game with questionable referee decisions

Stafford on road to Seahawks with a finger injury and a team that had lost steam in last few weeks of season.

YET, taken in isolation people would have you believe that he wasn’t as good a QB as Brock Osweiler who won a playoff game for the Texans at home to a Carr-less Raiders.

Then he moves to the Rams and, you know, wins a few playoff games in a row


Playoff records are about the QB but about so much more than just the QB
While this is true, there is a big difference between the Lions and Ravens franchises.

Let's ignore record and focus on just his play: do you think Lamar has performed well in the playoffs so far?
 

ESPN's Jeremy Fowler reports the Ravens "have strongly considered using the non-exclusive franchise tag on quarterback Lamar Jackson."​

The non-exclusive tag would allow other teams to make contract offers to Jackson. The Ravens then have the choice of matching the contract or declining it in exchange for a pair of first-round picks. This puts the onus on Jackson to go out and find a contract he deems fitting. The non-exclusive tag is also far cheaper than the franchise tag, coming in at roughly $32 million for a quarterback. Baltimore clearly wants to bring Jackson back, but they haven't shown a willingness to meet his demands. Placing the non-exclusive tag on Jackson would likely garner offers from other teams, though it could further damage the already fragile relationship between the Ravens and their star quarterback.
SOURCE: ESPN
Mar 5, 2023, 10:57 AM ET
This is the right play
 
Going back to Lamar’s playoff record..

You can never look at these kind of records and make a sweeping statement without going into all the details of each game and situation. Lions fans that hated Stafford used to beat him with a stick of never won a playoff game, not good enough to win a playoff game…

Young Stafford surrounded by mostly **** and Calvin on road to Brees Saints

Stafford on road to Cowboys, very close game with questionable referee decisions

Stafford on road to Seahawks with a finger injury and a team that had lost steam in last few weeks of season.

YET, taken in isolation people would have you believe that he wasn’t as good a QB as Brock Osweiler who won a playoff game for the Texans at home to a Carr-less Raiders.

Then he moves to the Rams and, you know, wins a few playoff games in a row


Playoff records are about the QB but about so much more than just the QB
I read most of these comments and I think Baltimore has lost its way. I look at the issues with their S&C and it's an issue. You have a wr calling out the coaching staff, The QB not getting paid. This looks like a bad season.
 
The guy simply is a freak athlete playing QB. When the freak becomes less freakish (inevitable by age or injury)... he becomes a liability.
Used to ASSUME the same thing a long time ago with a big athletic scrambling QB who was a threat with his gun and wheels. He was terrifying but very early in his career he blew out his knees so I figured he would begin a downward spiral since he wouldn't be the terrifying duel threat that he was his first two years in the league.
Wrong.
People don't realize that an uber athletic QB who gets injured isn't automatically cooked. There is a long history and history that teaches us not to ASSUME anything when it comes to players.
---------------------------
John Elway Played Entire Career Without ACL With Griffin's knee injury dominating headlines, we take a look back at Shanahan's past with John Elway's injuries.
...Today, surgical procedures often can repair torn ligaments. But when John hurt his knee [in high school], there was little doctors could do. In 1978, a torn ACL was a career-ending injury for most athletes. But John wasn't like most athletes.
...In 1985, Elway had microscopic surgery on his knee. The part that stands out here?
Elway, the Broncos second-year quarterback, said it would be his second such surgery. Saccomano said Elway told him he had noticed a "clicking" in his left knee before ...
Picture
John Elway — Denver Broncos Super-Bowl Winning Quarterback & General Manager - Knee Replacement
...Something you might not know: Elway had to have a knee replacement in 2007, after playing his entire career with almost no ACL left in his knee. Even though the original knee was in bad shape, he never had ACL reconstruction surgery, opting instead to continue playing through pain and discomfort.

Although Elway is sometimes cited as an example of what an athlete can do with no ACL, that was a different era-- it wasn't a good idea at the time, and it's something we don't recommend anyone doing in this day and age...
-----------------------------------
I remember I ASSUMED when I heard Elway blew out his knee that he'd never be the same, he wasn't the same duel threat but he still was able to hobble out a few calculated scrambles and adjusted his overall game having his best seasons completely without his ACL.
I don't assume Lamar Jackson is a liability because he is 'less freaky' of an athlete. Nah, not at all.
 
Going back to Lamar’s playoff record..

You can never look at these kind of records and make a sweeping statement without going into all the details of each game and situation. Lions fans that hated Stafford used to beat him with a stick of never won a playoff game, not good enough to win a playoff game…

Young Stafford surrounded by mostly **** and Calvin on road to Brees Saints

Stafford on road to Cowboys, very close game with questionable referee decisions

Stafford on road to Seahawks with a finger injury and a team that had lost steam in last few weeks of season.

YET, taken in isolation people would have you believe that he wasn’t as good a QB as Brock Osweiler who won a playoff game for the Texans at home to a Carr-less Raiders.

Then he moves to the Rams and, you know, wins a few playoff games in a row


Playoff records are about the QB but about so much more than just the QB
I read most of these comments and I think Baltimore has lost its way. I look at the issues with their S&C and it's an issue. You have a wr calling out the coaching staff, The QB not getting paid. This looks like a bad season.
Good post and I would like to add...when the Ravens put the full on franchise tag where he can't go anywhere, Jackson has months and months to sign that franchise tag
I want to stress this...Lamar Jackson IS NOT holding out when he takes the entire summer off with a new OC coming in the door and waits until 3 days prior to kickoff Week 1
That is completely acceptable and you need to swallow it when you feel righteous the Ravens are doing right by forcing Jackson to reject their below market offers.
I think Jackson is mostly done with the Ravens unless they back the truck up and even then the two sides might need some counseling in order to move forward.
Arizona talked a big game and it boiled down to some VCR Tape watching by Murray or they wouldn't sign off.
Of course Murray told them he would watch film, doesn't seem like he did this season
 

Speaking Monday on The Bernie Kosar Show, Ravens executive VP Ozzie Newsome said the team will continue contract negotiations with Lamar Jackson "today and up until 3:30 tomorrow".​

There's little expectation that the 25-month negotiation between Jackson and the Ravens will come to an end before Tuesday's franchise tag deadline. Jackson is reportedly looking for more than the $230 million in guaranteed money Deshaun Watson received last offseason, which has resulted in a drawn-out negotiation that could potentially end with Jackson playing for a different team in 2023. According to a recent report from ESPN's Jeremy Fowler, the Ravens may use the non-exclusive franchise tag on Jackson, which would allow him to speak with other teams about a new deal. Should Jackson find a deal to his liking, the Ravens would have the option to either match the deal and retain Jackson, or lose him in exchange for two first-round draft picks. What's already expected to be an eventful offseason for the Ravens will become all the more exciting if Jackson is free to negotiate with other teams in the coming days.
SOURCE: ESPN
Mar 6, 2023, 4:12 PM ET
 
Choosing the non-exclusive tag is an interesting play if everyone is correct that he won't get a fully guaranteed deal. Then the Ravens can let him see what is out there, and when he finds out no one will do that, he can sign a reasonable deal with BAL.
 
Choosing the non-exclusive tag is an interesting play if everyone is correct that he won't get a fully guaranteed deal. Then the Ravens can let him see what is out there, and when he finds out no one will do that, he can sign a reasonable deal with BAL.
Correct

-Or he could choose to take the Jets $300M fully guaranteed deal in exchange for 2 future 1st rd picks, Jets won't hesitate to ship them
 
From CBS...

The Ravens aren't going to doubt what Jackson brings to the organization, as they are 45-16 in his 61 starts since Jackson entered the league in 2018. They average 28.0 points per game when Jackson is on the field compared to 20.0 when Jackson misses games. Jackson is one of six players in NFL history to reach 100-plus passing touchdowns and 4,000-plus rushing yards in a career, and the fastest to reach the mark by 31 games. The Ravens are averaging 184.8 rushing yards per game with Jackson as a starter in his career -- the most by any starting quarterback since the 1970 merger.
 
Choosing the non-exclusive tag is an interesting play if everyone is correct that he won't get a fully guaranteed deal. Then the Ravens can let him see what is out there, and when he finds out no one will do that, he can sign a reasonable deal with BAL.
Maybe, maybe not.
---------------------------
With the Atlanta Falcons cutting Marcus Mariota, the Lamar Jackson coming to the Dirty South rumors are out in full force.
...Releasing Marcus Mariota creates another $12M for the Falcons in cap space.

Atlanta is now armed with close to $65M in cap space in 2023, second most in the NFL. https://t.co/pABH78K8oR
 
... they are 45-16 in his 61 starts... average 28.0 points per game ... 20.0 when Jackson misses games... one of six players in NFL history to reach 100-plus passing touchdowns and 4,000-plus rushing yards in a career... fastest to reach the mark by 31 games. The Ravens are averaging 184.8 rushing yards per game with Jackson as a starter in his career -- the most by any starting quarterback since the 1970 merger.
After the last game of the season.
-------------------------------------------------
Lamar Jackson appears to send Ravens message in cryptic Instagram post
January 16, 2023
... Jackson appeared to send a message to the Baltimore team that refused to give him a five-year, fully guaranteed contract last offseason.

When you have something good, you don’t play with it,” a message posted to Jackson’s Instagram Story read. “You don’t take chances losing it. You don’t neglect it. When you have something good, you pour into it. You appreciate it. Because when you take care of something good, that good thing takes care of you too.”

... Jackson, 26, also removed his profile picture on Instagram. His Twitter photo includes a snap of him in his Ravens uniform...
 
First QB extension is Geno Smith. What has been reported.
-- Sigmund Bloom@SigmundBloom
I’m glad he got paid but mid level QB salaries continue to be out of whack
>>> Why Geno Smith’s contract extension with the Seahawks is a win-win
... 32-year-old Pro Bowl quarterback ... three-year deal worth up to $105 million...
-- QB contract extensions from last year. Reposted info:
== Mathew Stafford 34 years old March 8. W/L 89/101/1 Rams: Four years, $160 million ($130 million guaranteed) W/L 150/79/1
Kirk Cousins 34 years old March 13. ikings: One year, $35 million (fully guaranteed) W/L 74/66/2
Aaron Rodgers 39 years old March 15. Packers: Three years, $150.8 million ($101.5 million guaranteed) W/L
Deshaun Watson 27 years old W/L 31/29 March 30. Deshaun Watson, Cleveland Browns: Five years, $230 million (fully guaranteed)
-- Contracts signed AFTER Watson --
Derek Carr
31 years old April 13. Las Vegas Raiders: Three years, $121.5 million (guaranteed pending) W/L 63/79
Kyler Murray 25 years old June 21st. W/L 25/31/1 Kyler Murray gets monster $230.5 million contract $160 million guaranteed.
The trend shows top QB contracts have and will continue to increase faster than fans realize.
... I don't expect Lamar to ask for anything less than Kyler's $160 and I suspect Burrow will eclipse that guarantee when he signs his extension and if that gets done before Jackson then I expect Jackson to look for Joe Burrow money and whatever Joe is able to land for his guarantee.

==
ADD: Ex-Raider Derek Carr agrees to 4-year contract with Saints - Carr's deal could be worth up to $150 million.
-- Anyone agree that these contracts got pushed at the last minute because teams anticipate Lamar's deal prod these mid-tear QB extensions done before LJ.
 
Last edited:
Ok so explain. Does this mean teams can offer Lamar a contract, and if he accepts the team pays what, one 1st? Two 1sts?
Seems it would put teams who pick much later in play.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top