Just because there aren't a lot of better options doesn't mean he is anything more than a backup quality NFL QB.Why do people think the NFL decision makers have a much more favorable opinion of him then NFL fans?
Just because there aren't a lot of better options doesn't mean he is anything more than a backup quality NFL QB.Why do people think the NFL decision makers have a much more favorable opinion of him then NFL fans?
Sure but not what I was asking.Just because there aren't a lot of better options doesn't mean he is anything more than a backup quality NFL QB.Why do people think the NFL decision makers have a much more favorable opinion of him then NFL fans?
My point was I am not so sure the NFL has that "much more favorable opinion of him then NFL fans". I think the NFL doesn't have many choices so he keeps getting chances.Sure but not what I was asking.Just because there aren't a lot of better options doesn't mean he is anything more than a backup quality NFL QB.Why do people think the NFL decision makers have a much more favorable opinion of him then NFL fans?
I don't see it that way.My point was I am not so sure the NFL has that "much more favorable opinion of him then NFL fans". I think the NFL doesn't have many choices so he keeps getting chances.Sure but not what I was asking.Just because there aren't a lot of better options doesn't mean he is anything more than a backup quality NFL QB.Why do people think the NFL decision makers have a much more favorable opinion of him then NFL fans?
Bradford was A LOT better than Darnold though. Bradford was a legit NFL starting QB (nowhere near worth the #1 overall pick though) for several years in the mid 2010s.Reminds me of Sam Bradford.I admit I am envious. If I put out a bad product, I'm no longer considered a good sauce maker.I was discussing this guy in another thread and accidentally typo'd his last name. But upon relooking at the type I think it is completely fitting and believe it should be legally changed.
From now on I will only refer to this guy as "Darnlold"
Darnold has turned being bad at his job into an incredibly lucrative proposition. He's right up there with Angel Hernandez at failing up in his career.
According to Spotrac, Bradford made $130,022,863 during his NFL career.
Must be a Sam thing.
Maybe he's a great practice/locker room guy?Why do people think the NFL decision makers have a much more favorable opinion of him then NFL fans?
So the QB's in comparison for you to show that NFL likes Darnlold a lot more than fans is that he was chosen over Lance (way over his head and terrible), Wilson (past his prime and basically zero upside or future), Brissett (I would say a guy equal to Darnlold but older), and Minshew (a journeyman backup placeholder)?I don't see it that way.
They get it wrong a lot, we all do, just worse that it's their one job.Maybe he's a great practice/locker room guy?
I don't think the NFL decision makers necessarily knows better than fans. They make terrible decisions that were obviously bad decisions at the time (not just with hindsight) constantly.
Does to me.So the QB's in comparison for you to show that NFL likes Darnlold a lot more than fans is that he was chosen over Lance (way over his head and terrible), Wilson (past his prime and basically zero upside or future), Brissett (I would say a guy equal to Darnlold but older), and Minshew (a journeyman backup placeholder)?I don't see it that way.
None of that screams that the NFL likes Darnlold much. He is just a guy that was available for not much cost. Sure, why not see if we can salvage at least something until we find someone that can actually do the job for us.
None of that screams the NFL likes him a lot.
I think some of it is clinging to pre-draft scouting, because there's not NFL tape to suggest he deserves anything more than a clear backup role. I was being serious when I said he might just be a good locker room/practice guy. Personally, I think he was a boom/bust prospect to begin with. He was never really elite at USC, struggling with accuracy, and that problem has only gotten worse in the NFL.They get it wrong a lot, we all do, just worse that it's their one job.Maybe he's a great practice/locker room guy?
I don't think the NFL decision makers necessarily knows better than fans. They make terrible decisions that were obviously bad decisions at the time (not just with hindsight) constantly.
He just keeps getting some really prime second chances.
Just seriously asking if it's the youth/pedigree, still clinging to their pre-draft scouting, think they can fix him?
I'm still intrigued by him for those reasons myself, though I think the Jets years might have broke him. I'm sure the Vikings will draft a QB and he won't have a long runway, but I'm kind of hoping he gets at least a few games to see if he can show something. I'm not betting on it working on out, but I think it could.
I mean GB & Love / Det looks amazing and da Bears have an outstanding offense and are drafting a generational talent; Minny is in last place not matter what IMO but drafting QB 4/5 at pick 6 is a mistake to me. Now if they can trade back and get McCarthy would a different story, but I say let it ride this yrI think the overall point is, if Darnold is the Vikings starter, they are finishing in last place in the North. They are probably finishing last with a rookie as well, but at least there is some upside there.He started for the SB runner up 49ers.this actually the 1st time Sammy will start for a good team, I'm pulling for him. Would love to see them build around him but we know their taking a QB
He was god awful.
That’s not completely fair. SF rested a lot of starters that game. No McCafrrey. Very little Deebo/Aiyuk. Not ideal.
@32BeatWriters
"Darnold looked calm, confident and prepared for what is likely to be another starting opportunity. Thursday, he surveyed receivers in a 7-on-7 rep, then placed the ball perfectly in stride toward Jordan Addison.
Darnold’s consistency stood out for 3 days. He connected with Jefferson on a couple of over routes Wednesday, dropping the ball into hard-to-see windows. He anticipated cuts and displayed touch."
I don't know about strong QB2 even. Low 2.So now that J.J. McCarthy is out for the year, what do we think? Darnold has never been good, but he's never been in a decent situation either. MIN has greater receivers and solid coaching. I'm thinking strong QB2, but maybe late QB1. But I have no idea.
Definitely not drafting as a QB1 unless you have 32 teams. I like him in best ball as a 3 still.So now that J.J. McCarthy is out for the year, what do we think? Darnold has never been good, but he's never been in a decent situation either. MIN has great receivers and solid coaching. I'm thinking strong QB2, but maybe late QB1. But I have no idea.
I got him for Howell + a 4th in SF, and would much rather have him than Geno or Russel Wilson. It’s not even close.Would truthfully rather take my chances with someone like Geno Smith or Russell Wilson than tie my wagon to Darnold. Dude is the definition of placeholder.
I’m not. I expected Darnold to start at least 8 games anyway.downgrade MIN offense with Darnold at helm /?
Sleeper alert said Addison apparently went down and was carted off.I got him for Howell + a 4th in SF, and would much rather have him than Geno or Russel Wilson. It’s not even close.Would truthfully rather take my chances with someone like Geno Smith or Russell Wilson than tie my wagon to Darnold. Dude is the definition of placeholder.
Much better OL, and a QB friendly scheme, plus JJ to throw to, along with Addison & at some point Hock?
Yep - super happy I dealt for him. Will definitely make him my QB2 in redraft.
or upgrade? While I fully expect McCarthy to be the superior QB, he may not have put up the superior numbers this season.downgrade MIN offense with Darnold at helm /?
I wouldn't say Darnold has never had a DECENT situation. He an ok OL, CMC, and DJ Moore in Carolina. The current Vikings are probably better than that, especially when Hockenson gets back, but its not like Darnold's whole career was just terrible supporting casts.So now that J.J. McCarthy is out for the year, what do we think? Darnold has never been good, but he's never been in a decent situation either. MIN has great receivers and solid coaching. I'm thinking strong QB2, but maybe late QB1. But I have no idea.
Back end QB2 now, but could really explode into a back end QB1. He does have weapons, and will get Hock back at some point as well. But if he stinks, Mullens could start there by week 5-6.
I'm not taking any of them.
It was the Matt Rhule era, but point taken.I wouldn't say Darnold has never had a DECENT situation. He an ok OL, CMC, and DJ Moore in Carolina. The current Vikings are probably better than that, especially when Hockenson gets back, but its not like Darnold's whole career was just terrible supporting casts.So now that J.J. McCarthy is out for the year, what do we think? Darnold has never been good, but he's never been in a decent situation either. MIN has great receivers and solid coaching. I'm thinking strong QB2, but maybe late QB1. But I have no idea.
CMC getting hurt during the 3rd game of the year really derailed that season. Darnold had a decent start though.I wouldn't say Darnold has never had a DECENT situation. He an ok OL, CMC, and DJ Moore in Carolina. The current Vikings are probably better than that, especially when Hockenson gets back, but its not like Darnold's whole career was just terrible supporting casts.So now that J.J. McCarthy is out for the year, what do we think? Darnold has never been good, but he's never been in a decent situation either. MIN has great receivers and solid coaching. I'm thinking strong QB2, but maybe late QB1. But I have no idea.
Not sure touch is the word I would use.wouldnt touch him
Well that’s less than ideal.Sleeper alert said Addison apparently went down and was carted off.
Exactly my feeling. Or they may have tried to limit what JJM did as compared to a more seasoned QB.or upgrade? While I fully expect McCarthy to be the superior QB, he may not have put up the superior numbers this season.downgrade MIN offense with Darnold at helm /?
Darnold is the QB comparison to holders for kickers who don’t put laces out.Would truthfully rather take my chances with someone like Geno Smith or Russell Wilson than tie my wagon to Darnold. Dude is the definition of placeholder.
I'd be okay with as many as 5, but I think they should be moved to Politics.Do we really need more than 1 Sam Darnold topic? Some might argue 1 was too many.![]()
Addison has a sprained ankle. I just updated his topic. I think he’ll live.I think he can exceed his career best in this offense. but the bar is pretty low there.
I wouldnt draft him, but I'd put him on my 'players to watch' list and if he shows signs of doing well in this offense I'd consider a waiver wire pickup.
I'd also downgrade all the vikings receivers with this news.
Yeah, he’s a stud.Dude is gonna ball, lots of ability here, KOC will do wonders for him and with no looking over his shoulder he should be able to take off.
Only a blessing he got a few years on the bench
I could see the vikings have a niners lance/purdy dynamic where your top 5 pick is wasted but you solved QB anyway
HC is a big part of the supporting cast.I wouldn't say Darnold has never had a DECENT situation. He an ok OL, CMC, and DJ Moore in Carolina. The current Vikings are probably better than that, especially when Hockenson gets back, but its not like Darnold's whole career was just terrible supporting casts.So now that J.J. McCarthy is out for the year, what do we think? Darnold has never been good, but he's never been in a decent situation either. MIN has great receivers and solid coaching. I'm thinking strong QB2, but maybe late QB1. But I have no idea.
Warren Sharp
the NFL avg completion rate the last decade is 63.9%
Sam Darnold played 66 games over 6 seasons
he NEVER had 1 season with even 62% comp
his career average is 59.7% comp
that ranks #47 out of 48 QBs
meanwhile...
Kirk Cousins ranked #4 of 48 (67.4%)
He never had JJ to throw to.Warren Sharp
the NFL avg completion rate the last decade is 63.9%
Sam Darnold played 66 games over 6 seasons
he NEVER had 1 season with even 62% comp
his career average is 59.7% comp
that ranks #47 out of 48 QBs
meanwhile...
Kirk Cousins ranked #4 of 48 (67.4%)x.com
x.com
Just bought him in SF for a, hopefully late, 2nd.or upgrade? While I fully expect McCarthy to be the superior QB, he may not have put up the superior numbers this season.downgrade MIN offense with Darnold at helm /?
thats the thing. playing under a bad coach can sometimes break a player. QB is tough enough as it is without having to deal with that.HC is a big part of the supporting cast.I wouldn't say Darnold has never had a DECENT situation. He an ok OL, CMC, and DJ Moore in Carolina. The current Vikings are probably better than that, especially when Hockenson gets back, but its not like Darnold's whole career was just terrible supporting casts.So now that J.J. McCarthy is out for the year, what do we think? Darnold has never been good, but he's never been in a decent situation either. MIN has great receivers and solid coaching. I'm thinking strong QB2, but maybe late QB1. But I have no idea.
That's where Darnold really started behind the 8-Ball. I like Todd Bowles but his staff was bad with the Jets. OC Jeremey Bates has been out of the league since 2018. Then Adam Gase followed by Matt Ruhl. Those are HCs, and the most important parts of their offensive coaching staff (Ben MacAdoo was Darnold's OC at one point) who were woefully in over their head.
At this point, I don't see much hope for Darnold suddenly turning it around because I think he is probably broken mentally. But I have learned not to doubt Kevin O'Connell's ability to get the most out of a QB. It would be a bummer if Addison misses time but with JJ as the WR1 you don't need much more to be successful as a QB.