Dr. Octopus said:
First of all, this is an odd way to look at it because all of those things seem pretty important and are the building blocks for successful quarterbacks - but on top of that he's very athletic (can gain yards with his legs), has shown an ability to run a pro style offense and seems to have the necessary intangibles like leadership and smarts.
Obviously great prospects have busted before - but why don't you list the factors you think leads to him being a bust?
The general fantasy community is a reactive and impressionable demographic. It is very reliant on media and outside influence. Before the mainstream media starts creating the narrative, I wanted to get out in front of it in regards to Trevor.
Trevor has many things going for him which led him to where he is now, the no.1 pick in the NFL Draft. Many of those things have already been regurgitated by some, bc in all honesty, it is of someone else's opinion being circulated on the internet. And they all say the same things - can't miss, winner, numbers/statistics, has everything you want in a leader, accurate, ideal size, big arm, mobile. While some of those things are important, the majority of it is not.
Statistics for me, gets my attention. You need to have good stats to stand out. So the counting stats, the percentages, the wins... all those things matter. BUT they do not tell the whole story, it never really does or else talent evaluators wouldn't be needed and teams would just draft from a list of who accomplished the most or accrued the most numbers. So while the metrics and numbers are nice, we have to look beyond those things below the surface. For me and most talent evaluators, the hardest thing to do is to evaluate players coming from notoriously winning environments. The reason being is, a team sport that is so reliant of your peers and the players next to you in the field, that it often gets lost in translation. Not all touchdowns are the same. Not all yards are created equally. Not all success is interpreted correctly. That is why you have to look at the tape, the bird never lies.
I feel like everyone knows the good about Trevor, so I won't go too much into that. But there seems to be very little said about the things we don't know about him.
-
How well will he handle adversity? (Will he block negative things out or will he Carson Wentz you?)
-
How does he look when he doesn't have an optimal environment of talent around him? (This is the key bc he's always had a plethora of talent around him at Clemson.)
-
What was the play called and what were the primary and secondary reads?
-
Where is the ball placement in regards to the window, the receiver and the defense?
-
Mental toughness? (How quickly does he rebound from a loss or failure?)
-
How well does he improvise when things break down?
- Passion?
I didn't spend a whole of time on watching all of his tape, but I saw enough. I saw a lot of his weaknesses like accuracy and tight windows being camoflauged by having great talent around him. Receivers can mask a lot of ducks and whoopsies that turn into first downs and touchdowns. I counted about a dozen throws that were completions that aren't completions in the NFL. Anticipation is the most overlooked attribute when evaluating QBs. His anticipation is middle of the road at best as of right now. I saw much better anticipation from Mac Jones and Trey Lance. The thing is when you have dogs at receiver you don't really need to anticipate bc they will be there. But when he absolutely needed to, he didn't really impress often staying safe or throwing the check down or into the flat. I need more.
I also want to note that the vast majority of his success through the air was on the primary read. That is the luxury of having great surroundings. This is a red flag. Now I'm not saying I didn't see secondary read completions, bc he did have some. But the quality of those completions were diluted bc instead of pushing the ball up the field to his second read, he would often chicken out and throw to the flat to Etienne. I didn't see much success when aggressive risk down the field was needed or a crowded window of defenders.
His feet are okay. It's always the first thing I look at. They need work but he can get better in that area. Without nimble feet, you have nothing, in any sport really. No glaring weakness but wasn't enamored either.
I also noticed a lot of his success were accrued off of screens. If somebody wants to look that up I'd be interested in knowing how many of his completions and yards were off screens. This is why college numbers are suppressed when transitioning into the NFL.
While I don't want to put players in a box and say,"if you don't do this this way, you can't be successful," I am a little concerned about his possible lack of passion for the game. In regards to the things between the ears you have to be very careful bc people can change and what you currently see might not be the same down the road. You have to give room for error and improvement when it comes to a person's evolution. But as someone who holds a lot of weight in the mental aspects of a player, his introverted nature worries me a little.
I'm not saying he will be a bust on the scale of Jemarcus Russell or Ryan Leaf and the like. Maybe more so on the level of an Alex Smith or Jared Goff. Guys that are serviceable but was obviously not the best quarterback taken in his draft. I think there will be two QBs in Trevor's draft that will end up being better in the end. But the "generational talent" being thrown around, I just don't see it.