250 yards and 2 TD with the threat to run. If he doesn't run at all early in the game, it won't take long for the Miami D coordinator to realize they can fall back into coverage more and shut down the pass with no threat from the run...Through 4 games he was averaging 250 yards and 2 TDs passing per game, and generally looked really good in the pocket. Then he had the game where he ran wild but also got hurt. I agree that he isn't a top 5 QB option without his legs, but he's still a solid option. A notch below Newton until we see how much he's going to run.
Still in the decision process on this one. Care to share your logic. My thoughts are that SF D is surprisingly tough at home, so thoughts that ATL torches them early and simply run the ball may be unfounded. However, Ryan has been unimpressive week to week since his hot start. My concerns on Taylor are well documented in the thread. Do they "protect" him by limiting runs, thus putting a ceiling on him? Is he truly healthy?Starting him over Matt Ryan.
I like the adjustments that the Buffalo O coordinator has been making all year with the injuries so this will be an interesting chess match.250 yards and 2 TD with the threat to run. If he doesn't run at all early in the game, it won't take long for the Miami D coordinator to realize they can fall back into coverage more and shut down the pass with no threat from the run...Through 4 games he was averaging 250 yards and 2 TDs passing per game, and generally looked really good in the pocket. Then he had the game where he ran wild but also got hurt. I agree that he isn't a top 5 QB option without his legs, but he's still a solid option. A notch below Newton until we see how much he's going to run.
Ryan has been a huge disappointment, Taylor has not. Simple as that for me.Still in the decision process on this one. Care to share your logic. My thoughts are that SF D is surprisingly tough at home, so thoughts that ATL torches them early and simply run the ball may be unfounded. However, Ryan has been unimpressive week to week since his hot start. My concerns on Taylor are well documented in the thread. Do they "protect" him by limiting runs, thus putting a ceiling on him? Is he truly healthy?Starting him over Matt Ryan.
Playing Eli over Ryan too (super-flex league).Playing Tyrod rather than Eli, just because Eli just threw six TD's I doubt he will produce again.
They are just smashing the Fins faces in on the run game, but Tygod looks fine.looks like he's having a pretty good game - and he's only passed the ball 12 times.
and Sammy is a heck of a good young weapon to toss the ball to.Tyrod's game really feels like he could be a monster in another year or two. He is putting up tremendous per pass numbers, the Bills just aren't passing a whole lot. Give him a full year, more learning of the playbook, more time working with his receivers and more trust from the coaches and they could unleash him to huge numbers.
Definitely an exciting possible future
Yep. Just when you think Watkins might be a wasted or busted talent, he comes in and dazzles.Ilov80s said:and Sammy is a heck of a good young weapon to toss the ball to.GroveDiesel said:Tyrod's game really feels like he could be a monster in another year or two. He is putting up tremendous per pass numbers, the Bills just aren't passing a whole lot. Give him a full year, more learning of the playbook, more time working with his receivers and more trust from the coaches and they could unleash him to huge numbers.
Definitely an exciting possible future
I don't watch bills games, so I don't see how well he plays. Is he worth keeping as your starter for next year? We keep three guys, giving up the draft pick ahead of where they were picked. Taylor was a FA for me, so he would cost a last round pick. I'm considering keeping him but I have concerns. Is Taylor another gimmick QB like Kapernick? Can he actually make throws?Tyrod's game really feels like he could be a monster in another year or two. He is putting up tremendous per pass numbers, the Bills just aren't passing a whole lot. Give him a full year, more learning of the playbook, more time working with his receivers and more trust from the coaches and they could unleash him to huge numbers.
Definitely an exciting possible future
if the season ended today, he'd break Drew Brees' record for highest completion percentage in a season.I don't watch bills games, so I don't see how well he plays. Is he worth keeping as your starter for next year? We keep three guys, giving up the draft pick ahead of where they were picked. Taylor was a FA for me, so he would cost a last round pick. I'm considering keeping him but I have concerns. Is Taylor another gimmick QB like Kapernick? Can he actually make throws?Tyrod's game really feels like he could be a monster in another year or two. He is putting up tremendous per pass numbers, the Bills just aren't passing a whole lot. Give him a full year, more learning of the playbook, more time working with his receivers and more trust from the coaches and they could unleash him to huge numbers.
Definitely an exciting possible future
Very legit in my opinion. I've watched all his games this year. Tremendous pocket awareness. The threat to run is a bonus from a FF perspective but IRL he doesn't try turn everything into a punt return. He hangs in there, moves up or to the side to work through his progressions. If you only saw his Baltimore years you don't know this guy. One of the most improved players in the league.I don't watch bills games, so I don't see how well he plays. Is he worth keeping as your starter for next year? We keep three guys, giving up the draft pick ahead of where they were picked. Taylor was a FA for me, so he would cost a last round pick. I'm considering keeping him but I have concerns. Is Taylor another gimmick QB like Kapernick? Can he actually make throws?Tyrod's game really feels like he could be a monster in another year or two. He is putting up tremendous per pass numbers, the Bills just aren't passing a whole lot. Give him a full year, more learning of the playbook, more time working with his receivers and more trust from the coaches and they could unleash him to huge numbers.
Definitely an exciting possible future
I would agree with this. Not enough sample size to say definitively that he's the guy, but he looks pretty good so far. There's always time for the bottom to fall out, but hopefully that's not the case here.There's always the danger of a small sample size leading to poor conclusions, but Taylor seems awfully legit to me. He makes good decisions, doesn't lock onto receivers, reads defenses fairly well, is calm in the pocket with good awareness, has shown good accuracy (especially on long balls), and has a great arm. He's also shown good leadership. And despite being a good runner, he's typically pretty good about keeping his eyes downfield when be breaks out of the pocket.
There's certainly enough there IMO to be optimistic going forward.
There was a discussion in another thread, and while it doesn't jive with our perception, offensive production on TNF is only minimally less than Sundays or Mondays.I am always hesitant to start players on Thursday nights. It's a roadie against a division rival still in contention for a wild card spot. I would lower my expectations.
Despite all that I still might be starting T-Mobile, Chris Ivory and Karlos this week.
I'm with you. The thought of a starter on Thursday having a crappy game and getting behind the eight ball for the week totally sucks. I realize that there's also a chance of him having a great game, but I don't like that gamble.There was a discussion in another thread, and while it doesn't jive with our perception, offensive production on TNF is only minimally less than Sundays or Mondays.I am always hesitant to start players on Thursday nights. It's a roadie against a division rival still in contention for a wild card spot. I would lower my expectations.
Despite all that I still might be starting T-Mobile, Chris Ivory and Karlos this week.
I'm with you - not thrilled with guys playing Thursdays or in London, but the data doesn't support the theory. Personally I love starting guys on Sunday Night or Monday Night. Not for any rational reason, but only because I like watching them real time with no other games on to distract me. I should feel the same way about Thursday or Sunday a.m. from Wembley games, but I don't.
The Jets that have allowed Carr and Bortles, to have 2 straight big days against them?It's not Thursday that has me benching T-Mobile, it's the Jets.
I've been on the receiving end a few times this year. Freeman put up a 37 pointer, I got whupped like 177-141 that week.I'm with you. The thought of a starter on Thursday having a crappy game and getting behind the eight ball for the week totally sucks. I realize that there's also a chance of him having a great game, but I don't like that gamble.There was a discussion in another thread, and while it doesn't jive with our perception, offensive production on TNF is only minimally less than Sundays or Mondays.I am always hesitant to start players on Thursday nights. It's a roadie against a division rival still in contention for a wild card spot. I would lower my expectations.
Despite all that I still might be starting T-Mobile, Chris Ivory and Karlos this week.
I'm with you - not thrilled with guys playing Thursdays or in London, but the data doesn't support the theory. Personally I love starting guys on Sunday Night or Monday Night. Not for any rational reason, but only because I like watching them real time with no other games on to distract me. I should feel the same way about Thursday or Sunday a.m. from Wembley games, but I don't.
The only Jets game I saw they completely shut down Kirk Cousins. KIRK COUSINS! I didn't like that.The Jets that have allowed Carr and Bortles, to have 2 straight big days against them?It's not Thursday that has me benching T-Mobile, it's the Jets.
If they play Cromartie again that's an automatic big night for somebody. Revis is still good, but he's no island. You can get lots of underneath stuff on him. The Bills have a lot of weapons: Watkins, Clay, two productive backs, Woods is an underrated possession receiver, Tyrod is legit.The Jets that have allowed Carr and Bortles, to have 2 straight big days against them?It's not Thursday that has me benching T-Mobile, it's the Jets.
This actually worries me more than it makes me hopeful. Rex gets waaaaay to fired up for these types of games and instills the same mentality in his players. Then they go out and start committing stupid penalties all over the place and get rolled.BobbyLayne said:This is Rex's game. He's had this one circled since the day the schedules came out. I don't care if you like him (personally I think he's a clown), he knows how to fire his team up. He wants this one more than any game they'll play this year. He truly is that childish.
Does it really matter if the points are scored on Thursday or Sunday?BobbyLayne said:I've been on the receiving end a few times this year. Freeman put up a 37 pointer, I got whupped like 177-141 that week.JuniorNB said:I'm with you. The thought of a starter on Thursday having a crappy game and getting behind the eight ball for the week totally sucks. I realize that there's also a chance of him having a great game, but I don't like that gamble.BobbyLayne said:There was a discussion in another thread, and while it doesn't jive with our perception, offensive production on TNF is only minimally less than Sundays or Mondays.Chaka said:I am always hesitant to start players on Thursday nights. It's a roadie against a division rival still in contention for a wild card spot. I would lower my expectations.
Despite all that I still might be starting T-Mobile, Chris Ivory and Karlos this week.
I'm with you - not thrilled with guys playing Thursdays or in London, but the data doesn't support the theory. Personally I love starting guys on Sunday Night or Monday Night. Not for any rational reason, but only because I like watching them real time with no other games on to distract me. I should feel the same way about Thursday or Sunday a.m. from Wembley games, but I don't.
Two weeks later I faced Brady, Landry & NE DST - down 72. I joked in the game thread my Sunday morning counter-punch was Alex Smith (bye week filler) and Kelce. That #### actually worked. Diggs, Green, Gurley, et al - won by 37. Sweet.
Jets just got torched by Oakland and Jacksonville passing games.Sebowski said:It's not Thursday that has me benching T-Mobile, it's the Jets.
Everyone realizes the points are the same. You missed the pointDoes it really matter if the points are scored on Thursday or Sunday?BobbyLayne said:I've been on the receiving end a few times this year. Freeman put up a 37 pointer, I got whupped like 177-141 that week.JuniorNB said:I'm with you. The thought of a starter on Thursday having a crappy game and getting behind the eight ball for the week totally sucks. I realize that there's also a chance of him having a great game, but I don't like that gamble.BobbyLayne said:There was a discussion in another thread, and while it doesn't jive with our perception, offensive production on TNF is only minimally less than Sundays or Mondays.Chaka said:I am always hesitant to start players on Thursday nights. It's a roadie against a division rival still in contention for a wild card spot. I would lower my expectations.
Despite all that I still might be starting T-Mobile, Chris Ivory and Karlos this week.
I'm with you - not thrilled with guys playing Thursdays or in London, but the data doesn't support the theory. Personally I love starting guys on Sunday Night or Monday Night. Not for any rational reason, but only because I like watching them real time with no other games on to distract me. I should feel the same way about Thursday or Sunday a.m. from Wembley games, but I don't.
Two weeks later I faced Brady, Landry & NE DST - down 72. I joked in the game thread my Sunday morning counter-punch was Alex Smith (bye week filler) and Kelce. That #### actually worked. Diggs, Green, Gurley, et al - won by 37. Sweet.
That's like saying all my guys go Sunday at noon so my opponent is "behind the eight ball" and needs to make a comeback to win... Not really. His players don't know they're losing. There's no momentum or psychological factor for fantasy football... Just points. If I'm down by 3 and my kicker scores me 4 on Monday night it's no different than if my kicker played Thursday and scored 4 points
I'll take Taylor this week.
Before he was hurt, Taylor was a top 5 fantasy qb. Today, in my league, the top 5 for avg/game areJets just got torched by Oakland and Jacksonville passing games.Sebowski said:It's not Thursday that has me benching T-Mobile, it's the Jets.
Not really... You said having a crappy game and getting behind the eight all sucks. I don't look at it that way at all. If a guy has a crappy game Thursday or Monday you're no worse behind the eight ballEveryone realizes the points are the same. You missed the pointDoes it really matter if the points are scored on Thursday or Sunday?That's like saying all my guys go Sunday at noon so my opponent is "behind the eight ball" and needs to make a comeback to win... Not really. His players don't know they're losing. There's no momentum or psychological factor for fantasy football... Just points. If I'm down by 3 and my kicker scores me 4 on Monday night it's no different than if my kicker played Thursday and scored 4 pointsBobbyLayne said:I've been on the receiving end a few times this year. Freeman put up a 37 pointer, I got whupped like 177-141 that week.JuniorNB said:I'm with you. The thought of a starter on Thursday having a crappy game and getting behind the eight ball for the week totally sucks. I realize that there's also a chance of him having a great game, but I don't like that gamble.BobbyLayne said:There was a discussion in another thread, and while it doesn't jive with our perception, offensive production on TNF is only minimally less than Sundays or Mondays.Chaka said:I am always hesitant to start players on Thursday nights. It's a roadie against a division rival still in contention for a wild card spot. I would lower my expectations.
Despite all that I still might be starting T-Mobile, Chris Ivory and Karlos this week.
I'm with you - not thrilled with guys playing Thursdays or in London, but the data doesn't support the theory. Personally I love starting guys on Sunday Night or Monday Night. Not for any rational reason, but only because I like watching them real time with no other games on to distract me. I should feel the same way about Thursday or Sunday a.m. from Wembley games, but I don't.
Two weeks later I faced Brady, Landry & NE DST - down 72. I joked in the game thread my Sunday morning counter-punch was Alex Smith (bye week filler) and Kelce. That #### actually worked. Diggs, Green, Gurley, et al - won by 37. Sweet.
I'll take Taylor this week.
PM HippleJets just got torched by Oakland and Jacksonville passing games.Sebowski said:It's not Thursday that has me benching T-Mobile, it's the Jets.
I don't know. Last week I was all over him and played him over Cam. Cam doubled him up. I still won, but it was much closer than it needed to be. I get that Tyrod is on the cusp of greatness, but Cam is already there. Or am I just chasing points here? Cam is on the road against a D on the rise while the Jets seem to be fading...Before he was hurt, Taylor was a top 5 fantasy qb.Today, in my league, the top 5 for avg/game areJets just got torched by Oakland and Jacksonville passing games.Sebowski said:It's not Thursday that has me benching T-Mobile, it's the Jets.
Brady
Newton
Brees
Rodgers
Dalton
Would you consider benching any of them against the jets?
Taylor is still 9th in my league in fp/g (8th because I really don't think Geno smith counts just playing one game)
The others around him are Palmer, Dalton, Rivers. I'd play all of them vs the jets.
WhyPM HippleJets just got torched by Oakland and Jacksonville passing games.Sebowski said:It's not Thursday that has me benching T-Mobile, it's the Jets.
Of course you didn't like it....you're a Skins fan.Sebowski said:The only Jets game I saw they completely shut down Kirk Cousins. KIRK COUSINS! I didn't like that.MattFancy said:The Jets that have allowed Carr and Bortles, to have 2 straight big days against them?Sebowski said:It's not Thursday that has me benching T-Mobile, it's the Jets.
http://www.totalprosports.com/2015/10/25/kirk-cousins-goes-ballistic-screams-you-like-that-after-comeback-win-video/Of course you didn't like it....you're a Skins fan.Sebowski said:The only Jets game I saw they completely shut down Kirk Cousins. KIRK COUSINS! I didn't like that.MattFancy said:The Jets that have allowed Carr and Bortles, to have 2 straight big days against them?Sebowski said:It's not Thursday that has me benching T-Mobile, it's the Jets.
Hey I've got Bortles and Tyrod too. I'm rolling with Tyrod just because he's fun to watch.FTR, I'm rolling with Bortles. I'm a total pimp for Tyrod but it's not a green light matchup. Wouldn't surprise me if he did well but I'm going with what I think is a better option.
How's my team doing in The League?http://www.totalprosports.com/2015/10/25/kirk-cousins-goes-ballistic-screams-you-like-that-after-comeback-win-video/Of course you didn't like it....you're a Skins fan.Sebowski said:The only Jets game I saw they completely shut down Kirk Cousins. KIRK COUSINS! I didn't like that.MattFancy said:The Jets that have allowed Carr and Bortles, to have 2 straight big days against them?Sebowski said:It's not Thursday that has me benching T-Mobile, it's the Jets.