May finish up tonite. Too much going on with work to plug thru the balance now.BnB has me riveted to my F5 key
Damn it, you had me for a second there.IvanKaramazov said:Today was my first tempo run since my half 2 1/2 weeks ago, a fairly easy and short 7/4 workout. I ran my HM at a pace (7:40) pretty close to what I had been doing my tempo runs at (7:35), so I decided to pick it a little today and see how it goes. The 4 LT miles came in at a 7:20 average and felt pretty good. I definitely could have done a couple more miles at that pace without getting beaten up too much.
This sort of thing is obviously a good argument for HR training. I tend to do the same workouts at the same pace year after year. In this case, my "proper" LT pace had gotten a little faster without me really noticing. I'm sure HR tracking would have made that a little more transparent. (Realistically I'm not going to start wearing a HR strap -- just acknowledging that it would catch this stuff).
Please stop wasting time replying to me and finish your reportBassNBrew said:If it were me, I would want to be doing the half marathon at about 95% or at least half of it at 95%. You're still 9+ days out where you would get the fitness gains from that run. If it's 13 miles of junk miles I don't see the point other than some possible heat acclimatization. If you are really that much faster than 2:20, I would go run your own 13 miler the day before and take most of the edge off. Then the 13 miler the next day would be on tired legs which might help you later in the marathon. That would be sort of the play on the ultra training theory where rather than doing one long run, you do back to back medium days.
Have eliminated all speedwork. Last one was a nightmare. Had to take a rest day to recover from 3 miles. I have a pair of compression shorts that have sleeves for ice packs. God I love those shorts. Had to cut a hole in them though for my man parts as it was just too tight there. After that adjustment, they are heavenly.IvanKaramazov said:parasaurolophus -- Keep icing that hamstring and go easy on it. I get that you're at a key time in your marathon training and can't take a lot of time off, but it's better to go conservative than to DNS. If it was me, I would probably ditch all speedwork, especially intervals, because I know those sometimes leave my hamstrings a little twitchy even when I'm 100%, and focus on the long runs and MLRs instead. You know yourself better than I do though.
God I love those shorts. Had to cut a hole in them though for my man parts as it was just too tight there. After that adjustment, they are heavenly.
Me too. If only Angie or Girl #2 were involved in this somehow, it would be perfect.BnB has me riveted to my F5 key
May finish up tonite. Too much going on with work to plug thru the balance now.BnB has me riveted to my F5 key
3.0 is now 5.0, good luck finding any 3.0's. Just went through it for my kid, couldn't find them.I run mostly barefoot, in soft sand. When that's not the case, I use these older Nike Frees, which I like I guess. Since it's time for a new running shoe, I figured the 3.0 would be the way to go, as they are the most minimalist shoe Nike has, no? Is that what I should be buying, or is there another one -- Nike or otherwise -- that you guys might suggest? I'm actually having trouble finding a pair of 3.0 online (including Nike's website). So many damn shoes out there, it's tough to know which is "right" for me. I run about 13 miles a week...
Yeah, no kidding. Reading about him makes me feel like the biggest vag out there.BnB has me riveted to my F5 key
May finish up tonite. Too much going on with work to plug thru the balance now.BnB has me riveted to my F5 key
Same here. But as I told a friend who was told he was nuts for doing a half marathon, insanity is relative. Bass is our crazy drunk uncle who we love for his stories but we know something isn't quite right upstairs. (I say that with the utmost respect and brotherly love)Yeah, no kidding. Reading about him makes me feel like the biggest vag out there.BnB has me riveted to my F5 key
damn. seems like a lot of long racing.The bolded section is key, especially for ultras - everyone is an experiment of one, particularly with nutrition. While blood is diverted from the digestive system to the working muscles during a race, which can contribute to stomach issues many experience, it seems to me pretty unlikely that it's just going to completely shut down early in a race and not function at all once some nutrition hits the stomach. But the point is that it works for your buddy, so if he's happy with that I would never suggest he do something different. As my last race report indicated, I'm still playing around with nutrition strategies and trying to figure out what works for me. I'm planning 2-3 50Ks over the summer with the primary goal of trying nail that down.I thought you might come out on that side. The reasoning behind the GU right before the ultra came from an old ultra guy. It was simple the way he explained it to me so I probably won't be able to do it justice but the basic idea is that as you run long, your body focuses on keeping essential organs & muscle groups supplied with blood/oxygen/nutrients while shutting down those that body doesn't need to continue doing what you are doing (running an ultra). One of the functions that shut down early is the digestive track, especially if you head into the race as we do with a pre-race meal occurring 3 hours before. The GU is simply used to keep the digestive system viable during the early portion of the race with the thinking that at some point along the way you will be hitting aid stations or taking in nutrition you pack. It will help alleviate jump starting the digestive system from being shut down to all of a sudden having to work overtime because you just pumped a bunch of calories in at an aid station (maybe causing cramps, bloating, etc right after an aid station stop).Now how scientific that is I don't know but it worked for him and he's run more miles than I've driven so I thought I'd give it a shot. Instead of a GU (which I really don't care for) I scarfed a banana (natures equivalent) about 30-45 minutes before the start of a 20 mile long run and it seemed work as intended or at least provided no ill effects. Did the same before the 50k and I was fine, felt like it helped.
To your point, everyone is so different what works for one is completely opposite for another. I can't say I would do it for every race, as you mentioned, the last half I ran I had a banana about 2 hours before and few cups of coffee and PR'd it.
900' is some solid climbing, sounds like a great run. Anytime you find local trails that you enjoy and can get some good runs in, that's a win. Even bad trails are better than good roads, imho.Posting how much I'm enjoying my 7 mile sandy hilly runs, somehow seems less impressive.
But really, I've found local trails here which are awesome because they're secluded but secure, hilly and sandy. pretty much constantly rolling hills. Only a 900' incline/decline over 7 miles but I'll take it.
I am training for an pretty damned long race. These will be long, supported training runs with the goal of dialing in race day routine for Pine to Palm 100. Of course everything I learn in a 5-6 hour race will go out the window in September when I hit mile 75, but still.....damn. seems like a lot of long racing.I'm planning 2-3 50Ks over the summer with the primary goal of trying nail that down.
Pretty much no one runs even ultra splits. Time on your feet, general wear on the body, darkness, sleepiness, etc will catch up with you regardless of your early pace. Better to bank some time within reason while you are fresh.I have a question for the ultra guys. It seems like the first 10 miles are always run at a faster pace than the last 40 or 90 or whatever. I only run shorter distances but I always try to maintain even splits. Wouldn't it make sense to do the same in a ultra ( as much as terrain will allow)? I figure I can speedwalk/hike an average 10 miles of terrain in like 3 hours. And when on suitable running paths, go at a 10 min/mile pace. I think I could do a 50 mile race in 16 hours with very minimal training simply by using this technique. Am I alone in this belief?
10 hours would be possible if the course was mostly running terrain, but I have never run more than 7 miles so I really don't know how my body would hold up. I also just looked at a list of fastest times and was surprised to see people are doing 50 miles in under 5 hours. I thought the world record was closer to 7 or 8. I remember reading the book Born to Run and thinking the times were slow but either I was doing bad math back then or people have gotten a lot faster.Pretty much no one runs even ultra splits. Time on your feet, general wear on the body, darkness, sleepiness, etc will catch up with you regardless of your early pace. Better to bank some time within reason while you are fresh.I have a question for the ultra guys. It seems like the first 10 miles are always run at a faster pace than the last 40 or 90 or whatever. I only run shorter distances but I always try to maintain even splits. Wouldn't it make sense to do the same in a ultra ( as much as terrain will allow)? I figure I can speedwalk/hike an average 10 miles of terrain in like 3 hours. And when on suitable running paths, go at a 10 min/mile pace. I think I could do a 50 mile race in 16 hours with very minimal training simply by using this technique. Am I alone in this belief?
I would hope you could do 50 miles in 16 hrs given your speed. I was 14h45m for my first 50 miles on a sprained ankle and I'm a 25-26 min 5k guy. With minimal training someone with your talent is probably looking at 10 hours and definitely inside of 12 hours.
Kinda what he doesdamn. seems like a lot of long racing.The bolded section is key, especially for ultras - everyone is an experiment of one, particularly with nutrition. While blood is diverted from the digestive system to the working muscles during a race, which can contribute to stomach issues many experience, it seems to me pretty unlikely that it's just going to completely shut down early in a race and not function at all once some nutrition hits the stomach. But the point is that it works for your buddy, so if he's happy with that I would never suggest he do something different. As my last race report indicated, I'm still playing around with nutrition strategies and trying to figure out what works for me. I'm planning 2-3 50Ks over the summer with the primary goal of trying nail that down.I thought you might come out on that side. The reasoning behind the GU right before the ultra came from an old ultra guy. It was simple the way he explained it to me so I probably won't be able to do it justice but the basic idea is that as you run long, your body focuses on keeping essential organs & muscle groups supplied with blood/oxygen/nutrients while shutting down those that body doesn't need to continue doing what you are doing (running an ultra). One of the functions that shut down early is the digestive track, especially if you head into the race as we do with a pre-race meal occurring 3 hours before. The GU is simply used to keep the digestive system viable during the early portion of the race with the thinking that at some point along the way you will be hitting aid stations or taking in nutrition you pack. It will help alleviate jump starting the digestive system from being shut down to all of a sudden having to work overtime because you just pumped a bunch of calories in at an aid station (maybe causing cramps, bloating, etc right after an aid station stop).Now how scientific that is I don't know but it worked for him and he's run more miles than I've driven so I thought I'd give it a shot. Instead of a GU (which I really don't care for) I scarfed a banana (natures equivalent) about 30-45 minutes before the start of a 20 mile long run and it seemed work as intended or at least provided no ill effects. Did the same before the 50k and I was fine, felt like it helped.
To your point, everyone is so different what works for one is completely opposite for another. I can't say I would do it for every race, as you mentioned, the last half I ran I had a banana about 2 hours before and few cups of coffee and PR'd it.
You might be right about the lower max. I think your ranges will end up quite similar to Juxt.For the Heart Rate Guys
I ended up buying a Polar RS100. I was going to go with the Garmin 110 as recommended, but the Polar was cheaper; $60 used. I don't need GPS and most reviews said that was the only difference between the two.
Just tried it on tonight and I will go for a run with it tomorrow. When I put the strap on and pushed the red button, the watch first read 50 but within a few minutes it said 40 then 39,38,37, then 00 at 1 point. I thought maybe it was broken but I checked my pulse and it was 36 or 37. It is saying 40 that I am typing. I knew my pulse was under 45 when in shape but had no idea it went this low. I wouldn't say I am in top shape right now, either. Probably can only run a 19:15 5K and maybe 5:35 mile. I am curious to see what my max heart rate is tomorrow. I understand that lower resting usually means lower max so maybe 171?
That's really cool.Mass 100 – Part 2
I took in the sights and sounds of the gorgeous river in the valley to the left and the towering ridge to my right as I walked it in knowing my fate was sealed.
You da man BnB, got nothing more to say than that. YOU DA MAN!This closing paragraph is what it's all about in the ultra world. We gotta run together sometime, no more excuses.Several have asked about the disappointment of coming so close only to come up short. Surprising, I’m very much at peace with the result. People deal with much worse in life than ending up in a spot in the woods a few miles from another spot in the woods. Excluding my ankles, I physically felt strong after 31 hours. I never once seriously considered quitting. Nutrition and hydration were close to flawless. The soreness the days following were surprisingly minimal, excluding the fact it took me a couple of days to get shoes onto my feet. The course was amazing, even if it doesn’t suit my strengths and the volunteers were even better. It’s my own fault for one miss-step around mile 10 derailing my race. I’m convinced that this experience will make me mentally stronger for something that awaits me in the future. I certainly have learned a lot from the experience.
Happy Trails!
This got me to thinking...Hang 10 said:10K tomorrow....
Did 5 miles yesterday and threw in 2 miles at race pace (6:21 and 6:12) . Probably ran a little harder than I should but was a good confidence booster considering the 80 degree heat. I'll thrilled with anything under 40 tomorrow.
I still shed a tear at that part.tri-man 47 said:That's really cool.BassNBrew said:Mass 100 – Part 2
I took in the sights and sounds of the gorgeous river in the valley to the left and the towering ridge to my right as I walked it in knowing my fate was sealed.
And: I say keep the rock.
I know you only listed out 2 weeks, but the thing that jumps out to me is the bolded statement along with the lack of long runs. I know I'm a broken record with this, but if you want to get to maximum potential, you need to go long. Even if you're just racing 5Ks...... you should be working in long runs of the 9-11mi territory.This got me to thinking...Hang 10 said:10K tomorrow....
Did 5 miles yesterday and threw in 2 miles at race pace (6:21 and 6:12) . Probably ran a little harder than I should but was a good confidence booster considering the 80 degree heat. I'll thrilled with anything under 40 tomorrow.
Question about 5k prep. Freshness > fitness has been the theme of my prep and it has led to gains the last couple of years, but I think there's room for more improvement. I think I may have over corrected a notch. Trying to find that sweet spot, so my legs are ready but my conditioning still holds. Below is not a 100% accurate representation of my 2 weeks pre race, but it's close
day 1 - easy 6
2 - hard 4
3 - off
4 - hard 3
5 - easy 4
6 - off
7 - trial 5k
8 - easy 5 miles
9 - off
10 - easy 3 miles + some strength exercises
11 - easy 4 miles
12 - off
13 - off
race day
Granted, my base is better now than it's ever been before, but I felt like the 19:01 earlier this month went similarly as most races last year. I was fresh going into the race, but my legs didn't have the juice to push through to achieve my goal. Some of my best runs have been training runs, usually after an off day, but were preceded by a difficult training week and not an easy one. Now, those runs are usually early afternoon runs and races are in the morning, but I think it's got to be more than just that. I have written down what my plan is for the next month before I race again at the end of June, but I'm curious what you guys suggest. Any ehlp would be appreciated.
If I only knew the correct formula for the short race taper...This got me to thinking...Hang 10 said:10K tomorrow....
Did 5 miles yesterday and threw in 2 miles at race pace (6:21 and 6:12) . Probably ran a little harder than I should but was a good confidence booster considering the 80 degree heat. I'll thrilled with anything under 40 tomorrow.
Question about 5k prep. Freshness > fitness has been the theme of my prep and it has led to gains the last couple of years, but I think there's room for more improvement. I think I may have over corrected a notch. Trying to find that sweet spot, so my legs are ready but my conditioning still holds. Below is not a 100% accurate representation of my 2 weeks pre race, but it's close
day 1 - easy 6
2 - hard 4
3 - off
4 - hard 3
5 - easy 4
6 - off
7 - trial 5k
8 - easy 5 miles
9 - off
10 - easy 3 miles + some strength exercises
11 - easy 4 miles
12 - off
13 - off
race day
Granted, my base is better now than it's ever been before, but I felt like the 19:01 earlier this month went similarly as most races last year. I was fresh going into the race, but my legs didn't have the juice to push through to achieve my goal. Some of my best runs have been training runs, usually after an off day, but were preceded by a difficult training week and not an easy one. Now, those runs are usually early afternoon runs and races are in the morning, but I think it's got to be more than just that. I have written down what my plan is for the next month before I race again at the end of June, but I'm curious what you guys suggest. Any ehlp would be appreciated.
What is Juxt's range?tri-man 47 said:You might be right about the lower max. I think your ranges will end up quite similar to Juxt.Arid Filch said:For the Heart Rate Guys
I ended up buying a Polar RS100. I was going to go with the Garmin 110 as recommended, but the Polar was cheaper; $60 used. I don't need GPS and most reviews said that was the only difference between the two.
Just tried it on tonight and I will go for a run with it tomorrow. When I put the strap on and pushed the red button, the watch first read 50 but within a few minutes it said 40 then 39,38,37, then 00 at 1 point. I thought maybe it was broken but I checked my pulse and it was 36 or 37. It is saying 40 that I am typing. I knew my pulse was under 45 when in shape but had no idea it went this low. I wouldn't say I am in top shape right now, either. Probably can only run a 19:15 5K and maybe 5:35 mile. I am curious to see what my max heart rate is tomorrow. I understand that lower resting usually means lower max so maybe 171?
He certainly is a role model for dedication, and I appreciate him answering my question about ultras. I know it could have seemed like I was being dismissive of what is means to run such long distances, but I am really just curious because I have no experience with that sort of thing. My joints are not very good anyway so I probably never will, nor should do those distances. But I see the long training those guys go through and the toll it takes on the body, and I am impressed. So good job to all FBG runners. Thank you all for doing your part to contradict America's obesity numbers.What a friggin' role model you are, BnB.
There's a very good chance the monitor spiked to the 160 mark at the beginning of the run. the chest straps are notorious for doing that for the first 1/2 mile to mile until you start sweating. I assume that low resting hr is good, less stress on the heart. Outside of a lab test, the best way to get your lacate threshold while running is to run 20 mins as hard as you can while maintaining an even effort and take the average of the last 10 mins.What is Juxt's range?tri-man 47 said:You might be right about the lower max. I think your ranges will end up quite similar to Juxt.Arid Filch said:For the Heart Rate Guys
I ended up buying a Polar RS100. I was going to go with the Garmin 110 as recommended, but the Polar was cheaper; $60 used. I don't need GPS and most reviews said that was the only difference between the two.
Just tried it on tonight and I will go for a run with it tomorrow. When I put the strap on and pushed the red button, the watch first read 50 but within a few minutes it said 40 then 39,38,37, then 00 at 1 point. I thought maybe it was broken but I checked my pulse and it was 36 or 37. It is saying 40 that I am typing. I knew my pulse was under 45 when in shape but had no idea it went this low. I wouldn't say I am in top shape right now, either. Probably can only run a 19:15 5K and maybe 5:35 mile. I am curious to see what my max heart rate is tomorrow. I understand that lower resting usually means lower max so maybe 171?
Here are my numbers from this morning:
35, 56, 37 heart rate in bed. As soon as I stood up and walk out the door I was already going 60-80. Withing 400 yards I was at 160. End of mile 1, 163-165. End of mile 2, 167-169. End of mile 3, 170-171. There were a few uphill sections where I hit 175. I was probably pushing myself a little harder than normal because of the monitor so I slowed up on mile 4 to 167-170 range until the last 100 yards I gave a little kick to get my HR up to 180.
Some of the numbers stored in my watch: Max HR 180; Max % 92; Avg HR 164 (includes a couple minutes walking and a brisk cool down). Avg % 84.
I saw something about 136-146 on the screen shortly after stopping the program. I assumed it was a recommended range but I can't find it in the file now.
My takeaway:
I noticed a big difference when running at 170+. All the muscles in my body began to fatigue at that level. I think 165-167 is more of a rate that I can maintain for long distances. I was surprised that my HR went to 160 so quickly at the start because I have always assumed that I begin my runs slow but I guess I could be wrong about that.
I can't figure out why my resting heart rate is as low as 35. Two years ago when I reached my peak shape, 18:35 5K, 5:20 mile, the lowest I ever manually recorded my HR at was 43. So to be in worse shape yet have it that much lower seems strange. One difference is I no longer drink alcohol. That alone dropped my systolic blood pressure from 130s to 110s so I suppose it could have effected my HR also.
Another possible explanation is that I have an enlarged heart. I have always exhibited symptoms of marfan's syndrome and recently, while trying to get cleared for deployment the military started an investigation into my heart. I have a large aortic root and the doctors believe I am at risk for a dissection. They ordered further exams in the coming weeks so I guess the results will be interesting, but I am going to keep the findings from my own investigation to myself because I do want to go on this deployment, regardless of my heart condition.
Almost invariably the morning of an event I am wondering WTF I was thinking, what a PIA it is to get organized and get out to these things, etc. Then I get there and have a blast. Except for the almost vomiting thing at the end.Also, you gotta love the mental aspect of days leading to a race. If I haven't raced in a while I'm chomping at the bit to sign up and run anything but once that race starts approaching I get that anxiety..."why am I doing this? You really want to run THAT hard on memorial day weekend? You should be drinking by the pool and eating cheeseburgers. Why do you care so much about your time that you're going to push to the edge of vomiting all over yourself?"
![]()
So I bought a pair of Newton Gravity instead (from Zappo's, haven't tried on yet). Also ordered an Asics Gabuya19 or whatever you call it. Read that Nike isn't all that. Basically, I went to the expensive running shoes with great reviews that were on sale, ha! Must be last year's models; fine with me. Newtons were 88 bucks, instead of 175. Asics were 105, down from 150.I run mostly barefoot, in soft sand. When that's not the case, I use these older Nike Frees, which I like I guess. Since it's time for a new running shoe, I figured the 3.0 would be the way to go, as they are the most minimalist shoe Nike has, no? Is that what I should be buying, or is there another one -- Nike or otherwise -- that you guys might suggest? I'm actually having trouble finding a pair of 3.0 online (including Nike's website). So many damn shoes out there, it's tough to know which is "right" for me. I run about 13 miles a week...
Newton's are awesome. I love the Gravity shoes.So I bought a pair of Newton Gravity instead (from Zappo's, haven't tried on yet). Also ordered an Asics Gabuya19 or whatever you call it. Read that Nike isn't all that. Basically, I went to the expensive running shoes with great reviews that were on sale, ha! Must be last year's models; fine with me. Newtons were 88 bucks, instead of 175. Asics were 105, down from 150.I run mostly barefoot, in soft sand. When that's not the case, I use these older Nike Frees, which I like I guess. Since it's time for a new running shoe, I figured the 3.0 would be the way to go, as they are the most minimalist shoe Nike has, no? Is that what I should be buying, or is there another one -- Nike or otherwise -- that you guys might suggest? I'm actually having trouble finding a pair of 3.0 online (including Nike's website). So many damn shoes out there, it's tough to know which is "right" for me. I run about 13 miles a week...
What a newb!
My bad, should have mentioned the long runs I have been doing up until 2 weeks pre race. Last year it was more in the 6-8 range, this year more in the 7-10 range. Usually do one every 5-10 days.I know you only listed out 2 weeks, but the thing that jumps out to me is the bolded statement along with the lack of long runs. I know I'm a broken record with this, but if you want to get to maximum potential, you need to go long. Even if you're just racing 5Ks...... you should be working in long runs of the 9-11mi territory.This got me to thinking...Hang 10 said:10K tomorrow....
Did 5 miles yesterday and threw in 2 miles at race pace (6:21 and 6:12) . Probably ran a little harder than I should but was a good confidence booster considering the 80 degree heat. I'll thrilled with anything under 40 tomorrow.
Question about 5k prep. Freshness > fitness has been the theme of my prep and it has led to gains the last couple of years, but I think there's room for more improvement. I think I may have over corrected a notch. Trying to find that sweet spot, so my legs are ready but my conditioning still holds. Below is not a 100% accurate representation of my 2 weeks pre race, but it's close
day 1 - easy 6
2 - hard 4
3 - off
4 - hard 3
5 - easy 4
6 - off
7 - trial 5k
8 - easy 5 miles
9 - off
10 - easy 3 miles + some strength exercises
11 - easy 4 miles
12 - off
13 - off
race day
Granted, my base is better now than it's ever been before, but I felt like the 19:01 earlier this month went similarly as most races last year. I was fresh going into the race, but my legs didn't have the juice to push through to achieve my goal. Some of my best runs have been training runs, usually after an off day, but were preceded by a difficult training week and not an easy one. Now, those runs are usually early afternoon runs and races are in the morning, but I think it's got to be more than just that. I have written down what my plan is for the next month before I race again at the end of June, but I'm curious what you guys suggest. Any ehlp would be appreciated.
I also don't see any intervals. Doing the hard 3milers is good, but I'd also focus on shorter intervals so you can go at or slightly faster than 5K race pace.
Pretty much ditto. Except for at the elite end of the spectrum, ultras aren't much about speed but they are all about endurance - mental and physical. Of course you don't want to go out too hard, but BnB is right on in that you run when you can and for as long as you can, because there will be a point when you won't be able to run much more at all.BassNBrew said:Pretty much no one runs even ultra splits. Time on your feet, general wear on the body, darkness, sleepiness, etc will catch up with you regardless of your early pace. Better to bank some time within reason while you are fresh.Arid Filch said:I have a question for the ultra guys. It seems like the first 10 miles are always run at a faster pace than the last 40 or 90 or whatever. I only run shorter distances but I always try to maintain even splits. Wouldn't it make sense to do the same in a ultra ( as much as terrain will allow)? I figure I can speedwalk/hike an average 10 miles of terrain in like 3 hours. And when on suitable running paths, go at a 10 min/mile pace. I think I could do a 50 mile race in 16 hours with very minimal training simply by using this technique. Am I alone in this belief?
I would hope you could do 50 miles in 16 hrs given your speed. I was 14h45m for my first 50 miles on a sprained ankle and I'm a 25-26 min 5k guy. With minimal training someone with your talent is probably looking at 10 hours and definitely inside of 12 hours.
My first thought. Back off the extended efforts, and push some intervals. 400m ..800m ...acclimate to that fast pace, and the muscles won't be working so hard on the 'slower' 5K pace.I also don't see any intervals. Doing the hard 3milers is good, but I'd also focus on shorter intervals so you can go at or slightly faster than 5K race pace.This got me to thinking...Hang 10 said:10K tomorrow....
Did 5 miles yesterday and threw in 2 miles at race pace (6:21 and 6:12) . Probably ran a little harder than I should but was a good confidence booster considering the 80 degree heat. I'll thrilled with anything under 40 tomorrow.
Question about 5k prep. Freshness > fitness has been the theme of my prep and it has led to gains the last couple of years, but I think there's room for more improvement. I think I may have over corrected a notch. Trying to find that sweet spot, so my legs are ready but my conditioning still holds. Below is not a 100% accurate representation of my 2 weeks pre race, but it's close
day 1 - easy 6
2 - hard 4
3 - off
4 - hard 3
5 - easy 4
6 - off
7 - trial 5k
8 - easy 5 miles
9 - off
10 - easy 3 miles + some strength exercises
11 - easy 4 miles
12 - off
13 - off
race day
Granted, my base is better now than it's ever been before, but I felt like the 19:01 earlier this month went similarly as most races last year. I was fresh going into the race, but my legs didn't have the juice to push through to achieve my goal. Some of my best runs have been training runs, usually after an off day, but were preceded by a difficult training week and not an easy one. Now, those runs are usually early afternoon runs and races are in the morning, but I think it's got to be more than just that. I have written down what my plan is for the next month before I race again at the end of June, but I'm curious what you guys suggest. Any ehlp would be appreciated.
im going to re do my plan for the next four weeks and post next time I'm on the computer. Any advice would be appreciated. I feel like I have a very good base right now, just did a nine mile trail run, been consistently around thirty mile weeks, but need to refine a bit as I taper.My first thought. Back off the extended efforts, and push some intervals. 400m ..800m ...acclimate to that fast pace, and the muscles won't be working so hard on the 'slower' 5K pace.I also don't see any intervals. Doing the hard 3milers is good, but I'd also focus on shorter intervals so you can go at or slightly faster than 5K race pace.This got me to thinking...Question about 5k prep. Freshness > fitness has been the theme of my prep and it has led to gains the last couple of years, but I think there's room for more improvement. I think I may have over corrected a notch. Trying to find that sweet spot, so my legs are ready but my conditioning still holds. Below is not a 100% accurate representation of my 2 weeks pre race, but it's closeHang 10 said:10K tomorrow....
Did 5 miles yesterday and threw in 2 miles at race pace (6:21 and 6:12) . Probably ran a little harder than I should but was a good confidence booster considering the 80 degree heat. I'll thrilled with anything under 40 tomorrow.
day 1 - easy 6
2 - hard 4
3 - off
4 - hard 3
5 - easy 4
6 - off
7 - trial 5k
8 - easy 5 miles
9 - off
10 - easy 3 miles + some strength exercises
11 - easy 4 miles
12 - off
13 - off
race day
Granted, my base is better now than it's ever been before, but I felt like the 19:01 earlier this month went similarly as most races last year. I was fresh going into the race, but my legs didn't have the juice to push through to achieve my goal. Some of my best runs have been training runs, usually after an off day, but were preceded by a difficult training week and not an easy one. Now, those runs are usually early afternoon runs and races are in the morning, but I think it's got to be more than just that. I have written down what my plan is for the next month before I race again at the end of June, but I'm curious what you guys suggest. Any ehlp would be appreciated.