What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

RB Alex Collins, SEA (1 Viewer)

I meant where they say "We gotta get him the ball!" then it happens for one game and they forget about him. Until the team realizes Flacco shouldn't be passing 40+ times a game or that Javorius Allen isn't the teams best back, the same pattern will continue. Collins will have to produce on the 11-14 carries a game he gets, and if he's lucky 2-3 receptions. Not going to talk about the goal line situation...
I agree on the Flacco passing 40+ times part but Collins was getting 17 ish carries in addition to 2-3 recs after he took the job last year. Not 11-14. And the Ravens were 6th I think in rushing attempts. He also has to be close to the top of the league in tds during that stretch. I’d let a normal game script or 2 play out before I started bailing on the notion that he’ll get that usage again.

 
I'd much rather have Howard. 
If it weren't for the uncertainty of Buck Allen's role, I might think the opposite.  I can see Collins putting up some 100 yard games.  Jordan likely won't sniff that.  Guess I am still holding out that Collins turns the corner.

 
If it weren't for the uncertainty of Buck Allen's role, I might think the opposite.  I can see Collins putting up some 100 yard games.  Jordan likely won't sniff that.  Guess I am still holding out that Collins turns the corner.
This. Buck Allen is the thorn in Collins owners sides. Leaches red zone appearances and TDs

 
If it weren't for the uncertainty of Buck Allen's role, I might think the opposite.  I can see Collins putting up some 100 yard games.  Jordan likely won't sniff that.  Guess I am still holding out that Collins turns the corner.
I don't understand, you think Howard won't have 100 yards in a game? What am I missing from your post?

Jordan had 107 yards in week 1, he is getting 18.5 touches per game Collins has 20 touches on the season.

Jordan also seems to have fixed his receiving issues so far which makes him more of an every down threat.

Plus Nagy just said today that he needs to use Howard even more in the fourth quarter when they have the lead. With that defense, which is far superior to Baltimore, they will be in plenty of close games.

IMO even if Buck Allen goes away, which he won't, it's Howard over Collins six days a week and twice on Sundays.

 
Collins IMNSHO is more talented than Howard and it isn't close. But right now, because of coaching and use, Howard has more value.  That could change in the future but right now, that's the deal.

 
Collins IMNSHO is more talented than Howard and it isn't close. But right now, because of coaching and use, Howard has more value.  That could change in the future but right now, that's the deal.
I like Collins as much as the next guy but I have no idea how anyone could see Collins as the unquestionably better back let alone thinking it isn't close. I get that Howard isn't considered a great receiver but he has been noticably improving every year and has zero ball security issues. 

I don't see anything Collins does markedly better than Howard that doesn't have a counterpoint in Howard's favor.

Howard >>>> Collins

 
I like Collins as much as the next guy but I have no idea how anyone could see Collins as the unquestionably better back let alone thinking it isn't close. I get that Howard isn't considered a great receiver but he has been noticably improving every year and has zero ball security issues. 

I don't see anything Collins does markedly better than Howard that doesn't have a counterpoint in Howard's favor.

Howard >>>> Collins
Agreed.  I've got many more shares of Collins, and I'll snap accept a Howard offer.  

Howard's the guy in Chicago.  And now he's getting 4 catches a game so far.  

 
I pretty much agree with the current thinking.  Maybe my sniffing comment was wrong.

I just think the upside is much better with Collins while the floor and consistency are better with Howard - as of today.  I looked at a lot of ROS ranks last night and these guys are rarely more than a couple of spots apart - even under current thinking.

 
I don't understand, you think Howard won't have 100 yards in a game? What am I missing from your post?

Jordan had 107 yards in week 1, he is getting 18.5 touches per game Collins has 20 touches on the season.

Jordan also seems to have fixed his receiving issues so far which makes him more of an every down threat.

Plus Nagy just said today that he needs to use Howard even more in the fourth quarter when they have the lead. With that defense, which is far superior to Baltimore, they will be in plenty of close games.

IMO even if Buck Allen goes away, which he won't, it's Howard over Collins six days a week and twice on Sundays.
I’d go 3 times on Sunday but that’s picking nits. 

 
I was intent on holding firm with him in my lineup at flex, but certain situations opening up mean that he may be getting benched by me for Gio or Clement ( if Ajayi sits ). I maintain he will come through with a big week very soon, and quite possibly as early as this week. Doesn't seem like the right time to try and trade him, there will be a game script round the corner where he runs for 100 odd yards with 15-20 touches and goes in for a TD or 2. Allen isn't vulturing all red zone looks, Collins will get his. Then would be the time to trade him away if you are intent on doing so.

 
Anyone trade Collins? I'm ready to move on & try to package him with another player for an upgrade somewhere.
I am trying to wait until his value goes up a little.   I don't think anything I am going to get for him now would be worth risking the off chance that he actually starts producing like we thought he would.

 
Anyone trade Collins? I'm ready to move on & try to package him with another player for an upgrade somewhere.
In my dynasty league I got offered Moncrief for him, I declined and countered with a 2019 1st. He declined. I expect Collins value to go up. How much? I am not sure. 

 
If you had Howard and needed a WR badly - would Collins and John Brown get it done for Howard?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am trying to wait until his value goes up a little.   I don't think anything I am going to get for him now would be worth risking the off chance that he actually starts producing like we thought he would.
This is where i am
I've been looking at his schedule and this may be the best week to trade him... he faces some really tough defenses. At this point it's either trade him or save him for the playoffs. According to Yahoo, 6 of the next 7 weeks are against unfavorable defenses. Which I understand, we are judging these defenses based off of 2 weeks only, but something to consider at least: 

Week 3: Denver (24th in fantasy points allowed to RBs- a lower number means higher scoring for RBs)
4: @PIT (26th)
5: @CLE (8th- favorable)
6: @ TEN (30th)
7: NO (31st)
8: @CAR (23rd)
9: PIT (26th)
BYE

After his bye he has all favorable matchups for RBs.

If I could trade for Collins as my RB3 and I didn't need him to play flex, I'd highly consider it. He could be a huge playoff boost for teams, resulting in this thread possibly re-igniting the exact same offseason debate we've had about Collins since December 2017. 

 
Week 3: Denver (24th in fantasy points allowed to RBs- a lower number means higher scoring for RBs)
4: @PIT (26th)
5: @CLE (8th- favorable)
6: @ TEN (30th)
7: NO (31st)
8: @CAR (23rd)
9: PIT (26th)
I think it's foolhardy to look at these rankings after Week 2.

 
tangfoot said:
Dr. Dan said:
Week 3: Denver (24th in fantasy points allowed to RBs- a lower number means higher scoring for RBs)
4: @PIT (26th)
5: @CLE (8th- favorable)
6: @ TEN (30th)
7: NO (31st)
8: @CAR (23rd)
9: PIT (26th)
I think it's foolhardy to look at these rankings after Week 2.
Also 3 of those 6 matchups are deceiving.  Pit (x2) and NO have been thrown all over on so there numbers are skewed by that.  It’s not that they are great run D’, it’s that they faced very strong pass O’s (KC and TB in particular) who lit them up.  

 
Dr. Dan said:
I've been looking at his schedule and this may be the best week to trade him... he faces some really tough defenses. At this point it's either trade him or save him for the playoffs. According to Yahoo, 6 of the next 7 weeks are against unfavorable defenses. Which I understand, we are judging these defenses based off of 2 weeks only, but something to consider at least: 

Week 3: Denver (24th in fantasy points allowed to RBs- a lower number means higher scoring for RBs)
4: @PIT (26th)
5: @CLE (8th- favorable)
6: @ TEN (30th)
7: NO (31st)
8: @CAR (23rd)
9: PIT (26th)
BYE

After his bye he has all favorable matchups for RBs.

If I could trade for Collins as my RB3 and I didn't need him to play flex, I'd highly consider it. He could be a huge playoff boost for teams, resulting in this thread possibly re-igniting the exact same offseason debate we've had about Collins since December 2017. 
Oddly, after this week, the week I am most likely to bench Collins is on the road at Cleveland, the matchup you list has as the most favorable.

That said, I think this is a big week for Collins and his future.  I am still a believer in his talent, but if he gets fewer than 15 touches this week, then he is probably not a startable asset until he puts a couple of big weeks up in a row.  I agree with the others that he is a victim of misuse by Morningweg/Harbaugh.  As a Bengals fan, I watched every second of the last game, and I sure felt relief whenever I saw Buck Allen in the backfield.  Collins was the Ravens' Mixon... when he was not in the game the whole offense slowed down.

Allen had a 1.3 YPC and even counting his receiving, he had less than 5 yards per touch.  Meanwhile, facing the same DEF, Collins had almost 4 YPC and 7.5 yards per touch.

I get that he has a fumbling issue, but to me, I would rather have an RB that gets 4 YPC and puts the ball on the ground every other game than one that gets 2.5 YPC and never fumbles.  Just like I would rather have a Favre, that throws for 350 a game with a pick or two each game, then say, a Dilfer, who throws for 180 a game and zero picks.

Benching him for fumbling and playing Allen would be like the Bengals benching AJ Green because of his fumbles (twice in week one) and starting Boyd.  I am not saying Collins is as good as Green... not even close... but the talent difference from Collins to Allen is at least as big as the talent delta from Green to Boyd.

 
Dr. Dan said:
I've been looking at his schedule and this may be the best week to trade him... he faces some really tough defenses. At this point it's either trade him or save him for the playoffs. According to Yahoo, 6 of the next 7 weeks are against unfavorable defenses. Which I understand, we are judging these defenses based off of 2 weeks only, but something to consider at least: 

Week 3: Denver (24th in fantasy points allowed to RBs- a lower number means higher scoring for RBs)
4: @PIT (26th)
5: @CLE (8th- favorable)
6: @ TEN (30th)
7: NO (31st)
8: @CAR (23rd)
9: PIT (26th)
BYE

After his bye he has all favorable matchups for RBs.

If I could trade for Collins as my RB3 and I didn't need him to play flex, I'd highly consider it. He could be a huge playoff boost for teams, resulting in this thread possibly re-igniting the exact same offseason debate we've had about Collins since December 2017. 
1. 2 weeks is way too small a sample size. And we’re looking at defenses - injuries happen allllll the time. 

2. I’m not big on selling low. At this point as an owner in one league I’d prefer to hold and take my solid if unspectacular RB2 production from him & see if he gets more touches. IMO they will come. 

I think owners would be wise to hold him & start him at RB2/Flex and if he breaks out, great. If he keeps doing the same, great.

fortunately the rest of my team is solid enough that he’s my Flex & I only need his floor. 

While some don’t have that luxury, I don’t see the benefit of selling low either. Best just to hold and hope for more touches & no fumbles for a few games. 

 
I am still a believer in his talent, but if he gets fewer than 15 touches this week, then he is probably not a startable asset until he puts a couple of big weeks up in a row. 
Wouldn’t that depend on what he does with those touches though? 

If he gets 12 touches but scores 3 long TDs, that’s ok right? :)  

 
Benching him for fumbling and playing Allen would be like the Bengals benching AJ Green because of his fumbles (twice in week one) and starting Boyd.  I am not saying Collins is as good as Green... not even close... but the talent difference from Collins to Allen is at least as big as the talent delta from Green to Boyd.
No, it wouldn't at all be like that because Collins is nowhere near the caliber of player that AJ is. I'm a Collins fan but the hype for this guy is insane.

 
tangfoot said:
I think it's foolhardy to look at these rankings after Week 2.
I realize that, and even commented on that. I just think it's worth taking a look at it regardless
 

Also 3 of those 6 matchups are deceiving.  Pit (x2) and NO have been thrown all over on so there numbers are skewed by that.  It’s not that they are great run D’, it’s that they faced very strong pass O’s (KC and TB in particular) who lit them up.  
I agree. TEN has only faced MIA and HOU, two teams with below average running games IMO (I'm not following how well Lamar Miller is doing in the regular season). PIT hasn't faced great running teams in general (minus KC but that was a shoot out), and NO as well hasn't faced much in general (CLE and TB) regarding running attacks. 

Baltimore doesn't really scare anyone offensively though... so if it's possible game script could favor Buck Allen rather than Collins. 

 
NeverEnough said:
Anyone trade Collins? I'm ready to move on & try to package him with another player for an upgrade somewhere.
In my dyno I am strong at RB, traded him for Josh Gordon.  Speculative.  Could come back to bite me.  BUT, I feel like after last season and the first 2 games of this year I have a good grasp of what collins is:  Solid RB.  Unspectacular.  Glaring deficiencies in his game that make it unlikely for him to ever rise to the ranks of elite workhorse.  Plus, harbaugh is an idiot and becomes enamored with middling talents like Suck Allen and that keeps Collins off the field too much.  He can get scripted out of games.  I decided to go with the upside of gordon with Brady.  

 
I need him to be a RB2 once i can no longer use James Connor.....if you're able to hang on tight and wait until the 2nd half of FF....I do think it looks bright. I'm able to keep him on my bench for the timebeing. 

 
No, it wouldn't at all be like that because Collins is nowhere near the caliber of player that AJ is. I'm a Collins fan but the hype for this guy is insane.
I did clarify on that didn't I?  I said "I am not saying Collins is as good as Green... not even close.."  Not sure I get how this can be called "hype."

My comment was more about the weakness of Allen than the strength of Collins.  

 
Terrible matchup in Denver, so logically he's going to have his best game of the season on my bench.

Have to choose between him or Lindsay. Can't say I feel good about either but I feel like their upside is about the same.

 
Once again I’ll believe it when I see it but another positive article.

https://www.baltimoreravens.com/news/news-notes-9-19-joe-flacco-wants-to-get-dynamic-alex-collins-the-ball

Flacco agrees with us about the bizarre game scripts  :P
That's encouraging. Feel like people in here drafted him too early, the way they're carrying on.

He's scored 6 points and 11 points which is perfectly fine as a RB2. Ravens haven't been in any "competitive" games. So far they blew out the Bills and got blown out by the Bengals.

If this Broncos game is competitive, it should be big game for him because he'll actually be used. Even if it's a Ravens blowout, I don't see him riding the pine on the road.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
That's encouraging. Feel like people in here drafted him too early, the way they're carrying on.

He's scored 6 points and 11 points which is perfectly fine as a RB2. Ravens haven't been in any "competitive" games. So far they blew out the Bills and got blown out by the Bengals.

If this Broncos game is competitive, it should be big game for him because he'll actually be used. Even if it's a Ravens blowout, I don't see him riding the pine on the road.
I tend to agree he was likely drafted too early.  The Cinnci game though wasnt really a blow out and Ravens had opportunity to use him more.

We'll see.  I may be sitting him for Clement this week.

 
That's encouraging. Feel like people in here drafted him too early, the way they're carrying on.

He's scored 6 points and 11 points which is perfectly fine as a RB2. Ravens haven't been in any "competitive" games. So far they blew out the Bills and got blown out by the Bengals.

If this Broncos game is competitive, it should be big game for him because he'll actually be used. Even if it's a Ravens blowout, I don't see him riding the pine on the road.
It’s a home game but you echo an excellent point, it’s unlikely the Ravens will be down 21 points in the early second or up 40 points in the early 3rd. 

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top