If I had Howard, I would want more than just Collins and I own Collins.Thinking about trading for Jordan Howard - whom I have never been a big fan. Is that a trade up?
If I had Howard, I would want more than just Collins and I own Collins.Thinking about trading for Jordan Howard - whom I have never been a big fan. Is that a trade up?
I agree on the Flacco passing 40+ times part but Collins was getting 17 ish carries in addition to 2-3 recs after he took the job last year. Not 11-14. And the Ravens were 6th I think in rushing attempts. He also has to be close to the top of the league in tds during that stretch. I’d let a normal game script or 2 play out before I started bailing on the notion that he’ll get that usage again.I meant where they say "We gotta get him the ball!" then it happens for one game and they forget about him. Until the team realizes Flacco shouldn't be passing 40+ times a game or that Javorius Allen isn't the teams best back, the same pattern will continue. Collins will have to produce on the 11-14 carries a game he gets, and if he's lucky 2-3 receptions. Not going to talk about the goal line situation...
I'd much rather have Howard.Thinking about trading for Jordan Howard - whom I have never been a big fan. Is that a trade up?
If it weren't for the uncertainty of Buck Allen's role, I might think the opposite. I can see Collins putting up some 100 yard games. Jordan likely won't sniff that. Guess I am still holding out that Collins turns the corner.I'd much rather have Howard.
This. Buck Allen is the thorn in Collins owners sides. Leaches red zone appearances and TDsIf it weren't for the uncertainty of Buck Allen's role, I might think the opposite. I can see Collins putting up some 100 yard games. Jordan likely won't sniff that. Guess I am still holding out that Collins turns the corner.
I don't understand, you think Howard won't have 100 yards in a game? What am I missing from your post?If it weren't for the uncertainty of Buck Allen's role, I might think the opposite. I can see Collins putting up some 100 yard games. Jordan likely won't sniff that. Guess I am still holding out that Collins turns the corner.
I like Collins as much as the next guy but I have no idea how anyone could see Collins as the unquestionably better back let alone thinking it isn't close. I get that Howard isn't considered a great receiver but he has been noticably improving every year and has zero ball security issues.Collins IMNSHO is more talented than Howard and it isn't close. But right now, because of coaching and use, Howard has more value. That could change in the future but right now, that's the deal.
Agreed. I've got many more shares of Collins, and I'll snap accept a Howard offer.I like Collins as much as the next guy but I have no idea how anyone could see Collins as the unquestionably better back let alone thinking it isn't close. I get that Howard isn't considered a great receiver but he has been noticably improving every year and has zero ball security issues.
I don't see anything Collins does markedly better than Howard that doesn't have a counterpoint in Howard's favor.
Howard >>>> Collins
I’d go 3 times on Sunday but that’s picking nits.I don't understand, you think Howard won't have 100 yards in a game? What am I missing from your post?
Jordan had 107 yards in week 1, he is getting 18.5 touches per game Collins has 20 touches on the season.
Jordan also seems to have fixed his receiving issues so far which makes him more of an every down threat.
Plus Nagy just said today that he needs to use Howard even more in the fourth quarter when they have the lead. With that defense, which is far superior to Baltimore, they will be in plenty of close games.
IMO even if Buck Allen goes away, which he won't, it's Howard over Collins six days a week and twice on Sundays.
I am trying to wait until his value goes up a little. I don't think anything I am going to get for him now would be worth risking the off chance that he actually starts producing like we thought he would.Anyone trade Collins? I'm ready to move on & try to package him with another player for an upgrade somewhere.
In my dynasty league I got offered Moncrief for him, I declined and countered with a 2019 1st. He declined. I expect Collins value to go up. How much? I am not sure.Anyone trade Collins? I'm ready to move on & try to package him with another player for an upgrade somewhere.
I’m throwing out low ball offers for him. Hoping others are throwing in the towel.
So it was YOU!!!In my dynasty league I got offered Moncrief for him, I declined and countered with a 2019 1st. He declined. I expect Collins value to go up. How much? I am not sure.
This is where i amI am trying to wait until his value goes up a little. I don't think anything I am going to get for him now would be worth risking the off chance that he actually starts producing like we thought he would.
I'd consider it, but likely see what other WR's were on rosterIf you had Howard and needed a WR badly - would Collins and John Brown get it done for Howard?
I've been looking at his schedule and this may be the best week to trade him... he faces some really tough defenses. At this point it's either trade him or save him for the playoffs. According to Yahoo, 6 of the next 7 weeks are against unfavorable defenses. Which I understand, we are judging these defenses based off of 2 weeks only, but something to consider at least:This is where i amI am trying to wait until his value goes up a little. I don't think anything I am going to get for him now would be worth risking the off chance that he actually starts producing like we thought he would.
I think it's foolhardy to look at these rankings after Week 2.Week 3: Denver (24th in fantasy points allowed to RBs- a lower number means higher scoring for RBs)
4: @PIT (26th)
5: @CLE (8th- favorable)
6: @ TEN (30th)
7: NO (31st)
8: @CAR (23rd)
9: PIT (26th)
Also 3 of those 6 matchups are deceiving. Pit (x2) and NO have been thrown all over on so there numbers are skewed by that. It’s not that they are great run D’, it’s that they faced very strong pass O’s (KC and TB in particular) who lit them up.tangfoot said:I think it's foolhardy to look at these rankings after Week 2.Dr. Dan said:Week 3: Denver (24th in fantasy points allowed to RBs- a lower number means higher scoring for RBs)
4: @PIT (26th)
5: @CLE (8th- favorable)
6: @ TEN (30th)
7: NO (31st)
8: @CAR (23rd)
9: PIT (26th)
I own Howard in one league and I would take that offer.The Dude said:If you had Howard and needed a WR badly - would Collins and John Brown get it done for Howard?
Oddly, after this week, the week I am most likely to bench Collins is on the road at Cleveland, the matchup you list has as the most favorable.Dr. Dan said:I've been looking at his schedule and this may be the best week to trade him... he faces some really tough defenses. At this point it's either trade him or save him for the playoffs. According to Yahoo, 6 of the next 7 weeks are against unfavorable defenses. Which I understand, we are judging these defenses based off of 2 weeks only, but something to consider at least:
Week 3: Denver (24th in fantasy points allowed to RBs- a lower number means higher scoring for RBs)
4: @PIT (26th)
5: @CLE (8th- favorable)
6: @ TEN (30th)
7: NO (31st)
8: @CAR (23rd)
9: PIT (26th)
BYE
After his bye he has all favorable matchups for RBs.
If I could trade for Collins as my RB3 and I didn't need him to play flex, I'd highly consider it. He could be a huge playoff boost for teams, resulting in this thread possibly re-igniting the exact same offseason debate we've had about Collins since December 2017.
1. 2 weeks is way too small a sample size. And we’re looking at defenses - injuries happen allllll the time.Dr. Dan said:I've been looking at his schedule and this may be the best week to trade him... he faces some really tough defenses. At this point it's either trade him or save him for the playoffs. According to Yahoo, 6 of the next 7 weeks are against unfavorable defenses. Which I understand, we are judging these defenses based off of 2 weeks only, but something to consider at least:
Week 3: Denver (24th in fantasy points allowed to RBs- a lower number means higher scoring for RBs)
4: @PIT (26th)
5: @CLE (8th- favorable)
6: @ TEN (30th)
7: NO (31st)
8: @CAR (23rd)
9: PIT (26th)
BYE
After his bye he has all favorable matchups for RBs.
If I could trade for Collins as my RB3 and I didn't need him to play flex, I'd highly consider it. He could be a huge playoff boost for teams, resulting in this thread possibly re-igniting the exact same offseason debate we've had about Collins since December 2017.
Wouldn’t that depend on what he does with those touches though?I am still a believer in his talent, but if he gets fewer than 15 touches this week, then he is probably not a startable asset until he puts a couple of big weeks up in a row.
No, it wouldn't at all be like that because Collins is nowhere near the caliber of player that AJ is. I'm a Collins fan but the hype for this guy is insane.Benching him for fumbling and playing Allen would be like the Bengals benching AJ Green because of his fumbles (twice in week one) and starting Boyd. I am not saying Collins is as good as Green... not even close... but the talent difference from Collins to Allen is at least as big as the talent delta from Green to Boyd.
I realize that, and even commented on that. I just think it's worth taking a look at it regardlesstangfoot said:I think it's foolhardy to look at these rankings after Week 2.
I agree. TEN has only faced MIA and HOU, two teams with below average running games IMO (I'm not following how well Lamar Miller is doing in the regular season). PIT hasn't faced great running teams in general (minus KC but that was a shoot out), and NO as well hasn't faced much in general (CLE and TB) regarding running attacks.Also 3 of those 6 matchups are deceiving. Pit (x2) and NO have been thrown all over on so there numbers are skewed by that. It’s not that they are great run D’, it’s that they faced very strong pass O’s (KC and TB in particular) who lit them up.
In my dyno I am strong at RB, traded him for Josh Gordon. Speculative. Could come back to bite me. BUT, I feel like after last season and the first 2 games of this year I have a good grasp of what collins is: Solid RB. Unspectacular. Glaring deficiencies in his game that make it unlikely for him to ever rise to the ranks of elite workhorse. Plus, harbaugh is an idiot and becomes enamored with middling talents like Suck Allen and that keeps Collins off the field too much. He can get scripted out of games. I decided to go with the upside of gordon with Brady.NeverEnough said:Anyone trade Collins? I'm ready to move on & try to package him with another player for an upgrade somewhere.
Rest day before 30 touches!Absent at practice today. No reason given yet.
"undisclosed injury" so far, maybe more info later
Came here to post the same. Practice report says illness. Good news. Was afraid it might have read “red zone drills” as his reason for being absent.Apparently twitter saying illness, haven’t checked myself tho
Hopefully he's studying Buck Allen red zone film while ill...Came here to post the same. Practice report says illness. Good news. Was afraid it might have read “red zone drills” as his reason for being absent.
Possibly he's feeling sick over his current lack of usage.Came here to post the same. Practice report says illness. Good news. Was afraid it might have read “red zone drills” as his reason for being absent.
I did clarify on that didn't I? I said "I am not saying Collins is as good as Green... not even close.." Not sure I get how this can be called "hype."No, it wouldn't at all be like that because Collins is nowhere near the caliber of player that AJ is. I'm a Collins fan but the hype for this guy is insane.
Oh, that was you? I was wondering who was the guy that wasn't too high on Collins. Mystery solved.People gave me some crap when I said I wasn't too high on him this offseason.
Let's see how it pans out for him the rest of the season though. Still early.Oh, that was you? I was wondering who was the guy that wasn't too high on Collins. Mystery solved.
That's encouraging. Feel like people in here drafted him too early, the way they're carrying on.Once again I’ll believe it when I see it but another positive article.
https://www.baltimoreravens.com/news/news-notes-9-19-joe-flacco-wants-to-get-dynamic-alex-collins-the-ball
Flacco agrees with us about the bizarre game scripts![]()
I tend to agree he was likely drafted too early. The Cinnci game though wasnt really a blow out and Ravens had opportunity to use him more.That's encouraging. Feel like people in here drafted him too early, the way they're carrying on.
He's scored 6 points and 11 points which is perfectly fine as a RB2. Ravens haven't been in any "competitive" games. So far they blew out the Bills and got blown out by the Bengals.
If this Broncos game is competitive, it should be big game for him because he'll actually be used. Even if it's a Ravens blowout, I don't see him riding the pine on the road.
It’s a home game but you echo an excellent point, it’s unlikely the Ravens will be down 21 points in the early second or up 40 points in the early 3rd.That's encouraging. Feel like people in here drafted him too early, the way they're carrying on.
He's scored 6 points and 11 points which is perfectly fine as a RB2. Ravens haven't been in any "competitive" games. So far they blew out the Bills and got blown out by the Bengals.
If this Broncos game is competitive, it should be big game for him because he'll actually be used. Even if it's a Ravens blowout, I don't see him riding the pine on the road.