leftcoastguy7
Footballguy
Everyone's guessing the # of games, but if Zeke is being suspended for domestic violence, doesn't that mean he must be suspended for 6 games under the new policy?
Actually, there's a lot going wrong fundamentally in this thread. So let's rewind to the start.
First,the statement was made, "In the last ten years, you can probably count the number of times Shefty has whiffed on half a hand". That was the post I replied to. That post implies that Shefty goes several years without getting anything wrong. That is not MY definition. That is the definition put forth by the individual I replied to. If you have a problem with that definition..... ok. Fine. It's not my definition. Have at it.
Secondly, a major problem is that I'm not debating. I'm stating a simple fact. A simple fact that seems to have unraveled several people in this thread. I will not debate whether Mitch Trubisky was the first player taken in the draft. If a group of people in this thread want to pretend that facts are not facts, again.... ok. Fine. I guess I'm old school in that facts are just facts. They are not evil characters trying to beat up on my friends. They are not "fake news". They just are. If you or anyone else want to debate if 7 is 9, or green is blue.... ok. I am not going to "debate" that you are wrong.
Lastly, I don't even dislike Schefter so I am not sure where all this vitriol is coming from.I guess just putting forth the notion than he(actually, sources of his) put out inaccurate information more than once every few years was some sort of trigger for a lot of people in this thread. Put down your rape whistles. You guys win. If you want to believe 2+2=5 then I will certainly not burst your bubble.
I don't think his suspension would be for domestic violence, it would be for conduct detrimental to the league, i.e.; getting accused of domestic violence in the first place, being seen at the pot store and pulling down his female friends top.Everyone's guessing the # of games, but if Zeke is being suspended for domestic violence, doesn't that mean he must be suspended for 6 games under the new policy?
And that's why I think they are focused on his behavior with the exposure incident more than the accusation that was pretty well debunked.Everyone's guessing the # of games, but if Zeke is being suspended for domestic violence, doesn't that mean he must be suspended for 6 games under the new policy?
Though I think its weird that you throw feminist in here like its a negative, I agree with you completely. The conduct detrimental to the league clause was bogus when they suspended Ben or Brady and it is bogus here. Goodell and the owners want to feel like they control these players. It makes it easier to make them disposable, which in turn makes the NFLPA weaker, keeping the salary cap and contracts down.I don't think his suspension would be for domestic violence, it would be for conduct detrimental to the league, i.e.; getting accused of domestic violence in the first place, being seen at the pot store and pulling down his female friends top.
It's a total witchhunt. I could accuse you of rape tomorrow if I so chose and you would have to defend yourself, the weed dispensary he was that was in a state where weed is legal and as far as everyone knows he didn't buy any. He hasn't failed any drug tests that we know of and despite what all the feminist say in this thread, if his female friend was cool with him pulling down her top, which apparently she was, that's not assault.
And that's why I think they are focused on his behavior with the exposure incident more than the accusation that was pretty well debunked.
Can't say I agree with any of these premises and logically it does not compute. The investigation has been ongoing before he ever pulled down the girls' top and before he ever went into the pot store in Seattle. Those incidents are not what he is being investigated for or possibly facing a suspension over.I don't think his suspension would be for domestic violence, it would be for conduct detrimental to the league, i.e.; getting accused of domestic violence in the first place, being seen at the pot store and pulling down his female friends top.
Your guess is as good as mine. Elliot handed over his phone records, unlike Brady.Can't say I agree with any of these premises and logically it does not compute. The investigation has been ongoing before he ever pulled down the girls' top and before he ever went into the pot store in Seattle. Those incidents are not what he is being investigated for or possibly facing a suspension over.
My best guess is something similar to the Brady suspension and I'm basing this on a follow up interview Shefter gave were he said something to the effect of Elliot not complying or providing the NFL with data or information they requested. They don't have evidence to suspend for what they were investigating, but feel like an attempt at a coverup was made so they might suspend him for that instead.
hes a must if are drafting elliott. beyond that still not muchWhat is McFadden worth in redraft? He already had value as a backup in an ideal situation, but add a couple guaranteed starts behind that line and I'd think his value climbs.
I'd much rather have McFadden than West in redraft though. If Dixon gets hurt, how excited are you to start West? If Elliot gets hurt, how many backs in the league would you bench McFadden for?If Zeke gets two or more games, McFadden jumps up squarely into the Jacquizz/T. West range of draft rankings. All three have "guaranteed" early season starts in that circumstance, with none having the likelihood of retaining the role long term.
I'm not so sure. Weeks 1-4 aren't very promising for McFadden.If Zeke gets two or more games, McFadden jumps up squarely into the Jacquizz/T. West range of draft rankings. All three have "guaranteed" early season starts in that circumstance, with none having the likelihood of retaining the role long term.
The giants were a top 3 run D, but they gave up 107 yards to Elliot the second time they met (he also played them week 1 and had 51 yards and a touchdown, but that was his first game as an nfl player).I'm not so sure. Weeks 1-4 aren't very promising for McFadden.
Gaints D is tough against the run (and pass).
Denver has a good D.
Rams Dline is no joke.
Cardinals D is rough as well.
West has a pretty good early schedule and could very well just keep the job. It's not like Dixon set the world on fire last seasonbostonfred said:I'd much rather have McFadden than West in redraft though. If Dixon gets hurt, how excited are you to start West? If Elliot gets hurt, how many backs in the league would you bench McFadden for?
Jon machota of dallas news just tweeted Source confirms @fishsports report that Ezekiel Elliott was involved in an altercation last night at Clutch bar in DallasAdam Caplan quoting Dallas reporter Mike Fisher
Looks like Elliott was involved in an altercation at a bar last night. Might be nothing. Twitter starting to twit.
I'm thinking with all these behavioral issues, I can get Elliott classified as a WR in my league.Jon machota of dallas news just tweeted Source confirms @fishsports report that Ezekiel Elliott was involved in an altercation last night at Clutch bar in Dallas
Commissioner Goodevil has been notified and will consider a warning for Elliott dependent upon the size of Mr. Bookmaker's donation to his favorite charity.Penguin said:Evan Silva Retweeted
Sports InsightsVerified account @SportsInsights 4h4 hours ago
The odds of Ezekiel Elliott getting suspended have moved from +130 to -175 at Bookmaker since Friday afternoon
Another urban Meyer gemReally disappointed in him as a person. Just seems like a punk. Entitled.
It may not legally be assault. But it's pretty screwed up. How often do you pull down the tops of your female friends in public?STEADYMOBBIN 22 said:if his female friend was cool with him pulling down her top, which apparently she was, that's not assault.
Nowadays? Never but I'm 40 years old. When I was 20 I dated several girls who are rather liberal with their tops.It may not legally be assault. But it's pretty screwed up. How often do you pull down the tops of your female friends in public?
Sure, but the 90s were still a little looser with what was sexual assault vs boys being boys.Nowadays? Never but I'm 40 years old. When I was 20 I dated several girls who are rather liberal with their tops.
Zeke and his girlfriend were at parade where the girl dripped her top down numerous times and so did a lot of girls at that event.
There is some random guy on twitter who tweeted like 11-12 hours ago that he just saw Elliot lay a "N word" out at Clutch.Jon machota of dallas news just tweeted Source confirms @fishsports report that Ezekiel Elliott was involved in an altercation last night at Clutch bar in Dallas
Yeah. You would think with the domestic violence issue still hanging over his head with the NFL that he would have been playing the role of "perfect citizen" instead of bringing more negative attention to himself, at least until training camp started and he had other things to occupy his time..Word here in Dallas is he knocked a bouncer at Clutch out cold. Broken nose. Witnesses.
This kid just doesn't get it.
Why wait? The price will only go higher. Morris is expected to be released, and McFadden is clearly the back-up. When in doubt, don't discount that the owner is an Ammuni of McFadden's school. McFadden is also a FAR better match to Elliot's skill-set, especially as a receiver.If I have Elliot I think I wait until after preseason game 3 or 4 to make a move for the backup.
I don't understand, you said this about a different player:This will almost certainly cause him to have a suspension now.
If the league was on the fence, which clearly they were, they are gonna issue one now. Just because of personal conduct, he dont have to be charged with anything.
Zeke came into the NFL with a pending domestic violence charge, or as you put it "a clean slate". Well, his behavior continues to raise eye brows and now will likely end in a suspension. Maybe now you see the point I was making, that personal conduct does have some value?Look, fantasy football is not real life. We get credit for their points. We may not have them available because of suspensions and what not, but he isnt in any risk of that and has as much of a clean slate as anyone else coming into the NFL.
Why is the price only going up? McFadden will turn 30 before the season starts and hasn't been the most durable guy. No way I'd buy before TC even starts. I don't think Morris will be released either. Who else is on the RB depth chart? One UDFA? It's possible they could even bring in a DeAngelo Williams type (cap permitting) if the suspension is 4 games or more. Or something happens with another team where a door is opened for a free/cheaper/younger player. If anything, the price will only go lower IMO, though it could peak some after a suspension is officially handed down.Why wait? The price will only go higher. Morris is expected to be released, and McFadden is clearly the back-up. When in doubt, don't discount that the owner is an Ammuni of McFadden's school. McFadden is also a FAR better match to Elliot's skill-set, especially as a receiver.
Once Elliot's suspension is confirmed and/or he gets nicked up in camp, McFadden's will be more expensive.
"though it could peak some after a suspension is officially handed down"Why is the price only going up? McFadden will turn 30 before the season starts and hasn't been the most durable guy. No way I'd buy before TC even starts. I don't think Morris will be released either. Who else is on the RB depth chart? One UDFA? It's possible they could even bring in a DeAngelo Williams type (cap permitting) if the suspension is 4 games or more. Or something happens with another team where a door is opened for a free/cheaper/younger player. If anything, the price will only go lower IMO, though it could peak some after a suspension is officially handed down.
Well said. I don't have Elliot on any of my teams, and as much as I would LOVE to have him, he has a high risk factor for these types of issues. Would I not want him? NO! Would I make sure I had his back-up on my roster?I've found out that most guys who get knocked out in a bar desreved to get knocked out in a bar.
That's true but how many mistakes did McCoy have leading up to that? Elliot's recent past issues are not helping at all.LeSean McCoy survived a bar brawl last offseason without catching a suspension.
That's pretty much already the assumption, we just don't know if it's 1, 2, 4 or even 6. If 4 or 6 and he doesn't go down before the season starts, you're right, his price will go up. If it's 1 or 2 or he tweaks a hammy or busts his busted toe, I think people would regret hastily trading for him. He'll never command too much as he's a 30 year old RB set to start only a few games. Why pay a 2nd for that when you can probably get Terrance West and have a shot at more production throughout the year?"though it could peak some after a suspension is officially handed down"
That is my point. Once you Know McFadden is going to start a few games, his price will go up. Morris might stick at the #3, but it's McFadden who better fits as the replacement in the offense. Plus he is a Jerry Jones favorite.
If you wait till after the suspension the McFadden owner is going to ask for more, or just role the the dice and play him at the #1 RB in a great offense for a few weeks.
Let me respond with a question: Does Goodell only suspend players who are arrested, charged, convicted?The overreaction in this thread is unsightly. He won't be arrested over this. The worst case scenario is a civil suit unless clear video emerges to show he assaulted the man unprovoked. Right now it's nothing but hearsay and the cops thought so much of it that they essentially issued a statement saying this is nothing right now. Certainly this effects draft value but people saying they don't want him on their fantasy teams. Lol, sure.