What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

RB Jonathon Brooks, CAR (1 Viewer)

Well, I admire the optimism. I'm pumping the breaks a bit but I do have him basically everywhere so am definitely a believer in the talent.

Together we can all be better. Let's win big on this guy!! He has the tools to be a 3 down grinder, not necessarily elite speed but very physical with a bag of tricks to pair with it.


I get a man amongst boy vibe watching his college tape.
 
I like him and drafted him 1.05, but you are drastically overrating him based on him being the first RB drafted.

This was considered a woefully poor RB class for starters.

Todd Gurley had the same injury as Brooks at the same time and was what, a top 8 pick? Truly elite talent still gets picked high. Brooks was borderline first round at best, but I still don't think it was ever happening for him.

I don't care where he was drafted relative to his RB peers. He was taken at #46 with a torn ACL. If he didn't have a torn ACL, he would have been a first round talent. First Round RB talent gets me excited, especially at a discount.

I'm not telling you he's a RB1, but he is certainly a RB2 with upside which is why you took him at 1.05. I think we agree and have the same world view, but I am taking the optimistic route.


This guy wishes he was Todd Gurley.
The team drafts him for the long term. We aren't debating his talent or long term dynasty value. I'm with you on that.

I'm just suggesting some tempered expectations when he comes back. He likely will be eased in/limited touches for the first few games back too. This is pretty common. Then add to it the offense stinks.

Like I said, I loved his talent coming out but it might take him some time to produce like a top fantasy RB.
 
not expecting much this year, would be happy with a flex option second half of the year. Team is just awful, he wont get enough quality touches to make a real difference
 
Hayden Winks
Sneaky winner of Week 3: Jonathon Brooks.

Jesse Morse, MD
With Andy Dalton’s monster performance in Week 3, Jonathon Brooks’ value just skyrocketed.

I’m expecting him to make his debut in between Week 5 and Week 8.

This might be the last you may be able to trade for him before the cost is unrealistic.

Brooks has the potential to be a top 5-10 RB by season’s end.
 
Hayden Winks
Sneaky winner of Week 3: Jonathon Brooks.

Jesse Morse, MD
With Andy Dalton’s monster performance in Week 3, Jonathon Brooks’ value just skyrocketed.

I’m expecting him to make his debut in between Week 5 and Week 8.

This might be the last you may be able to trade for him before the cost is unrealistic.

Brooks has the potential to be a top 5-10 RB by season’s end.
agreed. Carolina has been a laughing stock and the switch to Dalton has energized the team. Brooks can be a huge addition down the stretch (and of course great keeper) if you can buy low from an owner that cant afford to wait.
 
If we are expecting him to come back in the next few weeks, shouldn't we see some sort of practice reports this week? I imagine it will take 2-3 weeks of practicing , running and cutting, getting into "game shape", before he see's any actual game time.
 
Dave Canales told reporters that Jonathon Brooks (knee) is “really close” to coming off of the reserve/NFI list.

Reporters asked Canales about Panthers players who began the season on injury-related reserve lists, including Brooks, LB D.J. Wonnum, CB Dane Jackson and LB Amaré Barno. Canales responded, “We’re ramping them up... Some last couple of hurdles for them to clear before we feel like we can put them out there in practice. But they’re all really close.” Should Brooks return in Week 5, he would be roughly 10 months removed since undergoing ACL reconstruction.
 
Dave Canales told reporters that Jonathon Brooks (knee) is “really close” to coming off of the reserve/NFI list.

Reporters asked Canales about Panthers players who began the season on injury-related reserve lists, including Brooks, LB D.J. Wonnum, CB Dane Jackson and LB Amaré Barno. Canales responded, “We’re ramping them up... Some last couple of hurdles for them to clear before we feel like we can put them out there in practice. But they’re all really close.” Should Brooks return in Week 5, he would be roughly 10 months removed since undergoing ACL reconstruction.
10 months is still a fairly short timeline. I still expect a bit of a slow start for him as he gets up to speed in his first few games. Long term dynasty he was likely a bargain compared to if he never had his ACL injury but I'm proceeding with caution once he is back. I doubt the coaches will give him a big workload either.

Incoming complaints from redrafters....
 
Zero RB redrafter here. Took him late and chucked to the IR. Very happy if he becomes the engine of the offense for the second half.

Actually like the team is being cautious. Having healthy RB later in the season is better.
 
I also play redraft and drafted him, knowing I was chucking him directly into an IR spot. Personally, I hope he stays on the NFI list because he can stay on Yahoo's IR.
 
Hubbard isn't gong away anytime this year barring injury, so keep that in mind.
As a Hubbard owner I hope you're right.

I must say I have zero sense on when it's possible that this situation reaches a 50/50 timeshare this year...if at all.
 
Hubbard isn't gong away anytime this year barring injury, so keep that in mind.

The lifespan of coaches isn't very long these days. Especially in Carolina.
If the staff thinks Brooks is better and gives them a better chance of winning, he is going to play.
 
If Hubbard has another performance like last week I think the coaches will be just fine keeping him heavily involved. He looks really good and he looked quite good at the end of last season as well.

Brooks will play but I don't think they'll be in any rush to pile a heavy workload on him just yet.
 
Hubbard isn't gong away anytime this year barring injury, so keep that in mind.

The lifespan of coaches isn't very long these days. Especially in Carolina.
If the staff thinks Brooks is better and gives them a better chance of winning, he is going to play.
Perhaps, but Hubbard looked good last week in their only win. That gives him a stay from execution IMO.
 
If Hubbard has another performance like last week I think the coaches will be just fine keeping him heavily involved. He looks really good and he looked quite good at the end of last season as well.

Brooks will play but I don't think they'll be in any rush to pile a heavy workload on him just yet.
There is no doubt they will ease him in. But if Brooks can do things Hubbard can't, things might change.
 
Not sold that Hubbard is going to be a huge threat once Brooks is healthy and had some time to get up to speed. They drafted Brooks to be their guy moving forward, and they're going to want to see what they have. They've known what they have in Hubbard for years, and invested a second round pick in their RB of the future. Only questions I have are: when will Brooks be ready to roll, and will the Panthers be willing to give him a heavy load in a non-competitive season?

If Hubbard performs like a star against a tougher team, I can see a route, but I think last week may just be a special case.
 
Don't own Brooks anywhere in Dynasty. His rookie value went from 1.8/1.12 mid may to around 1.4, 1.5ish in June. At least that's what I saw.

If I did own him though I'd be praying that carolina doesn't play him this year. 10 months is not enough time to get that leg right . It just isn't.
But they will play him early and probably ruin him bc that's what Sargent Tepper and the Lowly Panther Band likes to do. Ruin players.
 
Don't own Brooks anywhere in Dynasty. His rookie value went from 1.8/1.12 mid may to around 1.4, 1.5ish in June. At least that's what I saw.

If I did own him though I'd be praying that carolina doesn't play him this year. 10 months is not enough time to get that leg right . It just isn't.
But they will play him early and probably ruin him bc that's what Sargent Tepper and the Lowly Panther Band likes to do. Ruin players.
Obviously every ACL injury is different, but it’s worth mentioning there’s precedent for this timeline. Breece Hall came back after 10-11 months and looked like his old self (even if the jets being bad was limiting his output).
 
Todd Gurley certain looked like himself after the same amount of time out.

You just don't know. The team seems optimistic he's ready to play so the best you can do is trust them. There just isn't much need to give him a stack of useful work if other guys on the team are performing, which right now they are.
 
Not sold that Hubbard is going to be a huge threat once Brooks is healthy and had some time to get up to speed. They drafted Brooks to be their guy moving forward, and they're going to want to see what they have. They've known what they have in Hubbard for years, and invested a second round pick in their RB of the future. Only questions I have are: when will Brooks be ready to roll, and will the Panthers be willing to give him a heavy load in a non-competitive season?

If Hubbard performs like a star against a tougher team, I can see a route, but I think last week may just be a special case.
You could be right but there is the scenario where it ends up a time share. Almost every backfield is going to a timeshare these days. So many RBs are getting injured they can't just roll with 1 feature back.

Hubbards last 2 games have been very good from a rushing perspective. He's also been good in the passing game catching 9 of 10 passes for 70 yards and a TD.

Unless they trade Hubbard I don't see him going anywhere this year. 6.4ypc and 5.4ypc the last 2 games in 31 carries.

As for the draft it doesn't really matter for these teams anymore. They want multiple RBs.

Walker in SEA - drafted Charbs 2nd round
Achane in MIA - drafted Wright and spent a future 3rd rounder to move up one round to take him
Gibbs drafted 12th overall - Monty still gets 15-20 touches a game

I like Brooks, I think he is a great talent. He's also coming of a significant injury than many RBs said it took them until year 2 after their injury to be mentally ready and feel like the were back 100%. Some don't come back as strong (Javonte Williams so far).

Hubbard has done it for 2 years. Brooks hasn't done anything yet. Do I hope Brooks ends up the lead back - yes but I'm also reserved to say it might not be there year. Keep expectations realistic and if Brooks comes back and smashes then he exceeds expectations. I don't think the expectations are that he comes back and saves CAR and saves your fantasy team this year.
 
Side note: if he comes back and falls flat or starts really slow I'm 100% trying to jump in and pick him up in keeper/dynasty leagues for next year.
 
Don't own Brooks anywhere in Dynasty. His rookie value went from 1.8/1.12 mid may to around 1.4, 1.5ish in June. At least that's what I saw.

If I did own him though I'd be praying that carolina doesn't play him this year. 10 months is not enough time to get that leg right . It just isn't.
But they will play him early and probably ruin him bc that's what Sargent Tepper and the Lowly Panther Band likes to do. Ruin players.
Obviously every ACL injury is different, but it’s worth mentioning there’s precedent for this timeline. Breece Hall came back after 10-11 months and looked like his old self (even if the jets being bad was limiting his output).

Ur right on the timelines, but rush him back for what? An improvement in wins this year? Rather keep him under wraps and ready to go
I don't want to potentially shorten his career like said Gurley.....
 
Don't own Brooks anywhere in Dynasty. His rookie value went from 1.8/1.12 mid may to around 1.4, 1.5ish in June. At least that's what I saw.

If I did own him though I'd be praying that carolina doesn't play him this year. 10 months is not enough time to get that leg right . It just isn't.
But they will play him early and probably ruin him bc that's what Sargent Tepper and the Lowly Panther Band likes to do. Ruin players.
Obviously every ACL injury is different, but it’s worth mentioning there’s precedent for this timeline. Breece Hall came back after 10-11 months and looked like his old self (even if the jets being bad was limiting his output).

Ur right on the timelines, but rush him back for what? An improvement in wins this year? Rather keep him under wraps and ready to go
I don't want to potentially shorten his career like said Gurley.....
I can totally see this as a possibility. Obviously if he comes back and suffers another injury or setback things we'd look back and admonish the decision. But, I don't think they hold back a healthy Brooks from getting game reps. The team hasn't been incredibly chatty about the recovery process, but I assume once he is able to start practicing we'll learn pretty quick if they'll be protective or not.

Wish we knew either way, but luckily I assume most people have the ability to stash him on IR (not me, I moved Pacheco there before last week on speculation that this team was awful to potentially drop Brooks).
 
Mike Boone cut.. Brooks Time:ponder:
Doubtful these dots can be connected. Boone’s bounced around from practice squad, active and inactive all season. Hubbard, Sanders and Blackshear are doing what they need.

Brooks must first return to practice and then they’ll likely take the full 21 day window to get him up to speed and evaluate before potentially being activated.
 
Haven’t heard it discussed as a possibility but any chance they trade Hubbard? I get that running backs don’t tend to fetch much value but will his value ever be higher? Seems like it might make some sense for a team that’s not winning any time soon and could use draft capital.
 
Haven’t heard it discussed as a possibility but any chance they trade Hubbard? I get that running backs don’t tend to fetch much value but will his value ever be higher? Seems like it might make some sense for a team that’s not winning any time soon and could use draft capital.
Apparently the owner loves Hubbard. If that's true then it's unlikely he'll be traded.
 
Haven’t heard it discussed as a possibility but any chance they trade Hubbard? I get that running backs don’t tend to fetch much value but will his value ever be higher? Seems like it might make some sense for a team that’s not winning any time soon and could use draft capital.
I don't see why they would trade him. Teams need more than 1 back and Hubbard is a good back. CAR likes Hubbard and I expect him to continue to be the lead back at least for the next little while.

Hubbard has been playing great as well and he's still young. They don't have to rush Brooks back and can ease him in.

If Hubbard keeps playing this well I would think he keeps the lead role for this season.
 
Brooks is and always will be a 2025 play once Hubbard is gone but as for this year, Hubbard seriously has to faceplant or obtain injury in order to even cede 50/50
 
The thought is that Brooks is a better talent which is why they drafted him when they did. If Brooks is more talented and makes the team better he'll play regardless of what Hubbard has done to date. He won't eliminate Hubbard but they drafted Brooks for a reason. It's about production at the end of the day.

Has he been removed from IR yet?
 
Haven’t heard it discussed as a possibility but any chance they trade Hubbard? I get that running backs don’t tend to fetch much value but will his value ever be higher? Seems like it might make some sense for a team that’s not winning any time soon and could use draft capital.
Yes, a chance.

His contract is up after this year and they got a lot of needs and they drafted his replacement.

Just a matter of if they can get enough to make it worth their while. My guess is they can’t, but it’s possible.

Obviously the RB they want to trade us Sanders but they’d have to pay someone to take him or eat salary.
 
The thought is that Brooks is a better talent which is why they drafted him when they did. If Brooks is more talented and makes the team better he'll play regardless of what Hubbard has done to date. He won't eliminate Hubbard but they drafted Brooks for a reason. It's about production at the end of the day.

Has he been removed from IR yet?
The thought for Gibbs was that he was a better talent than Monty. But Monty isn't going anywhere. Even though Gibbs is talented that doesn't mean Monty is expendable. Same with Hubbard.

Hubbard is a lot better RB than people give him credit. Guy has been balling out.

I like Brooks but he hasn't proven anything in the NFL yet. Could be be great? Sure. He could also start slow due to his ACL recovery and take time getting up to speed in the NFL. Some rookies take time.

Hubbard is the RB8 on the season and has a nearly 6ypc. 2 rushing and 1 receiving TD so far and nearly 500 total yards.
 
Ok last week he began practicing.

This week haven’t heard or seen any updates.

Anyone have anything?
 
If we're looking for positive, actionable results, he would have to be Walter Payton (Hubbard too) if he's lining up behind Bryce Young
 
crickets in here....been waiting for some updates to see when he may hit the field, how he's practicing, anything.....
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top