Don't think Stevenson is going that late, but after last night maybe he's dropping next week.You guys can all have Henderson. It will drive down the price of Stevenson . . . who will get 50-60% of the RB touches and red zone looks. Henderson has an ADP of 60 and rising. Stevenson is at 105 and falling. You don't send a guy you think of as a bell cow, heavy usage, major RB piece out to return kickoffs in a preseason game. You just don't.
I can see 150 - 170 rushes and 50+ receptions.If Henderson doesn't have at least 220 touches this year the Patriots aren't trying to win.
I didLove these...Do I take him at 1.03 and skip Hunter?
I did as well back in May. None of my leagues are IDP so easy pass on Hunter.I didLove these...Do I take him at 1.03 and skip Hunter?
Deal.You guys can all have Henderson. It will drive down the price of Stevenson . . . who will get 50-60% of the RB touches and red zone looks. Henderson has an ADP of 60 and rising. Stevenson is at 105 and falling. You don't send a guy you think of as a bell cow, heavy usage, major RB piece out to return kickoffs in a preseason game. You just don't.
I'd take that. I've said from the beginning this is a guy that can do more with less and still be very fantasy relevant. The combination of his rushing and receiving could produce 100+ yards many weeks. I would love 18 touches total a game. 12 rushes for 72 yards and 6 receptions for 50+ yards.As Mr Wolf said "let's not start sucking each other's.......". well.....you know the rest. He looked real good last night no doubt but he had multiple injuries in college. Higher work load could lead to time missed. He might be best served as a 15-18 touch guy with fireworks possible on each touch.
sameI didLove these...Do I take him at 1.03 and skip Hunter?
Kyren was a PR 2 years agoYou guys can all have Henderson. It will drive down the price of Stevenson . . . who will get 50-60% of the RB touches and red zone looks. Henderson has an ADP of 60 and rising. Stevenson is at 105 and falling. You don't send a guy you think of as a bell cow, heavy usage, major RB piece out to return kickoffs in a preseason game. You just don't.
If Henderson doesn't have at least 220 touches this year the Patriots aren't trying to win.
Personally I think it would leave him approaching 80 receptions probably 1300-1500 total yards. Gotta think he’s getting at least 6-8 tds with that many yards. Big return on his ADP if it doesn’t skyrocket.Everyone’s trying to replicate Monty and Gibbs and unfortunately without the touchdown equity what does that leave for Henderson? James Cook before his touchdown heavy season?
Did someone call him a bell cow?You guys can all have Henderson. It will drive down the price of Stevenson . . . who will get 50-60% of the RB touches and red zone looks. Henderson has an ADP of 60 and rising. Stevenson is at 105 and falling. You don't send a guy you think of as a bell cow, heavy usage, major RB piece out to return kickoffs in a preseason game. You just don't.
If Rham is a JAG he would not end up with more carries most likely.RHam is just a JAG with occasional fumbling issues. RHam might end up with more carries but Henderson’s receiving and big play ability gives him a much higher ceiling.
I’d wager that Henderson will get more touches but RHam will get slightly more carries. There are plenty of JAGs that get 200 carries.If Rham is a JAG he would not end up with more carries most likely.RHam is just a JAG with occasional fumbling issues. RHam might end up with more carries but Henderson’s receiving and big play ability gives him a much higher ceiling.
You sound like someone that has a lot of Stevenson shares. For fantasy, this situation won't be about who gets the most carries. I think Henderson is good enough to be a combination rush / rec to matter more in fantasy football. Because afterall, that's all that matters to me. At the end of the year, barring injury, you will see Henderson between 150-170 carries and unlimited potential in the receiving game. Perhaps 50+ receptions.Here are my observations. If people want to disregard them, so be it. I generally consider 20 year trends and recent full seasons more than a single preseason game, so that will tell you where I am headed. IMO, Stevenson is not a JAG. And McDaniels drafted him. (BTW, this is not a knock or a slight of Henderson in any way, shape, or form.)
Last year, Stephenson ranked 6th in the league in % of yards after contact and 9th overall in total YAC. At one point almost in the season last year, he had more yards after contact than he did total rushing yards. He was getting hit in the backfield nearly 50% of the time. That's not a Rhamondre problem. That's an OL problem.
In 2022, Stevenson put up these rankings:
3rd in % of yards after contact, 4th in total yards after contact, 3rd in RB receptions, 8th in missed tackle rate, 6th in 10 yard rushing rate, 6th in expected yards per carry, and was ranked by PFF as the 4th best RB that season. He's currently the 7th highest paid RB in the league in contract AAV.
Then the OL ranked 32nd in run block win rate in 2023 and 31st in 2024.
Looking back at 20 years of McDaniels as a OC or HC, there were 2 times when he drafted a first round RB to be the guy immediately as there was no incumbent RB: Moreno and Michel. The other time he drafted a first round RB was Maroney, but he was getting groomed to take over for a 32 year old Dillon. When his team's already had an established RB, the rookie backs didn't do that much.
When Stevenson was drafted, NE already had Damien Harris (remember him?). When Harris was healthy, Stevenson averaged 8.6 caries and 1.1 receptions a game as a rookie. The Pats had multiple players that WENT ON to do well, but not as rookies: Green-Ellis, Ridley, Vereen, White, DHarris, and Stevenson. Most of them barely even got on the field their first year. The most receptions by a rookie RB with McDaniels was Moreno . . . with 28.
As for McDaniels, IMO, he has been the one that's the JAG. Without Brady, he's predominantly struggled and been a Bottom 10 OC. But that's a different topic. In the 4 times he took over an offense 06 Pats, 09 Broncs, 11 Rams, and 22 Raiders), those teams had a net -28 points cored and -408 yards of offense compared to the prior season. He's not a quick turn specialist, and he has been a rookie escalator at any skill position.
Could Henderson be talented enough to be a market disrupter here? Sure. I'm just not sure a kickoff return TD in a preseason game is proof positive of that. In Stevenson's first preseason game as a rookie, he averaged 12.7 ypc and scored 2 TDs. Preseason games aren't usually indicative of much of anything.
The point in all of this is, the OL is the driver of RB success here, and if Stevenson or Henderson is going to be productive, the OL will have to play way better. Because Henderson will be stuck in the same mud as Stevenson was if its not.
I own 0 shares of either player.You sound like someone that has a lot of Stevenson shares. For fantasy, this situation won't be about who gets the most carries. I think Henderson is good enough to be a combination rush / rec to matter more in fantasy football. Because afterall, that's all that matters to me. At the end of the year, barring injury, you will see Henderson between 150-170 carries and unlimited potential in the receiving game. Perhaps 50+ receptions.Here are my observations. If people want to disregard them, so be it. I generally consider 20 year trends and recent full seasons more than a single preseason game, so that will tell you where I am headed. IMO, Stevenson is not a JAG. And McDaniels drafted him. (BTW, this is not a knock or a slight of Henderson in any way, shape, or form.)
Last year, Stephenson ranked 6th in the league in % of yards after contact and 9th overall in total YAC. At one point almost in the season last year, he had more yards after contact than he did total rushing yards. He was getting hit in the backfield nearly 50% of the time. That's not a Rhamondre problem. That's an OL problem.
In 2022, Stevenson put up these rankings:
3rd in % of yards after contact, 4th in total yards after contact, 3rd in RB receptions, 8th in missed tackle rate, 6th in 10 yard rushing rate, 6th in expected yards per carry, and was ranked by PFF as the 4th best RB that season. He's currently the 7th highest paid RB in the league in contract AAV.
Then the OL ranked 32nd in run block win rate in 2023 and 31st in 2024.
Looking back at 20 years of McDaniels as a OC or HC, there were 2 times when he drafted a first round RB to be the guy immediately as there was no incumbent RB: Moreno and Michel. The other time he drafted a first round RB was Maroney, but he was getting groomed to take over for a 32 year old Dillon. When his team's already had an established RB, the rookie backs didn't do that much.
When Stevenson was drafted, NE already had Damien Harris (remember him?). When Harris was healthy, Stevenson averaged 8.6 caries and 1.1 receptions a game as a rookie. The Pats had multiple players that WENT ON to do well, but not as rookies: Green-Ellis, Ridley, Vereen, White, DHarris, and Stevenson. Most of them barely even got on the field their first year. The most receptions by a rookie RB with McDaniels was Moreno . . . with 28.
As for McDaniels, IMO, he has been the one that's the JAG. Without Brady, he's predominantly struggled and been a Bottom 10 OC. But that's a different topic. In the 4 times he took over an offense 06 Pats, 09 Broncs, 11 Rams, and 22 Raiders), those teams had a net -28 points cored and -408 yards of offense compared to the prior season. He's not a quick turn specialist, and he has been a rookie escalator at any skill position.
Could Henderson be talented enough to be a market disrupter here? Sure. I'm just not sure a kickoff return TD in a preseason game is proof positive of that. In Stevenson's first preseason game as a rookie, he averaged 12.7 ypc and scored 2 TDs. Preseason games aren't usually indicative of much of anything.
The point in all of this is, the OL is the driver of RB success here, and if Stevenson or Henderson is going to be productive, the OL will have to play way better. Because Henderson will be stuck in the same mud as Stevenson was if its not.
I have a decent amount of Stevenson shares and im counting on him to be an RB3 that gives you those sneaky RB2 numbers. With his skill set, easy schedule and improved coaching and team play i can see that exactly happening for him for the next yr or so. A similar Montgomery and Gibbs situationYou sound like someone that has a lot of Stevenson shares. For fantasy, this situation won't be about who gets the most carries. I think Henderson is good enough to be a combination rush / rec to matter more in fantasy football. Because afterall, that's all that matters to me. At the end of the year, barring injury, you will see Henderson between 150-170 carries and unlimited potential in the receiving game. Perhaps 50+ receptions.Here are my observations. If people want to disregard them, so be it. I generally consider 20 year trends and recent full seasons more than a single preseason game, so that will tell you where I am headed. IMO, Stevenson is not a JAG. And McDaniels drafted him. (BTW, this is not a knock or a slight of Henderson in any way, shape, or form.)
Last year, Stephenson ranked 6th in the league in % of yards after contact and 9th overall in total YAC. At one point almost in the season last year, he had more yards after contact than he did total rushing yards. He was getting hit in the backfield nearly 50% of the time. That's not a Rhamondre problem. That's an OL problem.
In 2022, Stevenson put up these rankings:
3rd in % of yards after contact, 4th in total yards after contact, 3rd in RB receptions, 8th in missed tackle rate, 6th in 10 yard rushing rate, 6th in expected yards per carry, and was ranked by PFF as the 4th best RB that season. He's currently the 7th highest paid RB in the league in contract AAV.
Then the OL ranked 32nd in run block win rate in 2023 and 31st in 2024.
Looking back at 20 years of McDaniels as a OC or HC, there were 2 times when he drafted a first round RB to be the guy immediately as there was no incumbent RB: Moreno and Michel. The other time he drafted a first round RB was Maroney, but he was getting groomed to take over for a 32 year old Dillon. When his team's already had an established RB, the rookie backs didn't do that much.
When Stevenson was drafted, NE already had Damien Harris (remember him?). When Harris was healthy, Stevenson averaged 8.6 caries and 1.1 receptions a game as a rookie. The Pats had multiple players that WENT ON to do well, but not as rookies: Green-Ellis, Ridley, Vereen, White, DHarris, and Stevenson. Most of them barely even got on the field their first year. The most receptions by a rookie RB with McDaniels was Moreno . . . with 28.
As for McDaniels, IMO, he has been the one that's the JAG. Without Brady, he's predominantly struggled and been a Bottom 10 OC. But that's a different topic. In the 4 times he took over an offense 06 Pats, 09 Broncs, 11 Rams, and 22 Raiders), those teams had a net -28 points cored and -408 yards of offense compared to the prior season. He's not a quick turn specialist, and he has been a rookie escalator at any skill position.
Could Henderson be talented enough to be a market disrupter here? Sure. I'm just not sure a kickoff return TD in a preseason game is proof positive of that. In Stevenson's first preseason game as a rookie, he averaged 12.7 ypc and scored 2 TDs. Preseason games aren't usually indicative of much of anything.
The point in all of this is, the OL is the driver of RB success here, and if Stevenson or Henderson is going to be productive, the OL will have to play way better. Because Henderson will be stuck in the same mud as Stevenson was if its not.
Agreed Johnny. Barring injury I don't see a scenario where Henderson doesn't get 60 receptions. If his body can take 200 carries this guy is gonna surprise and be stop 10 rb this year. He just has that feel like he is gonna find the endzone 10 times. ImoYou sound like someone that has a lot of Stevenson shares. For fantasy, this situation won't be about who gets the most carries. I think Henderson is good enough to be a combination rush / rec to matter more in fantasy football. Because afterall, that's all that matters to me. At the end of the year, barring injury, you will see Henderson between 150-170 carries and unlimited potential in the receiving game. Perhaps 50+ receptions.Here are my observations. If people want to disregard them, so be it. I generally consider 20 year trends and recent full seasons more than a single preseason game, so that will tell you where I am headed. IMO, Stevenson is not a JAG. And McDaniels drafted him. (BTW, this is not a knock or a slight of Henderson in any way, shape, or form.)
Last year, Stephenson ranked 6th in the league in % of yards after contact and 9th overall in total YAC. At one point almost in the season last year, he had more yards after contact than he did total rushing yards. He was getting hit in the backfield nearly 50% of the time. That's not a Rhamondre problem. That's an OL problem.
In 2022, Stevenson put up these rankings:
3rd in % of yards after contact, 4th in total yards after contact, 3rd in RB receptions, 8th in missed tackle rate, 6th in 10 yard rushing rate, 6th in expected yards per carry, and was ranked by PFF as the 4th best RB that season. He's currently the 7th highest paid RB in the league in contract AAV.
Then the OL ranked 32nd in run block win rate in 2023 and 31st in 2024.
Looking back at 20 years of McDaniels as a OC or HC, there were 2 times when he drafted a first round RB to be the guy immediately as there was no incumbent RB: Moreno and Michel. The other time he drafted a first round RB was Maroney, but he was getting groomed to take over for a 32 year old Dillon. When his team's already had an established RB, the rookie backs didn't do that much.
When Stevenson was drafted, NE already had Damien Harris (remember him?). When Harris was healthy, Stevenson averaged 8.6 caries and 1.1 receptions a game as a rookie. The Pats had multiple players that WENT ON to do well, but not as rookies: Green-Ellis, Ridley, Vereen, White, DHarris, and Stevenson. Most of them barely even got on the field their first year. The most receptions by a rookie RB with McDaniels was Moreno . . . with 28.
As for McDaniels, IMO, he has been the one that's the JAG. Without Brady, he's predominantly struggled and been a Bottom 10 OC. But that's a different topic. In the 4 times he took over an offense 06 Pats, 09 Broncs, 11 Rams, and 22 Raiders), those teams had a net -28 points cored and -408 yards of offense compared to the prior season. He's not a quick turn specialist, and he has been a rookie escalator at any skill position.
Could Henderson be talented enough to be a market disrupter here? Sure. I'm just not sure a kickoff return TD in a preseason game is proof positive of that. In Stevenson's first preseason game as a rookie, he averaged 12.7 ypc and scored 2 TDs. Preseason games aren't usually indicative of much of anything.
The point in all of this is, the OL is the driver of RB success here, and if Stevenson or Henderson is going to be productive, the OL will have to play way better. Because Henderson will be stuck in the same mud as Stevenson was if its not.
Agree. 80 receptions is my prediction. Seems like a lot but with a less than stellar WR group, Henderson will see a massive target load IMO.Agreed Johnny. Barring injury I don't see a scenario where Henderson doesn't get 60 receptions. If his body can take 200 carries this guy is gonna surprise and be stop 10 rb this year. He just has that feel like he is gonna find the endzone 10 times. ImoYou sound like someone that has a lot of Stevenson shares. For fantasy, this situation won't be about who gets the most carries. I think Henderson is good enough to be a combination rush / rec to matter more in fantasy football. Because afterall, that's all that matters to me. At the end of the year, barring injury, you will see Henderson between 150-170 carries and unlimited potential in the receiving game. Perhaps 50+ receptions.Here are my observations. If people want to disregard them, so be it. I generally consider 20 year trends and recent full seasons more than a single preseason game, so that will tell you where I am headed. IMO, Stevenson is not a JAG. And McDaniels drafted him. (BTW, this is not a knock or a slight of Henderson in any way, shape, or form.)
Last year, Stephenson ranked 6th in the league in % of yards after contact and 9th overall in total YAC. At one point almost in the season last year, he had more yards after contact than he did total rushing yards. He was getting hit in the backfield nearly 50% of the time. That's not a Rhamondre problem. That's an OL problem.
In 2022, Stevenson put up these rankings:
3rd in % of yards after contact, 4th in total yards after contact, 3rd in RB receptions, 8th in missed tackle rate, 6th in 10 yard rushing rate, 6th in expected yards per carry, and was ranked by PFF as the 4th best RB that season. He's currently the 7th highest paid RB in the league in contract AAV.
Then the OL ranked 32nd in run block win rate in 2023 and 31st in 2024.
Looking back at 20 years of McDaniels as a OC or HC, there were 2 times when he drafted a first round RB to be the guy immediately as there was no incumbent RB: Moreno and Michel. The other time he drafted a first round RB was Maroney, but he was getting groomed to take over for a 32 year old Dillon. When his team's already had an established RB, the rookie backs didn't do that much.
When Stevenson was drafted, NE already had Damien Harris (remember him?). When Harris was healthy, Stevenson averaged 8.6 caries and 1.1 receptions a game as a rookie. The Pats had multiple players that WENT ON to do well, but not as rookies: Green-Ellis, Ridley, Vereen, White, DHarris, and Stevenson. Most of them barely even got on the field their first year. The most receptions by a rookie RB with McDaniels was Moreno . . . with 28.
As for McDaniels, IMO, he has been the one that's the JAG. Without Brady, he's predominantly struggled and been a Bottom 10 OC. But that's a different topic. In the 4 times he took over an offense 06 Pats, 09 Broncs, 11 Rams, and 22 Raiders), those teams had a net -28 points cored and -408 yards of offense compared to the prior season. He's not a quick turn specialist, and he has been a rookie escalator at any skill position.
Could Henderson be talented enough to be a market disrupter here? Sure. I'm just not sure a kickoff return TD in a preseason game is proof positive of that. In Stevenson's first preseason game as a rookie, he averaged 12.7 ypc and scored 2 TDs. Preseason games aren't usually indicative of much of anything.
The point in all of this is, the OL is the driver of RB success here, and if Stevenson or Henderson is going to be productive, the OL will have to play way better. Because Henderson will be stuck in the same mud as Stevenson was if its not.
He’s someone who has been a Pats fan and observer for 20+ years. But if you want to dismiss his views, that’s a choice.You sound like someone that has a lot of Stevenson shares. For fantasy, this situation won't be about who gets the most carries. I think Henderson is good enough to be a combination rush / rec to matter more in fantasy football. Because afterall, that's all that matters to me. At the end of the year, barring injury, you will see Henderson between 150-170 carries and unlimited potential in the receiving game. Perhaps 50+ receptions.Here are my observations. If people want to disregard them, so be it. I generally consider 20 year trends and recent full seasons more than a single preseason game, so that will tell you where I am headed. IMO, Stevenson is not a JAG. And McDaniels drafted him. (BTW, this is not a knock or a slight of Henderson in any way, shape, or form.)
Last year, Stephenson ranked 6th in the league in % of yards after contact and 9th overall in total YAC. At one point almost in the season last year, he had more yards after contact than he did total rushing yards. He was getting hit in the backfield nearly 50% of the time. That's not a Rhamondre problem. That's an OL problem.
In 2022, Stevenson put up these rankings:
3rd in % of yards after contact, 4th in total yards after contact, 3rd in RB receptions, 8th in missed tackle rate, 6th in 10 yard rushing rate, 6th in expected yards per carry, and was ranked by PFF as the 4th best RB that season. He's currently the 7th highest paid RB in the league in contract AAV.
Then the OL ranked 32nd in run block win rate in 2023 and 31st in 2024.
Looking back at 20 years of McDaniels as a OC or HC, there were 2 times when he drafted a first round RB to be the guy immediately as there was no incumbent RB: Moreno and Michel. The other time he drafted a first round RB was Maroney, but he was getting groomed to take over for a 32 year old Dillon. When his team's already had an established RB, the rookie backs didn't do that much.
When Stevenson was drafted, NE already had Damien Harris (remember him?). When Harris was healthy, Stevenson averaged 8.6 caries and 1.1 receptions a game as a rookie. The Pats had multiple players that WENT ON to do well, but not as rookies: Green-Ellis, Ridley, Vereen, White, DHarris, and Stevenson. Most of them barely even got on the field their first year. The most receptions by a rookie RB with McDaniels was Moreno . . . with 28.
As for McDaniels, IMO, he has been the one that's the JAG. Without Brady, he's predominantly struggled and been a Bottom 10 OC. But that's a different topic. In the 4 times he took over an offense 06 Pats, 09 Broncs, 11 Rams, and 22 Raiders), those teams had a net -28 points cored and -408 yards of offense compared to the prior season. He's not a quick turn specialist, and he has been a rookie escalator at any skill position.
Could Henderson be talented enough to be a market disrupter here? Sure. I'm just not sure a kickoff return TD in a preseason game is proof positive of that. In Stevenson's first preseason game as a rookie, he averaged 12.7 ypc and scored 2 TDs. Preseason games aren't usually indicative of much of anything.
The point in all of this is, the OL is the driver of RB success here, and if Stevenson or Henderson is going to be productive, the OL will have to play way better. Because Henderson will be stuck in the same mud as Stevenson was if its not.
Yep. In a big play league i think the Patriots already realize he is their best playmaker. Time to utilize him with the Gibbs blueprint. Gibbs rookie year of 182 rushes and 52 receptions is the floor in my opinion. Barring injuries of course.Agree. 80 receptions is my prediction. Seems like a lot but with a less than stellar WR group, Henderson will see a massive target load IMO.Agreed Johnny. Barring injury I don't see a scenario where Henderson doesn't get 60 receptions. If his body can take 200 carries this guy is gonna surprise and be stop 10 rb this year. He just has that feel like he is gonna find the endzone 10 times. ImoYou sound like someone that has a lot of Stevenson shares. For fantasy, this situation won't be about who gets the most carries. I think Henderson is good enough to be a combination rush / rec to matter more in fantasy football. Because afterall, that's all that matters to me. At the end of the year, barring injury, you will see Henderson between 150-170 carries and unlimited potential in the receiving game. Perhaps 50+ receptions.Here are my observations. If people want to disregard them, so be it. I generally consider 20 year trends and recent full seasons more than a single preseason game, so that will tell you where I am headed. IMO, Stevenson is not a JAG. And McDaniels drafted him. (BTW, this is not a knock or a slight of Henderson in any way, shape, or form.)
Last year, Stephenson ranked 6th in the league in % of yards after contact and 9th overall in total YAC. At one point almost in the season last year, he had more yards after contact than he did total rushing yards. He was getting hit in the backfield nearly 50% of the time. That's not a Rhamondre problem. That's an OL problem.
In 2022, Stevenson put up these rankings:
3rd in % of yards after contact, 4th in total yards after contact, 3rd in RB receptions, 8th in missed tackle rate, 6th in 10 yard rushing rate, 6th in expected yards per carry, and was ranked by PFF as the 4th best RB that season. He's currently the 7th highest paid RB in the league in contract AAV.
Then the OL ranked 32nd in run block win rate in 2023 and 31st in 2024.
Looking back at 20 years of McDaniels as a OC or HC, there were 2 times when he drafted a first round RB to be the guy immediately as there was no incumbent RB: Moreno and Michel. The other time he drafted a first round RB was Maroney, but he was getting groomed to take over for a 32 year old Dillon. When his team's already had an established RB, the rookie backs didn't do that much.
When Stevenson was drafted, NE already had Damien Harris (remember him?). When Harris was healthy, Stevenson averaged 8.6 caries and 1.1 receptions a game as a rookie. The Pats had multiple players that WENT ON to do well, but not as rookies: Green-Ellis, Ridley, Vereen, White, DHarris, and Stevenson. Most of them barely even got on the field their first year. The most receptions by a rookie RB with McDaniels was Moreno . . . with 28.
As for McDaniels, IMO, he has been the one that's the JAG. Without Brady, he's predominantly struggled and been a Bottom 10 OC. But that's a different topic. In the 4 times he took over an offense 06 Pats, 09 Broncs, 11 Rams, and 22 Raiders), those teams had a net -28 points cored and -408 yards of offense compared to the prior season. He's not a quick turn specialist, and he has been a rookie escalator at any skill position.
Could Henderson be talented enough to be a market disrupter here? Sure. I'm just not sure a kickoff return TD in a preseason game is proof positive of that. In Stevenson's first preseason game as a rookie, he averaged 12.7 ypc and scored 2 TDs. Preseason games aren't usually indicative of much of anything.
The point in all of this is, the OL is the driver of RB success here, and if Stevenson or Henderson is going to be productive, the OL will have to play way better. Because Henderson will be stuck in the same mud as Stevenson was if its not.
I just think it's a little too Stevenson friendly. Frankly I don't see the fantasy upside with Stevenson. Am I dismissing Stevenson, no. He will probably get more rushes than Henderson, but he won't be as fantasy relevant as Henderson. While I respect @Anarchy99 knowledge for all things Patriots, I'm an OSU fan that has watched a lot of Henderson.He’s someone who has been a Pats fan and observer for 20+ years. But if you want to dismiss his views, that’s a choice.You sound like someone that has a lot of Stevenson shares. For fantasy, this situation won't be about who gets the most carries. I think Henderson is good enough to be a combination rush / rec to matter more in fantasy football. Because afterall, that's all that matters to me. At the end of the year, barring injury, you will see Henderson between 150-170 carries and unlimited potential in the receiving game. Perhaps 50+ receptions.Here are my observations. If people want to disregard them, so be it. I generally consider 20 year trends and recent full seasons more than a single preseason game, so that will tell you where I am headed. IMO, Stevenson is not a JAG. And McDaniels drafted him. (BTW, this is not a knock or a slight of Henderson in any way, shape, or form.)
Last year, Stephenson ranked 6th in the league in % of yards after contact and 9th overall in total YAC. At one point almost in the season last year, he had more yards after contact than he did total rushing yards. He was getting hit in the backfield nearly 50% of the time. That's not a Rhamondre problem. That's an OL problem.
In 2022, Stevenson put up these rankings:
3rd in % of yards after contact, 4th in total yards after contact, 3rd in RB receptions, 8th in missed tackle rate, 6th in 10 yard rushing rate, 6th in expected yards per carry, and was ranked by PFF as the 4th best RB that season. He's currently the 7th highest paid RB in the league in contract AAV.
Then the OL ranked 32nd in run block win rate in 2023 and 31st in 2024.
Looking back at 20 years of McDaniels as a OC or HC, there were 2 times when he drafted a first round RB to be the guy immediately as there was no incumbent RB: Moreno and Michel. The other time he drafted a first round RB was Maroney, but he was getting groomed to take over for a 32 year old Dillon. When his team's already had an established RB, the rookie backs didn't do that much.
When Stevenson was drafted, NE already had Damien Harris (remember him?). When Harris was healthy, Stevenson averaged 8.6 caries and 1.1 receptions a game as a rookie. The Pats had multiple players that WENT ON to do well, but not as rookies: Green-Ellis, Ridley, Vereen, White, DHarris, and Stevenson. Most of them barely even got on the field their first year. The most receptions by a rookie RB with McDaniels was Moreno . . . with 28.
As for McDaniels, IMO, he has been the one that's the JAG. Without Brady, he's predominantly struggled and been a Bottom 10 OC. But that's a different topic. In the 4 times he took over an offense 06 Pats, 09 Broncs, 11 Rams, and 22 Raiders), those teams had a net -28 points cored and -408 yards of offense compared to the prior season. He's not a quick turn specialist, and he has been a rookie escalator at any skill position.
Could Henderson be talented enough to be a market disrupter here? Sure. I'm just not sure a kickoff return TD in a preseason game is proof positive of that. In Stevenson's first preseason game as a rookie, he averaged 12.7 ypc and scored 2 TDs. Preseason games aren't usually indicative of much of anything.
The point in all of this is, the OL is the driver of RB success here, and if Stevenson or Henderson is going to be productive, the OL will have to play way better. Because Henderson will be stuck in the same mud as Stevenson was if its not.
I too am a Buckeye's fan. My son graduated from tOSU. My in-laws live there. I frequent Ohio regularly. I met Ryan Day last year at my other son's graduatin (he was the commencement speaker). As I said . . . this isn't about Henderson. He's very talented and explosive. He will likely turn into the next guy after Stevenson.I just think it's a little too Stevenson friendly. Frankly I don't see the fantasy upside with Stevenson. Am I dismissing Stevenson, no. He will probably get more rushes than Henderson, but he won't be as fantasy relevant as Henderson. While I respect @Anarchy99 knowledge for all things Patriots, I'm an OSU fan that has watched a lot of Henderson.
I would think having as you said, "NE OL has been deplorable lately", that would benefit Henderson even more if they can get him out in space. Stevenson, not so much. Players like Barry Sanders played behind horrible OLs and was able to make something out of nothing because of his explosiveness. Not saying Henderson is another Barry Sanders, but just using that as an example of an RB with Henderson's architype and the anti-Stevenson architype.I too am a Buckeye's fan. My son graduated from tOSU. My in-laws live there. I frequent Ohio regularly. I met Ryan Day last year at my other son's graduatin (he was the commencement speaker). As I said . . . this isn't about Henderson. He's very talented and explosive. He will likely turn into the next guy after Stevenson.I just think it's a little too Stevenson friendly. Frankly I don't see the fantasy upside with Stevenson. Am I dismissing Stevenson, no. He will probably get more rushes than Henderson, but he won't be as fantasy relevant as Henderson. While I respect @Anarchy99 knowledge for all things Patriots, I'm an OSU fan that has watched a lot of Henderson.
All I did was present the actually known outcomes from the past 20 years (for McDaniels) and the last few years for Stevenson and NE. That's not an opinion. That's what actually happened.
Since I posted, NO ONE has addressed the 800 pound gorillas in the room: the NE OL has been deplorable lately, the offense been predominantly been incompetent, and McDaniels is not Ben Johnson.
I'm not looking to start a holy war and launch another round of The Crusades . . . certainly not with you. But was there something about McDaniels without Brady that would indicate he could be "lethal?" Because the numbers just don't back it up.His comp is a cross between muscle hampster and james white. mcdaniels coaching this machine could be lethal.
NE has had great in space and fast players over the years . . . White, Vereen, Strong at RB and Thornton, Dorsett, Bethel Johnson, Brandon Tate, Chad Jackson, Donte Stallworth. Again, I am not suggesting Henderson isn't a top talent. I'm just not convinced McDaniels is the guy that can unlock and unleash him.I would think having as you said, "NE OL has been deplorable lately", that would benefit Henderson even more if they can get him out in space. Stevenson, not so much. Players like Barry Sanders played behind horrible OLs and was able to make something out of nothing because of his explosiveness. Not saying Henderson is another Barry Sanders, but just using that as an example of an RB with Henderson's architype and the anti-Stevenson architype.
You're not suggesting Henderson is a top talent? Well, I beg to disagree with that for sure.NE has had great in space and fast players over the years . . . White, Vereen, Strong at RB and Thornton, Dorsett, Bethel Johnson, Brandon Tate, Chad Jackson, Donte Stallworth. Again, I am not suggesting Henderson is a top talent. I'm just not convinced McDaniels is the guy that can unlock and unleash him.I would think having as you said, "NE OL has been deplorable lately", that would benefit Henderson even more if they can get him out in space. Stevenson, not so much. Players like Barry Sanders played behind horrible OLs and was able to make something out of nothing because of his explosiveness. Not saying Henderson is another Barry Sanders, but just using that as an example of an RB with Henderson's architype and the anti-Stevenson architype.
NE has had great in space and fast players over the years . . . White, Vereen, Strong at RB and Thornton, Dorsett, Bethel Johnson, Brandon Tate, Chad Jackson, Donte Stallworth. Again, I am not suggesting Henderson is a top talent. I'm just not convinced McDaniels is the guy that can unlock and unleash him.I would think having as you said, "NE OL has been deplorable lately", that would benefit Henderson even more if they can get him out in space. Stevenson, not so much. Players like Barry Sanders played behind horrible OLs and was able to make something out of nothing because of his explosiveness. Not saying Henderson is another Barry Sanders, but just using that as an example of an RB with Henderson's architype and the anti-Stevenson architype.
should have been ISNT. Meaning i think he is.You're not suggesting Henderson is a top talent? Well, I beg to disagree with that for sure.NE has had great in space and fast players over the years . . . White, Vereen, Strong at RB and Thornton, Dorsett, Bethel Johnson, Brandon Tate, Chad Jackson, Donte Stallworth. Again, I am not suggesting Henderson is a top talent. I'm just not convinced McDaniels is the guy that can unlock and unleash him.I would think having as you said, "NE OL has been deplorable lately", that would benefit Henderson even more if they can get him out in space. Stevenson, not so much. Players like Barry Sanders played behind horrible OLs and was able to make something out of nothing because of his explosiveness. Not saying Henderson is another Barry Sanders, but just using that as an example of an RB with Henderson's architype and the anti-Stevenson architype.
I'd say Demaryius Thomas and Eric Decker were far better post-McDaniels. But McDaniels drafted guys that didn't pan out. Is that on him or the player? He turned Welker and Edelman into top slot guys, no doubt. But NE was already ahead of the game in using a slot WR with Troy Brown, especially with Brady.What talented players would you say McDaniels held back? Who took it to the next level once they left his system?
I'd say Demaryius Thomas and Eric Decker were far better post-McDaniels. But McDaniels drafted guys that didn't pan out. Is that on him or the player? He turned Welker and Edelman into top slot guys, no doubt. But NE was already ahead of the game in using a slot WR with Troy Brown, especially with Brady.What talented players would you say McDaniels held back? Who took it to the next level once they left his system?
fair. however (a) can you point to a similar to white talent mcdaniels has had outside the brady era, and (b) I know. I'm just fetishizing.I'm not looking to start a holy war and launch another round of The Crusades . . . certainly not with you. But was there something about McDaniels without Brady that would indicate he could be "lethal?" Because the numbers just don't back it up.His comp is a cross between muscle hampster and james white. mcdaniels coaching this machine could be lethal.
this discussion is about him being an OC in his time with the Pats
Here are my observations. If people want to disregard them, so be it. I generally consider 20 year trends and recent full seasons more than a single preseason game, so that will tell you where I am headed. IMO, Stevenson is not a JAG. And McDaniels drafted him. (BTW, this is not a knock or a slight of Henderson in any way, shape, or form.)
Last year, Stephenson ranked 6th in the league in % of yards after contact and 9th overall in total YAC. At one point almost in the season last year, he had more yards after contact than he did total rushing yards. He was getting hit in the backfield nearly 50% of the time. That's not a Rhamondre problem. That's an OL problem.
In 2022, Stevenson put up these rankings:
3rd in % of yards after contact, 4th in total yards after contact, 3rd in RB receptions, 8th in missed tackle rate, 6th in 10 yard rushing rate, 6th in expected yards per carry, and was ranked by PFF as the 4th best RB that season. He's currently the 7th highest paid RB in the league in contract AAV.
Then the OL ranked 32nd in run block win rate in 2023 and 31st in 2024.
Looking back at 20 years of McDaniels as a OC or HC, there were 2 times when he drafted a first round RB to be the guy immediately as there was no incumbent RB: Moreno and Michel. The other time he drafted a first round RB was Maroney, but he was getting groomed to take over for a 32 year old Dillon. When his team's already had an established RB, the rookie backs didn't do that much.
When Stevenson was drafted, NE already had Damien Harris (remember him?). When Harris was healthy, Stevenson averaged 8.6 caries and 1.1 receptions a game as a rookie. The Pats had multiple players that WENT ON to do well, but not as rookies: Green-Ellis, Ridley, Vereen, White, DHarris, and Stevenson. Most of them barely even got on the field their first year. The most receptions by a rookie RB with McDaniels was Moreno . . . with 28.
As for McDaniels, IMO, he has been the one that's the JAG. Without Brady, he's predominantly struggled and been a Bottom 10 OC. But that's a different topic. In the 4 times he took over an offense 06 Pats, 09 Broncs, 11 Rams, and 22 Raiders), those teams had a net -28 points cored and -408 yards of offense compared to the prior season. He's not a quick turn specialist, and he has been a rookie escalator at any skill position.
Could Henderson be talented enough to be a market disrupter here? Sure. I'm just not sure a kickoff return TD in a preseason game is proof positive of that. In Stevenson's first preseason game as a rookie, he averaged 12.7 ypc and scored 2 TDs. Preseason games aren't usually indicative of much of anything.
The point in all of this is, the OL is the driver of RB success here, and if Stevenson or Henderson is going to be productive, the OL will have to play way better. Because Henderson will be stuck in the same mud as Stevenson was if its not.
this discussion is about him being an OC in his time with the Pats
Fair, but there are some very notable differences between his OC setup then and now. I lean towards the idea that Josh McD has done nothing notable at any point in his career sans a certain GOAT QB. And that doesn't even mention Jelly Belly b/c in other fairness Vrabel may be a decent proxy.
All of the above aside, I luv Henderson the player. Kid is sick and definitely levels above whatever it is you guys are referring to as RHam.
Doug Kyed
Patriots OC Josh McDaniels on TreVeyon Henderson: "We’ve had some really good players with skillsets that are somewhat like his — maybe nobody quite as fast. (Shane) Vereen was probably the fastest — him and Danny Woodhead were fast, but TreVeyon’s fast fast."
Certainly encouraging to think of Henderson being used like Vereen and Woodhead……Doug Kyed
Patriots OC Josh McDaniels on TreVeyon Henderson: "We’ve had some really good players with skillsets that are somewhat like his — maybe nobody quite as fast. (Shane) Vereen was probably the fastest — him and Danny Woodhead were fast, but TreVeyon’s fast fast."
Carlos A. Lopez
#Patriots OC Josh McDaniels on RB TreVeyon Henderson:
“Awesome individual. Really hard worker. Smart kid. Can process a lot of information… explosive… and tough... I don’t have many negatives to say...”
McDaniels says the rookie is the fastest running back he’s worked with![]()