What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Recently viewed movie thread - Rental Edition (6 Viewers)

Saw The Walk

Entertaining, lighthearted, and interesting. You can't help but hold your breath a few times during the actual walk.

Looked up more info and found that it was pretty accurate.

 
Not a super hero movie guy at all but I watch them when they hit HBO/PRIME/ whatever.

I've enjoyed a couple of them but not many.

I really enjoyed Avengers II - Age of Ultron.

 
caught an episode of "midtown" on Amazon Prime over the weekend. it's a low-budget cop comedy show. it's kind of funny in a Denis Leary kind of way. maybe it was a web series? dunno but it was amusing if not exactly original or a home-run.

 
Denis Villeneuve's 'Blade Runner 2' Starring

Ryan Gosling & Harrison Ford Officially Starts Filming In July
I wanted to be against this movie since a sequel seems wrong, but with Gosling in it I have difficulty imagining it will be bad.
I find that the actor has very little control with the overall quality of the film. The director is the name that people should pay attention to and fortunately Villeneuve has a very solid track record.

 
Sweet J said:
cosjobs said:
Interesting:

10 Great Filmmakers’ Top 10 Favorite Movies

Now, I love classic movies. But it just so happens that most of my favorite movies were made in the last 35 years. If you read these lists, about 75% of their favorites are from 1925 - 1960, and some of these directors don't even list one film made after 1970. I just can't agree. Love Scorsese's movies, but what he's saying is movies were better 60 years ago, and I think that's silly.
Interesting. I like Edgar Wright's list the best.
I like Rian Johnson's.

I think, in regards to our modern "masters", they'll list films that influenced them the most during their formative years... so it makes sense that they're mostly pre 1970.
That and they probably understand that they would look like ###### #### when they each listed 10 films they directed.
yeah. I see this with all kinds of creative types- architects, designers, fashion designers, etc... the top people have the hardest time giving their peers proper due, so it's always the esoteric or previous era types that get mentioned.
I don't get it. I work in a creative field, and great work is great work.
They were asked their "favorite movies." If you asked for my favorite movies it would be a completely different list than, "the best," or "the greatest."

"Night of the Comet" would likely make my 10 favorite, but no way I'd ever include in a best or greatest ranking.
I f^cking LOVED "Night of the Comet." So much so that I refuse to watch it again, because I'm afraid it won't hold up and spoil the memory for me.
<spoiler> it holds up like Catherine Mary Stewart's perky titttiees</spoiler>

 
Sweet J said:
cosjobs said:
Interesting:

10 Great Filmmakers’ Top 10 Favorite Movies

Now, I love classic movies. But it just so happens that most of my favorite movies were made in the last 35 years. If you read these lists, about 75% of their favorites are from 1925 - 1960, and some of these directors don't even list one film made after 1970. I just can't agree. Love Scorsese's movies, but what he's saying is movies were better 60 years ago, and I think that's silly.
Interesting. I like Edgar Wright's list the best.
I like Rian Johnson's.

I think, in regards to our modern "masters", they'll list films that influenced them the most during their formative years... so it makes sense that they're mostly pre 1970.
That and they probably understand that they would look like ###### #### when they each listed 10 films they directed.
yeah. I see this with all kinds of creative types- architects, designers, fashion designers, etc... the top people have the hardest time giving their peers proper due, so it's always the esoteric or previous era types that get mentioned.
I don't get it. I work in a creative field, and great work is great work.
They were asked their "favorite movies." If you asked for my favorite movies it would be a completely different list than, "the best," or "the greatest."

"Night of the Comet" would likely make my 10 favorite, but no way I'd ever include in a best or greatest ranking.
I f^cking LOVED "Night of the Comet." So much so that I refuse to watch it again, because I'm afraid it won't hold up and spoil the memory for me.
<spoiler> it holds up like Catherine Mary Stewart's perky titttiees</spoiler>
:wub: :wub: :wub: :wub:

 
From those directors' lists.

Sorcerer.

A must watch. Shocked I had never even heard of it. Roy Scheider. Friedkin directed.

"Four unfortunate men from different parts of the globe agree to risk their lives transporting gallons of nitroglycerin across dangerous South American jungle."

10/10. A classic. Would love to see this on the big screen.

Being There.

Basically the inspiration for Forrest Gump I imagine. Peter Sellers is brilliant but this was a tough watch for me at times. Appreciated it and glad I watched but wouldn't run it back. Really could have benefited by cutting 30 minutes. Also think they could have added just a touch more variety with Sellers' dialogue. Perhaps some lines from tv ads/shows from the time. Basically what Gump did but much more subtle. Different movies.

7/10. Understand why it's a classic. Not one for me but could have been.

 
From those directors' lists.

Sorcerer.

A must watch. Shocked I had never even heard of it. Roy Scheider. Friedkin directed.

"Four unfortunate men from different parts of the globe agree to risk their lives transporting gallons of nitroglycerin across dangerous South American jungle."

10/10. A classic. Would love to see this on the big screen.
one of Friedkin's best

 
From those directors' lists.

Sorcerer.

A must watch. Shocked I had never even heard of it. Roy Scheider. Friedkin directed.

"Four unfortunate men from different parts of the globe agree to risk their lives transporting gallons of nitroglycerin across dangerous South American jungle."

10/10. A classic. Would love to see this on the big screen.
one of Friedkin's best
I've never seen it- need to fix that.

and I loved Being There- always seems like it's on a list of my favorite, under-appreciated movies.

 
From those directors' lists.

Sorcerer.

A must watch. Shocked I had never even heard of it. Roy Scheider. Friedkin directed.

"Four unfortunate men from different parts of the globe agree to risk their lives transporting gallons of nitroglycerin across dangerous South American jungle."

10/10. A classic. Would love to see this on the big screen.
one of Friedkin's best
I've never seen it- need to fix that.

and I loved Being There- always seems like it's on a list of my favorite, under-appreciated movies.
I rarely read a bad word about Sorcerer, but I found it pretty dull :shrug:

 
From those directors' lists.

Sorcerer.

A must watch. Shocked I had never even heard of it. Roy Scheider. Friedkin directed.

"Four unfortunate men from different parts of the globe agree to risk their lives transporting gallons of nitroglycerin across dangerous South American jungle."

10/10. A classic. Would love to see this on the big screen.
one of Friedkin's best
I've never seen it- need to fix that.

and I loved Being There- always seems like it's on a list of my favorite, under-appreciated movies.
I rarely read a bad word about Sorcerer, but I found it pretty dull :shrug:
Really? The scene on the bridge has enough tension for 10 movies. And the rest of it is good too. You sound like Andy.

 
From those directors' lists.

Sorcerer.

A must watch. Shocked I had never even heard of it. Roy Scheider. Friedkin directed.

"Four unfortunate men from different parts of the globe agree to risk their lives transporting gallons of nitroglycerin across dangerous South American jungle."

10/10. A classic. Would love to see this on the big screen.

Being There.

Basically the inspiration for Forrest Gump I imagine. Peter Sellers is brilliant but this was a tough watch for me at times. Appreciated it and glad I watched but wouldn't run it back. Really could have benefited by cutting 30 minutes. Also think they could have added just a touch more variety with Sellers' dialogue. Perhaps some lines from tv ads/shows from the time. Basically what Gump did but much more subtle. Different movies.

7/10. Understand why it's a classic. Not one for me but could have been.
Two great films.

 
From those directors' lists.

Sorcerer.

A must watch. Shocked I had never even heard of it. Roy Scheider. Friedkin directed.

"Four unfortunate men from different parts of the globe agree to risk their lives transporting gallons of nitroglycerin across dangerous South American jungle."

10/10. A classic. Would love to see this on the big screen.
one of Friedkin's best
I've never seen it- need to fix that.

and I loved Being There- always seems like it's on a list of my favorite, under-appreciated movies.
I rarely read a bad word about Sorcerer, but I found it pretty dull :shrug:
Me too. I saw it in the theater when it came out and while suspenseful (duh- an old truck carrying dynamite up a narrow mountain road), the narrative never matched the visuals.

 
Book of Eli - (7.5) Pretty good post apocalyptic flick starring Denzel and with Gary Oldman playing his typecast over the top Wack Job.

Odd Thomas - (3) Pretty bad adaptation of an excellent Dean Koontz (save the literary snob remarks for the book thread) book.

 
Book of Eli - (7.5) Pretty good post apocalyptic flick starring Denzel and with Gary Oldman playing his typecast over the top Wack Job.

Odd Thomas - (3) Pretty bad adaptation of an excellent Dean Koontz (save the literary snob remarks for the book thread) book.
hmmm.. I haven't read the first book in quite sometime so I don't recall how close the movie was to the book..

But as a Stand alone movie I thought it was pretty well done.. at least compared to most of the other Dean Koontz books to movie tries.. Phantom as an example was a HUGE disappointment..

As a "Stand Alone" movie I'd easily give Odd Thomas a 3.5 out of 5. :shrug:

 
Book of Eli - (7.5) Pretty good post apocalyptic flick starring Denzel and with Gary Oldman playing his typecast over the top Wack Job.

Odd Thomas - (3) Pretty bad adaptation of an excellent Dean Koontz (save the literary snob remarks for the book thread) book.
hmmm.. I haven't read the first book in quite sometime so I don't recall how close the movie was to the book..

But as a Stand alone movie I thought it was pretty well done.. at least compared to most of the other Dean Koontz books to movie tries.. Phantom as an example was a HUGE disappointment..

As a "Stand Alone" movie I'd easily give Odd Thomas a 3.5 out of 5. :shrug:
I agree. I enjoyed the movie a great deal and liked the book as well.

 
I didn't like Yelchin as Odd.

The lovey dovey between Odd and Stormy was a little much.

No Elvis (loved this in the story).

Hated Patton Oswald as Ozzie and the character was pretty much left out of the movie (fortunately as it turned out).

All the cell phone use, i thought i was watching The Good Wife.

Seemed like every time Odd called him the sheriff was making out with his wife.

Is it me or did the movie seem to kind of combine the sheriff (his supporter) and Ozzie (his confidant).

Odd seemed like a major bad ### from the first scene kicking that guys ### (flying over hedges?) ("I learned to take care of myself"). Seemed like the director was looking for every glass object he could think of to bust through in the fight. Just distracting.

I didn't hate the movie, I just think I had high expectations based on the book and the movie missed on a lot of levels :shrug:

 
Mr Brooks 8.0. Solid thriller with Kevin Costner, William Hurt and Demi Moore :wub: . (Even at 45 and in a pant suit at she is still smokin. Seems to have lost a lot of the raspy/throaty voice tho)

Really liked WH in this, and i thought the whole alter ego bit was played well. Some easy to guess plot twists were saved by a quick moving story and good performances. Also, did I mention Demi Moore was in this? :wub:

 
As I am watching stuff with my 9 year old, I am starting to chip away at my grumpiness a little. I still haven't forgiven him for not liking The Goonies, but he is starting to dabble in some pg-13 stuff so we have been watching some of the Marvel movies. While I still don't think they are the best of the Marvel movies, I was able to have more fun with them and enjoy them a tad more just because he was laughing and having a good time.

We watched Thor and Guardians of the Galaxy over the weekend. He laughed a lot at Thor, and seemed to like that one slightly more. GoG has more adult content in it. He still liked it, especially Pratt and the raccoon, but seemed to get twitchy and bored at times. Maybe it got too weird at times? Just as I did before, I think Thor is worse than GoG, but both are at the bottom of the Marvel list for me. Still, I had a lot more fun with them the second time around.

Goosebumps:

He liked it, and it's a good starter PG creepy movie. For me it was what I thought it would be - an ad for the books and the author. They must have been paid to mention the title of all the books during the movie and say R.L. Stein 100 times.

 
End of the Tour.

Segel was terrific. Eisenberg kind of ruined it. He couldn't even really smoke a cigarette correctly. Annoying. You cast the eisenberg part right and this one sails.

I still really enjoyed it. Was listening to every word intently. Segel performance really flying under the radar.

7/10.

 
Need to watch Sicario again. Underwhelmed the first time. But I was buzzing.

Remember liking movie but underwhelmed because performances very basic. Expected more.

 
From those directors' lists.

Sorcerer.

A must watch. Shocked I had never even heard of it. Roy Scheider. Friedkin directed.

"Four unfortunate men from different parts of the globe agree to risk their lives transporting gallons of nitroglycerin across dangerous South American jungle."

10/10. A classic. Would love to see this on the big screen.
one of Friedkin's best
I've never seen it- need to fix that.

and I loved Being There- always seems like it's on a list of my favorite, under-appreciated movies.
I rarely read a bad word about Sorcerer, but I found it pretty dull :shrug:
Me too. I saw it in the theater when it came out and while suspenseful (duh- an old truck carrying dynamite up a narrow mountain road), the narrative never matched the visuals.
I just watched it. Will say some scenes were deftly crafted. Ones u don't see in a suspenseful action movie nowadays.

The scheider dancing scene at the end is the type of thing that separates this one.

After all that. A beautiful human scene. Believable too.

 
End of the Tour.

Segel was terrific. Eisenberg kind of ruined it. He couldn't even really smoke a cigarette correctly. Annoying. You cast the eisenberg part right and this one sails.

I still really enjoyed it. Was listening to every word intently. Segel performance really flying under the radar.

7/10.
Really interesting movie, but there was not enough of Wallace's insight. It was more in the vein of the tortured artist hesitant to embrace fame theme, which was pretty pedestrian. Still a good watch.

 
Valley of the Dolls: 2.5/5. Thought it would be interesting, but so meh.

Beyond the Valley of the Dolls: 3/5. Not much better, but it had lots of boobies. Russ Meyer one upped the original in that area.

Might check out more Russ Meyer films. I know they are bad going in.

 
Mr Brooks 8.0. Solid thriller with Kevin Costner, William Hurt and Demi Moore :wub: . (Even at 45 and in a pant suit at she is still smokin. Seems to have lost a lot of the raspy/throaty voice tho)

Really liked WH in this, and i thought the whole alter ego bit was played well. Some easy to guess plot twists were saved by a quick moving story and good performances. Also, did I mention Demi Moore was in this? :wub:
One of my favorite movies. Clever, smart, different. Maybe not very believable, but very entertaining.

 
Saw "The Big Short" this weekend. Loved it. Very entertaining way to tell a horrible story.

A little complicated if you're like me and don't understand the higher end intricacies of the housing market, but they did a nice job of throwing in "tutorials" with some good cameo scenes.

Really enjoyed Christian Bale in this.

 
Transcendence

This got awful reviews. Depp was solid I thought. In fact I was really enjoying the movie and its universe right up until it did the "two years later" jump. Then it all went to crap and the ending while trying to be some kind of lofty message just fell flat. Up until the calendar jump it was a decent B/B- movie for me. But that jump and everything after made this really annoying in the end and it gets put in the "hated it" column.

Armegeddon

You think you know someone after being with them for about 20 years, but it turns out my wife had never seen this. IT made rewtching it so much more enjoyable as she basically thought it was a comedy - and when you watch it that way it's so much better - and I like the movie to begin with. But as a comedy this thing is pretty good. Buschemi was great.

Knights Tale

The Heath Ledger jousting movie. Another rewatch for me. I think this is one of those movies where I enjoyed the characters a lot more than the actual story.

 
Ex Machina - 8.5 awesome original story

Kingsman - 7.5 entertaining

Sicario - 9.5

Hateful 8 - 9.5

Revanant - 8

Specter - 5

Mad Max - 7.5

The Gambler - 6.5

Guardians of the Galaxy - 7

The Big Short - 8.5
Great list.Gotta say that I still smile every time I think about Kingsman. It really was a breath of fresh air in a genre that has pretty much blurred the lines between pretty much every action franchise. You just can't tell one from the other anymore. I appreciate how Kingsman stood out from all the noise.
Kingsman is what Specter should have been.

 
Valley of the Dolls: 2.5/5. Thought it would be interesting, but so meh.

Beyond the Valley of the Dolls: 3/5. Not much better, but it had lots of boobies. Russ Meyer one upped the original in that area.

Might check out more Russ Meyer films. I know they are bad going in.
Russ Meyer films are great if you like Hollywood breasts. That's why Ebert wrote the script for Beyond; he loved them, too.

 
The Martian 2.5/5

Some funny and interesting parts. But like others have said the movie seemed so overdone with plots from other recent movies.

Mission Impossible: Rogue Nation 3.5/5

These movies are pure fun. Cruise does a nice job and that leading lady actress was stunning. I just always get slightly annoyed that people are always perfectly timed and presence for the random spot that a chase scene ends. And, as always with the Mission Impossible movies, after ten minutes has passed since the movie ended I don't remember a damn thing about it. But still a great Friday night fun, zero thinking required movie.

 
The Martian 2.5/5

Some funny and interesting parts. But like others have said the movie seemed so overdone with plots from other recent movies.

Mission Impossible: Rogue Nation 3.5/5

These movies are pure fun. Cruise does a nice job and that leading lady actress was stunning. I just always get slightly annoyed that people are always perfectly timed and presence for the random spot that a chase scene ends. And, as always with the Mission Impossible movies, after ten minutes has passed since the movie ended I don't remember a damn thing about it. But still a great Friday night fun, zero thinking required movie.
I really liked the Martian but to each his own.

But Rogue Nation was, to me, the best of the series. You are right, pure fun. I just really liked everything about this one.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top