ShadowMaster
Footballguy
I seem to loose MANY close games in this group - so I think the single PK choice may haunt more than a few guys.
My past attempts at RB2BC have not gone well. The risk mitigator in me does prefer a single strong player to fill that RB2 role, but your right that you can probably get by with a few consistant role (3rd down or short yardage) players to contribute to that slot. The key word being consistant.
				
			My past attempts at RB2BC have not gone well. The risk mitigator in me does prefer a single strong player to fill that RB2 role, but your right that you can probably get by with a few consistant role (3rd down or short yardage) players to contribute to that slot. The key word being consistant.
			
				Last edited by a moderator: 
			
		
	
								
								
									
								
							
							 
	 
 
		 
 
		
 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
  have to use real names
  have to use real names   

 
 
		 
 
 
 
		 
 
		 
  
 
		
 What's funny is I saw what you posted and said, "Boy I hope it's me!"  And sure enough... it is!  Of course, that means your teamwill win by 30, despite all that...
  What's funny is I saw what you posted and said, "Boy I hope it's me!"  And sure enough... it is!  Of course, that means your teamwill win by 30, despite all that... 
  
 
		 
 
		