What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Reunion Teams & Discourse (1 Viewer)

I feel like I should let PAE tell this story but I gotta share...

So it took a day to get the pick in and it's Brandon Marshall. PAE is at the airport in Minneapolis changing planes and you won't believe it but who does he run into? Brandon Marshall...maybe that's a sign.

Just thought that was an interesting story.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I feel like I should let PAE tell this story but I gotta share...So it took a day to get the pick in and it's Brandon Marshall. PAE is at the airport in Minneapolis changing planes and you won't believe it but who does he run into? Brandon Marshall...maybe that's a sign. Just thought that was an interesting story.
maybe he told him who to pick now since he is BACK OTC
 
We were wanting Steve Smith in the 3rd round so to be able to have him on the way back in the 4th was a gift. After waiting patiently at WR and then snagging these 2 guys sets us up very well.

We got a site link so I can see the teams?

 
We were wanting Steve Smith in the 3rd round so to be able to have him on the way back in the 4th was a gift. After waiting patiently at WR and then snagging these 2 guys sets us up very well.

We got a site link so I can see the teams?
Yea, we both have two WRs now...with the same bye weeks. Ya snatched SS.Team link

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Was eating lunch today and ran into Marques Colston and I said it must be a sign and then some good for nothin nabs him one spot before me two hours later.

Welcome to my team Mr. Britt

 
Screwed up the instant pick there somehow... Definitely did not want Rivers. I had only Stewart on the list so I assumed it would only take him then stop.

Oh well. Really needed a WR there though.

 
GREAT job this morning guys - really nice to see a slew of picks sitting down to the computer at 8 AM

...and Thanks for letting Matt Ryan hang around until 6.05

One thing I will mention again now that we are on the 8 hour clock - if you make selections and use auto-pick, do not use "Fail Safe" unless you want to review previous picks and your list before you make your pick - it will wait until 7:59 into your clock - it just makes sure your pick is made before your time expires. You want to use Instant Pick and that can be a list you want to let go for several picks OR you can just use Instant - One pick only

 
Screwed up the instant pick there somehow... Definitely did not want Rivers. I had only Stewart on the list so I assumed it would only take him then stop.Oh well. Really needed a WR there though.
Makes more sense as you really surprised me with that 2nd QB pick. Expected BigBen or Shaub to fall, but happy with Fitz in that Buffalo spread offense as a consolidation. Most point at his inconsistant play, but I think that should be expected from a guy who only started 2 full years (and 2 partial). I like his 3/4 TD game track record and potential.NEVER expected to get Gonzo back to me at 6.14 and TE9? Forget PPR, Gonzo exceeds that slot in standard scoring every year since 1998. I thank each and every one of you for this gift.
 
Screwed up the instant pick there somehow... Definitely did not want Rivers. I had only Stewart on the list so I assumed it would only take him then stop.Oh well. Really needed a WR there though.
Makes more sense as you really surprised me with that 2nd QB pick. Expected BigBen or Shaub to fall, but happy with Fitz in that Buffalo spread offense as a consolidation. Most point at his inconsistant play, but I think that should be expected from a guy who only started 2 full years (and 2 partial). I like his 3/4 TD game track record and potential.NEVER expected to get Gonzo back to me at 6.14 and TE9? Forget PPR, Gonzo exceeds that slot in standard scoring every year since 1998. I thank each and every one of you for this gift.
Fwiw I was debating gonzo and djax there. Probably would have went djax, certainly not Rivers. I thought it would Just use my list and didn't know it would pull someone off their "top 300"... Whatever
 
Screwed up the instant pick there somehow... Definitely did not want Rivers. I had only Stewart on the list so I assumed it would only take him then stop.Oh well. Really needed a WR there though.
Makes more sense as you really surprised me with that 2nd QB pick. Expected BigBen or Shaub to fall, but happy with Fitz in that Buffalo spread offense as a consolidation. Most point at his inconsistant play, but I think that should be expected from a guy who only started 2 full years (and 2 partial). I like his 3/4 TD game track record and potential.NEVER expected to get Gonzo back to me at 6.14 and TE9? Forget PPR, Gonzo exceeds that slot in standard scoring every year since 1998. I thank each and every one of you for this gift.
Fwiw I was debating gonzo and djax there. Probably would have went djax, certainly not Rivers. I thought it would Just use my list and didn't know it would pull someone off their "top 300"... Whatever
We took Djax...assuming you mean DeSean Jackson in the 5th.
 
Screwed up the instant pick there somehow... Definitely did not want Rivers. I had only Stewart on the list so I assumed it would only take him then stop.Fwiw I was debating gonzo and djax there. Probably would have went djax, certainly not Rivers. I thought it would Just use my list and didn't know it would pull someone off their "top 300"... Whatever
There is a note there that auto pick defaults to their rankings IF (only if) you have set that AND there is no one left in your queue
 
Another reminder about WHICH auto-pick mode you should use

1)Fail-Safe. Allow the auto-picker to select the next player from my auto-draft list only if I did not make a selection within the time limit for my draft. Fail-Safe mode is used when you believe you may not be able to get your pick in on time (due to internet connectivity problems, for example) and you do not want your turn to be skipped. If time expires in fail-safe mode the system will first try to select a player from the user’s auto-draft list in the order defined by the user. ONLY if the auto-draft list does not exist, will the system then fall back to the RTSports Draft Guide rankings to make a selection.

2)Instant. Allow the auto-picker to select the next player from your auto-draft list as soon as it is your turn to pick. The user will not be manually making a pick in this instance, so fill out your auto-draft list wisely! Two important notes about this mode:

1.If your draft is running, you are currently up in the draft order, and you select "INSTANT", the system will IMMEDIATELY make a pick for your team. Be sure to know the current state of your draft before you change to this mode.

2.The system will first try to select a player from the user’s auto-draft list in the order defined by the user. ONLY if the auto-draft list does not exist, will the system then fall back to the RTSports Draft Guide rankings to make a selection.

3) Instant 1 Pick. This mode works the same as the Instant mode described above, however, it will only make 1 instant pick and then the auto-picker will be turned off.

Seems to me like we want to use #3 - the Instant pick for next pick ONLY

and we do NOT want to use Fail Safe which will take your full eight hours before it picks for you

 
anybody else besides me think that the wheels fall off from Tony Gonzalez this year? FBG rank is TE #8 and all the projections provided give him 60+ receptions, but he turned 36 years old in February 2012. He has had an awesome career, but seemed much slower to me last season and this is one year later. Ginzalez has played for 15 years already and has never missed more than one game in a season. That is a lot of collisions over a lot of years.

He probably is the all-time greatest TE so maybe I am wrong, but it seems unlikely to me that he could finish in the top ten for TEs again this season approaching 37 years of age.

Wesley Walls has the most catches ever by a TE at 36 years of age or greater and that was 20 catches for 222 yards and 1 TD in 2003.

 
anybody else besides me think that the wheels fall off from Tony Gonzalez this year? FBG rank is TE #8 and all the projections provided give him 60+ receptions, but he turned 36 years old in February 2012. He has had an awesome career, but seemed much slower to me last season and this is one year later. Ginzalez has played for 15 years already and has never missed more than one game in a season. That is a lot of collisions over a lot of years.He probably is the all-time greatest TE so maybe I am wrong, but it seems unlikely to me that he could finish in the top ten for TEs again this season approaching 37 years of age.Wesley Walls has the most catches ever by a TE at 36 years of age or greater and that was 20 catches for 222 yards and 1 TD in 2003.
I don't see that Steve - I would bet that Gonzo is Top 10 again this year - Atlanta is going to throw the ball more, not less and he will still be a big part of the offense
 
anybody else besides me think that the wheels fall off from Tony Gonzalez this year? FBG rank is TE #8 and all the projections provided give him 60+ receptions, but he turned 36 years old in February 2012. He has had an awesome career, but seemed much slower to me last season and this is one year later. Ginzalez has played for 15 years already and has never missed more than one game in a season. That is a lot of collisions over a lot of years.He probably is the all-time greatest TE so maybe I am wrong, but it seems unlikely to me that he could finish in the top ten for TEs again this season approaching 37 years of age.
Gonzo is 36, but nothing outside of that number shows any reason for a drop off. Compared to 2011, his Rec, Yards, YPC, and TD stats all went UP in 2012. He's a physical speciman with tramendous work ethic and great conditioning. Sure he's a tad slower and might not break free after the catch as much, but he still gets open and grabs his targets. I think he'll finish his career on a high note.NOBODY on the bench behind him. Speaks volumes of what Atlanta feels he has left.
Wesley Walls has the most catches ever by a TE at 36 years of age or greater and that was 20 catches for 222 yards and 1 TD in 2003.
Not for long..... and it won't take all season. It's a safe bet for Gonzo to surpass this production total by week 5.
 
Is Ravenz or the auto-system making these picks? 5RBs in 7 picks seems excessive in our score 2 format.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
'ShadowMaster said:
Is Ravenz or the auto-system making these picks? 5RBs in 7 picks seems excessive in our score 2 format.
He just takes a while to warm up. Probably laughing it up making RB 2s scarce. Should probably give him a heads up by the K2 run though.
 
really tough choice for me with my 8.12 - I saw several that I really wanted but just could not affored to avoid taking a tight end

 
@Ref Re: Tate :hot: :hot: :hot:
I knew that he had grabbed your guy there. The thing is that with so few rounds and such small rosters, every pick has to be about building your team and you really don't have the luxury of "blcoking" other teams. The only way that works is when his team need matched your team need and he got a double benefit. I really didn't even consider him as I had bigger issues elsewhere in my opinion.
 
@Ref Re: Tate :hot: :hot: :hot:
I knew that he had grabbed your guy there. The thing is that with so few rounds and such small rosters, every pick has to be about building your team and you really don't have the luxury of "blcoking" other teams. The only way that works is when his team need matched your team need and he got a double benefit. I really didn't even consider him as I had bigger issues elsewhere in my opinion.
I knew if Shadow was going to take him this turn was his last chance. And as Razor points out, I think he does help my crappy RB situation especially in best ball when I don't have to worry about starting him. Blocking him from locking up the HOU running game is a bonus. Honestly was kind of surprised that he made it to me to begin with as I like him more than most of the other RB taken in rounds 7-8. More on this later in my post that I am getting ready to post. I have given Shadow a couple of gifts (Jackson) ;) just because of personal preference and I had the same :hot: as Shadow when Rayou took Redman. Had I been able to get Redman, I may not have made the Tate pick, however Razor may have.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
First.....thanks for allowing me to be a part of this league.

Halfway Home:

Pre-draft: OK with my draft slot even though I would have preferred to be in the middle with my thoughts heading into this season. Know there are some quality drafters. A few players I am really targeting.

1.02 Aaron Rodgers QB1 GB 10

At 1.02 I wanted a guy who I felt was as close as I could get to a “no doubt, no brainer, automatic, will be in my lineup every week” type of guy in this best ball format. I think Rodgers is about as close as you can get to that and the reason I didn’t take one of the RB’s. To me, RB’s are at more of a risk to get dinged then QB’s and the possibility of them laying an egg or having a down week is higher as well. With this high of a pick, I want a guy that mitigates that risk as much as possible.

Other considerations: None really, except I did think about taking one of the RB’s and then maybe rolling the dice with Vick as my QB as I thought I would be able to get him at the 2-3 turn.

2.13 Steven Jackson RB13 STL 9

I already had a QB so it was nice to see 2 of them go right before my pick here allowing some other positions to fall. Legacy and Razor obviously wanted a top guy and felt they needed to grab one there as Shadow might take one at the turn. This pick was going to be a RB or Hernandez (was glad to see Gates go as TE3). Of the RB’s that were left, Jackson was the guy I was targeting as my pick got closer. I am a KC fan but I am a little skeptical that Charles returns to the player that he once was. Hillis ain’t no joke and a guy that I was hoping to get later in the draft. I think Charles owners will be disappointed this year. Jackson should see a ton of work with Fisher in town. I consider him one of the last of the dying bell cows and he can catch 40-50 balls as well.

Other considerations: Hernandez

3.02 Aaron Hernandez TE4 NE 9

Was glad Shadow didn’t go TE. Had he taken Hernandez, I would have passed on TE here. Those in any of the survivor leagues here at FBG know how much I like Hernandez as I have him in every one of those I am in. Long story short, in this format last year of the non-RB’s, Hernandez only trailed Gronk/Graham/Calvin/Welker in PPG scoring last year; and that was as the 3rd fiddle. Think about that; in this format, NE had 3 of the top 5 scoring non RB’s in the league. I am not as worried about Lloyd as the Welker owners should be. I think Hernandez will still get his targets and receptions. He had 79 receptions in only 14 games. I’m not a big stat guy and I don’t really go chasing them, I just think NE will still throw a ton and Hernandez will get his.

Other considerations: None. Although I was disappointed that I knew this pick would not allow me to have Brandon Marshall on my team.

4.13 Jeremy Maclin WR22 PHI 7

My first really tough choice and I struggled a little with this pick. Going into the draft, I was hoping to get Maclin as my WR2 and Decker as my WR3. I quickly realized with my draft position and the way the draft was going that that wasn’t going to happen. After going back and forth on a few guys I settled on taking Maclin here. I am gambling on some guys that I am really high on (more on that later) and Maclin is one of those guys. Decker is the other.

Other considerations: Easier to explain this pick by talking about who I maybe could have taken. Had Colston made it here, he would have been the pick. I would have liked a Colston/Maclin/Decker combo but Decker would have never made it back to me in the 6th. The two guys that Shadow ended up picking here at the turn were considerations and it was really hard not to pull the trigger on Jackson. But…I’m not sold that he will be the same player in TB, it came down to me feeling I needed to see how it goes for a year with him in TB. I know what I should get with Maclin in PHI. Johnson was also a possibility but the hammy seems to be a little issue there for him as I did some digging.

5.02 Eric Decker WR25 DEN 7

Shadow made this a pretty easy pick for me as he did what I thought he would and took both Jackson and Johnson. I may never know, but I thought if I had taken one of those guys at 4.13 that one of his picks at the turn would have been Maclin, and it really came down to the fact that I like Maclin better than both of them for next year. I was pretty sure Decker would be here at 5.02, but not so sure about Maclin. Had he not taken both Johnson and Jackson I would have had a decision here. Had Jackson been available it would have been a tough call. Decker is playing the old Austin Collie spot and I expect him to have a huge year. He was having a very good year last year with Orton at the helm. I wouldn’t be surprised to see him be more productive than Demaryus Thomas.

Other considerations: WR was getting pretty wiped out, so it seemed like the play here. My thoughts are that most of us will be scrambling for points at RB2 this year so better lock up my second WR in this start 3 WR format. So there really weren’t a ton of other ways to go here, maybe Lloyd, but I’m not as excited about him as others. He definitely benefits from a McDaniel’s system, but he has never been on a team like he is now with so many other quality receiving options. I think those expecting a “big” year out of Lloyd will be disappointed.

6.13 Denarius Moore WR32 OAK 5

This one hurt. Eight QB’s went in this round where I had the 13th pick. And one of my “boys” was falling to me and I thought I had a shot at a gift. Razor absolutely crushed me here by taking Redman with the pick right before me. I really wanted to add him as my RB2. I mean really wanted to add him. Razor had 2 RB’s already so I thought I would have a shot. But he obviously felt he was a little too much value to pass up. Damn it. Oh well, after this nut shot I switched directions. Moore could be the real deal, he passed my eye ball test, that’s all I can really say. He was next on my list, so I locked down my WR3 here.

Other considerations: :finger: to Razor. Starks was the next RB on my list but I thought Shadow would go a different direction than RB so WR was the pick.

7.02 James Starks RB29 GB 10

Consolation prize is GB running back in the 7th. Not much competition for carries but I hate that Rodgers and Kuhn steal his goaline love. Reports are he could breakout, let’s hope. He is on a high octane offense so we’ll see. Hate this pick, but it was necessary at the time. I immediately started targeting a couple of other guys that I hoped to get in the next couple of rounds to maybe bail out the ####ty start I have had to this draft, especially at RB. Redman pick still hurts. I really only like my Rodgers/Hernandez/Maclin picks at this point. Most of my picks have been dictated by draft position and need, I hate that. Feel like I haven’t really gotten any value other than I think I was able to get Hernandez a little later than where I think he deserves to go in this format.

Other considerations: :stillfinger: to Razor. Thought about Dwilly and even McGahee, but I was targeting Hillman as one of my two saviors at RB and I was planning on going all in with him and didn’t feel like covering myself by wasting a pick on McGahee.

8.13 Ben Tate RB41 HOU 8

Love getting Tate here as I would have taken him over most of the other RB’s who went before him in rounds 7-8. Had Hillis made it to me, he would have been the pick, but other than that I like Tate over the other RB’s taken in rounds 7 and 8. Maybe Brown but maybe not. Tate is the real deal and produces quality numbers even as the RB2 on his team. He is a nice pick in best ball format, cause I don’t have to worry about whether I start him or not. Should Foster go down, I have a top 5 RB. I will also say that my draft position here dictated this pick a little as well. Shadow is behind me with Foster and I didn’t want to allow him to lock up the HOU running game in best ball. Have a feeling he might of as it would have been his last chance.

Other considerations: Crabtree would have maybe been a nice addition here as a WR4 but I have a plan for rounding out my WR core later.

9.02 Ronnie Hillman RB42 DEN 7

This could make or break my team. Not going to say much more. Could be the SOD or worse pick ever. Potential upside here trumped some of the other safer “back up” RB’s still on the board.

Other considerations: None. There may be some others that feel the same way as I do in this league, so I felt I had to get him here. I could say who I would have looked at had he been taken already but some of those guys haven’t been picked yet.

Overall: I suck. While I like some of the players I have, it feels like I should change my name from Stinkin Ref to Reach City, because I have had to snag most of them about a round earlier than I wanted too. Quality drafters here, as expected, and things haven’t shaken down the way I hoped. Best ball is the only thing that may save me.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not happy both of my handcuff picks were swipped, but it may be for the better as it kept me focused on value.

RG3 and Crabtree, both well past their ADP are a great start to my 2nd string.

 
I seriously thought about taking Tate at 8.05 - he was definitely on the short list.

The player I had hoped to take there was Best

Not sure about the Mickel pick but I think he will be more involved with the red zone package there and Best does have injury concerns

I agree there is more upside with Tate for games he is the main ball carrier but with the lack of RB quality available - thanks to Ravnzfan - I wanted someone who would potentially score in more games rather than have fewer but bigger scores. Certainly the best ball format helps Tate (as well as several other players)

That pick is the only one so far that could make/break my team's fortunes

 
Given the apparent drafting errors...... (I made one). Next year let's return to the message board drafting we have successfully employed before.

Am I wrong?

Where the f$#k is Twilight?

 
Given the apparent drafting errors...... (I made one). Next year let's return to the message board drafting we have successfully employed before. Am I wrong? Where the f$#k is Twilight?
Personally I like the RTS way. It's easier to keep up with players that way. I haven't had much problem at all with the site.
 
Instant pick is cool.

The fact that it does not default to fail safe if your list runs out is lame.

That is why you will see me in fail safe until I can generate a list that will cover unitl my next pick and I'm comfortable I won't miss a run I might need to react to.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top