OKColin Dowling said:No offense GBCG, but you also have Iron Maiden as your avatar. We're going to take what you say with a *grain* of salt.I've had a few dogs and still wonder about anyone that would not save another human being.
OKColin Dowling said:No offense GBCG, but you also have Iron Maiden as your avatar. We're going to take what you say with a *grain* of salt.I've had a few dogs and still wonder about anyone that would not save another human being.
Deploy the Eddie Disembowelment schematicsOKColin Dowling said:No offense GBCG, but you also have Iron Maiden as your avatar. We're going to take what you say with a *grain* of salt.I've had a few dogs and still wonder about anyone that would not save another human being.
Human life >>>>> dog lifeSimple enough?I have to say that between both threads, I've yet to hear anyone actually give any valid reasons as to why I should save the stranger. Those of us who would save our dog have plenty of reasons, yet we're called terrible, crazy, etc. Why should I save the stranger? Why? If the answer is so obvious, it should be simple to explain.
If I am going to risk my human life it will be for the family member first. Except in cases of children as mentioned.Human life >>>>> dog lifeSimple enough?I have to say that between both threads, I've yet to hear anyone actually give any valid reasons as to why I should save the stranger. Those of us who would save our dog have plenty of reasons, yet we're called terrible, crazy, etc. Why should I save the stranger? Why? If the answer is so obvious, it should be simple to explain.
What if the human being is 90, and will very likely only live for a few more years tops?REALLY freaking selfish (and pretty downright twisted) to save an animal that will likely live about another decade over a human being...
Says who?Human life >>>>> dog lifeSimple enough?I have to say that between both threads, I've yet to hear anyone actually give any valid reasons as to why I should save the stranger. Those of us who would save our dog have plenty of reasons, yet we're called terrible, crazy, etc. Why should I save the stranger? Why? If the answer is so obvious, it should be simple to explain.
Kind of ironic that you have the Ronald Reagan quote about each and every life being valuable, but you'd rescue an animal before a fellow man.I voted dog before and I'll vote dog now. The one exception being a child. I've thought about it since the last vote and honestly I couldn't allow a child to drown if I could help it. Everyone over the age of 18 is on their own. The dog is family, the stranger is a stranger.
Human life is more important than nonhuman life. The two central tenets of human behavior are self preservation and species preservation. We see this in law all the time. If someone hit your dog with their car, they'd be really sorry about it, but they wouldn't be put in jail for vehicular manslaughter. The same is true for euthanasia, leash laws, etc. Since we have a mountain of precedent that human life is more valuable in society than dog life, the burden of proof is on you to explain why you should save the dog over the human. And while I've heard plenty of reasons why you should save your dog, I have yet to hear anyone actually give any valid reasons that explain why you should do so at the expense of another human life.I have to say that between both threads, I've yet to hear anyone actually give any valid reasons as to why I should save the stranger. Those of us who would save our dog have plenty of reasons, yet we're called terrible, crazy, etc. Why should I save the stranger? Why? If the answer is so obvious, it should be simple to explain.
Most all rational beingsSays who?Human life >>>>> dog lifeSimple enough?I have to say that between both threads, I've yet to hear anyone actually give any valid reasons as to why I should save the stranger. Those of us who would save our dog have plenty of reasons, yet we're called terrible, crazy, etc. Why should I save the stranger? Why? If the answer is so obvious, it should be simple to explain.
I'd rescue a family member over a stranger.Kind of ironic that you have the Ronald Reagan quote about each and every life being valuable, but you'd rescue an animal before a fellow man.I voted dog before and I'll vote dog now. The one exception being a child. I've thought about it since the last vote and honestly I couldn't allow a child to drown if I could help it. Everyone over the age of 18 is on their own. The dog is family, the stranger is a stranger.
What if the dog is 12, and will very likely only live for a few more months tops?These questions cut both ways...What if the human being is 90, and will very likely only live for a few more years tops?REALLY freaking selfish (and pretty downright twisted) to save an animal that will likely live about another decade over a human being...
That's a perfectly reasonable tiebreaker when choosing which human to save. What reason do you have for allowing a human to die?I'd rescue a family member over a stranger.Kind of ironic that you have the Ronald Reagan quote about each and every life being valuable, but you'd rescue an animal before a fellow man.I voted dog before and I'll vote dog now. The one exception being a child. I've thought about it since the last vote and honestly I couldn't allow a child to drown if I could help it. Everyone over the age of 18 is on their own. The dog is family, the stranger is a stranger.
We've been through this in the other thread. If someone is throwing their life on the line it is their choice to make. And to live with.If someone saw your dog drowning and allowed them to die while they saved another human, would you be upset? If someone let your wife die so they could save their dog, would you be more or less upset? What if it were your sister, or brother?
Cats, for sure. Most humans, too.Says who?Human life >>>>> dog lifeSimple enough?I have to say that between both threads, I've yet to hear anyone actually give any valid reasons as to why I should save the stranger. Those of us who would save our dog have plenty of reasons, yet we're called terrible, crazy, etc. Why should I save the stranger? Why? If the answer is so obvious, it should be simple to explain.
If I were in a drowning situation, I would hope that a stranger would save me before his dog. Hence, I'd save a stranger before my dog.I have to say that between both threads, I've yet to hear anyone actually give any valid reasons as to why I should save the stranger. Those of us who would save our dog have plenty of reasons, yet we're called terrible, crazy, etc. Why should I save the stranger? Why? If the answer is so obvious, it should be simple to explain.
The human isn't a family member. And it's my life to risk.That's a perfectly reasonable tiebreaker when choosing which human to save. What reason do you have for allowing a human to die?I'd rescue a family member over a stranger.Kind of ironic that you have the Ronald Reagan quote about each and every life being valuable, but you'd rescue an animal before a fellow man.I voted dog before and I'll vote dog now. The one exception being a child. I've thought about it since the last vote and honestly I couldn't allow a child to drown if I could help it. Everyone over the age of 18 is on their own. The dog is family, the stranger is a stranger.
OK, so let's assume that there was a car accident on a bridge over a frozen river. Your dog was out on the ice, running around having fun, when a man was knocked off the bridge and cracked the ice below. He appeared stunned at first, but now is aware that he has moments to live. Your dog fell into the water at a separate spot on the ice during the fray. You have your truck parked nearby, and it has a tow cable you can use to save one of them, but not both of them. There's nobody else close enough to help, and at the current water temperatures, one of them will certainly - not probably - die. The other will certainly - not probably - live. And using the tow cable, you are not putting your life or car or anything or anyone else at risk in any way. At this point, there's no blame, no risk to you, and no chance that one lives if you save the other. You still save your dog?We've been through this in the other thread. If someone is throwing their life on the line it is their choice to make. And to live with.If someone saw your dog drowning and allowed them to die while they saved another human, would you be upset? If someone let your wife die so they could save their dog, would you be more or less upset? What if it were your sister, or brother?
You're adding things to the hypothetical. This is not a valid reason to vote dog.what if I can't swim and I see a stranger drowning? Am I supposed to try to save him and drown myself?
I voted dog before and I'll vote dog now. The one exception being a child. I've thought about it since the last vote and honestly I couldn't allow a child to drown if I could help it. Everyone over the age of 18 is on their own. The dog is family, the stranger is a stranger.

zip it, Fred. I'm still saving my pup.You're adding things to the hypothetical. This is not a valid reason to vote dog.what if I can't swim and I see a stranger drowning? Am I supposed to try to save him and drown myself?
First of all, I don't claim to be right. In fact, I don't think either answer is right. Therefore, I don't accept the burden of proof. I never claimed that the dogs life is more valuable than the human life. I think it's unbelievably absurd to think that we, as humans, could possibly be fit to make that determination considering the overwhelming bias. I have to question the two tenets of human behavior you referred to. Judging by the poll results from the original thread, those tenets you base your stance on don't seem to be holding up. Things stand about 50/50 so far.Human life is more important than nonhuman life. The two central tenets of human behavior are self preservation and species preservation. We see this in law all the time. If someone hit your dog with their car, they'd be really sorry about it, but they wouldn't be put in jail for vehicular manslaughter. The same is true for euthanasia, leash laws, etc. Since we have a mountain of precedent that human life is more valuable in society than dog life, the burden of proof is on you to explain why you should save the dog over the human. And while I've heard plenty of reasons why you should save your dog, I have yet to hear anyone actually give any valid reasons that explain why you should do so at the expense of another human life.I have to say that between both threads, I've yet to hear anyone actually give any valid reasons as to why I should save the stranger. Those of us who would save our dog have plenty of reasons, yet we're called terrible, crazy, etc.
Why should I save the stranger? Why? If the answer is so obvious, it should be simple to explain.
No we don't. We're humans. If we're asking what a dog would do, that would be a different question. I would expect an educated human to make a better decision than a dog would. And if that educated human did not pick the stranger, I would expect them to go to jail.If we're going to debate the value of human life vs the life of a dog, we have to do so objectively, not from the viewpoint of a human.
The human mind is a weird and strange place. I personally have a dog and would save my dog over a stranger without a moment's hesitation.I've had a few dogs and still wonder about anyone that would not save another human being.
Just like I would save a friend or family member over a stranger.By owning our dogs I have taken the responsibility to care the best for them and they reciprocate that with unconditional love.Stranger loses.No we don't. We're humans. If we're asking what a dog would do, that would be a different question. I would expect an educated human to make a better decision than a dog would. And if that educated human did not pick the stranger, I would expect them to go to jail.If we're going to debate the value of human life vs the life of a dog, we have to do so objectively, not from the viewpoint of a human.
You can go to jail for not saving someone?OK.My Dog's Life>>>>>>>Random Human LifeApparently your statement wasn't simple enough.Human life >>>>> dog lifeSimple enough?I have to say that between both threads, I've yet to hear anyone actually give any valid reasons as to why I should save the stranger. Those of us who would save our dog have plenty of reasons, yet we're called terrible, crazy, etc. Why should I save the stranger? Why? If the answer is so obvious, it should be simple to explain.
In this case, yes. It's provable negligence. If I choose not to save someone, the generally assumed defense is that I would have to risk my own life to do so, and the state cannot compel me to risk my life for someone else. But in this case, I cannot make that defense. I'm at no greater risk in saving one vs. the other.No we don't. We're humans. If we're asking what a dog would do, that would be a different question. I would expect an educated human to make a better decision than a dog would. And if that educated human did not pick the stranger, I would expect them to go to jail.If we're going to debate the value of human life vs the life of a dog, we have to do so objectively, not from the viewpoint of a human.You can go to jail for not saving someone?OK.
FixedMy Dog A captive animal who wouldn't know me from Adam if someone else had claimed him from the wild >>>>>>> Random Human LifeHuman life >>>>> dog lifeSimple enough?I have to say that between both threads, I've yet to hear anyone actually give any valid reasons as to why I should save the stranger. Those of us who would save our dog have plenty of reasons, yet we're called terrible, crazy, etc.
Why should I save the stranger? Why? If the answer is so obvious, it should be simple to explain.
Right. Just like if I had to make a decision between swerving and possibly spilling soda on my car seat or plowing your dog, your dog loses.The human mind is a weird and strange place. I personally have a dog and would save my dog over a stranger without a moment's hesitation.I've had a few dogs and still wonder about anyone that would not save another human being.Just like I would save a friend or family member over a stranger.By owning our dogs I have taken the responsibility to care the best for them and they reciprocate that with unconditional love.Stranger loses.
Right. Just like if I had to make a decision between swerving and possibly spilling soda on my car seat or plowing your dog, your dog loses.The human mind is a weird and strange place. I personally have a dog and would save my dog over a stranger without a moment's hesitation.I've had a few dogs and still wonder about anyone that would not save another human being.Just like I would save a friend or family member over a stranger.By owning our dogs I have taken the responsibility to care the best for them and they reciprocate that with unconditional love.Stranger loses.
Right. Just like if I had to make a decision between swerving and possibly spilling soda on my car seat or plowing your dog, your dog loses.The human mind is a weird and strange place. I personally have a dog and would save my dog over a stranger without a moment's hesitation.I've had a few dogs and still wonder about anyone that would not save another human being.Just like I would save a friend or family member over a stranger.By owning our dogs I have taken the responsibility to care the best for them and they reciprocate that with unconditional love.Stranger loses.
Well if Max is drowning I'm not saving him even if my dog is sitting there with me.Right. Just like if I had to make a decision between swerving and possibly spilling soda on my car seat or plowing your dog, your dog loses.The human mind is a weird and strange place. I personally have a dog and would save my dog over a stranger without a moment's hesitation.I've had a few dogs and still wonder about anyone that would not save another human being.Just like I would save a friend or family member over a stranger.By owning our dogs I have taken the responsibility to care the best for them and they reciprocate that with unconditional love.Stranger loses.
I'd save a really comfortable chair over a dog any day.How far does this go? Would any of you save your goldfish over a human, too? What if you saw your favorite chair on a cracking sheet of ice over the river, and a stranger who was about to drown, would you save your chair? What if it was a really comfortable chair?
That goes without saying.I'd save a really comfortable chair over a dog any day.How far does this go? Would any of you save your goldfish over a human, too? What if you saw your favorite chair on a cracking sheet of ice over the river, and a stranger who was about to drown, would you save your chair? What if it was a really comfortable chair?
Heck, if my dog was on the chair and weighing it down so I couldn't get it to shore, I'd throw my dog off to preserve the chair. I could live with my decision, and I think an objective bystander would agree with me that their value is a wash, so it's an OK thing to doThat goes without saying.I'd save a really comfortable chair over a dog any day.How far does this go? Would any of you save your goldfish over a human, too? What if you saw your favorite chair on a cracking sheet of ice over the river, and a stranger who was about to drown, would you save your chair? What if it was a really comfortable chair?
Right. Just like if I had to make a decision between swerving and possibly spilling soda on my car seat or plowing your dog, your dog loses.The human mind is a weird and strange place. I personally have a dog and would save my dog over a stranger without a moment's hesitation.I've had a few dogs and still wonder about anyone that would not save another human being.Just like I would save a friend or family member over a stranger.By owning our dogs I have taken the responsibility to care the best for them and they reciprocate that with unconditional love.Stranger loses.
