What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

SF signs Westbrook (1 Viewer)

Roger Craig-Minnesota

Thurman Thomas-Miami

Eric Dickerson-Oak/ATL

Tony Dorsett-Denver

Eddie George-Dallas

Ahman Green-Houston

Franco Harris-Seattle

I'm not saying Westbrook will turn out the same as these guys but why are people getting so caddy? No one knows for sure but I doubt Westbrook is going to take a bunch of carries away from Gore. In many ways it only help Gore take a breather and for SF it's perfect so they can keep Gore fresh throughout the season. Gore has seen his carries drop every year for the last 4 years. Westbrook has a chance to see some action because of the developing second and third tier WRs in SF...Morgan and Ginn aren't scaring anyone. AS I posted earlier, SF can now line up 2 WRs, Davis at TE, Gore at HB, and if they want bring Westbrook into the slot for passing situations or third down. He makes an excellent slot guy and won't absorb as many hits there. It could cut a few receptions from Gore but he only carried it 229 times last year so maybe a better back up can get him into the 260-280 area for carries. I doubt Gore would be pulled at the goal line for Westbrook to plunge it in short range.

What is all the fuss about?
Roger - age 32 - 33 nothing left in tankTT - 34 YO - nothing left

ED - 32 - 33 YO nothing left

TD - age 33 nothing left

Eddie age 31 tons of milllage and nothing left his last few years in ten

ahman degen knee Green - same age but more millage and face it not the same back the last few years in GB

Franco - ummmmmm 34 nada left

I think the only thing these guys got in common with westy is they changed teams
You don't see Westbrook in the twilight of his career? Also a lot of these guys went into the HoF, doubt Westbrook would make it right now. I see alot of similarities. You are coming across like Westbrook could duplicate his numbers from Philly. You are pointing to to a 2-3 year age difference when anytime after about 28-29 a RB typically declines, then add in the injury history and concussions...you really think it's night and day?I don't want this to get caddy but Westbrook played a long time for one franchise. How many RBs over the age of 30 switch teams after a string of injuries and then don't miss a beat with their new team? You keep posting "nothing left nothing left", but when these players went to those teams both them and the teams that picked them up thought there was something left...it's easy to look back and say this now but it points to a trend don't you think?
Oh, man. What does HE have to do with this?
 
Roger Craig-Minnesota

Thurman Thomas-Miami

Eric Dickerson-Oak/ATL

Tony Dorsett-Denver

Eddie George-Dallas

Ahman Green-Houston

Franco Harris-Seattle

I'm not saying Westbrook will turn out the same as these guys but why are people getting so caddy? No one knows for sure but I doubt Westbrook is going to take a bunch of carries away from Gore. In many ways it only help Gore take a breather and for SF it's perfect so they can keep Gore fresh throughout the season. Gore has seen his carries drop every year for the last 4 years. Westbrook has a chance to see some action because of the developing second and third tier WRs in SF...Morgan and Ginn aren't scaring anyone. AS I posted earlier, SF can now line up 2 WRs, Davis at TE, Gore at HB, and if they want bring Westbrook into the slot for passing situations or third down. He makes an excellent slot guy and won't absorb as many hits there. It could cut a few receptions from Gore but he only carried it 229 times last year so maybe a better back up can get him into the 260-280 area for carries. I doubt Gore would be pulled at the goal line for Westbrook to plunge it in short range.

What is all the fuss about?
Roger - age 32 - 33 nothing left in tankTT - 34 YO - nothing left

ED - 32 - 33 YO nothing left

TD - age 33 nothing left

Eddie age 31 tons of milllage and nothing left his last few years in ten

ahman degen knee Green - same age but more millage and face it not the same back the last few years in GB

Franco - ummmmmm 34 nada left

I think the only thing these guys got in common with westy is they changed teams
You don't see Westbrook in the twilight of his career? Also a lot of these guys went into the HoF, doubt Westbrook would make it right now. I see alot of similarities. You are coming across like Westbrook could duplicate his numbers from Philly. You are pointing to to a 2-3 year age difference when anytime after about 28-29 a RB typically declines, then add in the injury history and concussions...you really think it's night and day?I don't want this to get caddy but Westbrook played a long time for one franchise. How many RBs over the age of 30 switch teams after a string of injuries and then don't miss a beat with their new team? You keep posting "nothing left nothing left", but when these players went to those teams both them and the teams that picked them up thought there was something left...it's easy to look back and say this now but it points to a trend don't you think?
Oh, man. What does HE have to do with this?
That's how good he is, he even takes touches from players on other teams in totally different divisions.. Now that's special!
 
Singletary made the statement that he made it clear to Westbrook that he was there to be ready when Gore needed a "blow".

'There would be times that Frank has to take a blow. At those times, I'd like you to be ready.' "

Who knows what Westbrook has left, but Gore loves to be fed the ball- so I think Westbrook will be just a typical fillin backup.

 
Singletary made the statement that he made it clear to Westbrook that he was there to be ready when Gore needed a "blow". 'There would be times that Frank has to take a blow. At those times, I'd like you to be ready.' "Who knows what Westbrook has left, but Gore loves to be fed the ball- so I think Westbrook will be just a typical fillin backup.
link please
 
From that article:

Singletary thinks Westbrook can teach Gore, 27, the wisdom of sharing the load for extended career's sake. Few backs play into their 30s without embracing the idea.

"Brian is at a place now where Frank is going," Singletary said. "I want (Gore) to understand we want to have him as long as we possibly can have him, and I want to take care of him."

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?...L#ixzz0wtC3uHun
But there is still no clear answer or understanding of how the touches will be split or work out.All articles and quotes I've found say what we already know, that Frank Gore is the #1 RB. And pretty much that Westbrook is the #2. Nothing yet on how Westbrook will be used primarily or how many touches to expect. But the above quote would suggest that Westbrook will be used to moderate Gore's carries, keeping him fresh short term and healthy long term.

 
From that article:

Singletary thinks Westbrook can teach Gore, 27, the wisdom of sharing the load for extended career's sake. Few backs play into their 30s without embracing the idea.

"Brian is at a place now where Frank is going," Singletary said. "I want (Gore) to understand we want to have him as long as we possibly can have him, and I want to take care of him."

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?...L#ixzz0wtC3uHun
But there is still no clear answer or understanding of how the touches will be split or work out.All articles and quotes I've found say what we already know, that Frank Gore is the #1 RB. And pretty much that Westbrook is the #2. Nothing yet on how Westbrook will be used primarily or how many touches to expect. But the above quote would suggest that Westbrook will be used to moderate Gore's carries, keeping him fresh short term and healthy long term.
What part of the following do you not understand?

"I said, 'There would be times that Frank has to take a blow. At those times, I'd like you to be ready.' "

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?...L#ixzz0wtOwBKgo

 
sadly this is enough to make me draft Turnr over Gore at the 4 spot. I can tbe sweating my first round pick and i hate when a back up takes my tds so i pass on rice and gore to take Turner

 
From that article:

Singletary thinks Westbrook can teach Gore, 27, the wisdom of sharing the load for extended career's sake. Few backs play into their 30s without embracing the idea.

"Brian is at a place now where Frank is going," Singletary said. "I want (Gore) to understand we want to have him as long as we possibly can have him, and I want to take care of him."

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?...L#ixzz0wtC3uHun
But there is still no clear answer or understanding of how the touches will be split or work out.All articles and quotes I've found say what we already know, that Frank Gore is the #1 RB. And pretty much that Westbrook is the #2. Nothing yet on how Westbrook will be used primarily or how many touches to expect. But the above quote would suggest that Westbrook will be used to moderate Gore's carries, keeping him fresh short term and healthy long term.
holy crap. before i thought you were delusional. turns out you're just dumb.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I actually feel its a positive for Gore. Picture 3rd and 15. I think w Coffee we wait for the punt. I feel with Westy 49er's got a shot to move the ball. Gore comes back on the field @ 2yd line. So he missed a few plays, he gets the TD...
Whether or not that specific scenario plays out much, you make a good point. Anything that makes the 49er team and/or offense better isn't too likely to hurt Gore.
Aren't you both making the assumption that it was Coffee in on 3rd and 15? Wouldn't in reality it have been Gore on 3rd/15, and now he's possibly lost the snap to Westbrook. And since Gore is so much more talented than Westy, there's a lower percentage that the 9ers convert, so Gore's percentage of getting that goal line TD dropped. :yes:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
From that article:

Singletary thinks Westbrook can teach Gore, 27, the wisdom of sharing the load for extended career's sake. Few backs play into their 30s without embracing the idea.

"Brian is at a place now where Frank is going," Singletary said. "I want (Gore) to understand we want to have him as long as we possibly can have him, and I want to take care of him."

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?...L#ixzz0wtC3uHun
But there is still no clear answer or understanding of how the touches will be split or work out.All articles and quotes I've found say what we already know, that Frank Gore is the #1 RB. And pretty much that Westbrook is the #2. Nothing yet on how Westbrook will be used primarily or how many touches to expect. But the above quote would suggest that Westbrook will be used to moderate Gore's carries, keeping him fresh short term and healthy long term.
What part of the following do you not understand?

"I said, 'There would be times that Frank has to take a blow. At those times, I'd like you to be ready.' "

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?...L#ixzz0wtOwBKgo
Does that quote in any way say how many carries either back will be getting, and the quote I posted for you came from the very same article that your quote came from...Looks like to me, that those blows Gore will need might be coming with more frequency then you expect evidently according to the article and Singletary's quote

excerp from your article:

Singletary thinks Westbrook can teach Gore, 27, the wisdom of sharing the load for extended career's sake. Few backs play into their 30s without embracing the idea.

"Brian is at a place now where Frank is going," Singletary said. "I want (Gore) to understand we want to have him as long as we possibly can have him, and I want to take care of him."

 
Last edited by a moderator:
From that article:

Singletary thinks Westbrook can teach Gore, 27, the wisdom of sharing the load for extended career's sake. Few backs play into their 30s without embracing the idea.

"Brian is at a place now where Frank is going," Singletary said. "I want (Gore) to understand we want to have him as long as we possibly can have him, and I want to take care of him."

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?...L#ixzz0wtC3uHun
But there is still no clear answer or understanding of how the touches will be split or work out.All articles and quotes I've found say what we already know, that Frank Gore is the #1 RB. And pretty much that Westbrook is the #2. Nothing yet on how Westbrook will be used primarily or how many touches to expect. But the above quote would suggest that Westbrook will be used to moderate Gore's carries, keeping him fresh short term and healthy long term.
holy crap. before i thought you were delusional. turns out you're just dumb.
Amassing.. :mellow: you're still at it.. Armed still without merit but with insults... sad

 
Last edited by a moderator:
From that article:

Singletary thinks Westbrook can teach Gore, 27, the wisdom of sharing the load for extended career's sake. Few backs play into their 30s without embracing the idea.

"Brian is at a place now where Frank is going," Singletary said. "I want (Gore) to understand we want to have him as long as we possibly can have him, and I want to take care of him."

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?...L#ixzz0wtC3uHun
But there is still no clear answer or understanding of how the touches will be split or work out.All articles and quotes I've found say what we already know, that Frank Gore is the #1 RB. And pretty much that Westbrook is the #2. Nothing yet on how Westbrook will be used primarily or how many touches to expect. But the above quote would suggest that Westbrook will be used to moderate Gore's carries, keeping him fresh short term and healthy long term.
holy crap. before i thought you were delusional. turns out you're just dumb.
Amassing.. :thumbup: you're still at it.. Armed still without merit but insults... sad
what are yours? you are emphatically and deliberately tweaking your debate every time someone rpesents new info that states westbrook is a depth signing and will have very little impact on gore. The article CLEARLY headlines with, Westbrook rushes in to lend depth to backfield. You keep saying that it doesnt prove his workload. HE IS A BACKUP THAT WILL GET BACKUP PLAYING TIME. holy dense batman.

 
what are yours? you are emphatically and deliberately tweaking your debate every time someone rpesents new info that states westbrook is a depth signing and will have very little impact on gore. The article CLEARLY headlines with, Westbrook rushes in to lend depth to backfield. You keep saying that it doesnt prove his workload. HE IS A BACKUP THAT WILL GET BACKUP PLAYING TIME.

holy dense batman.
My stance has stayed constant

#1) I said it is possible for Westbrook to amass 60 rec this year

#2) I said it would be smart for the team to expand his role to something greater than Coffee's based on his greater skillset.

#3) I said it would be nice to see Westbrook used out of the slot

#4) I said I thought it would be reasonable for him to see around 8-10 touches a game

You only keep saying 2 things

#1) he's done

#2) he won't impact Gore's touches

In response, to my request for some shared logic in your thinking, you respond with no such thing but rather hostility... and of course these insults.

#1) He had more YPC last year then in his previous year, and not far off his career average

last year 4.5, career average 4.55.... doesn't look like he's done to me honestly. And his REC per game were relatively close as well...

#2) I've never said he was going to drastically impact Gore's touches. And it seems I'm not the only one that thinks Westbrook being there lightens the load for Gore. Read back through the thread... I honestly believe Gore continues to be a top 10 Fantasy RB for a few years..

Well, I guess with this last post you've really found some evidence, rather ignore the Quotes from Singltary in side the article but focus on the title... An article title... hmm... I guess that settles it then. We have an article title folks...

BTW, after this post I'm setting you on ignore, have a nice season. Your welcome for the perspective outside of your narrow minded fantasy needs...

O' and "holy dense batman" is probably the most cognitively impaired insult I've heard. What are you 16? You could have at least said "Holy Density Batman", but instead you called Batman dense and holy.. brilliant..

 
Last edited by a moderator:
4.55, His YPC average last year was 4.5

His Career average Rec per game is 3.98, His RPG last year (excluding the concussion game) was 3.57

I see no major decline...

When Westbrook is healthy, he can still play ball, certainly not in his prime, but 4.5 YPC and 4.5 rec per game are certainly better than average #'s...

If he can hold off the injuries, he can still be a special RB.
A healthy, starting Westy can still produce. I do think that a big part of what made him "special" was playing in an offense tailor made for his skills. Reid, with his WCO background, took full advantage of Westbrook's receiving skills. I doubt that the situation in San Francisco is nearly as favorable for him. He has four things working against him....age, injury history, a talented rb ahead of him on the depth chart, and an offensive system that doesn't appear as accommodating to his particular skill set...which isn't to say the 49er offense is bad for him, just not AS good as Philly's was. For those reasons, I think it is highly unlikely he is ever special with the 49ers. We should see a flash here and there, but he has a lot working against him to be able to produce meaningful statistics. Yes, he has ability and the 49ers will get him some looks, but I can't assume an average of more than 10 touches per game. It is possible, but I just don't see it as likely. On average, a team will have about 65 offensive snaps in a game. For Westy to get 10-15 touches a game, he would have to be on the field probably 20-30 snaps a game. I don't think the 49ers, who apparently weren't really looking for a rb until Coffee retired, signed Westbrook with the intentions of putting him on the field for 30-50% of the plays. I could be wrong about it. Maybe the 49ers will ride him til he breaks, but that seems unnecessary and counter productive. You want your backup rb to be available when he is needed and Westbrook is not a guy you expect to stay healthy with a heavy workload.
And 10 touches a game was on the high side of what I was expecting..http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index...&p=12167800

The #'s I suggested there work out to a range of 8.75-10 touches a game.. I think that's reasonable. Seems like we might be in agreement there based on your post.

I don't think he'll ever again be worth much as far as FF goes (unless Gore goes down), but he can certainly be an asset to the niners this season, and depending on how things work out, maybe the next...

8-10 touches a game isn't a tremendous workload, so I don't expect that to be as much of a detriment to his heath as you're suggesting. To me it sounds like smart use of his abilities. He's still a talented RB and he brings something to the table that Coffee didn't.
OK, one poster suggests that Westy will AVERAGE as much as 15 touches per game. Another poster suggests that is too high and the expectation should be around 8 touches per game. You ask for the 8 touch per game guy to back up his claim (you didn't ask the same of the 15 touch per game guy).

http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index...&p=12166735

You agree with the poster that suggests that those downplaying the Westbrook signing (by saying he is depth that won't average more than 10 touches a game?) are just "consoling each other by trying to convince themselves that the signing is meaningless".

http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index...&p=12167284

It just seems you are talking out of both sides...wanting people to justify their expectations of fewer than 10 touches a game, while you claim the same expectation. There are only a few (one or two?) posters saying Westy will average more than 10 touches a game, yet you are arguing less with them and much more with those that project Westbrook to get about as many touches as your own projection. Maybe it is just perception, but you seem to be defending the idea that Westbrook is real threat to Gore (you've pointed out how he has effectively come back from injury in the past, you point out that his average per carry remained high last year, you've pointed out that his receptions per game average remained relatively steady in spite of injury, etc), while also suggesting he will only average 9 touches a game....numbers that don't worry Gore owners/supporters very much.

I'll give you this, you have effectively defended the idea that Westbrook is still a viable NFL rb when healthy. Maybe a couple of posters want to believe he is washed up and no more useful than Coffee was...but you are correct that, for as long as he is healthy, he has the ability to be productive.

 
My stance has stayed constant#1) I said it is possible for Westbrook to amass 60 rec this year#2) I said it would be smart for the team to expand his role to something greater than Coffee's based on his greater skillset.#3) I said it would be nice to see Westbrook used out of the slot#4) I said I thought it would be reasonable for him to see around 8-10 touches a game
#1) I think its possible for Westbrook to amass 60 receptions this year. I think it is likely will end up with around 35. #2) I agree#3) I agree#4) I think that is realistic but a little on the high side. 6-9 for me at this point. Maybe near the end of the season we may see more Brian, than the beginning. All these points do not contradict the fact that Westbrook's primary role will be that to spell Gore when he needs to take a rest. I suspect that Gore will be more likely to tap out now that there is a viable backup in place and due to the fact that it will be encouraged by Singletary. But with regards to Gore's fantasy value, I see no real hit here. My projections remain consistent pre-signing.
 
For those that say this clouds Gore's status I will disagree. My interpretation of the situation is as follows. With the retirement of Coffee, the 9ers lacked a veteran presence with the backups for Gore. Michael Robinson has been a do-it-all kind of back for the 9ers and filled in admirable as a FB in his career but his skill set is limited. He gets by on knowing the system and being able to play several positions. And after that all you have is Dixon. A young back but who doesn't know the system. Still is learning what it takes to remain or succeed at the NFL Level. He probably doesn't fully grasp the offense or the playbook. He probably can't be expected to identify and make the right reads in 3rd down situations, but he can be a guy that can run the ball. He has the power, speed, an athleticism to be a successful ball carrier at this point. So until his mind can catch up to his talents the 9ers felt exposed at the backup position. In comes Westbrook. He is everything that Dixon is not. He can come in on third downs, make the right reads, be in the right spots, leak to flat when expected, or stick his hat on a blitzing LB. If you combine the two to make one guy then you got one heck of a backup. Gore will play as expected before the signing. Gore plays all three downs until he takes himself out when he's winded. The difference now is that it will give Singletary the ability to mix and match his backups depending on down and situation. The last thing you want is to limit your play-calling because of the personnel. This signing eliminate that problem.
:(
 
I'm not sure that this is good news for Westbrook owners. I'm also not sure that this is good news for Gore owners either.For the 49ers, this is a GREAT signing. I never thought Westbrook's speed or physical skills eroded, it was the concussions that scared me.If he's past the concussions, this is a bigtime signing. It's obvious teams were skeptical, but the 49ers are a dream scenario. Dixon is there if Westbrook does get hurt again, Gore is the workhorse, and Westy can get 8-10 carries and catch 4-5 balls a game.
Westy wont be getting 15 touches per game. Not even close. try about 8 total on average per game for the year.
I can't predict his concussion future and won't pretend to.But assuming he stays healthy, I'd take that bet all day. 150 carries and 60 receptions seems like very realistic numbers.
You, sir, are a master :mellow:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
latrops said:
OK, one poster suggests that Westy will AVERAGE as much as 15 touches per game. Another poster suggests that is too high and the expectation should be around 8 touches per game. You ask for the 8 touch per game guy to back up his claim (you didn't ask the same of the 15 touch per game guy).

http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index...&p=12166735
I'm puzzled here because the poster (Shader) never said the word "AVERAGE" yet you have it in all capital letters as if to make some bold statement or as if it were some key point in your argument. He also never said he "will" average a certain amount of touches. He said "can" which is a big difference. "Will" meaning definite, and "Can" meaning it's possible. And again you using the word average and claiming his projection was 15 touches, when he said "can get 8-10 carries and catch 4-5" which is a range of 12-15 in which the average would be 13.5, not your stated 15...So to that point you are over stating and exaggerating that posters position. Shader was only stating his opinion about what the possibilities were.

On the other hand, Jade takes a more aggressive and bolder stance. "Westy wont be getting 15 touches per game. Not even close. try about 8 total on average per game for the year, maximum." First attacking Shaders stated opinion and implying his personal opinion but rather than proposing as opinion he states as if it were fact. As if he some how knows the future on the mater. How could he know what the maximum is, he can guess, or say "in my opinion" but he states it as if it's fact, as if Shader is silly for even considering an outside probability. He took a brazen and dogmatic approach that was unfriendly to the poster for which he was responding to.

In this instance you're understating the tone in Jades post and softening it using the words "Another poster suggests" when it wasn't a suggestion at all. And "should be" when what he said was "8 total" and "maximum"

Ultimately I thought Shader had a much more reasonable approach, stating his opinion and leaving open the possibility that he could be wrong. And Jade takes a more dogmatic and combative approach as if his opinion is definite and should be common knowledge. This is what sticks out to me more than the #'s. If he's going to be so adamant that his opinion is so much better than someone else's, he should #1 approach it with a little more diplomacy, and #2 Validate his opinion.

latrops said:
You agree with the poster that suggests that those downplaying the Westbrook signing (by saying he is depth that won't average more than 10 touches a game?) are just "consoling each other by trying to convince themselves that the signing is meaningless".

http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index...&p=12167284
In this portion of your post you're projecting my stance on the statement towards a certain poster who provided the #'s you've listed above. I never said which posters I thought this statement should be applied to, neither did the other poster (Shader). So when you say I was aiming my agreement of that post at a poster who projected 10 touches, or Westbrook as depth, when nothing in my or Shaders post even remotely implied that, you're trying to put words in my mouth in order to make your point. My agreeing with Shader would more be a product of my disagreeing with the approach of several posters. Some being overly defensive, some adamant about something they couldn't possibly know....
latrops said:
It just seems you are talking out of both sides...wanting people to justify their expectations of fewer than 10 touches a game, while you claim the same expectation. There are only a few (one or two?) posters saying Westy will average more than 10 touches a game, yet you are arguing less with them and much more with those that project Westbrook to get about as many touches as your own projection. Maybe it is just perception, but you seem to be defending the idea that Westbrook is real threat to Gore (you've pointed out how he has effectively come back from injury in the past, you point out that his average per carry remained high last year, you've pointed out that his receptions per game average remained relatively steady in spite of injury, etc), while also suggesting he will only average 9 touches a game....numbers that don't worry Gore owners/supporters very much.
Well with the above analysis, seems your "talking out of both sides" statement has been rendered inapplicable... And now you're calling the guy you described above as the poster who said "should be around 8 touches" as a poster who said 10 touches... which is it?.. Don't claim I'm "talking out of both sides" when you're contradicting yourself...You've also implying that I'm suggesting Gore owners should be worried, when over and over again I've made it very clear that is not my stance.

My differences with Jade are differences more with his approach, his in ability to see the possibility of anything outside of his prediction, and lack of validation. I never stood strong and hard against Gore being called depth, or the potential for him to get 8, 9, 10, touches per game. I merely suggested the possibilities outside of those predictions. No one can predict Westbrook's touches with any certainty, but Jade doesn't seem to think he can.

latrops said:
I'll give you this, you have effectively defended the idea that Westbrook is still a viable NFL rb when healthy. Maybe a couple of posters want to believe he is washed up and no more useful than Coffee was...but you are correct that, for as long as he is healthy, he has the ability to be productive.
At least you agree with me on something... lol
 
latrops said:
OK, one poster suggests that Westy will AVERAGE as much as 15 touches per game. Another poster suggests that is too high and the expectation should be around 8 touches per game. You ask for the 8 touch per game guy to back up his claim (you didn't ask the same of the 15 touch per game guy).

http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index...&p=12166735
I'm puzzled here because the poster (Shader) never said the word "AVERAGE" yet you have it in all capital letters as if to make some bold statement or as if it were some key point in your argument. He also never said he "will" average a certain amount of touches. He said "can" which is a big difference. "Will" meaning definite, and "Can" meaning it's possible. And again you using the word average and claiming his projection was 15 touches, when he said "can get 8-10 carries and catch 4-5" which is a range of 12-15 in which the average would be 13.5, not your stated 15...So to that point you are over stating and exaggerating that posters position. Shader was only stating his opinion about what the possibilities were.

On the other hand, Jade takes a more aggressive and bolder stance. "Westy wont be getting 15 touches per game. Not even close. try about 8 total on average per game for the year, maximum." First attacking Shaders stated opinion and implying his personal opinion but rather than proposing as opinion he states as if it were fact. As if he some how knows the future on the mater. How could he know what the maximum is, he can guess, or say "in my opinion" but he states it as if it's fact, as if Shader is silly for even considering an outside probability. He took a brazen and dogmatic approach that was unfriendly to the poster for which he was responding to.

In this instance you're understating the tone in Jades post and softening it using the words "Another poster suggests" when it wasn't a suggestion at all. And "should be" when what he said was "8 total" and "maximum"

Ultimately I thought Shader had a much more reasonable approach, stating his opinion and leaving open the possibility that he could be wrong. And Jade takes a more dogmatic and combative approach as if his opinion is definite and should be common knowledge. This is what sticks out to me more than the #'s. If he's going to be so adamant that his opinion is so much better than someone else's, he should #1 approach it with a little more diplomacy, and #2 Validate his opinion.

latrops said:
You agree with the poster that suggests that those downplaying the Westbrook signing (by saying he is depth that won't average more than 10 touches a game?) are just "consoling each other by trying to convince themselves that the signing is meaningless".

http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index...&p=12167284
In this portion of your post you're projecting my stance on the statement towards a certain poster who provided the #'s you've listed above. I never said which posters I thought this statement should be applied to, neither did the other poster (Shader). So when you say I was aiming my agreement of that post at a poster who projected 10 touches, or Westbrook as depth, when nothing in my or Shaders post even remotely implied that, you're trying to put words in my mouth in order to make your point. My agreeing with Shader would more be a product of my disagreeing with the approach of several posters. Some being overly defensive, some adamant about something they couldn't possibly know....
latrops said:
It just seems you are talking out of both sides...wanting people to justify their expectations of fewer than 10 touches a game, while you claim the same expectation. There are only a few (one or two?) posters saying Westy will average more than 10 touches a game, yet you are arguing less with them and much more with those that project Westbrook to get about as many touches as your own projection. Maybe it is just perception, but you seem to be defending the idea that Westbrook is real threat to Gore (you've pointed out how he has effectively come back from injury in the past, you point out that his average per carry remained high last year, you've pointed out that his receptions per game average remained relatively steady in spite of injury, etc), while also suggesting he will only average 9 touches a game....numbers that don't worry Gore owners/supporters very much.
Well with the above analysis, seems your "talking out of both sides" statement has been rendered inapplicable... And now you're calling the guy you described above as the poster who said "should be around 8 touches" as a poster who said 10 touches... which is it?.. Don't claim I'm "talking out of both sides" when you're contradicting yourself...You've also implying that I'm suggesting Gore owners should be worried, when over and over again I've made it very clear that is not my stance.

My differences with Jade are differences more with his approach, his in ability to see the possibility of anything outside of his prediction, and lack of validation. I never stood strong and hard against Gore being called depth, or the potential for him to get 8, 9, 10, touches per game. I merely suggested the possibilities outside of those predictions. No one can predict Westbrook's touches with any certainty, but Jade doesn't seem to think he can.

latrops said:
I'll give you this, you have effectively defended the idea that Westbrook is still a viable NFL rb when healthy. Maybe a couple of posters want to believe he is washed up and no more useful than Coffee was...but you are correct that, for as long as he is healthy, he has the ability to be productive.
At least you agree with me on something... lol
Really, you want to argue over whether someone meant 13.5 touches a game instead of 15....or 8 instead of 10...."can" instead of "will"? You want to continue this over 1.5 to 2 touches a game and verbiage?

I've made the points I wanted to make. I'm pretty well done with this thread. There are no absolutes, just educated guesses.

 
Brian Westbrook sits with hamstring injury Tue Aug 31, 06:51 PM San Francisco 49ers RB Brian Westbrook (hamstring) didn't practice Tuesday, Aug. 31, because of a hamstring injury suffered Saturday, Aug. 28, reports the Sacramento Bee's Matt Barrows. Westbrook played just six snaps on Saturday and carried the ball only twice for 17 yards.
well that didnt take long.
 
Brian Westbrook sits with hamstring injury Tue Aug 31, 06:51 PM San Francisco 49ers RB Brian Westbrook (hamstring) didn't practice Tuesday, Aug. 31, because of a hamstring injury suffered Saturday, Aug. 28, reports the Sacramento Bee's Matt Barrows. Westbrook played just six snaps on Saturday and carried the ball only twice for 17 yards.
well that didnt take long.
It amazes me when people get all worked up when a coach says another RB will help with the load. That is the case on every NFL team. If it wasn't Westy it would have been Coffee and still can be Dixon.Westy can't stay healthy for a fraction of a game....I really wonder how he even makes the team.
 
Brian Westbrook sits with hamstring injury Tue Aug 31, 06:51 PM San Francisco 49ers RB Brian Westbrook (hamstring) didn't practice Tuesday, Aug. 31, because of a hamstring injury suffered Saturday, Aug. 28, reports the Sacramento Bee's Matt Barrows. Westbrook played just six snaps on Saturday and carried the ball only twice for 17 yards.
well that didnt take long.
It amazes me when people get all worked up when a coach says another RB will help with the load. That is the case on every NFL team. If it wasn't Westy it would have been Coffee and still can be Dixon.Westy can't stay healthy for a fraction of a game....I really wonder how he even makes the team.
plenty of players pulling and injuring things, not just westbrook.. it's an epidemic and some of them are just getting out of preseason work...
 
Brian Westbrook sits with hamstring injury Tue Aug 31, 06:51 PM San Francisco 49ers RB Brian Westbrook (hamstring) didn't practice Tuesday, Aug. 31, because of a hamstring injury suffered Saturday, Aug. 28, reports the Sacramento Bee's Matt Barrows. Westbrook played just six snaps on Saturday and carried the ball only twice for 17 yards.
well that didnt take long.
It amazes me when people get all worked up when a coach says another RB will help with the load. That is the case on every NFL team. If it wasn't Westy it would have been Coffee and still can be Dixon.Westy can't stay healthy for a fraction of a game....I really wonder how he even makes the team.
plenty of players pulling and injuring things, not just westbrook.. it's an epidemic and some of them are just getting out of preseason work...
:)
 
Brian Westbrook sits with hamstring injury Tue Aug 31, 06:51 PM San Francisco 49ers RB Brian Westbrook (hamstring) didn't practice Tuesday, Aug. 31, because of a hamstring injury suffered Saturday, Aug. 28, reports the Sacramento Bee's Matt Barrows. Westbrook played just six snaps on Saturday and carried the ball only twice for 17 yards.
well that didnt take long.
It amazes me when people get all worked up when a coach says another RB will help with the load. That is the case on every NFL team. If it wasn't Westy it would have been Coffee and still can be Dixon.Westy can't stay healthy for a fraction of a game....I really wonder how he even makes the team.
plenty of players pulling and injuring things, not just westbrook.. it's an epidemic and some of them are just getting out of preseason work...
:lmao:
Care to elaborate? Or should I just get you a link to KFFL?
 
I agree with the Hustler on this last piece only. Did you really think Westy wouldn't live on the injury report anyway? He's been there for the last 4+ years. I expect this all season, where he's questionable with a hammy, soreness with his neck, whatever and 8/10 he's gonna play anyway. The fact is many players right now are experiencing soreness from the heat and practice. Not that much to worry about.

However, Westbrook cutting into Gore's touches isn't much for Gore owners to worry about either.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Carolina Hustler said:
Care to elaborate? Or should I just get you a link to KFFL?
There's a link that says Westbrook is faking his injury to get out of preseason work?
Did I say Westbrook was faking to get out of work? He is one of MANY players on the injury report, him being on the injury report for a pulled hammy is irrelevant at this point, until there is more information, I'll assume he's going to be ready for the first reg season game, like most of the other high profile players who are banged up right now...
 
Westy was a great one. Was.

Just an insurance policy. I don't see him getting more than maybe 4-5 touches a game and those would come on thrid downs.

Then again who knows. maybe they use him more on thrid downs than we thing. But he is undraftable at this point.

 
Westy was a great one. Was.

Just an insurance policy. I don't see him getting more than maybe 4-5 touches a game and those would come on thrid downs.

Then again who knows. maybe they use him more on thrid downs than we thing. But he is undraftable at this point.
With a 5.4 average last year, his ability to catch balls, and with as often as Gore is banged up, I'd say he's draft-able as a handcuff in deep roster PPR leagues at least. I'm not predicting Gore will be injured, but with as many times as he's played injured and been infective, you'd think the Niners would want to limit the chance of having an injured Gore, or shorten his recovery times buy giving him a break when he's banged up, something they have never had the luxury of being able to do in the past..
 
Haven't heard much at all about Westbrook lately. With the season about to begin, do any homers have any insight on where Westbrook stands with the team?

Has he practiced at all? If so, how has he looked?

Will he be part of the game plans at all?

Rotoworld lists him as the #3 back behind Dixon who is #2. Is this true?

 
By the looks of preseason, Dixon and not Westbrook would be the primary horse in the running game if Gore was injured. I think Westy is insurance and is in on the occasional 3rd down and 2 back sets.

 
Westy was a great one. Was.

Just an insurance policy. I don't see him getting more than maybe 4-5 touches a game and those would come on thrid downs.

Then again who knows. maybe they use him more on thrid downs than we thing. But he is undraftable at this point.
With a 5.4 average last year, his ability to catch balls, and with as often as Gore is banged up, I'd say he's draft-able as a handcuff in deep roster PPR leagues at least. I'm not predicting Gore will be injured, but with as many times as he's played injured and been infective, you'd think the Niners would want to limit the chance of having an injured Gore, or shorten his recovery times buy giving him a break when he's banged up, something they have never had the luxury of being able to do in the past..
he isnt the handcuff, but sure draft him.
 
Westy was a great one. Was.

Just an insurance policy. I don't see him getting more than maybe 4-5 touches a game and those would come on thrid downs.

Then again who knows. maybe they use him more on thrid downs than we thing. But he is undraftable at this point.
With a 5.4 average last year, his ability to catch balls, and with as often as Gore is banged up, I'd say he's draft-able as a handcuff in deep roster PPR leagues at least. I'm not predicting Gore will be injured, but with as many times as he's played injured and been infective, you'd think the Niners would want to limit the chance of having an injured Gore, or shorten his recovery times buy giving him a break when he's banged up, something they have never had the luxury of being able to do in the past..
he isnt the handcuff, but sure draft him.
Certainly looks like Dixon is the handcuff after his pre-season work.

I still think the 9er's should limit Gores carries more than they have in the past. Whether it be with Dixon or Westbrook..

Not much out there in the way of Westbrook news right now, I suspect we won't here much if anything about him until/unless Gore gets banged up.

 
Westy was a great one. Was.

Just an insurance policy. I don't see him getting more than maybe 4-5 touches a game and those would come on thrid downs.

Then again who knows. maybe they use him more on thrid downs than we thing. But he is undraftable at this point.
With a 5.4 average last year, his ability to catch balls, and with as often as Gore is banged up, I'd say he's draft-able as a handcuff in deep roster PPR leagues at least. I'm not predicting Gore will be injured, but with as many times as he's played injured and been infective, you'd think the Niners would want to limit the chance of having an injured Gore, or shorten his recovery times buy giving him a break when he's banged up, something they have never had the luxury of being able to do in the past..
he isnt the handcuff, but sure draft him.
Certainly looks like Dixon is the handcuff after his pre-season work.

I still think the 9er's should limit Gores carries more than they have in the past. Whether it be with Dixon or Westbrook..

Not much out there in the way of Westbrook news right now, I suspect we won't here much if anything about him until/unless Gore gets banged up.
for an all purpose back, the niners have done an excellent job limiting his workload over the past 4 years....in fact, each year, his workload has decreased.
 
Westy was a great one. Was.

Just an insurance policy. I don't see him getting more than maybe 4-5 touches a game and those would come on thrid downs.

Then again who knows. maybe they use him more on thrid downs than we thing. But he is undraftable at this point.
With a 5.4 average last year, his ability to catch balls, and with as often as Gore is banged up, I'd say he's draft-able as a handcuff in deep roster PPR leagues at least. I'm not predicting Gore will be injured, but with as many times as he's played injured and been infective, you'd think the Niners would want to limit the chance of having an injured Gore, or shorten his recovery times buy giving him a break when he's banged up, something they have never had the luxury of being able to do in the past..
he isnt the handcuff, but sure draft him.
Certainly looks like Dixon is the handcuff after his pre-season work.

I still think the 9er's should limit Gores carries more than they have in the past. Whether it be with Dixon or Westbrook..

Not much out there in the way of Westbrook news right now, I suspect we won't here much if anything about him until/unless Gore gets banged up.
for an all purpose back, the niners have done an excellent job limiting his workload over the past 4 years....in fact, each year, his workload has decreased.
That may be true, but it still seems like he plays banged up for a portion of the season every year and still carries a full load. His production may fall a bit but he's usually still in there...

He's certainly tough though, one of the more durable in my opinion.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top