latrops said:
OK, one poster suggests that Westy
will AVERAGE as much as 15 touches per game. Another poster suggests that is too high and the expectation should be around 8 touches per game. You ask for the 8 touch per game guy to back up his claim (you didn't ask the same of the 15 touch per game guy).
http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index...&p=12166735
I'm puzzled here because the poster (Shader) never said the word
"AVERAGE" yet you have it in all capital letters as if to make some bold statement or as if it were some key point in your argument. He also never said he
"will" average a certain amount of touches. He said
"can" which is a big difference.
"Will" meaning definite, and
"Can" meaning it's possible. And again you using the word average and claiming his projection was 15 touches, when he said
"can get 8-10 carries and catch 4-5" which is a range of 12-15 in which the average would be 13.5, not your stated 15...So to that point you are over stating and exaggerating that posters position. Shader was only stating his opinion about what the possibilities were.
On the other hand, Jade takes a more aggressive and bolder stance.
"Westy wont be getting 15 touches per game. Not even close. try about 8 total on average per game for the year, maximum." First attacking Shaders stated opinion and implying his personal opinion but rather than proposing as opinion he states as if it were fact. As if he some how knows the future on the mater. How could he know what the maximum is, he can guess, or say
"in my opinion" but he states it as if it's fact, as if Shader is silly for even considering an outside probability. He took a brazen and dogmatic approach that was unfriendly to the poster for which he was responding to.
In this instance you're understating the tone in Jades post and softening it using the words "Another poster suggests" when it wasn't a suggestion at all. And "should be" when what he said was "8 total" and "maximum"
Ultimately I thought Shader had a much more reasonable approach, stating his opinion and leaving open the possibility that he could be wrong. And Jade takes a more dogmatic and combative approach as if his opinion is definite and should be common knowledge. This is what sticks out to me more than the #'s. If he's going to be so adamant that his opinion is so much better than someone else's, he should #1 approach it with a little more diplomacy, and #2 Validate his opinion.
latrops said:
You agree with the poster that suggests that those downplaying the Westbrook signing (by saying he is depth that won't average more than 10 touches a game?) are just "consoling each other by trying to convince themselves that the signing is meaningless".
http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index...&p=12167284
In this portion of your post you're projecting my stance on the statement towards a certain poster who provided the #'s you've listed above. I never said which posters I thought this statement should be applied to, neither did the other poster (Shader). So when you say I was aiming my agreement of that post at a poster who projected 10 touches, or Westbrook as depth, when nothing in my or Shaders post even remotely implied that, you're trying to put words in my mouth in order to make your point. My agreeing with Shader would more be a product of my disagreeing with the approach of several posters. Some being overly defensive, some adamant about something they couldn't possibly know....
latrops said:
It just seems you are talking out of both sides...wanting people to justify their expectations of fewer than 10 touches a game, while you claim the same expectation. There are only a few (one or two?) posters saying Westy will average more than 10 touches a game, yet you are arguing less with them and much more with those that project Westbrook to get about as many touches as your own projection. Maybe it is just perception, but you seem to be defending the idea that Westbrook is real threat to Gore (you've pointed out how he has effectively come back from injury in the past, you point out that his average per carry remained high last year, you've pointed out that his receptions per game average remained relatively steady in spite of injury, etc), while also suggesting he will only average 9 touches a game....numbers that don't worry Gore owners/supporters very much.
Well with the above analysis, seems your
"talking out of both sides" statement has been rendered inapplicable... And now you're calling the guy you described above as the poster who said "should be around 8 touches" as a poster who said 10 touches... which is it?.. Don't claim I'm
"talking out of both sides" when you're contradicting yourself...You've also implying that I'm suggesting Gore owners should be worried, when over and over again I've made it very clear that is not my stance.
My differences with Jade are differences more with his approach, his in ability to see the possibility of anything outside of his prediction, and lack of validation. I never stood strong and hard against Gore being called depth, or the potential for him to get 8, 9, 10, touches per game. I merely suggested the possibilities outside of those predictions. No one can predict Westbrook's touches with any certainty, but Jade doesn't seem to think he can.
latrops said:
I'll give you this, you have effectively defended the idea that Westbrook is still a viable NFL rb when healthy. Maybe a couple of posters want to believe he is washed up and no more useful than Coffee was...but you are correct that, for as long as he is healthy, he has the ability to be productive.
At least you agree with me on something... lol