BoltBacker
Footballguy
'Gunz...... I am disappointed in you. Where are the blurbs from the darkest corners of the web declaring the punter "a steal!".
I am waiting here to high-five you buddy.
I am waiting here to high-five you buddy.
Pshhhhhhhh, you fogetin' that sleeper long snapper? Need depth there, brah.Cash is still on the board with two picks to go to the next Chargers pick. Is there any reason to hope they take him?
I actually don't mind the pick b/c now they can cut Scifries and save ~ 4M against the cap.'Gunz...... I am disappointed in you. Where are the blurbs from the darkest corners of the web declaring the punter "a steal!".
I am waiting here to high-five you buddy.
Last hope is that he lasts to the Chargers 7th round pick and they take him. His fall through the draft is very surprising. He was projected as high as the third round.Pshhhhhhhh, you fogetin' that sleeper long snapper? Need depth there, brah.
Have you seen some of the women on MT? They might give the best backup OLman on this roster a run for their money.I actually don't mind the pick b/c now they can cut Scifries and save ~ 4M against the cap.
Of course this means we passed on some OL from Montana so I know I'm supposed to be OUTRAGED!!!!!!![]()
Would be a valuable piece if Watt can be both the fullback and long snapper. Wouldn't have to waste a roster spot on Windt.Pshhhhhhhh, you fogetin' that sleeper long snapper? Need depth there, brah.
This again. Please take him Telesco.Cash is still on the board with two picks to go to the next Chargers pick. Is there any reason to hope they take him?
Quoting this for posterity. I bet 70% of these dudes are out of the league in 2 years or less, and NONE of them have the impact of Bosa or Henry.How about this:
SD trades #3 to TEN for (15, 76, 2017 2nd rounder)
SD #15 drafts Ryan Kelly C (pushes Watt to the bench)
SD trades #35 to JAX for (38, 146)
SD trades #38 to MIA for (42, 107)
SD trades #42 to GB for (57, 125, 248)
SD trades #57 to TB for (74, 106)
SD #66 drafts Darian Thompson S (pushes Addae to the bench)
SD #74 drafts Austin Hooper TE (much cheaper developmental TE with similar upside to Hunter)
SD trades #76 to CAR for (93, 129, 168)
SD #93 drafts Conner Cook QB (finally developing a guy with potential, replaces Clemens)
SD #102 drafts Nick Kwiatkoski LB (versatile ILB/OLB depth that can cover)
SD #106 drafts Hassan Ridgeway DE/DT (rare big pass rusher)
SD trades #107 to CHI for (117, 206)
SD #117 drafts Andrew Billings DT (long term NT, rotational with Mebane for now)
SD #125 drafts Kenneth Dixon RB (replaces Donald Brown, Gordon bust insurance)
SD #129 drafts Chris Westerman OG (depth, could develop into a starter)
SD #146 drafts KJ Dillon SS (hard hitting compliment to Thompson)
SD #168 drafts Rashard Higgins WR(depth, could push Inman off the roster)
SD #175 drafts Jerrell Adams TE (raw but athletic, time to develop while Gates takes his encore)
SD trade #179 to PHI (196, 240)
SD #196 drafts Dan Vitale FB (if you HAVE TO draft a FB may as well be a slightly better one)
SD #198 drafts Brandon Allen QB (practice squad QB replaces Sorenson/Renner)
SD #206 drafts Mike Thomas WR (fights with Higgins for roster/practic squad)
SD #224 drafts Daniel Lasco RB (raw practice squad freak athlete)
SD #248 drafts Jack Allen C (pushes for roster practice squad)
Sounds familiar, you said the same thing about all those RB's that were drafted after Gordon(and two additional picks) and played just as well.Quoting this for posterity. I bet 70% of these dudes are out of the league in 2 years or less, and NONE of them have the impact of Bosa or Henry.
That's the best you got? You'll take the 250 player "field" vs Bosa?Five years from now Chargers fans will look at some of the players they could have had instead of Bosa, and weep.
I don't need the 250 player field, I'll just take Ramsey, although there are more than a handful of others in the first round who will be vastly superior players than the meathead you chose. Enjoy the JAG you just picked, teaming him with Gordon should assure you another high pick in next years draft.That's the best you got? You'll take the 250 player "field" vs Bosa?
Way to go out on a limb, chief. How often would you say in the history of the NFL draft that the team with the third pick in the draft ended up taking the best player available?
I will go out on a limb and proclaim that the team drafting 6th next year will be awash in melancholy of what may have..... NAY, should have been.
Go away trollI don't need the 250 player field, I'll just take Ramsey, although there are more than a handful of others in the first round who will be vastly superior players than the meathead you chose. Enjoy the JAG you just picked, teaming him with Gordon should assure you another high pick in next years draft.
Better a troll than a blinders on homer. Have fun with that top five pick next year. Grab McCaffrey.Go away troll
Im far from a blind homer. Thanks for trollin though. Im not a fan of the bosa pick really as he seems to be more hype than anything else but im willing to give him a chanceBetter a troll than a blinders on homer. Have fun with that top five pick next year. Grab McCaffrey.
Well of course you're gonna give him a chance, what choice do you have, but I say Chargers fans will regret this pick in five years, you agree with me that you don't like the pick and somehow I'm a troll? Lol.Im far from a blind homer. Thanks for trollin though. Im not a fan of the bosa pick really as he seems to be more hype than anything else but im willing to give him a chance
No you are a trollWell of course you're gonna give him a chance, what choice do you have, but I say Chargers fans will regret this pick in five years, you agree with me that you don't like the pick and somehow I'm a troll? Lol.
So if I am understanding you correctly you are closing the door on the career of a guy who was a consensus top 10 pick by NFL GMs before he has played even one snap in the NFL?Well of course you're gonna give him a chance, what choice do you have, but I say Chargers fans will regret this pick in five years, you agree with me that you don't like the pick and somehow I'm a troll? Lol.
He did his anti-Bosa thing in the Jags thread, too.So if I am understanding you correctly you are closing the door on the career of a guy who was a consensus top 10 pick by NFL GMs before he has played even one snap in the NFL?
That stance makes it very difficult to take you seriously. Michigan fan?
And? You are calling a guy a bust before he's even played a snap. That kind of rash statement makes it difficult to take any of your analyses seriously.petekrum said:No, not closing the door, just saying they could have made a better pick. You boys might want to check out the bust rate of top ten picks over the years.
So you're saying that top ten picks can be busts? Does anyone else know this? Because you should probably have yourself a GM job in the NFL if not. That would give you a huge edge over everyone else.petekrum said:No, not closing the door, just saying they could have made a better pick. You boys might want to check out the bust rate of top ten picks over the years.
Joey Bosa, DE/OLB, Ohio State
Kangaroo Score: 0.763 Agility Score: 1.064 Avg TFL: 18.5
Based on our normal methods for doing this, Bosa is someone we should probably be excited about. When examining his athletic traits and college production, this is someone that the computer would allow us to select in the 1st round. Still, there are some odd details and concerns about Bosa that make us scratch our heads a bit. His Kangaroo Score suggests that he should have the lower body power to bull rush, as well as stand up against the opponent's running game. The score above actually might underestimate his power a bit, as the results from his broad jump would produce a result of 1.601, which is a significant improvement on his overall result. Then we have his agility results, which are also really quite good, especially for someone of his size. The one odd thing about his results was what happened when we removed mass as a factor. Suddenly, his lower body explosiveness was appearing to be just "okay", with a result that came in between 0.208 and 0.823. That result is a tad lower than what we normally see in most of the NFL's top level pass rushers, but not necessarily a significant problem. These results would suggest that he is probably more of a bull-rushing torque machine, and less of a blow past the tackle at the snap kind of player. That also probably fits with what we have seen of Bosa in the few games we have watched. The most similar athletic comparison we can make, is probably Kyle Vanden Bosch. Yes, we feel a bit awkward about making a white-guy-to-white-guy comparison. Then we come to Bosa's statistical production in college, which is a whole other can of worms. Because of the recent successes of the Ohio State football program, it is a bit more difficult to tell who is benefiting from being in an potentially advantageous situation. In 2014, we would say that Bosa's production was quite good, though still perhaps a hair short of what we typically find with top level pass rushers. In 2015, we run into much bigger problems. Bosa took a rather severe tumble in production, and we don't have an adequate explanation for why that is. Some people will say that it was caused by Bosa being double-teamed more often, but we're not so sure about that. Considering that his team was actually improving the rate that they were getting to the opposing quarterback (going from an 8.3% sack rate in 2015, to an 8.4% in 2015), and that Bosa was frequently benefiting from being able to go after the opponent's right tackle, his slump bothers us a bit. We'd also say that while Bosa appears to be active against the run, he was probably making about 10% fewer plays in this area than we would really like to see. Admittedly, part of the reason we are being so critical of Bosa is because of some of the similarities he possesses to another former Ohio State player, Vernon Gholston. Like Bosa, Gholston was an extremely gifted athlete whose market share of his team's pass rushing success was less impressive than his stat sheet might make you suspect. You could say, that for as gifted as Bosa/Gholston appeared to be physically, we actually think they both should have been even more productive in college, especially considering the beneficial environment they found themselves in. Maybe that seems like nitpicking. Despite all of this criticism, we still think Bosa is probably one of the better pass rushing prospects in this draft, and worth a 1st round pick. We just aren't certain that he should go in the top 5.
So apparently on this forum you aren't allowed to disagree with a pick? Keep flapping your gums, I'm sure you all were defending the Gordon pick lasty year.So you're saying that top ten picks can be busts? Does anyone else know this? Because you should probably have yourself a GM job in the NFL if not. That would give you a huge edge over everyone else.
PS. Ramsey was also a top ten pick - so does the top ten bust rate apply to him too or is he somehow the only guy to ever get drafted that would be immune to that for some reason?
I hated the Gordon pick immediately - look it up if you want. You can disagree with a pick, but the reasoning behind your disagreement has been pretty vapid so far. I'm not over the moon about Bosa by any stretch, but he doesn't scream bust to me just yet either. They could have screwed up much worse.So apparently on this forum you aren't allowed to disagree with a pick? Keep flapping your gums, I'm sure you all were defending the Gordon pick lasty year.
Well, that's a better point then.I don't need the 250 player field, I'll just take Ramsey, although there are more than a handful of others in the first round who will be vastly superior players than the meathead you chose. Enjoy the JAG you just picked, teaming him with Gordon should assure you another high pick in next years draft.
Fixed.petekrum said:No, not closing the door, just saying they could have made a better pick. You boys might want to check out the bust rate oftop tenpicks over the years.
Don't love the Bosa pick but at least he looks like a talented player at a need position. I'm still flabbergasted over trading up for Gordon.I hated the Gordon pick immediately - look it up if you want. You can disagree with a pick, but the reasoning behind your disagreement has been pretty vapid so far. I'm not over the moon about Bosa by any stretch, but he doesn't scream bust to me just yet either. They could have screwed up much worse.
It was dismayingly horrifying to learn that there actually could be a worse move than trading up for Ryan Matthews.Don't love the Bosa pick but at least he looks like a talented player at a need position. I'm still flabbergasted over trading up for Gordon.
It's not disagreeing with the pick that stands out, it's that you are effectively calling Bosa a bust. I agree that there will be better players to emerge from later in the draft it always happens (it's hardly a huge prediction on your part) what I am bothered by is just dismissing the pick entirely.So apparently on this forum you aren't allowed to disagree with a pick? Keep flapping your gums, I'm sure you all were defending the Gordon pick lasty year.
As you can tell, I don't think the did enough to improve the OL(as always). I also think the S position got even worse, and it killed the team last year.I dunno, I'm a proponent of trading down, but that doesn't look like a super fantastic haul. I'd probably be happy with this actual draft if they'd done something smarter with the 2nd rounder, and not drafted a punter. Just a trade down from 35 to 38 would have worked - they could have drafted the same stupid TE and got an extra pick out of it most likely.
Not sure they made the right picks, but I don't think they needed to add more than 2 OL in the draft. Only so many guys can make the roster, and, whether you agree or not, Telesco had already committed to these guys before the draft: Dunlap, Barksdale, Franklin, Fluker, Watt, Hairston, and Wiggins.As you can tell, I don't think the did enough to improve the OL(as always). I also think the S position got even worse, and it killed the team last year.
If they drafted Bosa primarily to get sacks, IMO they made a mistake. IMO they need him to add weight and play traditional 3-4 DE, at least for the majority of his snaps. He was a better run defender than pass rusher in college. Why would any team draft him and move him away from his strengths? Besides, if he is getting push from the DE spot, that should make things a bit easier for Liuget, Attaochu, and Ingram, and thus it should help the pass rush.While I won't criticize the Bosa selection, I am not completely sold on him adding the pass rush they are desperate for. That's one of the reason I said before I hope he plays at a natural ~269 and plays passing downs(~65% of snaps). Having him lose weight to play OLB or gain weight up to ~291+ to be an everydown 3-4 DE so that he can play 80+% of snaps would lessen the likelyhood he gets double digit sacks..... and that's why they drafted him.
I agree that he CAN play the run, but they need his pass rushing skills more than anything imo. You can draft a 3-4 DE that defends the run well anytime you want. Even in bad years. They call those run-stopping specialists "two down players" but that's not even true. In the NFL passing defenders are two down players, run stoppers are one down players and short yardage specialists. Pass rushers are so much more valuable than run stoppers it's not even close. I was a little shocked they passed on Noah, although he has character concerns and Telesco seems to avoid bad character guys. But if you are winning 4 games with high character guys, then.......If they drafted Bosa primarily to get sacks, IMO they made a mistake. IMO they need him to add weight and play traditional 3-4 DE, at least for the majority of his snaps. He was a better run defender than pass rusher in college. Why would any team draft him and move him away from his strengths? Besides, if he is getting push from the DE spot, that should make things a bit easier for Liuget, Attaochu, and Ingram, and thus it should help the pass rush.
Aside from that and back to Telesco. The position group he has done the poorest job with is DL. He has been there for four offseasons now, and he has signed just one impact DL (Mebane, we hope). But he has only used 3 of 28 draft picks on DL, with Bosa being the only one before the 5th round. So it isn't surprising that the Chargers have had poor DL play throughout Telesco's tenure.
This was my other issue with his draft this year. To draft a backup ILB in the 4th when NT/DT Billings was available is one of the worst decisions Telesco has made with the Chargers, and that is saying something.