I couldn't agree more JP. I have the 1.13 in the NFFC Main Event this Saturday. Any suggestions you'd like to share with the board on that spot? PM if you'd rather not derail this thread.TIAI'll say this - I anticipated having an issue at WR2 with my third pick (which is why Dodds said the #4 spot suxx0r).At pick 39, I had the following gone:This was not the case here.I can see where this type of draft, where ALLEGEDLY everyone knows what they're doingFixed?
Peyton
Gates
Carson
18-20RBs
15+ WRs
That would have put me at WR16 at best, possibly WR19 or 20. That'd be a major concern.
RB2 in the 4th is viable (Deuce, FTaylor and others) but WR2 outside of the Top 20 is a disadvantage.
I don't think this draft was quite what you'd see in a very tough NFFC draft. Pick 4 will be a tough spot.
Interesting that you say the MB helped you out. There were 20 MB picks and 18 Staff picks before your 3rd. 7 of the 18 staff were WR (43.75%) and 8 of the 20 MB were WR (40%). Not really a huge difference there.Now, if you want to discuss some of the MB taking a QB way too early, then I'll listen.Jeff Pasquino said:Ok, so let's break this down.....
Team:
First 4 picks:5.11 Jon Kitna Det/6
11.11 Jeff Garcia TB/10
22.04 JaMarcus Russell Oak/5
1.04 Brian Westbrook Phi/5
4.04 Deuce McAllister NO/4
7.11 Warrick Dunn ATL/8
15.11 Michael Robinson SF/6
19.11 Garrett Wolfe CHI/9
16.04 Cecil Sapp DEN/6
23.11 Jason Snelling ATL/8
2.11 T.J. Houshmandzadeh CIN/5
3.11 Plaxico Burress NYG/9
9.11 Mike Furrey DET/6
14.04 Bobby Engram SEA/8
10.04 Patrick Crayton DAL/8
13.11 Drew Carter CAR /7
24.04 Shaun McDonald DET/6
18.04 Lance Moore NO/4
6.04 Todd Heap BAL/8
12.04 Heath Miller PIT/6
20.04 Jeff Wilkins STL/9
21.11 Ryan Longwell MIN/5
8.04 Baltimore Ravens D/ST 8
17.11 Cincinnati Bengals D/ST 5Walked into Pick Slot 4 and took Westbrook. Re-affirmed that call when the MB said they'd have taken him at 5. Considered Reggie Bush (Wk 4 bye would be a later issue) and also FWP (really like him, but chose Westbrook in a close call). Obviously I was concerned that I'd not get a good enough WR2 in Round 3, but the MB helped me out and didn't take enough WRs. (Plax was #15). Outstanding value that fell. Chose Plax over Colston because I was targeting Deuce. Nailed that one. Also considered CJ2 (targeting Kitna later) but felt Plax was a slightly better play.1.04 Brian Westbrook Phi/5
2.11 T.J. Houshmandzadeh CIN/5
3.11 Plaxico Burress NYG/9
4.04 Deuce McAllister NO/4
I don't like CG's WR at all. I think it will be his downfall which is a shame as he has a nice QB combo and stable of RBs...I would guess Carlton has one of the best teams
VeryHere's a write-up on my draft..I went into this draft wanting to build a solid WR corps around my stud RB Johnson. In a best ball ppr where you start 3WR with a 4th possibly at flex, WR's are huge and have tremendous value. While on paper my team may not look like a top team, I beleive I have argualbly the best WR corps in the league and in this format I think can carry me pretty far. I'd like to however give props to Pasquino, who unbeleivably took 5 players right before my pick (Burress, Kitna, Dunn, Garcia & Robinson). The one thing I learned from this draft is that next time, I'm praying I wont be picking next to him. Nice work.
Working on the The Intimidator angle. 
I love MOPs arrogance in all his posts, it's so entertaining. I can't wait for the Hyper Active league to get going. It should be great fun.Should have his board privilages stripped for awhile...
The guy drafts the NFL leader in receptions in a PPR league and you don't like his WRs at all. That's some sound logic right there...lolI don't like CG's WR at all. I think it will be his downfall which is a shame as he has a nice QB combo and stable of RBs...I would guess Carlton has one of the best teams
Morris went sooner than expected and there were 22 picks between my picks ont he long side. There were not many decent RB options to clean up after, so I would have to take a guy potentially 20+ picks ahead of where he should get taken just to fill a void when at a certain point there were only pure backups left.I think some people that are critiquing things need to better understand how best ball works before saying teams are weak at one spot or another (although I'm not pointing to MOP on this one). The whole point is to take the best scorers at each position each week.With that in mind, a WR that scores exactly 10 points each week IS WORTH LESS than a guy that scores 20 points then 0 points and alternates each week. In this particular example, the first WR may not score at all the entire season while the second guy is pretty much a lock to count in 8 weeks.So someone like Favre will be worth a fair amount when he drops 30+ points in 6 games (but very little in others). As BassNBrew pointed out, guys that will rack up zeroes most of the season will actually HURT your team. While there is much debate on handcuffing, many people feel it is better to grab other players that will see the field regularly than trying to handcuff an otherwise mediocre scoring situation.You look good except at RB...why not grab Sammy Morris at some point? I just don't understand that and nothing you type is going to give me any clarity there. You are razor thin at RB IMO and your assessment is right on...you will never be at the bottom every week but you are not a top3 team. I also like how you took a player/position to "stick it" as you said to another MB team...I said you would do that in my write up yesterday.David Yudkin said:I think that I have opened at least one of my eyes now, so . . .QBFavre, Brett GBP QB - 7 8.12 Green, Trent MIA QB - 9 13.03 Roethlisberger, Ben PIT QB - 6 7.03 They've not elite, but they should all be up and down and are better for best ball than regular lineup leagues. I don't love Green but there were very few QB left at that point. We'll see just how wide opened the Steelers offense gets this year.RBBuckhalter, Correll PHI RB - 5 12.12 Jones, Julius DAL RB - 8 5.03 Maroney, Laurence NEP RB - 10 1.12 Moore, Mewelde MIN RB - 5 22.12 Every time I had a RB queued up he went just before my pick and there were no other guys that jumped out at me as comparible values. I actually thought I had taken a RB in the middle rounds but obviously that didn't happen. Without much access to the truly top guys, my options were limited and I opted to look for higher scoring elsewhere.WRColbert, Keary CAR WR - 7 16.12 Harrison, Marvin IND WR - 6 2.03 Jones, Matt JAC WR - 4 11.03 Lloyd, Brandon WAS WR - 4 23.03 Moss, Randy NEP WR - 10 4.12 Smith, Brad NYJ WR - 10 24.12 Stallworth, Donte' NEP WR - 10 9.03 Walter, Kevin HOU WR - 10 18.12 Williamson, Troy MIN WR - 5 10.12 Quantity over quality. Hopefully I got enough guys that will see a lot of time to have all of them in the mix throughout the year. At three in the morning, mistook my former 49ers wide receivers and thought I was taking Wilson instead of Lloyd (not that Wilson should have still been on the board). Seeing some of the other WRs that got taken late, I don't feel so bad about the guys added as padding. I think the negativism on Moss is overblown and he'll be fine. Paired with Stallworth, one or the other should have a decent game each week.TEGates, Antonio SDC TE - 7 3.03 Johnson, Eric NOS TE - 4 14.12 Martin, David MIA TE - 9 17.03 I completely misread the TE market and was expected people to jump in sooner for tight ends. Thus the risk in taking Gates. I see Gates putting up WR2 numbers, so he might still end up being a decent pick. At least I know what to expect from Gates (as opposd to guys with a fair amount of ??? at RB or WR that were still on the board). Martin and Johnson will (sadly) have weeks as my flex scorer, especially if they have weeks with TD catches.PKGould, Robbie CHI PK - 9 19.03 Nedney, Joe SFO PK - 6 21.03 Didn't get stuck with any of the guys on the kicking bubble and Gould should still do well (although not as well as last year).DEFBears, Chicago CHI Def - 9 6.12 Dolphins, Miami MIA Def - 9 15.03 Lions, Detroit DET Def - 6 20.12 Sure, CHI may have gone too early but their big weeks are MONSTER weeks. MIA DEF may be one of the few positive things happening for the Dolphins this year. Only took the defense to stick it to one of the MB teams. I would have gone with MIA and CHI on the same bye week and not really cared too much.I would like my team better if this were a straight Survivor league. I think I have enough to stay away from too many low scoring weeks but I don't think that I have enough to be a regular Top 3 scorer to beat most teams each week.Will try to make league comments later on . . .
The fact that Andre Johnson has a high PPG is mitigated a lot by his low TD total. He may or may not be a good overall fantasy receiver this year.The guy drafts the NFL leader in receptions in a PPR league and you don't like his WRs at all. That's some sound logic right there...lolI don't like CG's WR at all. I think it will be his downfall which is a shame as he has a nice QB combo and stable of RBs...I would guess Carlton has one of the best teams
I took Perry with the 23.04 pick.I'm surprised a board favorite over the years wasn't drafted in round 23 or 24. With Perry healing up, NOT going on PUP, and Marvin's recent comments I was sure he'd get picked.
Hmmm somehow I looked again and missed it, OKI took Perry with the 23.04 pick.I'm surprised a board favorite over the years wasn't drafted in round 23 or 24. With Perry healing up, NOT going on PUP, and Marvin's recent comments I was sure he'd get picked.
It's just a little ribbing.I love MOPs arrogance in all his posts, it's so entertaining. I can't wait for the Hyper Active league to get going. It should be great fun.Should have his board privilages stripped for awhile...
Sure thing.At 1.13 you're looking at best RB available. My goal here is to take Best RB and avoid byes of RBs I'd target in Rounds 4 and 5.I couldn't agree more JP. I have the 1.13 in the NFFC Main Event this Saturday. Any suggestions you'd like to share with the board on that spot? PM if you'd rather not derail this thread.TIAI'll say this - I anticipated having an issue at WR2 with my third pick (which is why Dodds said the #4 spot suxx0r).At pick 39, I had the following gone:This was not the case here.I can see where this type of draft, where ALLEGEDLY everyone knows what they're doingFixed?
Peyton
Gates
Carson
18-20RBs
15+ WRs
That would have put me at WR16 at best, possibly WR19 or 20. That'd be a major concern.
RB2 in the 4th is viable (Deuce, FTaylor and others) but WR2 outside of the Top 20 is a disadvantage.
I don't think this draft was quite what you'd see in a very tough NFFC draft. Pick 4 will be a tough spot.
Interesting that you say the MB helped you out. There were 20 MB picks and 18 Staff picks before your 3rd. 7 of the 18 staff were WR (43.75%) and 8 of the 20 MB were WR (40%). Not really a huge difference there.Now, if you want to discuss some of the MB taking a QB way too early, then I'll listen.Jeff Pasquino said:Walked into Pick Slot 4 and took Westbrook. Re-affirmed that call when the MB said they'd have taken him at 5. Considered Reggie Bush (Wk 4 bye would be a later issue) and also FWP (really like him, but chose Westbrook in a close call). Obviously I was concerned that I'd not get a good enough WR2 in Round 3, but the MB helped me out and didn't take enough WRs. (Plax was #15). Outstanding value that fell. Chose Plax over Colston because I was targeting Deuce. Nailed that one. Also considered CJ2 (targeting Kitna later) but felt Plax was a slightly better play.
Fair point here.4.10 Thomas Jones OK, well scratch the QB idea, as the killer B's Brees, Bulger and Brady come off the board prior to this pick...but that allows Jones to fall, which I am thrilled about...The Jets ran for over 1700 yards lats season with not much at RB, I think Jones will really have a solid year (and will chip in in the pass catching department as well) and outperform this draft slot5.05: Jerious Norwood With 2 RBs and 2 WRs to this point, this was a tough pick...I debated picking a 3rd WR from the Holmes/R Brown/V Jackson group, but ultimately decided that I'd rather have a RB here since I am a big Norwood fan...I think he's a guy who excels in this format, as I really doubt Dunn lasts the season as it is, and regardless Norwood is a big play threat who is reportedly going to be uber involved in the passing game...I expect several big games from him and an overall very solid seasonDraft Update: Through 3 rounds the following have come off the board: 2 QBs (Manning, Palmer)/1 TE (Gates)/22 RBs/17 WRs
A little surprised to see only 2 QBs off the board, I expected more to go, even though I had planned to wait...Start to thin abou tshifting gears and picking up a Brady/Brees type if I don't like the RB/WR talent at 4.10
7.05 Chester Taylor Leon Washington was on my radar for this pick (especially having T Jones), but he went a couple of picks before mine, so I chose Taylor...I think Taylor is solid here, as at worst he is going to get touches (and catches), and at best he is a 1200+ yard rusher palying behind a rookie who isn't exactly known for his durability...Certainly not an exciting pick, but a solid one IMO...Draft Update: Through 6 rounds the following have come off the board: 9 QBs/5 TEs/37 RBs/32 WRs/1 DEF
Not too many surprises so far...I have a group of about 5-6 available Qbs bunched pretty tightly so I still think I can wait another round there, basically going to look to go BPA at RB or WR the next couple of rounds...not looking at TE/K/Def yet
10.10 Matt Schaub Another QB I may be higher on than others...The next two rounds were VERY QB heavy, IMO...Let's just say I was REAL glad that I picked a QB here...That said, I will take Cutler and Schaub's value considering the8th and the 1oth rounds aren't really a high price to pay...May have a down week here or there, but I should be OK at QB11.05 Michael Pittman In retrospect I would have gone QN here, as I had originally planned to do, but I misread the 18 picks between this pick and y next one and thought I'd be able to get a low level starting QB with my 12th rounder...I don't regret Pittman all that much though...He fits the profile for my reserve RBs to a tee...Excellent receiver, should get 3rd down otouches, might get some goal line love, and plays behind a RB who has consistently missed time due to injuryDraft Update: Through 9 rounds the following have come off the board: 19 QBs/11 TEs/44 RBs/49 WRs/3 DEF
This was the start of crazy runs at WR and, to a lesser extent, QB2s...In the past 3 rounds only 7 Rbs have been taken, while 17 WRs have gone
13.05 Randy McMichael Happy to get him here...He;s the 15 TE off the board, but I like his talent and his situation...Clearly the best TE left on my board, IMO, so I tried not to overthink it and just selected him14.10 Cedrick Wilson Meh to the max here...Steelers seem to be throwing deep more, maybe he gets under a couple...Not my finest drafting hour...Felt the WR squeeze and picked...Although I will say that there wasn't a whole helluva lot left at WR at this pointDraft Update: Through 12 rounds the following have come off the board: 28 QBs/14 TEs/55 RBs/67 WRs/4 DEF
So almost 42% of the previous 6 rounds have been WRs (35 of the 84 picks)...I recognize, at this point, that while there is still some WR "value" on the board, I really don't like a whole hell of a lot of what is left...I like my WR talent at the top of my team (Wayne/Evans/DJax/Kennison), and looking at what is left, I essentially decide that if the aforementioned WRs on my team struggle to the point where I need the guys who are left to consistently chip in, I am likely dead in the water regardless, so I decide to look at TE/DEF over the next 4-5 rounds and pick up 2 or 3 receivers in there as well, but not to panic and pick a receiver simply because there has been a run on them
16.10 Carolina Defense 4 more defenses go in the 16th before my pick, so I pick the 10th D off the board in Carolina...They'll be fine and I want to protect against a D run here over the next 8 picks leaving me with scraps (FYI, another 3 did go before I picked again)17.05 Mark Bradley A smattering of defenses, tight ends, wide receivers, etc have been going as teams try to fill in depth...I still feel my WR squad needs some more depth and help, so I choose Bradley, a still young receiver who has shown flashes but has trouble staying healthy...I see some upside here, as Grossman does love to throw deepDraft Update: Through 15 rounds the following have come off the board: 31 QBs/22 TEs/65 RBs/86 WRs/5 DEF/1 K
We've reached the point of the draft where drafting malaise has set in...It's well past midnight, there's not a ton of talent left, and it is easy to mail it from here on out...I go to the bathrrom to splash some cold water on my face and get mys hit together...We still have 9 round sto go, and I guarantee that players picked here, no matter how mediocre they may seem, will be very productive members of our squads...
19.05 Redskins Defense With 18 picks until I go again, I don't want to risk not getting a 2nd defense, so I take my highest ranked remaining defense...They have some playmakers, so I could see some decent weeks here20.10 Ben Troupe Not much left on the TE front, but I do want to get a 2nd one, so I pick Troupe...I know Scaife is the Titans flavor of the moth at TE, but this is a team that always likes to throw to their TEs, and not too long ago Troupe was considered a rising star at the position...Hope he can stay healthyDraft Update: Through 18 rounds the following have come off the board: 32 QBs/29 TEs/69 RBs/94 WRs/23 DEF/5 K
Last few rounds have been very defensive heavy...Want to get one more decent defense and then start looking at the value between kickers, a second TE, and still getting some needed WR depth
22.10 Phil Dawson Fulfills my criteria of being stable, job-wise, and not awful...Not going to worry about my 2nd kicker, Dawson is fine here23.05 Sidney Rice That Minnesota WR corps is unsettled, and this guy had a great college career...Worth a flier here...Not sold on T Jackson at QB, but Rice is all upside all the time at pick 313Draft Update: Through 21 rounds the following have come off the board: 35 QBs/32 TEs/72 RBs/97 WRs/32 DEF/26 K
Half of the 42 picks of the past three rounds have been kickers, and now I am just hoping I can find a solid one who I don't have to worry about losing his job. Entering the home stretch now, I hoep to get one more kicker and then a couple of young receivers with Tremendous Upside
Solid posting and nice job TU. I think you and BusMan were the two best MB drafters in a grueling 5 hour marathon......
Final team:
Jay Cutler
Matt Schaub
Shaun Alexander
Thomas Jones
Jerious Norwood
Chester Taylor
Michael Pittman
Adrian Peterson (Chi)
Chris Henry (Tenn)
Reggie Wayne
Lee Evans
Darrell Jackson
Eddie Kennison
Cedrick Wilson
Josh Reed
Mark Bradley
Sidney Rice
Robert Meachem
Randy McMichael
Ben Troupe
Josh Reed
Phil Dawson
Carolina Defense
Washington Defense
I am happy with my draft overall...Seems to me that
Cutler
Alexander
T Jones
Wayne
Evans
D Jackson
C Taylor
McMichael
Reed
Panthers D
WOuld be a pretty solid squad for one of my regular 12 teamers, so this being a 14 team league, I am very happy...I do lack some WR depth, but I love my RB depth...
We shall see, of couse, but I think I can compete
Compare Jamal Lewis and Willis McGahee. Which is more talented?Not thrilled with those WRs either, but there will be holes in every starting lineup when the league is greater than 12 teams.Andy Dufresne said:Clayton Gray
Brady, Tom NEP QB - 10 4.08
Henry, Travis DEN RB - 6 1.08
McGahee, Willis BAL RB - 8 2.07
Johnson, Andre HOU WR - 10 3.07
Hackett, D.J. SEA WR - 8 7.07
Muhammad, Muhsin CHI WR - 9 9.07
Shockey, Jeremy NYG TE - 9 6.08
Don't like McGahee and the WR's are iffy at best. Shockey is perpetually hurt.
You two are not in the same conference. I guess you will have to meet in the Superbowl for the title.I love MOPs arrogance in all his posts, it's so entertaining. I can't wait for the Hyper Active league to get going. It should be great fun.Should have his board privilages stripped for awhile...
I feel like I'm debating a wall. "I don't like them though. That fact completely confuses you huh? I "have to" take the best player in your order huh?"I haven't commented on Jacobs' prospects. I'm commenting on your faulty judgement in chosing a draft position, because you could have had a top five back plus Jacobs in the second or third.One poster commented that you wanted Manning. You had the chance to get into position to draft him and take Jacobs in the second or third.Lastly you throw out a defense as to how RBs are over rated in this format (x of the top 50) to justify taking a RB.The only way your draft makes sense is if the following things happen...1. Jacobs finishes in the top fiveand 2. Palmer's VBD beats the 28 players selected before himand3. Palmer out performers guy like Brady by a landslideand4. Palmer matches Mannings outputMy hat is off to you if that happensI don't like them though. That fact completely confuses you huh? I "have to" take the best player in your order huh?There's an enormous difference of opinion on these boards as to how Jacobs will do, I imagine these guys really like Jacobs:I've got him being Christian Okoye like, you've got him being the next Bam Morris.That's fine, we disagree.
He selected Steve Smith. If he wanted Smith and Jacobs, I don't see much wrong with picking at 14. You can't say he should have picked earlier, because then you probably would have ripped on taking Smith at 7 or something.I feel like I'm debating a wall. "I don't like them though. That fact completely confuses you huh? I "have to" take the best player in your order huh?"I haven't commented on Jacobs' prospects. I'm commenting on your faulty judgement in chosing a draft position, because you could have had a top five back plus Jacobs in the second or third.One poster commented that you wanted Manning. You had the chance to get into position to draft him and take Jacobs in the second or third.Lastly you throw out a defense as to how RBs are over rated in this format (x of the top 50) to justify taking a RB.The only way your draft makes sense is if the following things happen...1. Jacobs finishes in the top fiveand 2. Palmer's VBD beats the 28 players selected before himand3. Palmer out performers guy like Brady by a landslideand4. Palmer matches Mannings outputMy hat is off to you if that happensI don't like them though. That fact completely confuses you huh? I "have to" take the best player in your order huh?There's an enormous difference of opinion on these boards as to how Jacobs will do, I imagine these guys really like Jacobs:I've got him being Christian Okoye like, you've got him being the next Bam Morris.That's fine, we disagree.
Or just simply a side bet when we are at full strength. It would be an exhibition that would not count against the records but our pocketbooks instead. I am sure Bri would place a bet for league fees or something.You two are not in the same conference. I guess you will have to meet in the Superbowl for the title.I love MOPs arrogance in all his posts, it's so entertaining. I can't wait for the Hyper Active league to get going. It should be great fun.Should have his board privilages stripped for awhile...
I really haven't been following the squabbling of the MB guys very closely, but I think Bass is saying that he should have either targetted different players fromt he 14 spot or have asked for a different slot to go after the players he was targetting.The issue really is that drafting at the turn in a larger league if the guy you really want will make it back to you. I would have thought that giver the 3RR that there was a decent chance that Jacobs would have lasted to the the top of the 3rd round. If I were trying to get him, I probably would have let him go at the top of the second and hoped that he was still thereat 3.01 and there would still be decent choices if he wasn't.He selected Steve Smith. If he wanted Smith and Jacobs, I don't see much wrong with picking at 14. You can't say he should have picked earlier, because then you probably would have ripped on taking Smith at 7 or something.
So Smith is to WRs what LT is to RBs?Even conceding that point, Jacobs would have been there at 3.1.He selected Steve Smith. If he wanted Smith and Jacobs, I don't see much wrong with picking at 14. You can't say he should have picked earlier, because then you probably would have ripped on taking Smith at 7 or something.I feel like I'm debating a wall. "I don't like them though. That fact completely confuses you huh? I "have to" take the best player in your order huh?"I haven't commented on Jacobs' prospects. I'm commenting on your faulty judgement in chosing a draft position, because you could have had a top five back plus Jacobs in the second or third.One poster commented that you wanted Manning. You had the chance to get into position to draft him and take Jacobs in the second or third.Lastly you throw out a defense as to how RBs are over rated in this format (x of the top 50) to justify taking a RB.The only way your draft makes sense is if the following things happen...1. Jacobs finishes in the top fiveand 2. Palmer's VBD beats the 28 players selected before himand3. Palmer out performers guy like Brady by a landslideand4. Palmer matches Mannings outputMy hat is off to you if that happensI don't like them though. That fact completely confuses you huh? I "have to" take the best player in your order huh?There's an enormous difference of opinion on these boards as to how Jacobs will do, I imagine these guys really like Jacobs:I've got him being Christian Okoye like, you've got him being the next Bam Morris.That's fine, we disagree.
This guy gets it...Bri's defense is that Jacobs is better than the next 28 players off the board.My counter is that if that's really his belief, he should have improved the first round pick.I'm guessing the next defense will be that Smith is better than the 8 or so RBs selected before him.Evening allowing for all those defenses, 5.1 >>> then 5.12 the last time I looked.I really haven't been following the squabbling of the MB guys very closely, but I think Bass is saying that he should have either targetted different players fromt he 14 spot or have asked for a different slot to go after the players he was targetting.The issue really is that drafting at the turn in a larger league if the guy you really want will make it back to you. I would have thought that giver the 3RR that there was a decent chance that Jacobs would have lasted to the the top of the 3rd round. If I were trying to get him, I probably would have let him go at the top of the second and hoped that he was still thereat 3.01 and there would still be decent choices if he wasn't.He selected Steve Smith. If he wanted Smith and Jacobs, I don't see much wrong with picking at 14. You can't say he should have picked earlier, because then you probably would have ripped on taking Smith at 7 or something.
Yes, but how is Brandon Jacobs at chess?BnB, enough already. Please. No headway is being done. 1) He chose the 14th spot because he THOUGHT that Manning would be there. Instead Manning went at 13. So sue him for not being a psychic.2) No, Jacobs would not have been there at 3.01. I would have taken Jacobs at 2.08 instead of Edge. Jacobs will have a much better than the 3.8 yards per average McGahee. Jacobs isn't terrible, if he didn't think he would get back to him. He took a shot in taking the 14th pick in hopes of Manning. It didn't work out and he wanted a top 10 RB and he think Jacobs was the only guy that could do that. So what. You are driving me nuts, BnB. It is a lot easier watching a chess game than actually playing in one. Let the games play themselves out and we'll see what happens at the end of the season. If Jacobs ends up with 1200 yards and 14 TD's, you should have an apology up and ready for him.
If he wanted Manning and Smith, 1.14 seems like as good a pick as any. After Manning goes, what does he do if Jacobs is his best back?This guy gets it...Bri's defense is that Jacobs is better than the next 28 players off the board.My counter is that if that's really his belief, he should have improved the first round pick.I'm guessing the next defense will be that Smith is better than the 8 or so RBs selected before him.Evening allowing for all those defenses, 5.1 >>> then 5.12 the last time I looked.I really haven't been following the squabbling of the MB guys very closely, but I think Bass is saying that he should have either targetted different players fromt he 14 spot or have asked for a different slot to go after the players he was targetting.The issue really is that drafting at the turn in a larger league if the guy you really want will make it back to you. I would have thought that giver the 3RR that there was a decent chance that Jacobs would have lasted to the the top of the 3rd round. If I were trying to get him, I probably would have let him go at the top of the second and hoped that he was still thereat 3.01 and there would still be decent choices if he wasn't.He selected Steve Smith. If he wanted Smith and Jacobs, I don't see much wrong with picking at 14. You can't say he should have picked earlier, because then you probably would have ripped on taking Smith at 7 or something.
Exactly! He takes him.If he wanted Manning and Smith, 1.14 seems like as good a pick as any. After Manning goes, what does he do if Jacobs is his best back?This guy gets it...Bri's defense is that Jacobs is better than the next 28 players off the board.My counter is that if that's really his belief, he should have improved the first round pick.I'm guessing the next defense will be that Smith is better than the 8 or so RBs selected before him.Evening allowing for all those defenses, 5.1 >>> then 5.12 the last time I looked.I really haven't been following the squabbling of the MB guys very closely, but I think Bass is saying that he should have either targetted different players fromt he 14 spot or have asked for a different slot to go after the players he was targetting.The issue really is that drafting at the turn in a larger league if the guy you really want will make it back to you. I would have thought that giver the 3RR that there was a decent chance that Jacobs would have lasted to the the top of the 3rd round. If I were trying to get him, I probably would have let him go at the top of the second and hoped that he was still thereat 3.01 and there would still be decent choices if he wasn't.He selected Steve Smith. If he wanted Smith and Jacobs, I don't see much wrong with picking at 14. You can't say he should have picked earlier, because then you probably would have ripped on taking Smith at 7 or something.
Good question.Yes, but how is Brandon Jacobs at chess?BnB, enough already. Please. No headway is being done. 1) He chose the 14th spot because he THOUGHT that Manning would be there. Instead Manning went at 13. So sue him for not being a psychic.2) No, Jacobs would not have been there at 3.01. I would have taken Jacobs at 2.08 instead of Edge. Jacobs will have a much better than the 3.8 yards per average McGahee. Jacobs isn't terrible, if he didn't think he would get back to him. He took a shot in taking the 14th pick in hopes of Manning. It didn't work out and he wanted a top 10 RB and he think Jacobs was the only guy that could do that. So what. You are driving me nuts, BnB. It is a lot easier watching a chess game than actually playing in one. Let the games play themselves out and we'll see what happens at the end of the season. If Jacobs ends up with 1200 yards and 14 TD's, you should have an apology up and ready for him.
If I'm driving you nuts then don't read my posts and don't sign up for a draft whose primary goal is to drive messageboard discussion.By the way, if you want Manning, you slide up a spot or two from the turn. Much more likely Smith slides around with differing opinions on SS/TO/CJ/Harrison.BnB, enough already. Please. No headway is being done. 1) He chose the 14th spot because he THOUGHT that Manning would be there. Instead Manning went at 13. So sue him for not being a psychic.2) No, Jacobs would not have been there at 3.01. I would have taken Jacobs at 2.08 instead of Edge. Jacobs will have a much better season than the 3.8 yards per average McGahee. Jacobs isn't a terrible pick, if he didn't think he would get back to him. Would I have taken him there? No, I would have taken C.Jo. But he took a shot in taking the 14th pick in hopes of Manning. It didn't work out and he wanted a top 10 RB and he think Jacobs was the only guy that could do that. So what. You are driving me nuts, BnB. It is a lot easier watching a chess game than actually playing in one. Let the games play themselves out and we'll see what happens at the end of the season. If Jacobs ends up with 1200 yards and 14 TD's, you should have an apology up and ready for him.
Fair enough, but your tone implies (at least to me) that you are badgering and not discussing. You seem to be making statements like they are fact, but yet how can they by when 1 game of the season hasn't even been played yet. Discuss all you want, but realize that it seems like you are pointing fingers and taking cheap shots.If people want to comment on my team, I'll be glad to respond- otherwise, let the games begin!If I'm driving you nuts then don't read my posts and don't sign up for a draft whose primary goal is to drive messageboard discussion.BnB, enough already. Please. No headway is being done. 1) He chose the 14th spot because he THOUGHT that Manning would be there. Instead Manning went at 13. So sue him for not being a psychic.2) No, Jacobs would not have been there at 3.01. I would have taken Jacobs at 2.08 instead of Edge. Jacobs will have a much better season than the 3.8 yards per average McGahee. Jacobs isn't a terrible pick, if he didn't think he would get back to him. Would I have taken him there? No, I would have taken C.Jo. But he took a shot in taking the 14th pick in hopes of Manning. It didn't work out and he wanted a top 10 RB and he think Jacobs was the only guy that could do that. So what. You are driving me nuts, BnB. It is a lot easier watching a chess game than actually playing in one. Let the games play themselves out and we'll see what happens at the end of the season. If Jacobs ends up with 1200 yards and 14 TD's, you should have an apology up and ready for him.
If I'm driving you nuts then don't read my posts and don't sign up for a draft whose primary goal is to drive messageboard discussion.By the way, if you want Manning, you slide up a spot or two from the turn. Much more likely Smith slides around with differing opinions on SS/TO/CJ/Harrison.BnB, enough already. Please. No headway is being done. 1) He chose the 14th spot because he THOUGHT that Manning would be there. Instead Manning went at 13. So sue him for not being a psychic.2) No, Jacobs would not have been there at 3.01. I would have taken Jacobs at 2.08 instead of Edge. Jacobs will have a much better season than the 3.8 yards per average McGahee. Jacobs isn't a terrible pick, if he didn't think he would get back to him. Would I have taken him there? No, I would have taken C.Jo. But he took a shot in taking the 14th pick in hopes of Manning. It didn't work out and he wanted a top 10 RB and he think Jacobs was the only guy that could do that. So what. You are driving me nuts, BnB. It is a lot easier watching a chess game than actually playing in one. Let the games play themselves out and we'll see what happens at the end of the season. If Jacobs ends up with 1200 yards and 14 TD's, you should have an apology up and ready for him.
And I don't see how Manning going right before your pick in the 1st round ruins your whole draft. As a FF vet, you make adjustments and move forward. Jacobs was his adjustment, and it's in the minority opinion of being a good pick at the 1-2 turn.1.14 is a horrible place to pin yourself. Other drafters can use your previous picks against you. With quick time limits on the picks have less time for analysis.Without seeing his projections I can't answer the question. If he's that high on Jacobs couldn't risk going Manning/Smith in the first place and pass on Jacobs. Manning's ADP is around 11. The only wa to justify the draft position is if you have VBD of Manning=Smith > Jacobs >>>> WR2. At 14 it's possible that both Smith and Manning could have been gone.If he wanted Manning and Smith, 1.14 seems like as good a pick as any. After Manning goes, what does he do if Jacobs is his best back?This guy gets it...Bri's defense is that Jacobs is better than the next 28 players off the board.My counter is that if that's really his belief, he should have improved the first round pick.I'm guessing the next defense will be that Smith is better than the 8 or so RBs selected before him.Evening allowing for all those defenses, 5.1 >>> then 5.12 the last time I looked.I really haven't been following the squabbling of the MB guys very closely, but I think Bass is saying that he should have either targetted different players fromt he 14 spot or have asked for a different slot to go after the players he was targetting.The issue really is that drafting at the turn in a larger league if the guy you really want will make it back to you. I would have thought that giver the 3RR that there was a decent chance that Jacobs would have lasted to the the top of the 3rd round. If I were trying to get him, I probably would have let him go at the top of the second and hoped that he was still thereat 3.01 and there would still be decent choices if he wasn't.He selected Steve Smith. If he wanted Smith and Jacobs, I don't see much wrong with picking at 14. You can't say he should have picked earlier, because then you probably would have ripped on taking Smith at 7 or something.
I'll rip on your team later if it makes you feel betterFair enough, but your tone implies (at least to me) that you are badgering and not discussing. You seem to be making statements like they are fact, but yet how can they by when 1 game of the season hasn't even been played yet. Discuss all you want, but realize that it seems like you are pointing fingers and taking cheap shots.If people want to comment on my team, I'll be glad to respond- otherwise, let the games begin!If I'm driving you nuts then don't read my posts and don't sign up for a draft whose primary goal is to drive messageboard discussion.BnB, enough already. Please. No headway is being done. 1) He chose the 14th spot because he THOUGHT that Manning would be there. Instead Manning went at 13. So sue him for not being a psychic.2) No, Jacobs would not have been there at 3.01. I would have taken Jacobs at 2.08 instead of Edge. Jacobs will have a much better season than the 3.8 yards per average McGahee. Jacobs isn't a terrible pick, if he didn't think he would get back to him. Would I have taken him there? No, I would have taken C.Jo. But he took a shot in taking the 14th pick in hopes of Manning. It didn't work out and he wanted a top 10 RB and he think Jacobs was the only guy that could do that. So what. You are driving me nuts, BnB. It is a lot easier watching a chess game than actually playing in one. Let the games play themselves out and we'll see what happens at the end of the season. If Jacobs ends up with 1200 yards and 14 TD's, you should have an apology up and ready for him.
This is strategy discussion. I haven't once said Jacobs sucks. I'm actually learning some good things about Jacobs from Bri, but as he pointed out that's also in the spotlight. The conversation here is focused on this concept of selecting your draft position and how to handle the turn in an NFFC format.For people drafting this weekend wanting Manning, it looks like the 14th spot isn't ideal. I'd also submit that Manning has less value in a best ball format so you might even need to adjust even more.I hardly think the bolded above is relevant. You aren't always going to get the guy you want but that shouldn't throw off your entire draft.BnB, enough already. Please. No headway is being made.
1) He chose the 14th spot because he THOUGHT that Manning would be there. Instead Manning went at 13. So sue him for not being a psychic.
2) No, Jacobs would not have been there at 3.01. I would have taken Jacobs at 2.08 instead of Edge. Jacobs will have a much better season than the 3.8 yards per average McGahee. Jacobs isn't a terrible pick, if he didn't think he would get back to him. Would I have taken him there? No, I would have taken C.Jo. But he took a shot in taking the 14th pick in hopes of Manning. It didn't work out and he wanted a top 10 RB and he think Jacobs was the only guy that could do that. So what.
You are driving me nuts, BnB. It is a lot easier watching a chess game than actually playing in one. Let the games play themselves out and we'll see what happens at the end of the season. If Jacobs ends up with 1200 yards and 14 TD's, you should have an apology up and ready for him.
Did you destroy mine yet?I'll rip on your team later if it makes you feel betterFair enough, but your tone implies (at least to me) that you are badgering and not discussing. You seem to be making statements like they are fact, but yet how can they by when 1 game of the season hasn't even been played yet. Discuss all you want, but realize that it seems like you are pointing fingers and taking cheap shots.If people want to comment on my team, I'll be glad to respond- otherwise, let the games begin!If I'm driving you nuts then don't read my posts and don't sign up for a draft whose primary goal is to drive messageboard discussion.BnB, enough already. Please. No headway is being done. 1) He chose the 14th spot because he THOUGHT that Manning would be there. Instead Manning went at 13. So sue him for not being a psychic.2) No, Jacobs would not have been there at 3.01. I would have taken Jacobs at 2.08 instead of Edge. Jacobs will have a much better season than the 3.8 yards per average McGahee. Jacobs isn't a terrible pick, if he didn't think he would get back to him. Would I have taken him there? No, I would have taken C.Jo. But he took a shot in taking the 14th pick in hopes of Manning. It didn't work out and he wanted a top 10 RB and he think Jacobs was the only guy that could do that. So what. You are driving me nuts, BnB. It is a lot easier watching a chess game than actually playing in one. Let the games play themselves out and we'll see what happens at the end of the season. If Jacobs ends up with 1200 yards and 14 TD's, you should have an apology up and ready for him.![]()
To reiterate something I said earlier-He went 9 spots early, ADP is 2.10Jacobs was a huge reach at 2.01 by any standards. He went a good round-round and a half too early. It's fine to like players, but it doesn't mean it isn't a reach.
It's heavy if you allow 7 or less points. At first I didn't think that was very significant becuase most teams will score more than 7 but I went back and checked last year's results and of 512 possible scores (32*16), 54 of them (10.5%) were 7 or less so that's more significant than my initial inclination.I nearly took my D a lot earlier and now I kinda wish I had!Thank you, Nasty for the review. One thing that has not been brought out yet is the heavy defense scoring. I bring it up because one of the MB teams that many like, BusMan, got squeezed and only has one defense. That is why most of the staffer tried to get three, and always nice to put the squeeze on. Here is the defense scoring. Notice the points against scoring.
Fumble Recoveries (from Opponent) 0-10 2 points each
Interceptions Caught 0-10 2 points each
Sacked a QB 0-10 1 point
Safeties 0-10 2 points each
Total Points Allowed 0-0 12
Total Points Allowed 1-7 8
Total Points Allowed 8-12 4
Total Points Allowed 13-17 2
Total Points Allowed 18-99 0
Number of Defensive & Special Teams TDs 0-10 6 points each
Sure would but with that goofy rule I'm paid up for next year alreadyOr just simply a side bet when we are at full strength. It would be an exhibition that would not count against the records but our pocketbooks instead. I am sure Bri would place a bet for league fees or something.You two are not in the same conference. I guess you will have to meet in the Superbowl for the title.I love MOPs arrogance in all his posts, it's so entertaining. I can't wait for the Hyper Active league to get going. It should be great fun.Should have his board privilages stripped for awhile...
Who has his ADP at 2.10?To reiterate something I said earlier-He went 9 spots early, ADP is 2.10Jacobs was a huge reach at 2.01 by any standards. He went a good round-round and a half too early. It's fine to like players, but it doesn't mean it isn't a reach.
It's listed as 34th on this site and 37th on Antsports which equates to 3.06 or 3.09 in a 14-teamer.Who has his ADP at 2.10?To reiterate something I said earlier-He went 9 spots early, ADP is 2.10Jacobs was a huge reach at 2.01 by any standards. He went a good round-round and a half too early. It's fine to like players, but it doesn't mean it isn't a reach.