Donsmith753
Footballguy
What? It was! Just behind tds and yards.Barring Shipley, Edelman and Decker I think all of my WR's should start for their teams, this was something that was important to me.![]()
What? It was! Just behind tds and yards.Barring Shipley, Edelman and Decker I think all of my WR's should start for their teams, this was something that was important to me.![]()
Great minds think alike. Your team and mine probably look very similar.A couple things that stand out IMO:1) You are best served staying in the 21-25 player range. More than this and your team is too diluted of power, less than and you are too thin to survive the inevitable injury strike.2) You need to spend quality money at the QB and TE positions. Go cheap here and its gonna cost you big time.3) If there is any area to sacrifice and go cheap, its at the DEF position. The point production from here is low and is semi-unstable.4) You should carry no less than 3 PK, and no more than 6. I think 4 is the optimum number.Im gonna post my team after the deadline, but looking like 22 or 23 playersThis is, by far, a much harder contest than it was the last couple years. Kudo's to the staff. Been making changes 3 - 4 times a day.
7's the key number here. Think about it. 7-Elevens. 7 dwarves. 7, man, that's the number. 7 chipmunks twirlin' on a branch, eatin' lots of sunflowers on my uncle's ranch. You know that old children's tale from the sea. It's like you're dreamin' about Gorgonzola cheese when it's clearly Brie time, baby.A couple things that stand out IMO:
4) You should carry no less than 3 PK, and no more than 6. I think 4 is the optimum number.
Yeah, in theory. Bye weeks are crap this year, though. I don't want to have my 'studs' from off. juggernauts like KC, TB, Seat, Buff, Car, AZ, Mia, etc. Unfortunately, it seems like a lot of the guys I like this year have week 8-10 bye weeks.IMO some people are seriously underestimating the value of early bye weeks for your studs....
I decided on Sunday that I had maximized my team and wouldn't be making any more changes. I actually made it until last night before making a minor tweak. So far today, I've dropped my 2nd most expensive WR and have made 4 other changes. Is there a FBG Contest Anonymous meeting I can go to?
I changed this thing way too often, and today switched philosophies. I like the looks of my team but RB went from a strength to my possible downfall.
i came in 2nd 3 years ago. i picked my team at the last min and in about 10 mins. it is 100% luckLast year I studied, analyzed, re-evaluated and carefully selected my team. Never got eliminated, never came close to a prize. This year, I just said, OK so I'll pick GB and Balt to be in the Supe. Knocked out my picks in a couple of minutes and am comfortable knowing I never win these kinds of things anyway.
Same here. Always start these things with a heavy bias towards early bye week players, but quickly it was WTF when doing the same this year. I got a small bunch of week 4 byes this year, but for the most part I just tried to balance the load.Yeah, in theory. Bye weeks are crap this year, though. I don't want to have my 'studs' from off. juggernauts like KC, TB, Seat, Buff, Car, AZ, Mia, etc. Unfortunately, it seems like a lot of the guys I like this year have week 8-10 bye weeks.IMO some people are seriously underestimating the value of early bye weeks for your studs....
finally satisfied. Reading news and posts is bad for this thing, every time I read something good about a player the thought is how to get him on my team.But, balanced byes, decent mix of studs, potential and cheap fliers, and I feel as good as I can about this thing. I'll put it out here now, if Collie, AGonzo, Ben, Flacco, CJ, Wallace or Spiller go off and would have won this for me I'll be mildly upset. Those are the key players I changed out.I decided on Sunday that I had maximized my team and wouldn't be making any more changes. I actually made it until last night before making a minor tweak. So far today, I've dropped my 2nd most expensive WR and have made 4 other changes. Is there a FBG Contest Anonymous meeting I can go to?I changed this thing way too often, and today switched philosophies. I like the looks of my team but RB went from a strength to my possible downfall.
roster fixed for the last 48 hours at 19 players. one significant injury and i'm done. going for all the marbles.i see some are going the quantity average player route. just do not see how that will work. need stud(s) to win
Your team is available under your "MY FBG's" TabCongratulations to the contest creators as this was great fun in the pre-season and killed a lot of my spare time over the past two weeks especially. I have concluded my selections and will not look at them again.An FYI from past years experience, you may want to write down your entry as sometimes they are not locatable after the contest timeline deadline passes. And if you are like me and several others, you will no be able to recall those final changes that you made.Good Luck to all and to all a good night.
Ya thats practically suicide in a suicide contest. Im glad none of the players I picked had the same bye week in the same position without even checking!question i have that we will find out soon is, is there anyone BOLD enough to pair up both Andre & Calvin Johnson. Very costly move and whats worst is they both have the same BYE.
Could be the winning formula...im going to try it and see what the team looks like.Ya thats practically suicide in a suicide contest. Im glad none of the players I picked had the same bye week in the same position without even checking!question i have that we will find out soon is, is there anyone BOLD enough to pair up both Andre & Calvin Johnson. Very costly move and whats worst is they both have the same BYE.
Foster will be.I will be shocked if any player is 90% owned.
I didn't select Foster.-Jermichael FinleyFoster will be.I will be shocked if any player is 90% owned.
Let's not forget the Steve Slaton affect from two years ago and how irrelavant he made RBs that season.If Foster is a bust then it's a non-issue, but if he performs at High RB2/Low RB1 there is going to be a lot of wasted money for most RBs costing more than his $13 price tag.There are a few WRs I think that will also have a high ownership percentage and could seriously impact the WR pool. That's 2 RBs, 3 WRs, and potentially the flex spot out of 10 slots total.Being above average at QB and TE could set you above the rest. DST and Ks are just too unpredictable so most of that is luck factor.If you're going with studs you better hope they outperform the Arian Fosters and Mike Williams of the contest otherwise you're just throwing away cash...Foster will be.I will be shocked if any player is 90% owned.
That is the beauty of this thing, they paid a lot more attention to pricing of lower players (making expensive) while giving people the lure of 30 positions. I cant see that as a winning strategy. 21-23 players should be a winner.i see some are going the quantity average player route. just do not see how that will work. need stud(s) to win
It's supposed to have as of 12 min ago, but see I can still get onto the entry form, so who know'sHas the "deadline" passed?

I'm going to bed right now so I can't make any more changes.
Woke up.Changed it again 3 times.Now I'm done.Please lock it now. Please?HeheheI didn't pick him. I had him on my team many times but also had Best and decided to go with only one of them. Now, J. Finley is prob going to be on a ton of teams.Foster will be.I will be shocked if any player is 90% owned.
Two weeks ago I would have agreed with you completely, and all my teams were in the 23-25 player range.But as I started tweaking things, and looking at which players actually performed (scored) for their teams last year, it became evident that the big names weren't at the top.I wound up with a 30 player team:QB 3 / $46 (18%)RB 5 / $78 (31%)WR 10 /$75 /30%TE 4 / $23 / (9%)K 5 / $12 / (5%)D 3 / $16 (6%)We'll see. Last year I made it to the final 250 with a 20 player team (when clearly 24 player teams were statistically more revelant), and I'm sure now I'll be bumped in week 1.That is the beauty of this thing, they paid a lot more attention to pricing of lower players (making expensive) while giving people the lure of 30 positions. I cant see that as a winning strategy. 21-23 players should be a winner.
One interesting item, I made a note at the end of last year that on average, the finalist teams spent 32% of their budget on RB's (vs 34% for all teams), yet RB's only scored them 20% of total points. Try as I might though, I couldn't make a 20% RB team work.Good luck everyone!we have the same top 3 RBs but I also have ronnie brown and only have 4Let's see where this one takes me..QB - Philip Rivers - SD/10 - $19QB - Ben Roethlisberger - PIT/5 - $14QB - Derek Anderson - ARI/6 - $6RB - Ahmad Bradshaw - NYG/8 - $18RB - C.J. Spiller - BUF/6 - $17RB - Arian Foster - HOU/7 - $13RB - LaDainian Tomlinson - NYJ/7 - $12RB - Leon Washington - SEA/5 - $8RB - Tashard Choice - DAL/4 - $4WR - Pierre Garcon - IND/7 - $12WR - Jacoby Jones - HOU/7 - $10WR - Mike Williams - TB/4 - $8WR - James Jones - GB/10 - $7WR - Dexter McCluster - KC/4 - $7WR - Laurent Robinson - STL/9 - $7WR - Legedu Naanee - SD/10 - $7WR - Julian Edelman - NE/5 - $5WR - Jason Avant - PHI/8 - $4WR - Louis Murphy - OAK/10 - $4WR - Devery Henderson - NO/10 - $4WR - Greg Camarillo - MIN/4 - $3TE - Jermichael Finley - GB/10 - $21TE - Chris Cooley - WAS/9 - $13PK - Mason Crosby - GB/10 - $6PK - Dan Carpenter - MIA/5 - $3PK - Rob Bironas - TEN/9 - $3PK - Jason Hanson - DET/7 - $2TD - Philadelphia Eagles - PHI/8 - $6TD - San Francisco 49ers - SF/9 - $5TD - Detroit Lions - DET/7 - $2
Dude....our teams are only about 3 fringe players different....in all the year's I've been doing this, this is about the closest thing to a repeated team I've seen. Kinda scary, but hopefully we see each other in the finals!QB - Tom Brady - NE/5 - $24QB - Matt Ryan - ATL/8 - $16--> I tried teams with Rodgers, but I couldn't pull the trigger with any of the really cheap back ups. I had Schaub until I decided to carry Andre Johnson...at that point, I wanted to diversify and went to Brady.RB - DeAngelo Williams - CAR/6 - $28RB - Ahmad Bradshaw - NYG/8 - $18RB - Arian Foster - HOU/7 - $13RB - Leon Washington - SEA/5 - $8RB - Tashard Choice - DAL/4 - $4--> DWill looked like the only real value over $25. I toyed with Stephen Jackson to go against the grain, but I ultimately decided that Bradshaw and Foster would suffice for the RB2 spot. I anticipate TE covering flex most weeks, and I used the RB spot to create more flex depth. Between RB and TE I have 6 different bye weeks, and Choice/Witten are the only ones that match.WR - Andre Johnson - HOU/7 - $32WR - Santana Moss - WAS/9 - $18WR - Mike Williams - TB/4 - $8WR - Bernard Berrian - MIN/4 - $7WR - Laurent Robinson - STL/9 - $7WR - Louis Murphy - OAK/10 - $4WR - Deion Branch - SEA/5 - $3--> I think Andre will be a fairly low % play. I liked some of the $27 guys, but at that price, I thought I should just go to the #1 guy. I looked at Garcon and Dez Bryant for the #2 spot, but finally decided to use 7 WR instead of 8 to upgrade to Santana Moss. He isn't that sexy of a pick, but I just want solid production that can cover up for any stinkers from my low priced group. Douglas and Hartline were late cuts (to go up to Moss and add K depth). TE - Jermichael Finley - GB/10 - $21TE - Jason Witten - DAL/4 - $19--> This is the key to the team. Finley will be high %, but Witten is almost as good of a value with the 1.5 ppr scoring. I expect Witten to flex most weeks (with Bradshaw/Foster potentially taking a few). The FBG projections would put Witten on par with Roddy White.He could lose a few TD from the projection (7 TD) and still be an excellant value. PK - Neil Rackers - HOU/7 - $4PK - Dan Carpenter - MIA/5 - $3PK - Sebastian Janikowski - OAK/10 - $2PK - Graham Gano - WAS/9 - $2--> not much to see here. 4 different bye weeks.TD - Chicago Bears - CHI/8 - $4TD - Tampa Bay Buccaneers - TB/4 - $3TD - Detroit Lions - DET/7 - $2--> not much to see here either. Defense is a very low scoring position, so I wanted to keep it under $10 total. I like the Bears D this year, and I seem to get them in every league that doesn't have points against as a consideration. The contest was awesome again this year...I plan for it more than most of my drafts. Great job by the staff on the prices!
Well everybody (playes) should hate that aspect of the pricing because its more of a brain bender to find the value and more expensive to get the locks for production. I bet they tested the scenarios with a FF focus group in MayI'm probably being a crybaby, but I don't like the values assigned this year. I don't think they make a while lot of sense. I guess my problem is I probably think of it in terms of my auction draft, which would have much wider numbers.
) Bottom line is that they did their job.