KarmaPolice
Footballguy
Ugh. sitting at 51.3%. I am at 145.85 with Brady (-5.6) and Keller (-12.7) going. To be safe I would need a 30pt game from Tommy.Somewhere in the 160s. Tough to narrow it down much more than that.
Ugh. sitting at 51.3%. I am at 145.85 with Brady (-5.6) and Keller (-12.7) going. To be safe I would need a 30pt game from Tommy.Somewhere in the 160s. Tough to narrow it down much more than that.
Somewhere in the 160s. Tough to narrow it down much more than that.
20 points from Brady gets you through with no doubts.Higher percentage than I expected, not that I am complaining! I need about 35 points combined from Brady and Branch to feel comfortably safe!
If you made it to the final group, I would say you are doin' alright even with the losses... Any given Sunday... or multiple Sundays as in the case of this contest!I've made the final group, however, I've lost Gore, Clayton, and Finley for the year, so probably not much of a threat to finish in the money.
Just at a glance, that looks like a pretty unique team.That's exactly the kind of team I was talking about earlier with the 249 clones vs 1 unique team discussion...Looks like our hopes for 100% Foster ownership in the final 250 have been dashed. This non-Foster owner has a 100% chance of surviving this week according to the sim.
a_rackowski said:Can anyone tell me whEre entry 109568 sits? I was 19 at the start of week but can't find it on this dang blackberry.
What does the (-12) mean? expected points? where can i find this information?bagger said:i am only at 9% with 4 guys going...sanchez (-16), LT (-12), Welker (-8), and Gronkowski (-5) or so.
That means the player he's currently using as RB2 (or flex) scored 12 points, so LT would need to score more than 12 points to move into the starting lineup. So basically, only points that LT scores in excess of 12 will count.What does the (-12) mean? expected points? where can i find this information?bagger said:i am only at 9% with 4 guys going...sanchez (-16), LT (-12), Welker (-8), and Gronkowski (-5) or so.
thanks. i'm easily confusedThat means the player he's currently using as RB2 (or flex) scored 12 points, so LT would need to score more than 12 points to move into the starting lineup. So basically, only points that LT scores in excess of 12 will count.What does the (-12) mean? expected points? where can i find this information?bagger said:i am only at 9% with 4 guys going...sanchez (-16), LT (-12), Welker (-8), and Gronkowski (-5) or so.
I'll cheer for Branch (especially as I have him going as well!!!)thanks. i'm easily confusedI have welker, braylon, and branch going and will have to use 2 of the 3 of them. need about 38 to get me safely over 170.
I'm sure something could have been worked out. A free 1000-year subscription for finishing first, maybe?i have a 30+% chance so not looking good...funny thing is, i've never really read the rules. found out last week that residents of Iowa can't receive prizes anyway. probably wouldn't have been too happy to bring home some prize money only to find out that i couldn't accept it.![]()
Witten (week 8) and Boss (week 10) picked very good weeks to have their best games of the season for him.Ignoratio Elenchi said:Looks like our hopes for 100% Foster ownership in the final 250 have been dashed. This non-Foster owner has a 100% chance of surviving this week according to the sim.
Odds are a little higher that two of three team defenses wouldn't be lost to injury.K is probably the 2nd safest position though.Saint said:I took 3 kickers on my team as I thought it was a good number to help offset 2 kickers having a bad day. The irony is that I have lost Nedney to IR, and Hanson (don't know if he is coming back). I never thought that I would lose 2 of 3 kickers when this contest started. Figured that was the safest position.![]()
I was thinking that at first, but then i remembered the impact of the steeler's losing polamalu and the ravens losing ray lewis. Both defenses were hit hard. I figured those guys have a higher liklihood of being injured compared to kickers.Odds are a little higher that two of three team defenses wouldn't be lost to injury.K is probably the 2nd safest position though.Saint said:I took 3 kickers on my team as I thought it was a good number to help offset 2 kickers having a bad day. The irony is that I have lost Nedney to IR, and Hanson (don't know if he is coming back). I never thought that I would lose 2 of 3 kickers when this contest started. Figured that was the safest position. :(
At 163.9 with anything that Branch and Welker get in the 2nd half added... Hopefully that will give me enough.Sitting at 150.0 with Welker and Branch left -5.6 & -4.4. My percentages are a little higher than when I started the week, still a toss up...
Somewhere in the 160s. Tough to narrow it down much more than that.
59 live entries (11.8%) with Brady. It will move it up, but I have no idea how much.How much will this big game by Brady inch up the cut?
I'll get the back of my envelope out (i.e. guess completely).Figure half the entries with Brady are already above the cut. Perhaps a bad assumption but this is an envelope we're talking here.So about maybe, 30 entries below the line have Brady. Figure half of those probably gained 20+ points and that 2/3 of them jumped above the cut. Figure that of the rest they got maybe a 10-point bump and 1/3 of them jumped above the cut. So that's 15 that jump above the cut. Sounds like a few points to me.All that said, all we've got is the Turkomatic sim that estimated a mid-160s cut. We don't know where that 250th player person was to start the day (i.e. with all Jets and Patriots at zero points).So at the end of the day, given that there was a definite ownership bias to Patriots and that 4 of them had at least 15 points. I'll say that the 80th-percentile Turkomatic cut line is about where the number will be. -QG59 live entries (11.8%) with Brady. It will move it up, but I have no idea how much.How much will this big game by Brady inch up the cut?