ShamrockPride
Footballguy
Sounded more like a wrestling promo.Kelce sounds like he has CTE.. I fear for Taylor
Sounded more like a wrestling promo.Kelce sounds like he has CTE.. I fear for Taylor
I bet they break up by the draft..NFL won't allow it as long as he's still dating Taylor anyway.Kelce will announce retirement
They completely changed the OT rules and it is now set up like the first quarter and second quarter. Had the time run out, they would have switched sides and kept playing and 2OT wouldThat's not what @Anarchy99 saysthe game would have continued into another quarterSF has come up just short now a couple times vs Mahomes and the Chiefs
3 seconds left in Overtime up 22-19, that's going to be a very hard pill to swallow for that team
I'd like clarity on this because if that's true as you say Mitchie, there's no real reason for the game clock to be on
Breakup album in 3.2.1…I bet they break up by the draft..NFL won't allow it as long as he's still dating Taylor anyway.Kelce will announce retirement
Outside of Gabe Davis thread, i love your posts gb . Congrats on a great year.There’s always next year.I feel bad for @Wingnut @Hot Sauce Guy
There's other big SF fans on here but those guys are there every week throughout
I'm sure you all will be in the mix again next year
Lost to Mahomes happens to a lot of teams.
Can’t blame it on Moody. Can’t blame it on Shanny. Can’t blame it on defense.
Hell of a game. One for the ages.
By taking the ball first, they guaranteed the Chiefs get an extra down on their final drive. They had to go for it on 4th. I would rather be in the position of knowing that I have to go for it on 4th.That's fine but you still have to play the best odds right? Give the Chiefs the ball first and if they go down and score a TD at least you know you are always in 4 down territory. There is absolutely no reason to take the ball first with the current rules. It probably cost them the game.As they mentioned on the broadcast, I think the defense was gassed.Especially with Mahomes as the QB. Egregious mistake by the Niners. That's on their coaches for not preparing the players for that coin toss.No both teams were getting a possession. I’d rather know what I need and if I’m in 4 downWhat is the rule, couldn’t KC have gone done and scored a TD and ended it without SF getting a touch?I almost wonder if the player didn't know the rules. Such an egregious mistake to take the ball.Should’ve kicked to start OT
Of course there’s a reason to. If the Niners scored a TD and Chiefs matched then SF gets the ball back with a chance to win with a FG.
By taking the ball first, they guaranteed the Chiefs get an extra down on their final drive. They had to go for it on 4th. I would rather be in the position of knowing that I have to go for it on 4th.That's fine but you still have to play the best odds right? Give the Chiefs the ball first and if they go down and score a TD at least you know you are always in 4 down territory. There is absolutely no reason to take the ball first with the current rules. It probably cost them the game.As they mentioned on the broadcast, I think the defense was gassed.Especially with Mahomes as the QB. Egregious mistake by the Niners. That's on their coaches for not preparing the players for that coin toss.No both teams were getting a possession. I’d rather know what I need and if I’m in 4 downWhat is the rule, couldn’t KC have gone done and scored a TD and ended it without SF getting a touch?I almost wonder if the player didn't know the rules. Such an egregious mistake to take the ball.Should’ve kicked to start OT
Of course there’s a reason to. If the Niners scored a TD and Chiefs matched then SF gets the ball back with a chance to win with a FG.
Have to put him equal to Brady in the fact that they both got a ring due to their defence. Although Brady was more than one.I love Brady but Mahomes is the greatest player of all time.
Hes winning rings with Mecole Freaking Hardman and Marquez Valdes-Scantling
I feel like knowing what you need on your 1st possession is a huge advantage, just like college.By taking the ball first, they guaranteed the Chiefs get an extra down on their final drive. They had to go for it on 4th. I would rather be in the position of knowing that I have to go for it on 4th.That's fine but you still have to play the best odds right? Give the Chiefs the ball first and if they go down and score a TD at least you know you are always in 4 down territory. There is absolutely no reason to take the ball first with the current rules. It probably cost them the game.As they mentioned on the broadcast, I think the defense was gassed.Especially with Mahomes as the QB. Egregious mistake by the Niners. That's on their coaches for not preparing the players for that coin toss.No both teams were getting a possession. I’d rather know what I need and if I’m in 4 downWhat is the rule, couldn’t KC have gone done and scored a TD and ended it without SF getting a touch?I almost wonder if the player didn't know the rules. Such an egregious mistake to take the ball.Should’ve kicked to start OT
Of course there’s a reason to. If the Niners scored a TD and Chiefs matched then SF gets the ball back with a chance to win with a FG.
I feel like you are ignoring the 3rd possession - I have no clue what the math will say but my gut tells me receiving is the right call.
Yeppers, second best QB todayAlso, hope this puts to bed any talk remotely suggesting Purdy isn’t the surefire franchise QB they need to move forward with.
He was excellent.
Those are like his 5th and 6th options, Brady's weapons a lot of years were no different.I love Brady but Mahomes is the greatest player of all time.
Hes winning rings with Mecole Freaking Hardman and Marquez Valdes-Scantling
I feel like knowing what you need on your 1st possession is a huge advantage, just like collefe.By taking the ball first, they guaranteed the Chiefs get an extra down on their final drive. They had to go for it on 4th. I would rather be in the position of knowing that I have to go for it on 4th.That's fine but you still have to play the best odds right? Give the Chiefs the ball first and if they go down and score a TD at least you know you are always in 4 down territory. There is absolutely no reason to take the ball first with the current rules. It probably cost them the game.As they mentioned on the broadcast, I think the defense was gassed.Especially with Mahomes as the QB. Egregious mistake by the Niners. That's on their coaches for not preparing the players for that coin toss.No both teams were getting a possession. I’d rather know what I need and if I’m in 4 downWhat is the rule, couldn’t KC have gone done and scored a TD and ended it without SF getting a touch?I almost wonder if the player didn't know the rules. Such an egregious mistake to take the ball.Should’ve kicked to start OT
Of course there’s a reason to. If the Niners scored a TD and Chiefs matched then SF gets the ball back with a chance to win with a FG.
I feel like you are ignoring the 3rd possession - I have no clue what the math will say but my gut tells me receiving is the right call.
I love Brady but Mahomes is the greatest player of all time.
Hes winning rings with Mecole Freaking Hardman and Marquez Valdes-Scantling
You might be right but I'm not ignoring the 3rd possession. That's irrelevant IMO. San Fran elects to receive in OT which means 4 options:By taking the ball first, they guaranteed the Chiefs get an extra down on their final drive. They had to go for it on 4th. I would rather be in the position of knowing that I have to go for it on 4th.That's fine but you still have to play the best odds right? Give the Chiefs the ball first and if they go down and score a TD at least you know you are always in 4 down territory. There is absolutely no reason to take the ball first with the current rules. It probably cost them the game.As they mentioned on the broadcast, I think the defense was gassed.Especially with Mahomes as the QB. Egregious mistake by the Niners. That's on their coaches for not preparing the players for that coin toss.No both teams were getting a possession. I’d rather know what I need and if I’m in 4 downWhat is the rule, couldn’t KC have gone done and scored a TD and ended it without SF getting a touch?I almost wonder if the player didn't know the rules. Such an egregious mistake to take the ball.Should’ve kicked to start OT
Of course there’s a reason to. If the Niners scored a TD and Chiefs matched then SF gets the ball back with a chance to win with a FG.
I feel like you are ignoring the 3rd possession - I have no clue what the math will say but my gut tells me receiving is the right call.
And so what? Then the Chiefs still have an extra automatic down.I feel like knowing what you need on your 1st possession is a huge advantage, just like collefe.By taking the ball first, they guaranteed the Chiefs get an extra down on their final drive. They had to go for it on 4th. I would rather be in the position of knowing that I have to go for it on 4th.That's fine but you still have to play the best odds right? Give the Chiefs the ball first and if they go down and score a TD at least you know you are always in 4 down territory. There is absolutely no reason to take the ball first with the current rules. It probably cost them the game.As they mentioned on the broadcast, I think the defense was gassed.Especially with Mahomes as the QB. Egregious mistake by the Niners. That's on their coaches for not preparing the players for that coin toss.No both teams were getting a possession. I’d rather know what I need and if I’m in 4 downWhat is the rule, couldn’t KC have gone done and scored a TD and ended it without SF getting a touch?I almost wonder if the player didn't know the rules. Such an egregious mistake to take the ball.Should’ve kicked to start OT
Of course there’s a reason to. If the Niners scored a TD and Chiefs matched then SF gets the ball back with a chance to win with a FG.
I feel like you are ignoring the 3rd possession - I have no clue what the math will say but my gut tells me receiving is the right call.
What if SF scored a TD?
Then KC would have known they needed to score one to match.I feel like knowing what you need on your 1st possession is a huge advantage, just like collefe.By taking the ball first, they guaranteed the Chiefs get an extra down on their final drive. They had to go for it on 4th. I would rather be in the position of knowing that I have to go for it on 4th.That's fine but you still have to play the best odds right? Give the Chiefs the ball first and if they go down and score a TD at least you know you are always in 4 down territory. There is absolutely no reason to take the ball first with the current rules. It probably cost them the game.As they mentioned on the broadcast, I think the defense was gassed.Especially with Mahomes as the QB. Egregious mistake by the Niners. That's on their coaches for not preparing the players for that coin toss.No both teams were getting a possession. I’d rather know what I need and if I’m in 4 downWhat is the rule, couldn’t KC have gone done and scored a TD and ended it without SF getting a touch?I almost wonder if the player didn't know the rules. Such an egregious mistake to take the ball.Should’ve kicked to start OT
Of course there’s a reason to. If the Niners scored a TD and Chiefs matched then SF gets the ball back with a chance to win with a FG.
I feel like you are ignoring the 3rd possession - I have no clue what the math will say but my gut tells me receiving is the right call.
What if SF scored a TD?
I love Brady but Mahomes is the greatest player of all time.
Hes winning rings with Mecole Freaking Hardman and Marquez Valdes-Scantling
Well, and the greatest TE in NFL history and one of the best offensive playcallers ever.
I'm a big Mahomes fan and agree he will probably end up the greatest, but it's not like Kelce/Rice/Hardman/MVS is worse than Daniel Graham/Troy Brown/Deion Branch/David Patten.
You might be right but I'm not ignoring the 3rd possession. That's irrelevant IMO. San Fran elects to receive in OT which means 4 options:By taking the ball first, they guaranteed the Chiefs get an extra down on their final drive. They had to go for it on 4th. I would rather be in the position of knowing that I have to go for it on 4th.That's fine but you still have to play the best odds right? Give the Chiefs the ball first and if they go down and score a TD at least you know you are always in 4 down territory. There is absolutely no reason to take the ball first with the current rules. It probably cost them the game.As they mentioned on the broadcast, I think the defense was gassed.Especially with Mahomes as the QB. Egregious mistake by the Niners. That's on their coaches for not preparing the players for that coin toss.No both teams were getting a possession. I’d rather know what I need and if I’m in 4 downWhat is the rule, couldn’t KC have gone done and scored a TD and ended it without SF getting a touch?I almost wonder if the player didn't know the rules. Such an egregious mistake to take the ball.Should’ve kicked to start OT
Of course there’s a reason to. If the Niners scored a TD and Chiefs matched then SF gets the ball back with a chance to win with a FG.
I feel like you are ignoring the 3rd possession - I have no clue what the math will say but my gut tells me receiving is the right call.
1. They go down and score a TD
2. They go down and kick a FG
3. They punt it back to the Chiefs
4. They turn the ball over
In scenarios 1 and 2, the Chiefs have an automatic extra 4th down play. That seems like a massive advantage to me. I'm not thinking ahead to a 3rd possession.
You mean when they said kc would win no matter what? Saw those rules before the game beganDid no one pay attention when they explained the OT rules?
I love Brady but Mahomes is the greatest player of all time.
Hes winning rings with Mecole Freaking Hardman and Marquez Valdes-Scantling
Well, and the greatest TE in NFL history and one of the best offensive playcallers ever.
I'm a big Mahomes fan and agree he will probably end up the greatest, but it's not like Kelce/Rice/Hardman/MVS is worse than Daniel Graham/Troy Brown/Deion Branch/David Patten.
No worries. We'll disagree there. I think he's the greatest now. But I'm sure plenty will disagree.
Then KC would have known they needed to score one to match.I feel like knowing what you need on your 1st possession is a huge advantage, just like collefe.By taking the ball first, they guaranteed the Chiefs get an extra down on their final drive. They had to go for it on 4th. I would rather be in the position of knowing that I have to go for it on 4th.That's fine but you still have to play the best odds right? Give the Chiefs the ball first and if they go down and score a TD at least you know you are always in 4 down territory. There is absolutely no reason to take the ball first with the current rules. It probably cost them the game.As they mentioned on the broadcast, I think the defense was gassed.Especially with Mahomes as the QB. Egregious mistake by the Niners. That's on their coaches for not preparing the players for that coin toss.No both teams were getting a possession. I’d rather know what I need and if I’m in 4 downWhat is the rule, couldn’t KC have gone done and scored a TD and ended it without SF getting a touch?I almost wonder if the player didn't know the rules. Such an egregious mistake to take the ball.Should’ve kicked to start OT
Of course there’s a reason to. If the Niners scored a TD and Chiefs matched then SF gets the ball back with a chance to win with a FG.
I feel like you are ignoring the 3rd possession - I have no clue what the math will say but my gut tells me receiving is the right call.
What if SF scored a TD?
I don’t know what the math says — maybe having the third possession outweighs the value of knowing what you need on the second — but imagine the Niners kicked and both drives played out the same way. You don’t think Kyle would have liked to know that he should have gone for it on 4th and goal?
And so what? Then the Chiefs still have an extra automatic down.I feel like knowing what you need on your 1st possession is a huge advantage, just like collefe.By taking the ball first, they guaranteed the Chiefs get an extra down on their final drive. They had to go for it on 4th. I would rather be in the position of knowing that I have to go for it on 4th.That's fine but you still have to play the best odds right? Give the Chiefs the ball first and if they go down and score a TD at least you know you are always in 4 down territory. There is absolutely no reason to take the ball first with the current rules. It probably cost them the game.As they mentioned on the broadcast, I think the defense was gassed.Especially with Mahomes as the QB. Egregious mistake by the Niners. That's on their coaches for not preparing the players for that coin toss.No both teams were getting a possession. I’d rather know what I need and if I’m in 4 downWhat is the rule, couldn’t KC have gone done and scored a TD and ended it without SF getting a touch?I almost wonder if the player didn't know the rules. Such an egregious mistake to take the ball.Should’ve kicked to start OT
Of course there’s a reason to. If the Niners scored a TD and Chiefs matched then SF gets the ball back with a chance to win with a FG.
I feel like you are ignoring the 3rd possession - I have no clue what the math will say but my gut tells me receiving is the right call.
What if SF scored a TD?
Mahomes said if they won the toss they would have kicked it. I guess that makes sense because if the other team scores a TD you are going to go for 2 anyway.
The only drawback is the FG/FG thing though.
Yeah that’s the thing. KC is almost certainly going for two because you’d rather put the game in the hands of Mahomes rather than your gassed D. So you have to figure that into your calculationsAnd so what? Then the Chiefs still have an extra automatic down.I feel like knowing what you need on your 1st possession is a huge advantage, just like collefe.By taking the ball first, they guaranteed the Chiefs get an extra down on their final drive. They had to go for it on 4th. I would rather be in the position of knowing that I have to go for it on 4th.That's fine but you still have to play the best odds right? Give the Chiefs the ball first and if they go down and score a TD at least you know you are always in 4 down territory. There is absolutely no reason to take the ball first with the current rules. It probably cost them the game.As they mentioned on the broadcast, I think the defense was gassed.Especially with Mahomes as the QB. Egregious mistake by the Niners. That's on their coaches for not preparing the players for that coin toss.No both teams were getting a possession. I’d rather know what I need and if I’m in 4 downWhat is the rule, couldn’t KC have gone done and scored a TD and ended it without SF getting a touch?I almost wonder if the player didn't know the rules. Such an egregious mistake to take the ball.Should’ve kicked to start OT
Of course there’s a reason to. If the Niners scored a TD and Chiefs matched then SF gets the ball back with a chance to win with a FG.
I feel like you are ignoring the 3rd possession - I have no clue what the math will say but my gut tells me receiving is the right call.
What if SF scored a TD?
Then unless KC goes for 2 I’m going to get the ball with a chance to kick a FG to win.
with far worse receiving options.
WWMCDCD?Mahomes said if they won the toss they would have kicked it. I guess that makes sense because if the other team scores a TD you are going to go for 2 anyway.
The only drawback is the FG/FG thing though.
Would you go for 2? Defenses are gassed so maybe but I don’t think it’s automatic. Will be interesting to see if someone has run the numbers on this already.
100% I think KC goes for 2 there.And so what? Then the Chiefs still have an extra automatic down.I feel like knowing what you need on your 1st possession is a huge advantage, just like collefe.By taking the ball first, they guaranteed the Chiefs get an extra down on their final drive. They had to go for it on 4th. I would rather be in the position of knowing that I have to go for it on 4th.That's fine but you still have to play the best odds right? Give the Chiefs the ball first and if they go down and score a TD at least you know you are always in 4 down territory. There is absolutely no reason to take the ball first with the current rules. It probably cost them the game.As they mentioned on the broadcast, I think the defense was gassed.Especially with Mahomes as the QB. Egregious mistake by the Niners. That's on their coaches for not preparing the players for that coin toss.No both teams were getting a possession. I’d rather know what I need and if I’m in 4 downWhat is the rule, couldn’t KC have gone done and scored a TD and ended it without SF getting a touch?I almost wonder if the player didn't know the rules. Such an egregious mistake to take the ball.Should’ve kicked to start OT
Of course there’s a reason to. If the Niners scored a TD and Chiefs matched then SF gets the ball back with a chance to win with a FG.
I feel like you are ignoring the 3rd possession - I have no clue what the math will say but my gut tells me receiving is the right call.
What if SF scored a TD?
Then unless KC goes for 2 I’m going to get the ball with a chance to kick a FG to win.
He had the picture off too.I had the volume off. Seriously though, they didn't declare a winner for like fifteen seconds.I legit didn't even realize it was over. Great job talking heads.
They explained it like 45 times.
Wait so you turned the volume off and then criticized the talking heads for not finding a way to communicate it to you while you had them muted?
EDIT: It was also written on the screen at the beginning of overtime, btw.
Yeah that’s the thing. KC is almost certainly going for two because you’d rather put the game in the hands of Mahomes rather than your gassed D. So you have to figure that into your calculationsAnd so what? Then the Chiefs still have an extra automatic down.I feel like knowing what you need on your 1st possession is a huge advantage, just like collefe.By taking the ball first, they guaranteed the Chiefs get an extra down on their final drive. They had to go for it on 4th. I would rather be in the position of knowing that I have to go for it on 4th.That's fine but you still have to play the best odds right? Give the Chiefs the ball first and if they go down and score a TD at least you know you are always in 4 down territory. There is absolutely no reason to take the ball first with the current rules. It probably cost them the game.As they mentioned on the broadcast, I think the defense was gassed.Especially with Mahomes as the QB. Egregious mistake by the Niners. That's on their coaches for not preparing the players for that coin toss.No both teams were getting a possession. I’d rather know what I need and if I’m in 4 downWhat is the rule, couldn’t KC have gone done and scored a TD and ended it without SF getting a touch?I almost wonder if the player didn't know the rules. Such an egregious mistake to take the ball.Should’ve kicked to start OT
Of course there’s a reason to. If the Niners scored a TD and Chiefs matched then SF gets the ball back with a chance to win with a FG.
I feel like you are ignoring the 3rd possession - I have no clue what the math will say but my gut tells me receiving is the right call.
What if SF scored a TD?
Then unless KC goes for 2 I’m going to get the ball with a chance to kick a FG to win.
I would go for two. I also would elect to receive though for the fg fg scenario. Or, alternatively, a punt punt scenario I suppose. Either way there is a real possibility of a third possession even if the other team is going to go for two if you score a td first.Mahomes said if they won the toss they would have kicked it. I guess that makes sense because if the other team scores a TD you are going to go for 2 anyway.
The only drawback is the FG/FG thing though.
Would you go for 2? Defenses are gassed so maybe but I don’t think it’s automatic. Will be interesting to see if someone has run the numbers on this already.
WWMCDCD?Mahomes said if they won the toss they would have kicked it. I guess that makes sense because if the other team scores a TD you are going to go for 2 anyway.
The only drawback is the FG/FG thing though.
Would you go for 2? Defenses are gassed so maybe but I don’t think it’s automatic. Will be interesting to see if someone has run the numbers on this already.
(Motor City Dan Campbell)
I just like that it scrambles everyone’s brain and we don’t readily have all the WP% calculations at our fingertips because this is a totally new situationYeah that’s the thing. KC is almost certainly going for two because you’d rather put the game in the hands of Mahomes rather than your gassed D. So you have to figure that into your calculationsAnd so what? Then the Chiefs still have an extra automatic down.I feel like knowing what you need on your 1st possession is a huge advantage, just like collefe.By taking the ball first, they guaranteed the Chiefs get an extra down on their final drive. They had to go for it on 4th. I would rather be in the position of knowing that I have to go for it on 4th.That's fine but you still have to play the best odds right? Give the Chiefs the ball first and if they go down and score a TD at least you know you are always in 4 down territory. There is absolutely no reason to take the ball first with the current rules. It probably cost them the game.As they mentioned on the broadcast, I think the defense was gassed.Especially with Mahomes as the QB. Egregious mistake by the Niners. That's on their coaches for not preparing the players for that coin toss.No both teams were getting a possession. I’d rather know what I need and if I’m in 4 downWhat is the rule, couldn’t KC have gone done and scored a TD and ended it without SF getting a touch?I almost wonder if the player didn't know the rules. Such an egregious mistake to take the ball.Should’ve kicked to start OT
Of course there’s a reason to. If the Niners scored a TD and Chiefs matched then SF gets the ball back with a chance to win with a FG.
I feel like you are ignoring the 3rd possession - I have no clue what the math will say but my gut tells me receiving is the right call.
What if SF scored a TD?
Then unless KC goes for 2 I’m going to get the ball with a chance to kick a FG to win.
Ok, 51-49 receiving.
I‘ll say this - they’ve made it where it seems about as fair as it could be and much better than it’s been.
I thought Purdy played well overall but not excellent. In the third quarter when the Niners had a chance to pad their lead, he was terrible. I don’t have stats in front of me but it seemed like he couldn’t complete a pass in the 3rd quarter. I was impressed, though, that he fought through it and ended to game pretty well.Also, hope this puts to bed any talk remotely suggesting Purdy isn’t the surefire franchise QB they need to move forward with.
He was excellent.
I thought he played well in the first quarter. After that, I thought he struggled. The Niners were controlling that game early and could not put it away.I thought Purdy played well overall but not excellent. In the third quarter when the Niners had a chance to pad their lead, he was terrible. I don’t have stats in front of me but it seemed like he couldn’t complete a pass in the 3rd quarter. I was impressed, though, that he fought through it and ended to game pretty well.Also, hope this puts to bed any talk remotely suggesting Purdy isn’t the surefire franchise QB they need to move forward with.
He was excellent.
Meh. He's more than a game manager and surely better than Jimmy G. He reads coverages well which certainly allows him to play above his skill set. When pass protection doesn't breakdown he's ultra efficient. Was he really any better than any QB he played against in the playoffs?Also, hope this puts to bed any talk remotely suggesting Purdy isn’t the surefire franchise QB they need to move forward with.
He was excellent.
Any HOF legacies on the line? Chris Jones and George Kittle come to mind. Kyle Shanahan. Harrison Butker.
Reid/Mahomes/Kelce/Spags/CMC/Trent are all locks.
Meh. He's more than a game manager and surely better than Jimmy G. He reads coverages well which certainly allows him to play above his skill set. When pass protection doesn't breakdown he's ultra efficient. Was he really any better than any QB he played against in the playoffs?Also, hope this puts to bed any talk remotely suggesting Purdy isn’t the surefire franchise QB they need to move forward with.
He was excellent.
Couldn't disagree more. Shanahan constantly putting too much on his plate when he's just not good enough to handle it is why they lost imo. Can count 3-4 times where he got away from his best player McCaffrey and it never went well. Especially the first two possessions coming out of the half. Major momentum killer for SF.Also, hope this puts to bed any talk remotely suggesting Purdy isn’t the surefire franchise QB they need to move forward with.
He was excellent.