What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Survivor Season 42: Starts Wednesday March 9, 2022 (3 Viewers)

I’m curious what the thoughts are about Jonathan. If he doesn’t blink out on the final immunity challenge or wins the fire contest, did he have a chance to win? I can’t tell if he was liked or respected by his fellow competitors or not. I know Lindsay had a beef with him but he did towards her as well. That was like two alpha athletes that could not get along.

My wife and I liked him, maybe for different reasons. Physically dominating but awful with strategy stuff. Did he have a chance against Maryanne? 
I think for Jonathan to have won you would need Romeo and another poor player and you would then need him to have an amazing final tribal and then to be really bad.

a lot of exit interviews mentioned Jonathan talking poorly to the women out there.  I don’t think he was well liked.  So i don’t think he had much of a shot to win based on what I’ve seen.  

 
You know what would be nice.  If they released unedited footage from the season after for people to see what really happened.  Kind of like the feeds on big brother.  I know on big brother the feeds often tell a completely different story from the main show.  It’s often like your watching two different shows.  It would be interesting to see more context from the season.  

 
Yeah, I'd love to know if Maryanne chilled the hell out later in the season or if they just started editing her to make her seem more serious.

 
Yeah, I'd love to know if Maryanne chilled the hell out later in the season or if they just started editing her to make her seem more serious.
They also could have edited her to be worse than she may have been early on.  But i think she probably calmed down as she got comfortable.  

 
Yeah, I'd love to know if Maryanne chilled the hell out later in the season or if they just started editing her to make her seem more serious.
Yeah, I think it's probably a combo of both.   She's really probably somewhere in the middle  At the beginning they edited her with every one of her over the top cringe moments.  At the end they edited her with every one of her savvy moments.  They probably did the editing on purpose like that knowing she ultimately won...like the nerdy kid who gets a superpower and slowly turns into a superhero.

I also find it interesting that the "black" topic was such a huge deal for a few weeks and now that a black person won it's not even mentioned.   I'm sure there was a semblence of that giving Maryanne an advantage with the jury.   Romeo was a throwaway so essentially came down to white vs. black decision and Maryanne made her pitch good enough to sway towards her.

Hopefully between Big Brother and the last 2 Survivor wins the minority/woman not fair thing can go away now.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah, I'd love to know if Maryanne chilled the hell out later in the season or if they just started editing her to make her seem more serious.
I wonder if it had to do with the lower energy level that affects everyone as they progress through the game. Most people go from a normal level of energy/enthusiasm to a depleted one. Maybe Maryanne went from an excessive level to a normal one. 

Tony was like that, in his own way.

 
I also find it interesting that the "black" topic was such a huge deal for a few weeks and now that a black person won it's not even mentioned.   I'm sure there was a semblence of that giving Maryanne an advantage with the jury.   Romeo was a throwaway so essentially came down to white vs. black decision and Maryanne made her pitch good enough to sway towards her.
so you think the jury decided based on her race and not how she dominated the final tribal?  
 

i did find it interesting it wasn’t mentioned as she was only the second black woman to win and it’s been 20 years i believe since the first.  But then again if they do mention it folks would be complaining “why do we have to mention race?” So can’t win really.  

 
I wonder if it had to do with the lower energy level that affects everyone as they progress through the game. Most people go from a normal level of energy/enthusiasm to a depleted one. Maybe Maryanne went from an excessive level to a normal one. 

Tony was like that, in his own way.
Jonathan said this in his exit interview.  He was extremely worn down energy wise by the end.  I bet they all were.

 
so you think the jury decided based on her race and not how she dominated the final tribal?  
 

i did find it interesting it wasn’t mentioned as she was only the second black woman to win and it’s been 20 years i believe since the first.  But then again if they do mention it folks would be complaining “why do we have to mention race?” So can’t win really.  
Read what I wrote again. I said she swayed at jury enough to make it logical to choose her. They wanted her to be their vote but couldn’t justify it until her rationale. Then it made it easy to switch. 

 
They wanted her to be their vote
Im pretty sure they all wanted Mike to be the vote but he couldnt own his game.  And Maryanne didnt sway the jury "just enough" she completely owned that final tribal.  One of the best showings in a final tribal as well.  She deserved that win. 

 
Agree with the comments about Maryanne crushing that FT. And the secret idol...slam dunked her explanation about her strategy- that's why the jury reacted like they did.

But it was Mike's to lose, and lose it he did with the Loyalty/honesty play and shambolic explanation.

One thing...the people who hang back and coast a lot- like Maryanne- don't have to worry about being as deceitful and burning bridges by being power-players who are taking people out. Makes their sales pitch easier at FT by not having to face a group of people they deceived.

 
Read what I wrote again. I said she swayed at jury enough to make it logical to choose her. They wanted her to be their vote but couldn’t justify it until her rationale. Then it made it easy to switch. 
A majority raised their hands saying they were coming in thinking they were voting for Mike. 

Where are you getting that "they wanted her to win but couldn't justify their vote"

 
A majority raised their hands saying they were coming in thinking they were voting for Mike. 

Where are you getting that "they wanted her to win but couldn't justify their vote"
I'm saying coming into final 3 tribal, yeah why wouldn't they assume it was Mike....the other 2 were Romeo and Maryanne and by all accounts of what they knew neither of them did much of anything.  So, many of them probably wanted Maryanne based on the woke black factor, but there was just no logical justification for it at that time to not have their vote looked at like a woke joke.

When Maryanne gave some substance to her game, then it was easy for them to switch it up.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm saying coming into tribal, yeah why wouldn't they assume it was Mike....the other 2 were Romeo and Maryanne and by all accounts of what they knew neither of them did nothing.  So, many of them probably wanted Maryanne based on the woke black factor but there was just no logical justification for it at that time to not have their vote looked at like a woke joke.

When Maryanne gave some substance to her game, then it was easy for them to switch it up.
Does this line of thinking also translate to white players winning on “non woke” seasons?  Just curious.  

 
Does this line of thinking also translate to white players winning on “non woke” seasons?  Just curious.  
Not sure I understand your question.  There's never been a tribal dedicated to focusing on how white people don't get a fair shake and others gang up on them because of the color of their skin with idols being played unnecessarily to make a statement of solidarity.  

 
Every year when I watch the show, there's at least one person like Romeo who does absolutely nothing all season. Terrible at challenges, zero social game, etc. It makes me wonder how those people even make the show. Like what was Romeos audition like? What did they see in him that they chose cast him? I'm sure he had to go thru a few interviews or screenings, and yet they still picked him. Surely there had to be hundreds if not thousands of better applicants.

Maybe the fact that he's a gay minority has something to do with it. Gotta stay woke and diverse.
Not a fan of quotas myself... although one would expect more excitement when people have opposing perspectives, such as young/old, etc.

But I wouldn't criticize Romeo or the casting.  Group dynamics is a funny thing.  In fact, you could probably have a deep discussion about how a 2 or 3 tribe season affects bonding and alliances.  Small groups are more difficult.  Romeo seemed OK early on and, as I recall, started the skinny guys alliance with Zach, who was a quick exit.  I can see things play out so people are quickly on the outside looking in... this isn't unique to Romeo. 

 
I wonder if it had to do with the lower energy level that affects everyone as they progress through the game. Most people go from a normal level of energy/enthusiasm to a depleted one. Maybe Maryanne went from an excessive level to a normal one. 

Tony was like that, in his own way.
I've had a strong suspicion all season that Maryanne may have ADHD. My daughter has it, and as a result, I'm around other kids who have it too. She shares many similar traits. I don't know, and have not looked, to see if she's been diagnosed, and I don't know if there are past instances of contestants who have ADHD and are unable to access their medication (Adderall, Ritalin, etc.). I know when my daughter forgets to take her medication. My wife and I just look at each other, knowingly. 

And if it's the case, and her temperament changed as the game played on, without food, without quality sleep, under stress...well, I think there might be something there for doctors to study. Because I found her metamorphosis to be amazing, impressive, admirable. She was likable, extremely well spoken, clever. But what do I know. It was probably all just editing.

 
I'm saying coming into final 3 tribal, yeah why wouldn't they assume it was Mike....the other 2 were Romeo and Maryanne and by all accounts of what they knew neither of them did much of anything.  So, many of them probably wanted Maryanne based on the woke black factor, but there was just no logical justification for it at that time to not have their vote looked at like a woke joke.

When Maryanne gave some substance to her game, then it was easy for them to switch it up.
Who in the cast said that? At tribal, they said they came in thinking of voting for Mike. That's why I asked the question.

 
so you think the jury decided based on her race and not how she dominated the final tribal?  

i did find it interesting it wasn’t mentioned as she was only the second black woman to win and it’s been 20 years i believe since the first.  But then again if they do mention it folks would be complaining “why do we have to mention race?” So can’t win really.  
I'm certain her race wasn't a factor.  She was a worthy winner.

But race wasn't a factor in placing the first two members of the jury either...  Yet many people reached that conclusion and it was given excessive, usually inaccurate, media coverage...  I asked you directly if you thought race was a factor and I never saw a reply.

I do watch many youtube videos of previous seasons and there are some obnoxious racist moments.  I don't believe it is prevalent and don't recall any recent example.

You mean 20 seasons... Using a phrase with "only" implies you think black women are under represented.  Statistically, I don't think that is true.  We've had 25 men (3 black or 12% of the men) and 15 women (2 black - 13.3%) winners.  But, to be blunt, I typically react to the winner and what I thought of their game play, I don't fixate on their gender, race, ethnicity, etc.

 
Who in the cast said that? At tribal, they said they came in thinking of voting for Mike. That's why I asked the question.
I distinctly remember 1 or 2 of them in a one on one when they were reviewing the finalist said "really want it to be Maryanne".  But in general, nobody is going to come straight out and say "I'm gonna vote for Maryanne because she's black and female and I want it to be a statement".   What I said was of course they said they were leaning towards Mike because the jury looked at Romeo and Maryanne as floating goats so it was only logical to think it would be Mike.  But when Maryanne broke out her silent idol and how she planned to utilize it, then that gave them a reason to switch the vote to her.

 
I wonder if it had to do with the lower energy level that affects everyone as they progress through the game. Most people go from a normal level of energy/enthusiasm to a depleted one. Maybe Maryanne went from an excessive level to a normal one. 

Tony was like that, in his own way.
I'm sure not sleeping, being cold in the rain, and lack of food sucked out some of the energy. Also, Omar told her she played a sloppy social game early on, and she said she became aware of that at the fake merge. She may have simmered her emotions down some once she realized it, and that may have been why she mellowed some (her mellowness is equivalent to someone's normal energy). 

I think Maryanne deserved/earned her win over Romeo and Mike. She was always very social, and she was liked by everyone (even though she got on some nerves being a motor mouth). She participated at camp by weaving palm fonds, gutted fish for eating, made Omar a mat, attempting to cut coconuts, etc. She always looked for an idol, and got lucky more than once.  She helped get Omar out, although it is unclear whose idea it was since Jonathan said he and Mike thought of it first. If it was, it wasn't shown on camera. More than anything though, once she found the merge idol, she kept track of the combinations in her head that would for sure get her to the final three, and she didn't reveal her idol to anyone, and so it didn't make her a target. She knew Romeo wouldn't choose her to make fire. She read it right. Prior to the final tribal council, the jury didn't know about this, but had any of them known while still in the game, it could have blown up her plan. I also liked her self growth story of how she chose to not sabotage herself by playing her idol for Lindsay, even though she wanted to and was scared of losing the friendship.  She said she decided to take the chance to lose (the friendship), because she deserved the chance to win. She is young and it showed sometimes, but she is also intelligent, and that intelligence shined brightly at tribal council. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm saying coming into final 3 tribal, yeah why wouldn't they assume it was Mike....the other 2 were Romeo and Maryanne and by all accounts of what they knew neither of them did much of anything.  So, many of them probably wanted Maryanne based on the woke black factor, but there was just no logical justification for it at that time to not have their vote looked at like a woke joke.
I don't believe that. In the words I envision Maryanne saying, "Fudge that shiz."

 
It kind of did excuse him, he just didn't do a good job. It was as simple as:

"Hey Lindsay, you're a great competitor. You've been gunning for me for a few days and I know that. I respect it. But let's not pretend "we're in an alliance" is why I should bring you in about Omar. You've been gunning for me. I got to him, and now I'm coming for you. You're most likely to beat me in any given challenge and that's how it goes. May the best of us win. Put yourself in my shoes - you just voted for me also. So you're upset with me for turning on you the same tribal you turned on me. Are you upset with me, or just upset it didn't work?"
Couldn't agree more.  I don't think Jonathan was ever "cringy" and complaints about him using the word "aggressive" are nonsense as well as Lindsay's accusation that he turned on her.  Why does he have to excuse his action of not telling Lindsay their plans when she was clearly against him?  Bizarre take...

He was blunt... and direct and fair in responding to these situations.  He told Lindsay the truth.  People don't always like that.

His two big weakness was being "hangry" and an apparent lack of strategy.  The former is legit because of his size...  I was disappointed that he didn't make the final three because I was anticipating how he might pitch final tribal to address those weaknesses.   He alienated Lindsay by not listening to her opinion.  The edit had him and Mike not listening to Maryanne, however, even that was contradicted somewhat in the after show.

 
I'm certain her race wasn't a factor.  She was a worthy winner.

But race wasn't a factor in placing the first two members of the jury either...  Yet many people reached that conclusion and it was given excessive, usually inaccurate, media coverage...  I asked you directly if you thought race was a factor and I never saw a reply.


Answered exactly 1 month ago. 

And yes, survivor is a microcosm of society.  So yes i think race, gender, age, where you are from, etc are all factors in how the game plays out or how people judge, trust and interact with one another be it conscious or unconscious.  I'm not sure how anyone could be "certain" it wasn't a factor and there really is no way to prove that tbh.  But that doesn't mean anyone is being racist.  it can both be a factor and not mean someone is racist or that its the specific reason something occurred and i feel like that is what you feel is being implied. 

Drea and Maryanne like myself have watched survivor(and other reality shows) and seen sometimes where black contestants get perceived as "Aggressive" or "Deceitful" or an outsider or something else that often leads to them getting voted off many times early.  That's not saying they are being voted off because the other contestants are racist and Drea and Maryanne did not say that.

 
I don't know if there are past instances of contestants who have ADHD and are unable to access their medication (Adderall, Ritalin, etc.).
There is at least one. Christina from S24 (One World) was not allowed to have her ADHD medication because a side effect was that it functioned as an appetite suppressant, which production determined would give her an unfair advantage. I haven't watched that season because I've heard it's terrible, but my understanding is that she acted like a zombie much of the time. 

 
So you think Jonathan telling Drea she was being aggressive at tribal council was accurate?
I think it's impossible to answer this question without seeing the unedited conversation. The version that we saw didn't make it look like she was being aggressive.

 
Who in the cast said that? At tribal, they said they came in thinking of voting for Mike. That's why I asked the question.
I distinctly remember 1 or 2 of them in a one on one when they were reviewing the finalist said "really want it to be Maryanne".  But in general, nobody is going to come straight out and say "I'm gonna vote for Maryanne because she's black and female and I want it to be a statement".
I just watched it last night for the first time and I don't remember a single person saying that. I remember Drea said she really liked Maryanne, but that wasn't enough to vote for her. I could be wrong though..maybe somebody did. Will try to rewatch a bit. But I do know Jeff asked the group- who came in thinking they were voting for Mike- most of them raised their hands...I don't remember anybody who didn't to be honest.

 
I just watched it last night for the first time and I don't remember a single person saying that. I remember Drea said she really liked Maryanne, but that wasn't enough to vote for her. I could be wrong though..maybe somebody did. Will try to rewatch a bit. But I do know Jeff asked the group- who came in thinking they were voting for Mike- most of them raised their hands...I don't remember anybody who didn't to be honest.
Ok so what’s your point?  You’re basically proving what I’m saying. They all came in expecting to vote for Mike. That all easily changed after some fancy secret idol reveal.  If you don’t think there’s some underlying thought of “wanting” Maryanne to win it based on a big part of this seasons “moment” then not sure what to tell ya. 

 
Ok so what’s your point?  You’re basically proving what I’m saying. They all came in expecting to vote for Mike. That all easily changed after some fancy secret idol reveal.  If you don’t think there’s some underlying thought of “wanting” Maryanne to win it based on a big part of this seasons “moment” then not sure what to tell ya. 
I'm watching the show and don't see the contestants saying it. You keep saying they are. I keep saying I haven't seen or heard it except from you. So after three rounds of this where you haven't pointed to any of them saying it...that seems to be your agenda. Not sure why that's the case.

 
I'm watching the show and don't see the contestants saying it. You keep saying they are. I keep saying I haven't seen or heard it except from you. So after three rounds of this where you haven't pointed to any of them saying it...that seems to be your agenda. Not sure why that's the case.
None of them are gonna say to the cameras that they want the black woman to win without any merit. I said what you said about Drea “liking” her (aka I want her to win but can’t vote without some game to her resume). The whole jury doesn’t flip their vote like that by a speech without some underlying “want” for it to go that way. 
 

And really I don’t care at all about sex or skin color….my original post was saying I was surprised that it wasn’t talked about at all after that topic being the biggest moment of the season. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
None of them are gonna say to the cameras that they want the black woman to win without any merit. I said what you said about Drea “liking” her (aka I want her to win but can’t vote without some game to her resume). The whole jury doesn’t flip their vote like that by a speech without some underlying “want” for it to go that way. 
 

And really I don’t care at all about sex or skin color….my original post was saying I was surprised that it wasn’t talked about at all after that topic being the biggest moment of the season. 
Again, you are displaying a tremendous disrespect to the jury and an overly simplistic view of the season and show. 

This phenomenon you claimed hasn’t happened before actually has, and some of us discussed those incidences a few days ago.

 
None of them are gonna say to the cameras that they want the black woman to win without any merit. I said what you said about Drea “liking” her (aka I want her to win but can’t vote without some game to her resume). The whole jury doesn’t flip their vote like that by a speech without some underlying “want” for it to go that way. 
 

And really I don’t care at all about sex or skin color….my original post was saying I was surprised that it wasn’t talked about at all after that topic being the biggest moment of the season. 
I think you're underestimating what Maryanne did in the final two episodes.  She was key in ousting Omar.  She seemed to be on the fence regarding Lindsay and, per the edit, that was Romeo's call.  However, "taking" Mike's idol was pivotal.  I commented when Mike played it for her that it would blow up on him and could make for a final tribal revelation that suggests she outplayed him.

I do share your observation that it was crickets when she won.  I'm of the mindset that you can't have it both ways.  I would prefer that people admit that those on the jury deserved to be there just as she deserved to win.

 
None of them are gonna say to the cameras that they want the black woman to win without any merit. 
 
in past seasons would you also say that players wouldn’t say to the cameras that they want white players to win or stay in the game?  That was my question from before.  Is this only black players you feel this happens with or are you saying this has happened for many years?

 
 
in past seasons would you also say that players wouldn’t say to the cameras that they want white players to win or stay in the game?  That was my question from before.  Is this only black players you feel this happens with or are you saying this has happened for many years?
Cmon my man. I love the passive aggressive question asking.  I’m not in the least bit racist (many black friends), but I am a realist. There is a HUGE focus in recent years on racism relating to intent against African Americans in these types of shows (casting, winning, etc).  That’s not the case for whites.   I’m focusing specifically on this season, the focus the black women themselves in the game  made it a point to highlight and how that would sway comments and opinions on this season. Thats it. 
 

it’s completely naive to think that big tribal event with Drea and Maryanne discussing this topic RIGHT WHEN JURY WAS STARTING TO GET ESTABLISHED didn’t have some effect on the mindset when they were voting for the winner approx only 2 wks later (in real time). 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Cmon my man. I love the passive aggressive question asking.  I’m not in the least bit racist (many black friends), but I am a realist. There is a HUGE focus in recent years on racism relating to intent against African Americans in these types of shows (casting, winning, etc).  That’s not the case for whites.   I’m focusing specifically on this season, the focus the black women themselves in the game  made it a point to highlight and how that would sway comments and opinions on this season. Thats it. 
I’m not calling you racist first off.  And I’m sure you have all the black friends.  I’m simply clarifying what you are saying so that i understand.

you mentioned there is no focus on whites winning and race.  Why do you think that is?

 
I’m not calling you racist first off.  And I’m sure you have all the black friends.  I’m simply clarifying what you are saying so that i understand.

you mentioned there is no focus on whites winning and race.  Why do you think that is?
Because historically the cast was majority white, so just using statistics alone there was a much greater chance of a white person winning (that doesn't make the cast's racist, it's just numbers given to them to play the game).

In recent years, that discrepancy has obviously been highlighted and the show is making it crystal clear they are casting with more equal diversity (which is a good thing).  

With all that, there is no need to focus on whites winning.   They are focusing (and editing accordingly) on the diversity as a PR move to make up for all the years that they didn't cast as diverse races, sexual preference, etc. 

And with that, the cast is obviously aware that their actions on the show will carry over into their real life afterwards, and the absolute last thing a white person would want is to come out of the show looking racist in any way (it's basically a life ruiner with the backlash you'd receive).   So, you can't tell me that there isn't some semblance of advantage at this point to a black person in the finale given all of this (even if it's subconsciously).  Not racist, just human nature to protect your image when there really isn't anything in it for you to vote the other way.  It's the safe personal PR move at this point.   (one which Jonathan didn't make, surprisingly given his role in that infamous tribal not knowing how he'd be edited)

 
nysfl2 said:
I think it's impossible to answer this question without seeing the unedited conversation. The version that we saw didn't make it look like she was being aggressive.
She had an angry demeanor... She used words like "I'm pissed", "F that", talked over Jonathan and actually introduced the word aggression with "Don't make it out like I'm being aggressive".  Without her statement, I doubt the word comes up.

 
PinkydaPimp said:
 And I’m sure you have all the black friends.


:lmao:  

She had an angry demeanor... She used words like "I'm pissed", "F that", talked over Jonathan and actually introduced the word aggression with "Don't make it out like I'm being aggressive".  Without her statement, I doubt the word comes up.


Wow, it's amazing how we can all see the same thing so differently.  I never saw her as aggressive or angry and actually found her very calm and pleasant overall.  She was one of my favorites, along with Omar.

 
Wow, it's amazing how we can all see the same thing so differently.  I never saw her as aggressive or angry and actually found her very calm and pleasant overall.  She was one of my favorites, along with Omar.
Yes, it is amazing.  Everything I said is stone cold accurate.  Actually watch the scene again.  When was the last survivor to say "I'm pissed and "F that"?  Your definition of pleasant?

 
Yes, it is amazing.  Everything I said is stone cold accurate.  Actually watch the scene again.  When was the last survivor to say "I'm pissed and "F that"?  Your definition of pleasant?


 I tried to be nice.  You seem angry and aggressive.  :lmao:  

 
offdee said:
In recent years, that discrepancy has obviously been highlighted and the show is making it crystal clear they are casting with more equal diversity (which is a good thing).  

With all that, there is no need to focus on whites winning.   They are focusing (and editing accordingly) on the diversity as a PR move to make up for all the years that they didn't cast as diverse races, sexual preference, etc. 
So you think a more diverse cast is a good thing but in the same breath that if someone from that diverse part of the cast is there the jury and show will favor them just because of their race?  And if the jury were to favor a black player just because of their race, why couldnt/wouldnt a jury favor a white players just because of their race in prior years?  Again i'm just to just trying to follow your line of thinking here. 

 
So you think a more diverse cast is a good thing but in the same breath that if someone from that diverse part of the cast is there the jury and show will favor them just because of their race?  And if the jury were to favor a black player just because of their race, why couldnt/wouldnt a jury favor a white players just because of their race in prior years?  Again i'm just to just trying to follow your line of thinking here. 


PdP asked:

So you think a more diverse cast is a good thing

- Yes

but in the same breath that if someone from that diverse part of the cast is there the jury and show will favor them just because of their race? 

- These past few years specifically and if all else is equal in gameplay...Yes.   Race/Sex equality is a HUGE social topic the past few years (BLM, #metoo, LGBTQA, etc.) and people/businesses want to be crystal clear that they support it, whether it's truly how they feel or just for positive PR.  And if you clearly do not support it, you will be labeled racist (which is a death blow to any person or business).  It's naïve to think that shows like this don't now cast and edit to fit a certain agenda and point of view that favors their social cause status.

And if the jury were to favor a black player just because of their race, why couldnt/wouldnt a jury favor a white players just because of their race in prior years? 

- Maybe they did, we'll never really know because it wasn't a social focus at that time and because of that the casting wasn't race equal unfortunately...but why does that matter with what we're discussing here?  I'm not talking about 5-10 yrs ago seasons in any of my comments.  I'm focusing on the past few years when "woke" society has been at its highest.   Again, this is not a bad thing and I support all of it...I'm saying that the news and media are making it a top priority these past few years to clearly show their support and make changes in verbiage/edits/casting that fit that narrative.  I don't really see how anybody can disagree that this is true.

An extreme example of this is the past Big Brother season.  A group of 7 black contestants created an alliance called "The Cookout".  To the point that even mixed races weren't brought into that alliance.   It was known in the BB After Dark episodes that a couple of the white contestants had a hunch what was going on, but they could never really speak about it or call it out because that would be considered racist.   Like what are they gonna say to the cameras...."us whites need to ban together to start breaking apart this strong black alliance coming after us"  That's crazy and basically social suicide to anybody that would say anything remotely close to that.  So The Cookout took advantage of that and ran the show.    Nothing was really thought wrong with any of it and the entire cast was happy and supportive of the ultimate African American winner.  (again...this is a GOOD THING...means we're making progress!)

But, let's reverse that and how would this scenario have played out?    A group of 7 white contestants create an alliance called "The Country Club" and make all of their decisions and conversations with the goal of voting out all the black, asian, mixed races so a white person wins.  After every successful elimination, the group of whites get together and jump around celebrating that they are closer to their goal of having a house full of only white people at the end. Editing clearly shows all of these conversations and highlights it.  Damn, I'm uncomfortable even typing that.   The show would be culture cancelled immediately (and rightfully so).

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top