What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

TE Jimmy Graham, CHI (2 Viewers)

steveski said:
Faust said:
Time to sell now, fellas. I'm not sure he can be the same guy after being violated by the joker like that.
Excerpt:

Turns out, The Joker is actually 43-year-old Scott McGowan, and he can explain what happened.

“I went for what I could grab,” he told The Advocate's Ramon Antonio Vargas. “Everything else was taken, so I took what I could get.” McGowan added, presumably while stifling a laugh: “I officially know now that (Graham) is a tight end.
:lol:

This guy should be charged for sexual assault. His hand did not accidentally touch Jimmy Graham's rear. He grabbed it. This is about more than spoiling the fun for Saints fans. This is about more than offending Jimmy Graham. If this man will sexually assault someone (and that is what this is -- a nonconsensual sexual touching) with the "whole world watching," God knows what he does when he thinks no one is watching. This is not a laughing matter. The fact that he makes light of it only shows that he is a sociopath.

As a gay man, I feel that Mr McGowan has done more than grope Jimmy Graham. I feel he has endangered the safety of gay men in this city. His actions play into a sinister lie that gay men are prone to be sexual predators. His behavior will make some who do not know better believe that such thoughts are true, and will justify a homophobic attack against other gay men.

Most Saints fans are good and decent people. But all you need for this to be more than an embarrasment for Mr Graham is for one rotten homophobic Saints fan to see this story, and blame all gay men for "spoiling the fun" and commit some viscious attack against gay men because McGowan's actions, in their minds, confirm their worst beliefs about gay men. If such a thing happens, Mr McGowan would be morally culpable.

As it stands, he sould be held criminally responsible for his grope.
 
Just one of Graham's three looks came after the first quarter. The three targets were Graham's second fewest of the season. Graham took a savage cheap shot from S George Iloka on the Saints' opening drive, appearing to tweak his troublesome shoulder. He stayed in the game, however, and was never announced with an injury. He has an extra day to heal up for Week 12, as the Saints are hosting the Ravens on Monday Night Football.
How's my dude doing? Did anyone watch the game and saw if Graham was hurting?

 
How's my dude doing? Did anyone watch the game and saw if Graham was hurting?
Just one of Graham's three looks came after the first quarter. The three targets were Graham's second fewest of the season. Graham took a savage cheap shot from S George Iloka on the Saints' opening drive, appearing to tweak his troublesome shoulder. He stayed in the game, however, and was never announced with an injury. He has an extra day to heal up for Week 12, as the Saints are hosting the Ravens on Monday Night Football
 
Just one of Graham's three looks came after the first quarter. The three targets were Graham's second fewest of the season. Graham took a savage cheap shot from S George Iloka on the Saints' opening drive, appearing to tweak his troublesome shoulder. He stayed in the game, however, and was never announced with an injury. He has an extra day to heal up for Week 12, as the Saints are hosting the Ravens on Monday Night Football.
How's my dude doing? Did anyone watch the game and saw if Graham was hurting?
Seemed fine w/zero signs of injury in the second half.

The Saints just hung back, ran the ball without urgency, huddled up and succeeded with their goal of making it home in time for the 6 o'clock news.

 
Hoping that the injury wasn't a reason his targets shrunk.

If not, have to think that with the terrible offensive production and loss at home, Payton and Brees will remember that getting Graham heavily involved is a key to success.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
For those that watched and listened to the game, you know that the announcers (Gumble and Green) were wondering out loud during the last 20 minutes of the game re why the Saints were taking their time dink & dunking it in the pass game and still running with some consistency.

The Saints should be a "pass-to-setup-the-run" team the way the Packers are. And you know what? ...when you look at the pass/run ratio yesterday it does not indicate that they ran too much. HOWEVER, it's how they ran, how they passed and their general lack of urgency and lack of a vertical attack that makes it appear as if they are grounding and pounding.

 
Hoping that the injury wasn't a reason his targets shrunk.

If not, have to think that with the terrible offensive production and loss at home, Payton and Brees will remember that getting Graham heavily involved is a key to success.
The Bengals had Pacman Jones on him the whole game. It seems like a major physical mismatch in Graham's favor but Brees largely stood down.

 
For those that watched and listened to the game, you know that the announcers (Gumble and Green) were wondering out loud during the last 20 minutes of the game re why the Saints were taking their time dink & dunking it in the pass game and still running with some consistency.

The Saints should be a "pass-to-setup-the-run" team the way the Packers are. And you know what? ...when you look at the pass/run ratio yesterday it does not indicate that they ran too much. HOWEVER, it's how they ran, how they passed and their general lack of urgency and lack of a vertical attack that makes it appear as if they are grounding and pounding.
The playcalling the whole game was a mystery. In general Payton's play-calling has been unimaginative since his return. It's really an open question around here what's going on. Brees does have a serious lack of receiving options these days though and no Pierre and no Sproles means very little in teh screen game which has often been a staple of theirs. A lot of what Graham has done in the past has been sort of a high-low routine with Brees to him, Pierre and Sproles.

 
Rotoworld:

Jimmy Graham played on 54-of-71 snaps (76.0 percent) in Sunday's loss to the Bengals.
It's the highest percentage of snaps Graham has played since Week 4. So even though he appeared to tweak his troublesome shoulder during the disappointing three-catch outing, it doesn't look like there was any real concern from the training staff. Graham has an extra day to get right with the Saints facing the Ravens on Monday Night Football in Week 12. Drew Brees should really force-feed his tight end going forward, especially with Brandin Cooks (thumb) out 2-4 weeks.

Source: profootballfocus.com
Nov 17 - 10:23 AM
 
For those that watched and listened to the game, you know that the announcers (Gumble and Green) were wondering out loud during the last 20 minutes of the game re why the Saints were taking their time dink & dunking it in the pass game and still running with some consistency.

The Saints should be a "pass-to-setup-the-run" team the way the Packers are. And you know what? ...when you look at the pass/run ratio yesterday it does not indicate that they ran too much. HOWEVER, it's how they ran, how they passed and their general lack of urgency and lack of a vertical attack that makes it appear as if they are grounding and pounding.
The playcalling the whole game was a mystery. In general Payton's play-calling has been unimaginative since his return. It's really an open question around here what's going on. Brees does have a serious lack of receiving options these days though and no Pierre and no Sproles means very little in teh screen game which has often been a staple of theirs. A lot of what Graham has done in the past has been sort of a high-low routine with Brees to him, Pierre and Sproles.
It's no mystery to me. Would you guys score another TD after this happened to you?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGe--I6ApLw

Clearly Graham called Brees aside and told him to call somebody else's number last week and that strategy failed. In fantasy football you have to be one step ahead. Even Graham doesn't have an answer for the ### clown rapist. Look for him to disappear next week again, then for him to bounce back outside the dome week 13 for an away game.

I mean, jeez, this is what NO fans do to their OWN TEAM!!! Imagine what they would do to a rival or, say even just a fan from another team.

http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=720923

 
@PFF_NateJahnke: Jimmy Graham has only played in 59.5% of the Saints offensive snaps in the first half. He has played in at least 60% in each of his last 4.

 
ya, its crazy that he hasnt been in on every single goal to go play. cant complain with gl targets tho, i guess. he shoulda had the 2nd too.

also, its super crazy they have 335 yards of offense and he only has 15 yards. does seem that ravens are covering him well, but also doesnt seem that brees is looking his way much. probably should change some in the 2nd half as their corners have been getting torched deep and they may need to give safety help.

 
As a Graham owner I was screaming at the TV every time they lined up inside the 10 and he wasn't in there....but 17 fantasy points works for me. Pretty clear though that there aren't going to be any 100 yard games this year.

 
Yeah, that late TD was great, but it's been a disappointing season overall for Graham owners. Was hoping to ride him to a title, but the damage of little production early on was done.

 
1) The snap count is puzzling. He looks like he is 90%+ health-wise; maybe they're just trying to keep him fresh...but RZ snaps too? That's the area of concern that I cannot resolve.

2) Yards: The lack of deep balls will likely resolve itself soon. There is no reason that they wont start sending him deeper. That means yards. Im not giving up on the probability of 1 or 2 100 yd games the rest of the way.

3) Goalline: Even despite the few RZ snaps he sat, is there any team focused on getting a player the ball at the goalline more than the Saints right now with Graham? And that's including RBs. Not many.

4) Schedule: Graham is still my #1 projected TE from here on out as he has a high probability of getting meaningful minutes in week 16 and 17

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah, that late TD was great, but it's been a disappointing season overall for Graham owners. Was hoping to ride him to a title, but the damage of little production early on was done.
For a few min there on the late 1st half drive it looked like the offense got their mojo back. Then they seemed to fall back into the same missteps and struggled second half while their defense just can not get off the field.

Kills me how much they try to run at the goal line when it's not exactly their strength.

 
He has 9 TDs through 11 games.
No one is complaining about the TDs. Just really hasn't been a big yardage guy thus far and, beyond the big 16 TDs last year, that's the main thing that historically has separated himself from just about everyone not named Gronk.

 
Yeah, that late TD was great, but it's been a disappointing season overall for Graham owners. Was hoping to ride him to a title, but the damage of little production early on was done.
he had a torrid start in ppr.

8/82

10/118/2

6/54

8/86/1

then he got hurt and sucked for 2 games. then put up 6 tds in 5 games. you really cant ask for much better of a season.

 
Yeah, that late TD was great, but it's been a disappointing season overall for Graham owners. Was hoping to ride him to a title, but the damage of little production early on was done.
he had a torrid start in ppr.

8/82

10/118/2

6/54

8/86/1

then he got hurt and sucked for 2 games. then put up 6 tds in 5 games. you really cant ask for much better of a season.
yes you can. Last year ;)
 
Yeah, that late TD was great, but it's been a disappointing season overall for Graham owners. Was hoping to ride him to a title, but the damage of little production early on was done.
I don't know if you saw the 3rd and goal pass at the end of the 2nd quarter. Brees' pass to Graham was a little behind him which allowed the DB to break up the pass. If Brees leads him a little it's #2 of 3 TDs.

 
Yeah, that late TD was great, but it's been a disappointing season overall for Graham owners. Was hoping to ride him to a title, but the damage of little production early on was done.
I don't know if you saw the 3rd and goal pass at the end of the 2nd quarter. Brees' pass to Graham was a little behind him which allowed the DB to break up the pass. If Brees leads him a little it's #2 of 3 TDs.
Oh, I saw it. Even woke up my son groaning about it.

Don't get me wrong- he's been good, just well below the dominant Jimmy of 2013.

 
Brees and Graham actually put up good numbers the past week. I just don't think Brees is gonna throw for 5 TDs anymore. But what pisses me off the most is even when they're down big they're still trying to establish the run. They need to do what they're good at and it's throwing the damn ball over over the place...

 
Brees and Graham actually put up good numbers the past week. I just don't think Brees is gonna throw for 5 TDs anymore. But what pisses me off the most is even when they're down big they're still trying to establish the run. They need to do what they're good at and it's throwing the damn ball over over the place...
But...........to who? Cooks out. Graham (while great) isn't 100%. Colston is still ok but a shell. Their RBs aren't all that good out of the backfield compared to what they used to have with Sproles.

I mean, I agree they should probably be whipping it around more, but I really dont think it's going to bring them much more success, if any, than trying to be balanced.

It would probably help if they took a bit of the Patriots approach and run 40 times when you play a team with a not so good run D (see Colts game), and when you do play a team with a really good run D then just throw it a ton (see Lions game).

ANd I dont know what this crazy "Jimmy hasnt been dominant" talk is all about from some people. In 1 point PPR leagues he is scoring like 18 points per game played, which seems rather dominant. I only own him in one league, but he is a HUGE reason why I am doing so well in that league. Jesus, half his games this year are the types of games where getting those kinds of points from your TE basically win you your matchup. And while he hasnt looked as good as before he hurt the shoulder, he is still producing more than well enough to justify pretty much any drop spot where you might have taken him.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah, that late TD was great, but it's been a disappointing season overall for Graham owners. Was hoping to ride him to a title, but the damage of little production early on was done.
he had a torrid start in ppr.

8/82

10/118/2

6/54

8/86/1

then he got hurt and sucked for 2 games. then put up 6 tds in 5 games. you really cant ask for much better of a season.
I can ask for much better.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top