pantherclub
Footballguy
they have to draft a tackle in the first no matter whatYeah. I said last night the first two picks almost have to be in the trenches
they have to draft a tackle in the first no matter whatYeah. I said last night the first two picks almost have to be in the trenches
Other than Taylor there aren't any really good tackles that deserve a first round pick coming out. And he is unlikely to last until our pick. This isn't a great tackle class.they have to draft a tackle in the first no matter what
I havent really looked except for the bleacher report mock this morning (Bama safety) but if thats the case then trade down or something. They must IMO come out of the first 3 rounds with at least 2 olineman and a pass rusher. Maybe even 3 lineman. This business of not protecting cam has to get fixed asap. It will be interesting to see our cap space after all of the decisions are made. I saw today where the jags are looking to blow things up and Jalen Ramesy will be available. Not sure what it would take for him but its at least worth looking at. That would make our dbacks set for a while. But all in all they must figure out the oline situation. I wonder if Dwilliams will take a hometown hurt discount to come back?Other than Taylor there aren't any really good tackles that deserve a first round pick coming out. And he is unlikely to last until our pick. This isn't a great tackle class.
Little will only be a first rounder because of how weak this class is. His own coaches call him an underachiever who doesn't play to his full potential and displays a lack of interest in playing better. Guys who will never play an NFL down outplayed him consistently getting pressure on the QB. Little is the trap of drafting someone based on need. You draft him, you think you can get him to his level and then he gets cut because he never does and you wasted a first rounder on a project.I havent really looked except for the bleacher report mock this morning (Bama safety) but if thats the case then trade down or something. They must IMO come out of the first 3 rounds with at least 2 olineman and a pass rusher. Maybe even 3 lineman. This business of not protecting cam has to get fixed asap. It will be interesting to see our cap space after all of the decisions are made. I saw today where the jags are looking to blow things up and Jalen Ramesy will be available. Not sure what it would take for him but its at least worth looking at. That would make our dbacks set for a while. But all in all they must figure out the oline situation. I wonder if Dwilliams will take a hometown hurt discount to come back?
Just looked. Greg Little looks to be a mid round pick. I would get him if we could at 16. Dude seems legit and could at least play RT right away.
I would welcome that move because the man can run a defense and he's a good assistant head coach so I would love to see thatBring Wilks back as DC? Arizona didn't give him much of a chance. Wish he'd come back.
Absolutely. Would love to see this. I thought he was fantastic taking over for McDermott last year, then kinda got a raw deal in Arizona. How do you draft a rookie QB without much ahead of him and then fire the coach 16 games later?Jayrok said:Bring Wilks back as DC? Arizona didn't give him much of a chance. Wish he'd come back.
Yeah, he should have gotten some time to develop his team. One year isn't enough to do much of anything, especially with a rookie QB. I do wish they'd grab him back to Charlotte.Absolutely. Would love to see this. I thought he was fantastic taking over for McDermott last year, then kinda got a raw deal in Arizona. How do you draft a rookie QB without much ahead of him and then fire the coach 16 games later?
I think our secondary is better now than when Wilks was DC. If we keep Reid and draft/sign another S and or CB, it will be even better. Our two CBs have developed very well, imo, and I'd like to see more blitzes from a Wilks-run defense. We certainly need to address the safety position, though. Way too many wide-open WR running around the middle of the field this season.Gosh I guess I disagree with almost everyone. Well, whoever wants OL in the 1st and Wilkes as DC. I loved Wilkes as secondary coach but not so much as a blitz happy DC. But maybe experience helps and he could be a better DC this time around, I don't know. I just know I was not crazy about him as DC, and the secondary suffered from his absence. As far as OL I just don't see a step-right-in stud LOT happening mainly because schools just aren't turning them out. It's about the only or maybe the second thing I agreed with Gettleman about, we never took that 1st round LOT because the right one wasn't there; not because we didn't want one, I have to credit his discipline in that regard. I think we just missed one or two being there but they were snatched.
Our draft, DL, pass rush. Stack it up. Best player once that is done because lord knows we have plenty of positions open. We have so many spots to fill, as pointed out, it is gonna be tough.
And no one knows what to think about Cam, from where we sit. I think it could be a very big problem but the information to decide isn't available to fans. Probably a crap shoot if you are a doctor for that matter.
Not sure you can. Luke seemed like a luxury glad we made that pick. No team, no talking head, no one is 100% on draft choices.I can easily argue that for the panthers the bpa strategy is a huge failure.
Funchess - BPA, Shaq - BPA, Vernon-BPANot sure you can. Luke seemed like a luxury glad we made that pick. No team, no talking head, no one is 100% on draft choices.
We did need a receiver when we drafted Funchess. Shaq was ou led to take the place of TD who is always an injury risk and Vernon was drafted because we knew we couldn't keep the interior together.Funchess - BPA, Shaq - BPA, Vernon-BPA
3 drafts that DG's strategy buried us in the hole we are in now. We didnt a wideout that draft, sure as hell didnt need another linebacker and at the time we had short and star on the roster. Totally ignoring oline and pass rusher and safety. Gettlemans BPA strategy for us (now it may work for others) was a big failure as it pertains to this team. I dont like it and never have. If you have a hole on your roster and there is a guy that can help in fill that up then what does it matter if you reach a bit for said player if you have done your due diligence on him?
Like I said earlier it is imperative we draft a tackle in the first or second reach be damned. For instance if the best player on the board is a linebacker are you implying we should take that him over our actual more pressing needs? No man we have to fill out our roster instead of over drafting at postions
Dont get me wrong. Funchess was a head scratcher especially given the trade up. Butler was highly regarded but injury setbacks are hard to bake into the equation. And Shaq has shown promise if not so far consistently dazzling play. But with hindsight I am sure we could do better in every case. We could have made better decisions on our tackles a couple of years ago and be much better off today. This team has certainly made mistakes. And they have reached before for need with poor results. Bet we can all name a couple or 3. So for me rather than grab a guy a round early I'd try to grab the next Luke or CMC in those early rounds.Our cornerbacks are sort of better just this past season. 2 of them anyway. Truthfully it's hard to do worse than the way we went into 2016, that was a lot to fix. There does seem to be hope. Reid may be good seems like he is better acclimated and is at least an athlete. Too many big hits not enough wrap up mentality.
Basically I remember Wilkes as doing a lot with what he was given to work with, until 2016 which the lord himself would have had a hard time making lemonade out of that situation. But I was real happy with his work as secondary coach. Hey I'm just a fan, make no claims of being infallible, maybe I am way off in thinking Wilkes was an above average secondary coach and that he wasn't that great a DC.
The BPA vs need well I think early if a transcendent talent somehow falls to you then you take him regardless of position. Otherwise it is more of BPA at a position of need, and we have plenty so we should have some good options.
Past players mentioned, I didn't buy Funchess as best WR on the board let alone player. And on top, we traded up for him. I think I probably held reasonable hope he'd develop into a good #2 but that was about it. He was young, so you could have some patience but it's hard to justify sticking with him after this past season.
Butler was sort of a wtf for me, drafting two years into the future which personally I do like that way of thinking but you had better have a stacked roster to do it with a 1st round pick. As to whether he was the best available, there are guys who turned out better, but I think some other teams liked him too. I do feel like you are adding risk to something that is already a gamble when you take a guy from a smaller school/lesser conference.
I didn't have a huge problem with Shaq but haven't seen what I expected or hoped. Can't win them all.
He wasn’t a need with Stewart in place and a dozen guys available via fahe was also a need
There are some players that I'd be happy to give up a future first round pick for...Never give up a future 1st. Just don't.
As a Clemson fan, I admit I'm a little biased, but I'm telling you, this kid is special. 19 years old and is fearless in the pocket. Monday night's title game showed his poise and abilities on the grandest stage in college football..... I wish we could trade up to draft Trevor Lawrence when he hits the draft in 2021. I've watched every Clemson game and that kid is a phenom who already has a better arm than most NFL QBs. He's a 6'6 film-rat with an accurate canon who is described as a more athletic Peyton Manning (his childhood idol).
I think he will give some team 16 years of top QB play. WIsh/hope it is us.
We had a chance to get luck if ####### Jerry Richardson would have hire Harbaugh. Turns out he didnt even know who he was.There are some players that I'd be happy to give up a future first round pick for...
As a Clemson fan, I admit I'm a little biased, but I'm telling you, this kid is special. 19 years old and is fearless in the pocket. Monday night's title game showed his poise and abilities on the grandest stage in college football.
Several years ago when Luck came out the saying was "suck for Luck". I imagine there will be teams that will think about "Tanking for Trevor" or something. I think he is a transcendent talent that will change a franchise and make them competitive for years to come. I'd love for him to be a Panther.
I remember this. Didn't Luck stay in school when we had the first pick? And we drafted Cam instead.We had a chance to get luck if ####### Jerry Richardson would have hire Harbaugh. Turns out he didnt even know who he was.
Yes but conventional wisdom and common knowledge says he would have followed his beloved college coach to the pros given the chance. When Jerry was asked about it following firing John Fox he looked completely out of touch and didnt even seem to know who he was.I remember this. Didn't Luck stay in school when we had the first pick? And we drafted Cam instead.
I should have stipulated draft pick trades. Like moving back up into the first as we did in that Otah example using next year's first (plus whatever else there was... a 2nd and probably one more I don't remember). I don't mind giving future 4ths or 6ths so much but heck I'd have a real hard time giving up a 2nd to move up. Now would I trade my current first for a haul that included a 1 next year? Heck yes I would.
There are some players that I'd be happy to give up a future first round pick for...
hell no.Cam would definitely ner a first if his shoulder is good by the time of the trade. It isn't even a question.
Would you guys give up this years 1st for Antonio Brown? Pittsburgh wants to shop him. We have a strong connection to the Steelers. Would he be worth it? Is he too much of a diva?
NoCam would definitely ner a first if his shoulder is good by the time of the trade. It isn't even a question.
Would you guys give up this years 1st for Antonio Brown? Pittsburgh wants to shop him. We have a strong connection to the Steelers. Would he be worth it? Is he too much of a diva?
I like Brown but I wouldn't want to trade a first rounder for him. Just had a lot of people tell me they think we should and thought I'd get you guys take on it to see if I was the crazy one. Apparently I'm not.I'd say no to Brown. The timing is just wrong. Why invest that when you may not have anyone to get him the ball? And if you have to acquire someone to get him the ball what is left to get him with?
Nothing against Brown in a football sense, he is great, but I want to stop losing at the LOS.
No comments on Rivera being named DC?
I thought Smitty had some great thoughts on it, heard him on WFNZ today. There is probably a podcast up.
The Panthers are interviewing Perry Fewell for the secondary coach position.On Rivera I dont really like to see HC also coordinate. I think it's too much really. HC and DC are both full time jobs and require full focus. With that said the D improved noticeably under Ron so I guess we'll have to see.
Just listened to it.II thought Smitty had some great thoughts on it, heard him on WFNZ today. There is probably a podcast up.
End of an era. I do think time is starting to catch up to him. Saw him miss tackles he never would've before. And he seems to have lost some recovery speed for when he gets out of position. Still one of the all time Panthers. I can't imagine he won't retire as a Panther.
True. Its sad but part of it. The missing tackles and weird angles he took this year told me the time finally had caught up. Another thing that nobody seems to mention is that I also noticed Luke wasnt his usual self this season. Missed a lot of tackles and assignments during games. He was still good but it was strange seeing people run through him at times.End of an era. I do think time is starting to catch up to him. Saw him miss tackles he never would've before. And he seems to have lost some recovery speed for when he gets out of position. Still one of the all time Panthers. I can't imagine he won't retire as a Panther.
I think the root problem of many timeouts is Cam. He needs to be more aware of the time clock, and get back to the line or huddle quicker. Sometimes I think he is rattled from some of the hits he takes, and that makes him lose track of how much time has already ticked off the clock, cause it happens most often when he has just ran the ball.Not that Rivera does not have his faults. I just think most are exaggerated. I do believe he needs to hire an analytical assistant type to help with timeouts and stuff like that.
Or it may be thisI think the root problem of many timeouts is Cam. He needs to be more aware of the time clock, and get back to the line or huddle quicker. Sometimes I think he is rattled from some of the hits he takes, and that makes him lose track of how much time has already ticked off the clock, cause it happens most often when he has just ran the ball.
I knew what you were going to post before even looking. I don't think it is that, and other QBs do the first down sign too (Rivers did this past weekend after he ran for a first), but they make it back to the line in time to get the ball off before time expires.
Sean McVay, Andy Reid, Mike McCarthy, Kyle Shanahan, Frank Reich, Adam Gase, Pat Shurmur, Bill O'Brien, and Doug Pederson all called their offensive plays in 2018. I think John and Jay Gruden also were the offensive play callers in 2018.Smitty mentioned that Sean Payton is the Saints' OC.