Ruffrodys05
IBL Representative
The little Russian birdie in the window?Appreciate the response. Can you explain who you think spied on Trump while he was in office?
The little Russian birdie in the window?Appreciate the response. Can you explain who you think spied on Trump while he was in office?
Genuinely curious what that claim refers to.The little Russian birdie in the window?
No…you haven’t answered a thing.To posters that haven’t spent 5 years always defending their team regardless of how wrong they are and open to good dialogue I have, if not then you know where you fall. You can keep trolling if you want but I’m not a fan of your schtick and have asked you many times to just put me on ignore if you have an issue.
Russia has proven to be an excuse for taking an election loss and nothing more. Sorry but that’s fact at this point.
Someone posted what apparently was un redacted from Mueller. the response has been nothing about that…but a dismissive…who still believes type rants.Thank you. It’s this simple. If you still believe anything else it’s because you WANT to believe it in the face of all reality.
Yes... he has answered. His claim is accurate. He is caught up on RussiaNo…you haven’t answered a thing.
You just claim its trolling or schtick.
and no…russia isn’t just some excuse..you should actually try to catch up with what was claimed in the thread.
Dude, take a hint and move on.No…you haven’t answered a thing.
You just claim its trolling or schtick.
and no…russia isn’t just some excuse..you should actually try to catch up with what was claimed in the thread.
Thanks GB, it’s clear everyone is caught up on Russia except the last few keeping this fake conspiracy alive.Yes... he has answered. His claim is accurate. He is caught up on Russia
Best to do so…because we know you all wont want to actually address the topic honestly and review the information that was previously redacted. That is what bumped this topic.Dude, take a hint and move on.
Questioning whether Russia had eyes and ears on DJT prior to and during his tenure. You know, spying. Because they probably did. I also wonder if DJT unwittingly allowed it to happen as he was such good buds with Putin.Desert_Power said:Genuinely curious what that claim refers to.
I was referring to the claim from KD about spying on Trump when he was in office. More specifically, I'm trying to understand who Trump supporters claim has "spied" on Trump while in office.Questioning whether Russia had eyes and ears on DJT prior to and during his tenure. You know, spying. Because they probably did. I also wonder if DJT unwittingly allowed it to happen as he was such good buds with Putin.
Oh, I wasn't confused, I just took it on a tangent. My apologies.I was referring to the claim from KD about spying on Trump when he was in office. More specifically, I'm trying to understand who Trump supporters claim has "spied" on Trump while in office.
Sorry for the confusion.
Questioning whether Russia had eyes and ears on DJT prior to and during his tenure. You know, spying. Because they probably did. I also wonder if DJT unwittingly allowed it to happen as he was such good buds with Putin.
Questioning whether Russia had eyes and ears on DJT prior to and during his tenure. You know, spying. Because they probably did. I also wonder if DJT unwittingly allowed it to happen as he was such good buds with Putin.
The rest of the world has moved on from the ultimate nothingburger, at what point will they? For their sake I hope soon.It's like you aren't even trying to seek out the truth. You just keep speculating and speculating and that drives your mania. You and others just can't be bothered with anything other than wild conspiracy theories that support The NarrativeTM. Other people like you see your posts and then just continue to add to the wild speculation - and that is your truth.
Trump rules you guys with an iron fist.
No apology necessary. Just trying to get someone to enunciate the actual claim.Oh, I wasn't confused, I just took it on a tangent. My apologies.
See what I do is just follow what actual courts do and say. Like they convicted a whole bunch of Trumps people. I have not seen where anyone from the Biden camp has been convicted of things.knowledge dropper said:Making up a false story to undermine the free and fair election and then spying on a candidate and President in hopes to find snippets that you can craft to fit the false narrative you created from thin air.
We are still waiting for that Trump conviction from the Russia hoax, keep us posted.See what I do is just follow what actual courts do and say. Like they convicted a whole bunch of Trumps people. I have not seen where anyone from the Biden camp has been convicted of things.
Sure. As I’m still awaiting Obama to take my guns.We are still waiting for that Trump conviction from the Russia hoax, keep us posted.
You’ve got him this time! Don’t let up!Sure. As I’m still awaiting Obama to take my guns.
I think it’s hilarious how you root for the fraudster to beat your own government and get away with crimes. It really shows your true colors. It’s like rooting for Ray Lewis because he can get away with crimes. But hey that’s cool. We will still take care of you. We love you brother.You’ve got him this time! Don’t let up!
I actually just root for you to start using facts to back up your weak . Again, let us know when you lock up Trump. We are patiently waiting.I think it’s hilarious how you root for the fraudster to beat your own government and get away with crimes. It really shows your true colors. It’s like rooting for Ray Lewis because he can get away with crimes. But hey that’s cool. We will still take care of you. We love you brother.
I’m in favor of locking up all criminals. Mueller a probe did that. The fact that Trump let Qanon Flynn go just shows how black his heart is. I honestly couldn’t care less what happens to Trump and am actually appreciating watching him destroy the right with bluster and bravado, just like he did the left.I actually just root for you to start using facts to back up your weak . Again, let us know when you lock up Trump. We are patiently waiting.
It’s getting much worse. They may not have been spying on Trump but more likely planting fake evidence. Durham is hitting dingers.
https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2022/02/13/did-hillarys-campaign-plant-fabricated-evidence-to-frame-trump-n1558840
Sorry friend but you aren’t dealing in facts making it hard to take seriously and comes across as more trolling. If you deliver any results and lock Trump up as has been promised for years let us know. Best of luck!I’m in favor of locking up all criminals. Mueller a probe did that. The fact that Trump let Qanon Flynn go just shows how black his heart is. I honestly couldn’t care less what happens to Trump and am actually appreciating watching him destroy the right with bluster and bravado, just like he did the left.
Bump for the truth seekers in the morning crowd.dozer said:Please don't just scroll past this post.
The document I posted above yesterday is what has the right is frothing at the mouth about today.
It is the government’s (Durham’s) motion to inquire into potential conflicts of interest.The latest filing from the Durham investigation.
This document is being touted as proof that Russia….. didn’t happen, or whatever.
This thirteen-page document is supposed to make us all forget about the investigation that produced 37 indictments, seven guilty pleas or convictions, and compelling evidence that the president obstructed justice on multiple occasions.
Mueller also uncovered and referred 14 criminal matters to other components of the Department of Justice.
We are supposed to forget about the offer, acceptance, and action that occurred when senior members of the Trump campaign took a June 9, 2016, meeting with Russian nationals at Trump Tower, after outreach from an intermediary informed Trump, Jr., that the Russians had derogatory information on Clinton that was “part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.”
Offer, acceptance, action.
Trump had personally signed a letter of intent to build Trump Tower Moscow, yet he lied to all of us about it many times.
George Papadopoulos, Rick Gates, Michael Flynn, and Michael Cohen all admitted that they made false statements to federal investigators or to Congress about their contacts with Russians.
And then Roger Stone… Giuliani, Sydney Powell, oh my gosh!
It is absolutely exhausting to try and recall all of the many, many shady characters, disbarred lawyers, convicted felons, and miscellaneous grifters that are forever engrained into the disastrous Presidential legacy of Trump.
But nope. None of that matters now. Don’t you feel silly for believing all that witness testimony and evidence? The guilty pleas? The spiderweb of related crimes, and all that stuff you saw with your eyes and heard with your ears?
If you don’t feel silly, don’t worry. There is no need. This new filing is just another misdemeanor that has been blown out of proportion by the rightwing apparatus.
Durham will find a few things, there will be some low-level convictions, but There are no revelations. Don’t believe the wave of impending misinformation that is coming.
If you want to know the truth:
First!! Read the Governments Motion I linked above. IT IS the document in question. Not some partisan hacks version of it. (Durham is biased, but I would stop short of calling him a hack)
Then read this ridiculous statement by Kash Patel. Patel is a Trump pardon recipient, who played a key role in US national security for the entirety of the Trump Administration.
Then, please, I’m begging you, read this article from Marcy Wheeler as she calmly explains that statements like:
“… the Hillary Campaign, ordered … lawyers at Perkins Coie to orchestrate a criminal enterprise to fabricate a connection between President Trump and Russia.”
…are absurdly false.
Then, please read this short twitter thread on the technology involved. This is really where the rubber hits the road in the outlandish accusations going on right now.
TIA
The Democrats would be crazy to convict Trump at this point, he’s their best hope of destroying the current radical Republican Party.Sorry friend but you aren’t dealing in facts making it hard to take seriously and comes across as more trolling. If you deliver any results and lock Trump up as has been promised for years let us know. Best of luck!
A wise poster said attacking the source and not the story is “lazy posting.” I agree.PJ Media
Questionable Reasoning: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Poor Sourcing, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA (45/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
I would love to hear from some legitimate news sources on this story if you happen to see anything…
You thought the president of the United States could get locked up?Sorry friend but you aren’t dealing in facts making it hard to take seriously and comes across as more trolling. If you deliver any results and lock Trump up as has been promised for years let us know. Best of luck!
Tip of the hat for A+ schtick heredozer said:Please don't just scroll past this post.
""Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake." - Napoleon Bonaparte
The Democrats would be crazy to convict Trump at this point, he’s their best hope of destroying the current radical Republican Party.
Wait, the conspiracy kooks are suggesting that White House servers were hacked into to plant fake evidence against Trump? Ah hahahahahaha
So he can call people Kooks but smily faces are the “bullying” that goes on here? Interesting who gets a pass here while banning others isn’t it?Pro-Tip, James: Conspiracy kooks shouldn't be pointing fingers at other people and calling them "conspiracy kooks".
I mean, you and your side believed in Russian collusion, pee-tapes and EVERY anti-Trump Twitter post as 100% fact (and still do).
When you find your self in a hole, stop digging.
Kooks now bothers you? And I said conspiracy kooks.So he can call people Kooks but smily faces are the “bullying” that goes on here? Interesting who gets a pass here while banning others isn’t it?
Please dont, be better than this.Kooks now bothers you? And I said conspiracy kooks.
Ok, now I do think that you use the crying emoji so much because so many things bother you.
My bad.
Its just that your source is so terrible. It’s not a source at all, but a propaganda machine.A wise poster said attacking the source and not the story is “lazy posting.” I agree.
Also, did you even look at my post I bumped this morning?A wise poster said attacking the source and not the story is “lazy posting.” I agree.
I appreciate the work you put in, but Hillary and her crew are going down for this one. This is becoming every bit as big a story as 1/6. Some high profile people did some awful things in 2016 to taint that election and President. I think we all hope they pay for it and it won’t be another whitewash like Epstein or some of the Clinton scandals of the past.Also, did you even look at my post I bumped this morning?
Lazy?
I go to great lengths to get to the truth. I use multiple sources from right and left wing sources.
I post court documents, testimony, and verified reports…
I even posted some technical analysis on the DNS nothing burger being touted as “bigger than watergate…”
And you post one hyperlink to pjmedia. You don’t even give it a little analysis of your own.
Lazy…. Please.
You should be thanking me…
Listen, there is a story here.
Some crimes committed by the Hillary campaign.
But posting premature ramblings about made up criminal organizations are political fantasy, and none of it excuses the many, many indictments and guilty pleas from Trump world.
If she did something wrong…take it to court…prove it…put her away. Is anyone arguing in support of her? Problem us…even her actions will not justify Trump’s (through his campaign) wrongdoing.I appreciate the work you put in, but Hillary and her crew are going down for this one. This is becoming every bit as big a story as 1/6. Some high profile people did some awful things in 2016 to taint that election and President. I think we all hope they pay for it and it won’t be another whitewash like Epstein or some of the Clinton scandals of the past.
I’m old enough to remember when he tried to convince Joe that smily faces are bullying….yet he continues with that and as you mentioned the multiple aliases. I don’t get it, oh well.Todd Andrew’s back in town
Still baffled by the idiotic decision with Perinne on 3rd & 1Heck of a SB last night eh buddy?
Locking him out is fine. I don’t personally care what happens to Donald Trump. I just don’t want a civil war because my kids have to live here.Sorry friend but you aren’t dealing in facts making it hard to take seriously and comes across as more trolling. If you deliver any results and lock Trump up as has been promised for years let us know. Best of luck!
This is going to be part of the problem when Durham starts rolling out the indictments. The legacy media is so invested and on record as having gobbled up this hoax that they really have no choice but to pointedly ignore anything here. They're certainly ignoring it now.PJ Media
Questionable Reasoning: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Poor Sourcing, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA (45/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
I would love to hear from some legitimate news sources on this story if you happen to see anything…
No...if Durham rolls out actual indictments for things...AP, Reuters and the like will cover this. They won't opine on it like the fringe sites. And yes, PJ Media is a fringe type site. Low on factual reporting for a reason. Id much rather see the fox link that PJ or Redstate or GatewayPundit types.This is going to be part of the problem when Durham starts rolling out the indictments. The legacy media is so invested and on record as having gobbled up this hoax that they really have no choice but to pointedly ignore anything here. They're certainly ignoring it now.
This thing is so toxic to the mainstream media that they'll ignore it until Hillary gets dragged into court. Because of that you'll see right leaning, Fox, and maybe some middle of the road (WSJ, etc.) give this some coverage.
I look forward to seeing the court papers that back this up and not concern myself so much with who is covering it.
I hope you read my post above that included the court papers you seek.This is going to be part of the problem when Durham starts rolling out the indictments. The legacy media is so invested and on record as having gobbled up this hoax that they really have no choice but to pointedly ignore anything here. They're certainly ignoring it now.
This thing is so toxic to the mainstream media that they'll ignore it until Hillary gets dragged into court. Because of that you'll see right leaning, Fox, and maybe some middle of the road (WSJ, etc.) give this some coverage.
I look forward to seeing the court papers that back this up and not concern myself so much with who is covering it.