What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The Trent Richardson Thread (2 Viewers)

Why is anyone waiting or relying on FBG for breaking news when there are several apps on mobile devices that are far faster and reliable?
Not the point.

Why Subscribe?

5. BREAKING NEWS EMAIL UPDATES

One of the features subscribers continually tell us is the most useful is our Breaking News Email Updates. When you have our staff of 40+ guys, plus a network of thousands of contacts across the country, it's a fantastic "grapevine" for obtaining news and insights.

When the local radio announces Peyton Manning tweaked a hamstring in practice 10 minutes ago, you'll know about it with a Footballguys Breaking News Email. It's like being plugged into the world's best information network. Our readers will consistently be aware of breaking news.
 
Why is anyone waiting or relying on FBG for breaking news when there are several apps on mobile devices that are far faster and reliable?
Not the point.
Why Subscribe?5. BREAKING NEWS EMAIL UPDATESOne of the features subscribers continually tell us is the most useful is our Breaking News Email Updates. When you have our staff of 40+ guys, plus a network of thousands of contacts across the country, it's a fantastic "grapevine" for obtaining news and insights.When the local radio announces Peyton Manning tweaked a hamstring in practice 10 minutes ago, you'll know about it with a Footballguys Breaking News Email. It's like being plugged into the world's best information network. Our readers will consistently be aware of breaking news.
Not trying to dismiss your point. Just making a statement. I haven't subscribed for years.

 
Off the top of my head I can't think of many running back trades were the team getting the running back has got the better end of the deal. Marshall Faulk deal might be the one notable exception.
Corey Dillon was a true beast for the Patriots in the 2004 season and helped them win their last Super Bowl. I'm not sure who the Bengals took with the second round pick the Pats traded for Dillon, but it seems worth it given the Lombardi Trophy outcome.
Except they had already won two SB's with the worst starting RB in the AFC at the time.
This means nothing in relation to 2004.
It's pretty good evidence that the importance of RB is grossly overrated. As is the Colts finally breaking thru after they replaced Edge James with a couple Schmos'.

 
Why is anyone waiting or relying on FBG for breaking news when there are several apps on mobile devices that are far faster and reliable?
Not the point.

Why Subscribe?

5. BREAKING NEWS EMAIL UPDATES

One of the features subscribers continually tell us is the most useful is our Breaking News Email Updates. When you have our staff of 40+ guys, plus a network of thousands of contacts across the country, it's a fantastic "grapevine" for obtaining news and insights.

When the local radio announces Peyton Manning tweaked a hamstring in practice 10 minutes ago, you'll know about it with a Footballguys Breaking News Email. It's like being plugged into the world's best information network. Our readers will consistently be aware of breaking news.
Screw this... you guys are turning a huge NFL trade into a complaint against Football Guys because you didn't get an e-mail. A) get a twitter account. B) take a brake from Magical Football once and a while and enjoy real live football C) Don't be that Guy.

 
@JeffDarlington: A Browns starter tells me: "It makes sense. Trent has some things he needs to figure out before he becomes a dominant player in the league."

This, as a TRich owner, scares me. I think it says a lot and there is a lot that we don't know....behind closed doors.
How many Browns starters have things all figured out and are dominant?

 
FBG email about the Richardson trade?

I'm still waiting for D. Dodds' email explaining why he projected AJ Green as the number 2 WR in week 2, knowing he was going to be shadowed by Ike Taylor all night on MNF.

 
I don't think this is as slam dunk for trich as people are saying. Teams with GREAT qbs, and I think Luck is on that path, don't build their teams around what a RB will bring to the table. The RB benefits from Rodgers or Bree's, not the other way around.

At best, I see this as a sjax to Atlanta in the best case scenario but definitely not as good as even a few months ago when people were drooling that trich would get a ton of carries in Cleveland and be the focal point. The colts want a power running game. Don't misinterpret that for "we want to run all the time". They just want a physical and reliable player that can clinch games and move the chains, not some guy that they are going to waste all their offensive talent behind and just sit back and hand it to all day.

I think this move solidifies trich in the sense that he is probably now a safer top 10 guy but in no way do I see it as it makes him a better ff play (like, he's now a top 3-4 RB).

 
@JeffDarlington: A Browns starter tells me: "It makes sense. Trent has some things he needs to figure out before he becomes a dominant player in the league."

This, as a TRich owner, scares me. I think it says a lot and there is a lot that we don't know....behind closed doors.
How many Browns starters have things all figured out and are dominant?
I am 2-0 in a league where I have Andrew Luck as QB and Trent Richardson and LeSean McCoy at RB... I have Josh Gordon on my Bench... Holding on all these players.... PATIENCE.

 
RBs are commodities in today's NFL. A team with so many holes, like Cleveland, doesn't really gain anything by having a stud or perceived stud at RB. They need help at so many positions. Richardson was a luxury they didn't need.
Yeah, teams don't need young, talented players. You're absolutely right.

 
Why is anyone waiting or relying on FBG for breaking news when there are several apps on mobile devices that are far faster and reliable?
Not the point.
Why Subscribe?5. BREAKING NEWS EMAIL UPDATESOne of the features subscribers continually tell us is the most useful is our Breaking News Email Updates. When you have our staff of 40+ guys, plus a network of thousands of contacts across the country, it's a fantastic "grapevine" for obtaining news and insights.When the local radio announces Peyton Manning tweaked a hamstring in practice 10 minutes ago, you'll know about it with a Footballguys Breaking News Email. It's like being plugged into the world's best information network. Our readers will consistently be aware of breaking news.
Not trying to dismiss your point. Just making a statement.I haven't subscribed for years.
Understood. I've been a subscriber for years, and honestly "breaking news emails" isn't the reason I keep paying every year. But this news broke hours ago and I still don't have an email. That's insane and totally inexcusable. I don't want to hear about "Joe has a life, it's Wednesday night," etc. This is his business - he shouldn't tout breaking news updates if he's not actually prepared or equipped to send them out. This is likely to be one of the biggest NFL news items all year long, and they totally dropped the ball.

 
Off the top of my head I can't think of many running back trades were the team getting the running back has got the better end of the deal. Marshall Faulk deal might be the one notable exception.
Why did the Colts get the better end of the deal?

Most posts saying the Colts crushed the trade don't have much to back it up with. Just sayin...
I made the post because I am not sure the Colts did get the better end of the deal. The value of a running back in the real NFL is a lot lower than it is in fantasy football that is for sure.
I read your post wrong....and confused it with another right around it. :thumbup:

 
@JeffDarlington: A Browns starter tells me: "It makes sense. Trent has some things he needs to figure out before he becomes a dominant player in the league."

This, as a TRich owner, scares me. I think it says a lot and there is a lot that we don't know....behind closed doors.
How many Browns starters have things all figured out and are dominant?
I think he was saying that if this kid figures it all out he will dominant because he has the talent. Some people have it figured out and are at the peak of their performance and will never be dominant because they don't have the physical talent.

 
Off the top of my head I can't think of many running back trades were the team getting the running back has got the better end of the deal. Marshall Faulk deal might be the one notable exception.
Why did the Colts get the better end of the deal?

Most posts saying the Colts crushed the trade don't have much to back it up with. Just sayin...
I made the post because I am not sure the Colts did get the better end of the deal. The value of a running back in the real NFL is a lot lower than it is in fantasy football that is for sure.
I read your post wrong....and confused it with another right around it. :thumbup:
It's a wait and see trade....unfortunately only a few people will remember this trade when it actually pans out...

 
Off the top of my head I can't think of many running back trades were the team getting the running back has got the better end of the deal. Marshall Faulk deal might be the one notable exception.
Corey Dillon was a true beast for the Patriots in the 2004 season and helped them win their last Super Bowl. I'm not sure who the Bengals took with the second round pick the Pats traded for Dillon, but it seems worth it given the Lombardi Trophy outcome.
Except they had already won two SB's with the worst starting RB in the AFC at the time.
This means nothing in relation to 2004.
It's pretty good evidence that the importance of RB is grossly overrated. As is the Colts finally breaking thru after they replaced Edge James with a couple Schmos'.
As a Pats fan, I watched all their games in their entirety over the Super Bowl years span. They definitely road Dillon much more than they road Antowain Smith. When the Pats got the lead in games during the 2004 season they turned 'Clock Killin' Corey Dillon to salt the game away to a far greater degree than they did with Antowain Smith. This may sound blasphemous to Brady lovers (of which I am one), but Dillon may have been just as important to that 2004 offense as Brady was.
 
Why is anyone waiting or relying on FBG for breaking news when there are several apps on mobile devices that are far faster and reliable?
Not the point.
Why Subscribe?5. BREAKING NEWS EMAIL UPDATESOne of the features subscribers continually tell us is the most useful is our Breaking News Email Updates. When you have our staff of 40+ guys, plus a network of thousands of contacts across the country, it's a fantastic "grapevine" for obtaining news and insights.When the local radio announces Peyton Manning tweaked a hamstring in practice 10 minutes ago, you'll know about it with a Footballguys Breaking News Email. It's like being plugged into the world's best information network. Our readers will consistently be aware of breaking news.
Not trying to dismiss your point. Just making a statement.I haven't subscribed for years.
Understood. I've been a subscriber for years, and honestly "breaking news emails" isn't the reason I keep paying every year. But this news broke hours ago and I still don't have an email. That's insane and totally inexcusable. I don't want to hear about "Joe has a life, it's Wednesday night," etc. This is his business - he shouldn't tout breaking news updates if he's not actually prepared or equipped to send them out. This is likely to be one of the biggest NFL news items all year long, and they totally dropped the ball.
You not receiving an email <> no email being sent out

 
Richardson owner & Browns fan chiming in here:

I'm definitely in the "Richardson is better than his traditional stats" camp - I've seen a lot of him making guys miss, it's just that there's usually like 3 other guys right there to make the play anyway.

That said, I'm genuinely excited for this trade. The Browns have not focused on the passing game nearly enough since they've come back, and it doesn't help that our fanbase is constantly saying the team has to be more TOUGH & PHYSICAL when tough & physical isn't what wins in the NFL anymore. This move tells me this team is done with taking chances on the Quinns & Weedens in the lower 1st round, and wants a truly top-3 level prospect at the most important position. Sure, that QB is no guarantee, but the current route IS a guarantee...for no Super Bowl anytime soon.

I also like how this regime has realized just how awful last year's 1st-round picks were and is focusing ASAP on doing what they can to correct them, and realizes that you just cannot build a team around a RB in this era. No RB should be drafted in the 1st round anymore unless you KNOW he's the next Peterson or Tomlinson, or you already have a good team and he's an obviously perfect fit for your offense (e.g. Edgerrin James, kinda)...we know Richardson didn't meet the second criteria, and I would bet strongly on him not meeting the first one either.

Basically, the Browns already have a good number of pieces in place to be a playoff team, but also have a few much bigger needs than RB - a franchise QB, a real CB opposite Haden, a real WR opposite Gordon, and more o-line depth. At this point I would far rather have any of those than Richardson.

So overall I love the deal for us, and am skeptical of how well it works out for Indy. TBH I think it's more likely than not they completely miss the playoffs this year, given how much stronger teams like KC/SD/TEN/MIA look now. Even if they get in, another one-and-done would be a poor result for what they gave up.

 
Why is anyone waiting or relying on FBG for breaking news when there are several apps on mobile devices that are far faster and reliable?
Not the point.
Why Subscribe?5. BREAKING NEWS EMAIL UPDATESOne of the features subscribers continually tell us is the most useful is our Breaking News Email Updates. When you have our staff of 40+ guys, plus a network of thousands of contacts across the country, it's a fantastic "grapevine" for obtaining news and insights.When the local radio announces Peyton Manning tweaked a hamstring in practice 10 minutes ago, you'll know about it with a Footballguys Breaking News Email. It's like being plugged into the world's best information network. Our readers will consistently be aware of breaking news.
Not trying to dismiss your point. Just making a statement.I haven't subscribed for years.
Understood. I've been a subscriber for years, and honestly "breaking news emails" isn't the reason I keep paying every year. But this news broke hours ago and I still don't have an email. That's insane and totally inexcusable. I don't want to hear about "Joe has a life, it's Wednesday night," etc. This is his business - he shouldn't tout breaking news updates if he's not actually prepared or equipped to send them out. This is likely to be one of the biggest NFL news items all year long, and they totally dropped the ball.
Agreed. If I paid, I'd be upset. There should be a far better system in place than this. Poor planning at the very least is displayed here. Nobody is saying Joe can't have a life. Have one, but put a system in place to handle situations like this. Epic fail here IMO. This is as you said, likely to be the biggest new break of the season as it relates to FF.

 
Off the top of my head I can't think of many running back trades were the team getting the running back has got the better end of the deal. Marshall Faulk deal might be the one notable exception.
Corey Dillon was a true beast for the Patriots in the 2004 season and helped them win their last Super Bowl. I'm not sure who the Bengals took with the second round pick the Pats traded for Dillon, but it seems worth it given the Lombardi Trophy outcome.
Except they had already won two SB's with the worst starting RB in the AFC at the time.
This means nothing in relation to 2004.
It's pretty good evidence that the importance of RB is grossly overrated. As is the Colts finally breaking thru after they replaced Edge James with a couple Schmos'.
As a Pats fan, I watched all their games in their entirety over the Super Bowl years span. They definitely road Dillon much more than they road Antowain Smith. When the Pats got the lead in games during the 2004 season they turned 'Clock Killin' Corey Dillon to salt the game away to a far greater degree than they did with Antowain Smith. This may sound blasphemous to Brady lovers (of which I am one), but Dillon may have been just as important to that 2004 offense as Brady was.
Well what do you know, apparently I'm a Brady lover. Who knew? :)

There's only one person as responsible as #12 for any of their Super Bowls and that's Walt Coleman.

 
Why is anyone waiting or relying on FBG for breaking news when there are several apps on mobile devices that are far faster and reliable?
Not the point.
Why Subscribe?5. BREAKING NEWS EMAIL UPDATESOne of the features subscribers continually tell us is the most useful is our Breaking News Email Updates. When you have our staff of 40+ guys, plus a network of thousands of contacts across the country, it's a fantastic "grapevine" for obtaining news and insights.When the local radio announces Peyton Manning tweaked a hamstring in practice 10 minutes ago, you'll know about it with a Footballguys Breaking News Email. It's like being plugged into the world's best information network. Our readers will consistently be aware of breaking news.
Not trying to dismiss your point. Just making a statement.I haven't subscribed for years.
Understood. I've been a subscriber for years, and honestly "breaking news emails" isn't the reason I keep paying every year. But this news broke hours ago and I still don't have an email. That's insane and totally inexcusable. I don't want to hear about "Joe has a life, it's Wednesday night," etc. This is his business - he shouldn't tout breaking news updates if he's not actually prepared or equipped to send them out. This is likely to be one of the biggest NFL news items all year long, and they totally dropped the ball.
I think it's important to note that most subscribers got this email hours ago. Spam filter maybe?

 
this is waiving the white flag 2 games in though

that's pretty unprecedented, even jax is pretending they have a chance
So are they waiving the white flag forever? They just traded a second year RB who they gave up a ton for. You don't make this kind of trade unless you are not satisfied with a players on field performance, chance to improve as a player, or attitude.
forever?

where did i say forever

waiving the white flag on this season
You didn't, but you don't throw away a second year guy who you invested a ton into if you are just throwing away one season. You hold on to that guy and build with him unless there is more to this then we know. I believe they are not satisfied with either his future on the field or his attitude.
This is right on. There's got to be more to this.

 
This sums it up pretty nicely.

The Indianapolis Colts’ rebuilding project, one brought on by Peyton Manning’s injury and subsequent departure, more or less ended the moment they took Andrew Luck No. 1 overall in 2012. It officially ended Wednesday when they dealt away their 2014 first-rounder for running back Trent Richardson.

This is a franchise that believes two things: 1. That it can win the Super Bowl right now, this season; and 2. That it does not really need a first-round pick next May.

The reasoning behind both trains of thought are born from the work Indianapolis has done since muddling through that miserable 2-14 season. They hired Ryan Grigson as general manager almost immediately after that year wrapped, and he proceeded to mold the roster using all avenues available to him.

Grigson traded for CB Vontae Davis, FB Stanley Havili (a key piece in first-year offensive coordinator Pep Hamilton’s scheme), LB Kelvin Sheppard and others. He chased WR Darrius Heyward-Bey, OT Gosder Cherulis, NT Aubrayo Franklin, DT Ricky Jean-Francois and CB Greg Toler in free agency. And, most importantly, he made his draft picks count — Luck, T.Y. Hilton, Coby Fleener, Dwayne Allen, Bjoern Werner, Hugh Thornton.

Indianapolis was not as decimated as that 2-14 record would have you believe when Grigson stepped in as GM. Less than two years later, the Colts are a legitimate contender in a relatively unimpressive AFC.

This is a young roster, with most of its key pieces locked into place for years to come. It’s not perfect — the offensive line still needs help, as does the defense. Grigson could have utilized that 2014 first-rounder to bring in another building block, but the opportunity presented itself to add one overnight.

Is there an element of risk here? Absolutely. A pretty substantial one, in fact.

For all his obvious talent and the hype he brought with him out of Alabama, Richardson is a relatively unproven NFL commodity. Though he totaled more than 1,300 yards last season, Richardson has a career yards-per-carry average of 3.5 and has struggled to stay healthy. Plus, there’s this, as told to the NFL Network’s Jeff Darlington by an anonymous Browns player: “Trent has some things he needs to figure out before he becomes a dominant player in the league.”

The Browns opted to roll with the possibilities presented by a loaded 2014 draft class rather than wait for Richardson to become a star. They did not view him as a fit in their new offense or in their new approach.

The Colts do, and with good reason.

Richardson is an able runner, sure, but he also can get out of the backfield and catch passes (51 receptions last season). And the threat of him taking off with the football ought to be enough to keep defenses honest, thus opening up the field for Luck. Last season, Luck completed 63.7 of his passes (65-for-102) off of play-action, according to Pro Football Focus; he was at just 52.2 percent on straight drops. The Colts now can utilize those fakes more consistently — and more effectively — with Richardson and Ahmad Bradshaw paired in the backfield.

Hamilton’s playbook is built for a player of Richardson’s ilk to carry the load. In his two seasons as Stanford’s offensive coordinator, Hamilton helped produce rushing totals of 1,330 and 1,530, respectively, for Stepfan Taylor (the former came with Luck at QB). Hamilton wants to use his running backs often, in a variety of ways.

It appeared that he might have a chance to do so when Indianapolis brought in Ahmad Bradshaw to join Vick Ballard. Bradshaw, though, spent the entire offseason rehabbing after foot surgery, and Ballard just went down for the season with an injury of his own.

The Colts knew they could contend in the AFC South, possibly even on a larger stage. They also knew — and owner Jim Irsay said as much on Twitter over the weekend — that the backfield situation was unsteady.

Some may argue that it still is, at least until Richardson proves he can stay healthy and take off as a No. 1 back. For the Colts, the potential for him to pull that off was worth the high price tag Grigson had to pay to pry Richardson from Cleveland.

Indianapolis’ GM can justify such a purchase because of everything he had done leading up to Wednesday’s trade.

The Browns feel as if they have to focus on the future. The Colts’ future has already arrived.
 
I don't think this is as slam dunk for trich as people are saying. Teams with GREAT qbs, and I think Luck is on that path, don't build their teams around what a RB will bring to the table. The RB benefits from Rodgers or Bree's, not the other way around.

At best, I see this as a sjax to Atlanta in the best case scenario but definitely not as good as even a few months ago when people were drooling that trich would get a ton of carries in Cleveland and be the focal point. The colts want a power running game. Don't misinterpret that for "we want to run all the time". They just want a physical and reliable player that can clinch games and move the chains, not some guy that they are going to waste all their offensive talent behind and just sit back and hand it to all day.

I think this move solidifies trich in the sense that he is probably now a safer top 10 guy but in no way do I see it as it makes him a better ff play (like, he's now a top 3-4 RB).
I see your point. That said, doesn't the Luck/TRich duo remind you a little of Manning/Edge? That worked out pretty well for Edge owners. Sometimes the pass sets up the run, right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Off the top of my head I can't think of many running back trades were the team getting the running back has got the better end of the deal. Marshall Faulk deal might be the one notable exception.
Why did the Colts get the better end of the deal?

Most posts saying the Colts crushed the trade don't have much to back it up with. Just sayin...
The Colts have a QB and solid WR core. Now they have one of the better young RBs in the league. They crushed the trade. The immediacy of a top back in hand far outweighs a future draft pick.... what else do you you need to know... Just saying...

 
I don't think this is as slam dunk for trich as people are saying. Teams with GREAT qbs, and I think Luck is on that path, don't build their teams around what a RB will bring to the table. The RB benefits from Rodgers or Bree's, not the other way around.

At best, I see this as a sjax to Atlanta in the best case scenario but definitely not as good as even a few months ago when people were drooling that trich would get a ton of carries in Cleveland and be the focal point. The colts want a power running game. Don't misinterpret that for "we want to run all the time". They just want a physical and reliable player that can clinch games and move the chains, not some guy that they are going to waste all their offensive talent behind and just sit back and hand it to all day.

I think this move solidifies trich in the sense that he is probably now a safer top 10 guy but in no way do I see it as it makes him a better ff play (like, he's now a top 3-4 RB).
I see your point. That said, doesn't the Luck/TRich duo remind you a little of Manning/Edge? That worked out pretty well for Edge owners. Sometimes the pass sets up the run, right?
Actually I think Irsay thinks this is Marshall Faulk Parte II.

 
I know I'm in the minority on this...and I know tons of people are going to scream and hollar...

But I think that from a real life football talent perspective, Richardson is overrated as hell. I'm a Dolphins fan and from what I witnessed last weekend that kid left quite a few yards on the field. There were some holes there and he missed them. I know the Fins have a good front 7 but there were opportunities there that a more explosive back would have taken advantage of.

Fantasy is a completely different animal and he'll never see an 8 or 9 man front ever again in Indy so I'm sure he'll do well there....but in my eyes he's not an elite talent. I think the Browns getting a first rounder for him isn't a terrible deal...especially when they weren't going to win this year anyways with him.

RB shelf life is about 20 minutes in the NFL to begin with, which is why I can't understand for the life of me why a GM would ever take one in the first round...much less the top 10. But getting a first rounder in return for a prior regimes mistakes isn't the worst deal in the world.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why is anyone waiting or relying on FBG for breaking news when there are several apps on mobile devices that are far faster and reliable?
Any specific recommendations? I don't have any.

Why is anyone waiting or relying on FBG for breaking news when there are several apps on mobile devices that are far faster and reliable?
Not the point.

Why Subscribe?

5. BREAKING NEWS EMAIL UPDATES

One of the features subscribers continually tell us is the most useful is our Breaking News Email Updates. When you have our staff of 40+ guys, plus a network of thousands of contacts across the country, it's a fantastic "grapevine" for obtaining news and insights.

When the local radio announces Peyton Manning tweaked a hamstring in practice 10 minutes ago, you'll know about it with a Footballguys Breaking News Email. It's like being plugged into the world's best information network. Our readers will consistently be aware of breaking news.
Screw this... you guys are turning a huge NFL trade into a complaint against Football Guys because you didn't get an e-mail. A) get a twitter account. B) take a brake from Magical Football once and a while and enjoy real live football C) Don't be that Guy.
I do not want to follow twitter.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I still haven't received an email about this from FBG, which is absurd. I don't want to get in the middle of a debate about the merits of twitter and whatnot. At this point, hours after news of the trade broke, I should have an email.
True, surprised.

By the way, I still haven't gotten one.
Strange.. I received an email around 45 minutes after this thread was started. So a little :confused: why you hadn't received it when you posted this.
 
Off the top of my head I can't think of many running back trades were the team getting the running back has got the better end of the deal. Marshall Faulk deal might be the one notable exception.
Why did the Colts get the better end of the deal? Most posts saying the Colts crushed the trade don't have much to back it up with. Just sayin...
The Colts have a QB and solid WR core. Now they have one of the better young RBs in the league. They crushed the trade. The immediacy of a top back in hand far outweighs a future draft pick.... what else do you you need to know... Just saying...
Yep. That about sums it up. Colts>>>Browns in this deal. Unless we find out that TRich has a drug problem or went Aaron Hernandez on a bunch of people, the Browns did not get good value for TRich back.

 
Off the top of my head I can't think of many running back trades were the team getting the running back has got the better end of the deal. Marshall Faulk deal might be the one notable exception.
Why did the Colts get the better end of the deal?

Most posts saying the Colts crushed the trade don't have much to back it up with. Just sayin...
The Colts have a QB and solid WR core. Now they have one of the better young RBs in the league. They crushed the trade. The immediacy of a top back in hand far outweighs a future draft pick.... what else do you you need to know... Just saying...
I like what YOU bolded. That immediacy does not compute for the Browns, if you have watched them play.

What you didn't note, is that the Browns do not have a franchise QB or a solid WR core.

I didn't say the Browns crushed the trade. Just sayin....

 
NFL mobile and Sportscenter app are both on my phone.... Seeing you don't like twitter.

One of them had it alert my phone around 6, not sure which one.

 
@JeffDarlington: A Browns starter tells me: "It makes sense. Trent has some things he needs to figure out before he becomes a dominant player in the league."

This, as a TRich owner, scares me. I think it says a lot and there is a lot that we don't know....behind closed doors.
How many Browns starters have things all figured out and are dominant?
I think he was saying that if this kid figures it all out he will dominant because he has the talent. Some people have it figured out and are at the peak of their performance and will never be dominant because they don't have the physical talent.
You may be right. The way I read the post was "uh oh, some unnamed Browns player says Richardson needs to figure things out so there must be trouble with Richardson." Which I'm not buying. I figure the Browns know they're going to lose most of their games with Richardson on the roster, so why not beef up their draft for next year since they can lose games without Richardson?

 
I got a breaking news email from Joe Bryant about an hour after as Schefter broke the news on twitter. (Hardly breaking news at that point) Some of you need to check your account settings.

 
The NFL has precious few in-season trades.

But this isn't like basketball or baseball where the new player can fit in so quickly.

I think this is a wash value or decrease in value for Richardson, IMO. Seems like the gut reaction is to be a trader FOR T.Rich.. If I was a T.Rich owner (which I'm not) I don't like this very much and don't expect much moving forward... then again.. if something was wrong with Weeden it could be the player wasn't going to materialize into 1st round value anyway... or even 2nd round for that matter.

 
Why is anyone waiting or relying on FBG for breaking news when there are several apps on mobile devices that are far faster and reliable?
Not the point.

Why Subscribe?

5. BREAKING NEWS EMAIL UPDATES

One of the features subscribers continually tell us is the most useful is our Breaking News Email Updates. When you have our staff of 40+ guys, plus a network of thousands of contacts across the country, it's a fantastic "grapevine" for obtaining news and insights.

When the local radio announces Peyton Manning tweaked a hamstring in practice 10 minutes ago, you'll know about it with a Footballguys Breaking News Email. It's like being plugged into the world's best information network. Our readers will consistently be aware of breaking news.
Where do they say they will be breaking the news or even getting their take out in a fast manner? Read that again. When this stuff happens the good owners react.

 
Why is anyone waiting or relying on FBG for breaking news when there are several apps on mobile devices that are far faster and reliable?
Not the point.
Why Subscribe?5. BREAKING NEWS EMAIL UPDATESOne of the features subscribers continually tell us is the most useful is our Breaking News Email Updates. When you have our staff of 40+ guys, plus a network of thousands of contacts across the country, it's a fantastic "grapevine" for obtaining news and insights.When the local radio announces Peyton Manning tweaked a hamstring in practice 10 minutes ago, you'll know about it with a Footballguys Breaking News Email. It's like being plugged into the world's best information network. Our readers will consistently be aware of breaking news.
Not trying to dismiss your point. Just making a statement.I haven't subscribed for years.
Understood. I've been a subscriber for years, and honestly "breaking news emails" isn't the reason I keep paying every year. But this news broke hours ago and I still don't have an email. That's insane and totally inexcusable. I don't want to hear about "Joe has a life, it's Wednesday night," etc. This is his business - he shouldn't tout breaking news updates if he's not actually prepared or equipped to send them out. This is likely to be one of the biggest NFL news items all year long, and they totally dropped the ball.
I am not sure why some people didnt get emails.. I got an email with in an hour of hearing about it.

 
and what exactly are people looking for in that email, how they should babysit their team going forward if they t-rich?

just seems silly to ##### about that, look at all the good stuff you get from being a subscriber.. an email about t-rich being traded when the whole world all know seems silly to complain about it.

thats just me though

 
Some of you are complaining about an email that may have come an hour after the trade... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I hope you guys complaining aren't serious because if you are, you have reached a new low.

 
and what exactly are people looking for in that email, how they should babysit their team going forward if they t-rich?

just seems silly to ##### about that, look at all the good stuff you get from being a subscriber.. an email about t-rich being traded when the whole world all know seems silly to complain about it.

thats just me though
Maybe they would have appreciated the heads up to take a flyer on another CLE RB? :shrug:

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top