I didn't say he could continue at his YPC last season and have success. I just said he has to be good enough to hold onto the starting job (which he wasn't las year).
Somehow there is this perception that an RB is worthless unless he averages > 4.0 YPCand he won't get many touches. According to the data, over the past 4 seasons, roughly 30% of the RBs with more than 200 carries in a given year have done so with a sub 4.0 YPC.
Again, kudos for bringing some data to the discussion, but it really doesn't help your case at all. A 30% chance at 200 carries isn't good to begin with, and zero RBs who reached 200 carries had a ypc as low Richardson.I think you're the only one who brought up the magic 4.0 number, but what you basically said is if Richardson plays much better than he did last year, he can be relevant in fantasy. Nothing earth shattering there.
Actually, you left the original comment out where someone brought up a bogey of 3.5 YPC and inferring it is bad:mr roboto, on 29 Aug 2014 - 11:40 AM, said:
Why would he get 'volume' if his ypc is terrible? That seems like a weird combination.
'Yeah, he'll average 3.5 but with 400 touches he will be a great flex!'
It's a bit ironic since we've already seen TRich have a season with 3.6 YPC where he put up RB1 numbers.
He doesn't need a great YPC; it can be as mediocre as it was his rookie year and he can still be valuable, as long as he holds on to the starting job.