I don't think Ingram was ever really given a chance in that offense. He was one of the most predictably used RBs in the past few years (along with Mathews). If he was in the game, there was like a 67% chance they were going to run. And most of the time it was already in obvious running situations so he saw a stacked box. But I think most of his detractors had to eat a little crow last year. He clearly looked legit when given the opportunity. Dude can't stay healthy, though.Ingram hasn't been in an elite offense?INSIDE INFO ON 'BAMA BACKS.......they need elite offenses
Lacy ended up in an elite offense, or else he'd suffer the same fate as other overrated 'Bama backs.
Imagine Lacy with the Browns...loooool. That fat #### wouldn't break 900 yards there.
Ingram or Richardson in the Packers offense? = Lacy at minimum
FWIW, I've never been an Ingram bandwagoner. Just a value seeker. I do think he'd put up similar stats to Lacy in GB's offense, but Lacy has been more durable than Ingram. I'll be shocked if Ingram ever hits 300 touches.
I can't even fathom a guess as to why Trent has busted. Bell, Forte, Tomlinson... he wasn't alone in starting his career below 4 ypc. Hell, Forte's second year was even worse than his first. But man, Trent never got going. The curious case of Trent Richardson.