Otis
Footballguy
Yup.so you made a bet that basically you cant lose for another 20 years or so but could win a lot earlier.
Smart on your end
Yup.so you made a bet that basically you cant lose for another 20 years or so but could win a lot earlier.
Smart on your end
Cool. So we've got this subjective thing where maybe it's time to pay but maybe not. Do we go by your assessment? Or mine? What if he is two shy of the record and playing well? I guess you should probably pay me at that point? Or do we have to wait for 19?I agree. If he retired but only needed one more major for Oats to win the bet I could see possibly hanging on to see if he stayed retired. Comes out of retirement and has one epic run at Augusta or something. But 5 more majors? That is a hall of fame career.
Also, I've been here since April '03. Just sayin.
You said you were with team Otis did you not?is that what i said
The smart folks are ALWAYS with Team Otis.You said you were with team Otis did you not?
The people whose life happiness seems contingent on Tiger spraying a drive or getting hurt again and posting their jubilation here are the db's imo.Who could have predicted the ##### baggery from the Tiger knobbers?
I agree that the terms of bet are obviously favourable to you and that, short of his death, you dictate when you are prepared to acknowledge that you lost the bet. Hell, he can play in the Masters and British as long as he wants. All I am saying is that if he retired next year (or anytime going forward, really) citing a back that will not allow him to compete at the level he wants to and he still sits 5 majors short, I would pay the bet.Otis said:Cool. So we've got this subjective thing where maybe it's time to pay but maybe not. Do we go by your assessment? Or mine? What if he is two shy of the record and playing well? I guess you should probably pay me at that point? Or do we have to wait for 19?
Or what if he's two shy and retires? I pay? Or I don't?
You entered into a bet that a guy will never do something. When he dies, it's a clear win for you. When he retires at 55 or something, 5 short of the mark still? Yeah, I'd be pretty comfortable paying you then. If he retires in a year or two? Hell, I don't know. Did you win at that point? It looks like you probably will win at that point. But it also looked like Hillary probably would win and the Falcons probably would win.
Who decides?
By the way, I've never welched on a bet here, always pay out, and pay out quickly. But a deal's a deal.
I honestly never understood this. He's not the model husband or family man, but otherwise what's so terrible? He was so much fun to watch and dominated golf in ways it had never been before. Maybe the most dominant player in all of sports for that stretch. I just don't understand why total strangers get off on his injuries and hardships.johnnyrock62000 said:The people whose life happiness seems contingent on Tiger spraying a drive or getting hurt again and posting their jubilation here are the db's imo.
Why are people that hope he can get right physically and mentally and return to the game on a regular basis db's?
I'm tempted to throw another $1k on him breaking Jack's record at those 1000/1 odds, as well as $1000 for him finishing top20 once this year. Could make a killing here.I agree that the terms of bet are obviously favourable to you and that, short of his death, you dictate when you are prepared to acknowledge that you lost the bet. Hell, he can play in the Masters and British as long as he wants. All I am saying is that if he retired next year (or anytime going forward, really) citing a back that will not allow him to compete at the level he wants to and he still sits 5 majors short, I would pay the bet.
Your examples are a little disingenuous imo. Trump was a longshot. 10/1 would be a generous description of his pre-election odds. The Falcons were an even longer shot in the 4th quarter of the SB. I heard that, at one point they were 1.1% to come back.
There are no odds for Tiger beating Jack. The bookies stopped offering that prop future 2 years ago. Because everyone knows it will not happen. That ship has sailed. The odds that Tiger wins 5 more majors is orders of magnitude longer than Trump and the Falcons wins. The guy is (before the latest injury) even money just to finish top 20 this year. In any tournament that has a field of 100 guys.
Anyway, I recognize that when you decide to pay is entirely up to you. The terms of the bet clearly dictate that. I probably would rely on those favourable terms to ride this latest "comeback" out. But, if he retires, I'd pay. You may not. I get that.
EDIT: just found some odds as of November 2016. Tiger is 1000/1 to break Jack's record: http://www.sportsbettingexperts.com/golf-odds-tiger-woods-announces-return-to-competitive-play/
2nd in wins, 2nd in majors. Greatest 'run' in the history of golf but certainly not the GOAT. He could have been but he flamed out. Tyson was the greatest until he flamed out as well, then he wasn't. You become the greatest by performing as the greatest of the course of your career. Jack's majors span 24 years. Tiger flamed out after 12 years.Tiger is the GOAT in my opinion. Jack has more majors but no one dominated golf like Tiger. He is one of the greatest athletes of all time.
2nd in wins, 2nd in majors. Greatest 'run' in the history of golf but certainly not the GOAT. He could have been but he flamed out. Tyson was the greatest until he flamed out as well, then he wasn't. You become the greatest by performing as the greatest of the course of your career. Jack's majors span 24 years. Tiger flamed out after 12 years.
Perfect, I will put down $1 for Binky and you can put down $2 for Otis. They pay us now and if Tiger breaks Jack's record in the future they are paid out. Everyone wins!I agree that the terms of bet are obviously favourable to you and that, short of his death, you dictate when you are prepared to acknowledge that you lost the bet. Hell, he can play in the Masters and British as long as he wants. All I am saying is that if he retired next year (or anytime going forward, really) citing a back that will not allow him to compete at the level he wants to and he still sits 5 majors short, I would pay the bet.
Your examples are a little disingenuous imo. Trump was a longshot. 10/1 would be a generous description of his pre-election odds. The Falcons were an even longer shot in the 4th quarter of the SB. I heard that, at one point they were 1.1% to come back.
There are no odds for Tiger beating Jack. The bookies stopped offering that prop future 2 years ago. Because everyone knows it will not happen. That ship has sailed. The odds that Tiger wins 5 more majors is orders of magnitude longer than Trump and the Falcons wins. The guy is (before the latest injury) even money just to finish top 20 this year. In any tournament that has a field of 100 guys.
Anyway, I recognize that when you decide to pay is entirely up to you. The terms of the bet clearly dictate that. I probably would rely on those favourable terms to ride this latest "comeback" out. But, if he retires, I'd pay. You may not. I get that.
EDIT: just found some odds as of November 2016. Tiger is 1000/1 to break Jack's record: http://www.sportsbettingexperts.com/golf-odds-tiger-woods-announces-return-to-competitive-play/
No way. He'll have a very good, Phil Mickelson-type career. Could be a top 10 type career. But he'll never win 44% of the events he enters. It's amazing how quickly people have forgotten just how dominant Tiger was. He was so good he could be ultra conservative and win every other tournament he played in. Nobody else does that. And Jordan's swing doesn't stack up. His putting does, but that's it.Jordan Spieth will have a better career than Tiger.
Neither will Tiger if he doesn't retire now.No way. He'll have a very good, Phil Mickelson-type career. Could be a top 10 type career. But he'll never win 44% of the events he enters. It's amazing how quickly people have forgotten just how dominant Tiger was. He was so good he could be ultra conservative and win every other tournament he played in. Nobody else does that. And Jordan's swing doesn't stack up. His putting does, but that's it.
Nope. Not even close.Jordan Spieth will have a better career than Tiger.
That's fair. Let's just say that there are some guys on this board that deserve their due. If Otis fakes a cancer death and leaves dramatically, that's on my dumb ###. Otherwise, the pigeon was never meant for him. Just saying.I used it in reply to Otis saying he wouldn't pay up even if Tiger announced his retirement. I've needled Binky here and there about paying up but as I stated previously I think it is premature. However, if Tiger retires and he doesn't pay up I will be disappointed.
I know he will. His character and reputation are well known and not in dispute. I've been a fan for years. Prime years oats was top drawer FFA stuff.oats will pay. not sure why this is at issue. give him some leeway on the timeframe.
and those wishing ill on tiger, or anyone else, pretty lame.
Lmao. This is good stuff right here.Jordan Spieth will have a better career than Tiger.
I agree. He isn't going to just troll around if he knows he can't win. He'll hang them up and walk away. It won't be a sandy Lyle situation where he shows up at Augusta every year as a mascot.I think, with Tiger, that we'll know for sure here in a year or two whether he's "done."
Agree if he is one away. If he is 5 away at 45, totally different. The guy hasn't won a major in a decade. Jack's body wasn't destroyed either.Nicklaus won his last major at 46. Regardless of Tiger's health, I don't see how anyone could argue that this bet is lost when Tiger is 41. For all practical purposes, sure. But as far as having to pay up? Why wouldn't Tiger get the benefit of reaching the same age as Jack when he won 18?
Agreed ...but what if he retires and comes back?I have $500 with Binky that Tiger doesn't break Jack's record. There is no doubt I will win but premature for him to pay up. Now, if he announces a retirement hopefully we can agree it will be time to settle up.
He didn't train like an 'actual athlete.' He trained like a ####### moron. His fake military man bull#### would have been bad for any sport.1000-1? More like a quadrillion to one. Stop comparing his potential longevity to other golfers. He trained like an actual athlete, and at 41, after multiple back & knee surgeries, he's the equivalent of a 41-yo former elite pro athlete. He's done.
Senoir tour majors don't count.Agreed ...but what if he retires and comes back?
FairAgreed ...but what if he retires and comes back?
ETA: Sorry, responded before I saw the rest of the ongoing conversation.
If Tiger formally announced his retirement, I would suggest going ahead and paying out with a caveat in the unlikely event that he comes back and breaks the record. In that case, I get my original payment back along with the bet payment.
Fair? ...
Jack had bad knees and a bad back and from 1981-1985 won no majors and a total of 2 PGA tournaments, then won the Masters in 1986.Agree if he is one away. If he is 5 away at 45, totally different. The guy hasn't won a major in a decade. Jack's body wasn't destroyed either.
And, the competition now is way deeper. These kids are better than him at every facet of the game.
He sucks at that too.If Tiger had any shot it's over. This layoff was his last run. He made sure he didn't come back before he was mentally and physically ready. Plays a few rounds and now he's horizontal. Time to develop some courses Tiger..
Because he comes off like an ####### in public. And there are tons of stories of him being an ####### IRL too. Believe it or not, the vast majority of people still want people to be nice. Be an ####### and you can expect a whole lot of hate. Don't want to get hated? Don't be an #######.I honestly never understood this. He's not the model husband or family man, but otherwise what's so terrible? He was so much fun to watch and dominated golf in ways it had never been before. Maybe the most dominant player in all of sports for that stretch. I just don't understand why total strangers get off on his injuries and hardships.
Weird world out there. I for one still hope he comes back. Nothing to do with the bet. I'd pay zoonation 1k to bring him back if I could. It's just a whole lot more fun watching golf when he's playing like himself.![]()
Jordan has won 9 PGA events in his first 5 years on tour (1.8 wins per year). Tiger has won 79 PGA events spanning 18 years (4.4 wins per year), last win in 2013.Jordan Spieth will have a better career than Tiger.
In that long article, which was a good read, the part about him not picking up the tab for the Seals did not surprise me. Woods has always been high on the list of celebrities/athletes known for being cheap tippers, as has Michael Jordan, so it doesn't shock me that they are buddies. Jordan is probably the one who advised him long ago to do it.Because he comes off like an ####### in public. And there are tons of stories of him being an ####### IRL too. Believe it or not, the vast majority of people still want people to be nice. Be an ####### and you can expect a whole lot of hate. Don't want to get hated? Don't be an #######.
lolI think, with Tiger, that we'll know for sure here in a year or two whether he's "done."
First of all, Spieth only has 4 full years on tour. He also tied Tiger with 7 total wins before turning 23. You are comparing Woods prime years to Spieth's first few years on tour which is a bit of a stretch.Jordan has won 9 PGA events in his first 5 years on tour (1.8 wins per year). Tiger has won 79 PGA events spanning 18 years (4.4 wins per year), last win in 2013.
At Jordan's pace, in 18 years he will have won 32.4 events. To reach 79 wins, at that pace, he'll need 43.8 years on tour. He'll need to pick up the pace a little to catch Tiger, and throw in 16 more Majors in there somewhere. Add the fact that the competition will only get stiffer with all these young golfers (many of them inspired to play the game by Tiger Woods) coming along.
It's staggering the impact Tiger has had on the PGA tour. Jordan Spieth is a fine golfer and will have a great career, but he's no TW.
I made a mistake when I said he needs to win 16 more majors. I meant to type 12 more there. Spieth is in his 5th year so from January 2013 (Farmers Insurance Open; he missed the cut) to January 2017 he won 8 PGA events. His 9th win last weekend would be in his 5th year.Joe T said:First of all, Spieth only has 4 full years on tour. He also tied Tiger with 7 total wins before turning 23. You are comparing Woods prime years to Spieth's first few years on tour which is a bit of a stretch.
Also from Wikipedia:
Spieth won his first major at the 2015 Masters Tournament with a score of 270 (−18), earning him $1.8 million. Spieth tied the 72-hole record set by Tiger Woods in 1997 and became the second youngest to win the Masters, behind Woods. He then won the 2015 U.S. Open with a final score of 5-under-par.[3] He was the youngest U.S. Open champion since Bobby Jones in 1923. He followed up with a win in the 2015 Tour Championship, which clinched the 2015 FedEx Cup. At the 2016 Masters Tournament, Spieth suffered one of the biggest collapses in the event's history after leading by five strokes halfway through the final round.
He's pretty good for only being 23. And his career is very comparable to Tiger at that age.
You said Spieth will have a better career than Tiger. But if we just look at their first 4 years, since that is all we have of Spieth. Tiger had 15 more wins than Spieth in his first 4 years.You are comparing Woods prime years to Spieth's first few years on tour which is a bit of a stretch.