My favorite concept today is just leave the defense alone and add offensive talent.
The problem is that the best talent in the draft is defense. If they can trade back, is McMillan worth drafting at 3 if Carter or Hunter are there? (In this scenario the giants traded up for sanders or ward)
I get that. Good point.
I think I'd trade back twice then, take Jeanty and let that kid try to be their next 2k yard back.
I'd also probably lose the 'offense only' thought at that point too though because now I have a lot of picks. Hypocritical some but I'd be a whole lot of offense still. They're just so lacking.
I keep evolving or changing or some word about Hunter. Solomon Wilcox says "what happens when he gets hurt because he's gonna get hurt. They have him only play one position." He goes on to explain he's talking dings and oh well if it's more serious I'm definitely thinking one position. I think he's got a real good point.
I think I'd rather Jeanty and a lot of picks than Hunter and six more.
Suppose one trade back because I may be adding too much FF into the NFL with that concept- and Carter or Hunter.
They "have to" either sign a free agent tackle or draft one with their second round pick.
Where's the QB? Third round? Carr?
Still need a WR and is that a fourth round starter?
It quickly degrades with all the needs and it's really challenging to think through and fill them. I wish we knew what they added in free agency now so we can discuss that