What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

TRUMP TO INFINITY AND BEYOND HQ - The Great and Positive Place (5 Viewers)

On TV now, the replay, people just standing there with their hands up in the middle of the smoke.  :lmao: . No that's not tear gas. 

 
Opie said:
If you don't know...why do you keep talking?

There is a huge difference between the two and yes....Being on an NBC (Nuclear, Biological, Chemical) DECON Team while in the USMC...I DO know.

...you don't.

You know only what your are told....and I'm telling you.
Click to expand...
Actually you haven’t told me. So I ask you, politely, respectfully: in terms of what those protestors experienced, what was the difference? 
 

Oh and BTW, since I was unaware you were a Marine: thank you for your service. 

 
timschochet said:
Actually you haven’t told me. So I ask you, politely, respectfully: in terms of what those protestors experienced, what was the difference? 
 

Oh and BTW, since I was unaware you were a Marine: thank you for your service. 
Click to expand...
First of all...Tim, you've thanked me before...thank you.

TEAR GAS contains a very strong irritant that burns your eyes and throat.
It sticks to your skin and clothing.
Once in it...you feel the effects for a very long time. It is difficult to breath and you don't want to open your eyes.
Your fist inclination is to rub your eyes but that only makes it worse.
It sticks to foliage and grass so when you walk through it, you kick it up and when you brush against a branch or something, that too, kicks it up.
The area that is exposed to tear gas remains "hostile" for more than an hour. You don't cross a field or go into an area that has been affected by tear gas without wearing a gas mask.

SMOKE...is more of a shield. It limits the vision and allows you to move from one place to another without being seen.
It confuses and disorientates the people who didn't deploy it.
The irritation it causes is far less than a campfire causes.
Troops can easily deploy smoke without wearing a gas mask.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Opie said:
First of all...Tim, you've thanked me before...thank you.

TEAR GAS contains a very strong irritant that burns your eyes and throat.
It sticks to your skin and clothing.
Once in it...you feel the effects for a very long time.
It sticks to foliage and grass so when you walk through it, you kick it up and when you brush against a branch or something, that too, kicks it up.
The area that is exposed to tear gas remains "hostile" for more than an hour. You don't cross a field or go into an area that has been affected by tear gas without wearing a gas mask.

SMOKE...is more of a shield. It limits the vision and allows you to move from one place to another without being seen.
It confuses and disorientates the people who didn't deploy it.
The irritation it causes is far less than a campfire causes.
Click to expand...
Thank you. 
Based on what you’re saying the smoke shouldn’t have chased all those protestors off. 

 
timschochet said:
Thank you. 
Based on what you’re saying the smoke shouldn’t have chased all those protestors off. 
Click to expand...
It would confuse them.
Many of their first inclinations would have been to run, thinking it may have been tear gas.

Same thing with the milk in the eyes....a response to a placebo.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If Biden attends Floyd's funeral, will any blacks or POC vote for Trump?  Trump awkwardly hold a bible or Biden crying at the funeral. What's Trump's next attempt at branding?

 
tonydead said:
I have 10 posts all day. You have 10 in the last 15 minutes.  :lmao:
Click to expand...
Ha! You got me. But my point remains. You posted plenty last night. You were very pleased with Trump’s action. You thought the use of tear gas was justified and you defended it. At no time did you argue that it wasn’t tear gas. 

 
timschochet said:
Ha! You got me. But my point remains. You posted plenty last night. You were very pleased with Trump’s action. You thought the use of tear gas was justified and you defended it. At no time did you argue that it wasn’t tear gas. 
Click to expand...
That was then and this is now.    :coffee:

 
timschochet said:
Thank you. 
Based on what you’re saying the smoke shouldn’t have chased all those protestors off. 
Click to expand...
It wasn’t classic tear gas like CS gas. Anyone who’s gone through a gas chamber without a mask knows what people look like that have been exposed. I’m sure there was smoke, pepper spray, pepper balls etc. Could call the difference semantics but when you think of tear gas, it’s a lot more sinister in its effects. 

 
timschochet said:
Ha! You got me. But my point remains. You posted plenty last night. You were very pleased with Trump’s action. You thought the use of tear gas was justified and you defended it. At no time did you argue that it wasn’t tear gas. 
Click to expand...
Link where I said it was tear gas. Please back up your claim.  I wont hold my breath. You're batting .000 right now. 

 
squistion said:
No, it doesn't and I have a feeling that if someone had chemical analysis of what was fired at the protesters and was proven to be tear gas, they would not accept that either. 
Click to expand...
Wow...you are really hanging on.

Good for you.

I'm telling you...no gas masks...no tear gas.

GUARANTEED.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
tonydead said:
Peaceful protesters dont get chaiced off. Check. What was all the complaining about warnings all about?   :lmao:
Click to expand...
But that’s a separate argument. That’s the argument that’s been made all day: that they were warned to leave and didn’t. I don’t agree with that argument either but at least it’s more legitimate than “or it wasn’t actually tear gas, it was a combination of smoke, pepper spray and other irritants.” To which I say so what? 

 
timschochet said:
But that’s a separate argument. That’s the argument that’s been made all day: that they were warned to leave and didn’t. I don’t agree with that argument either but at least it’s more legitimate than “or it wasn’t actually tear gas, it was a combination of smoke, pepper spray and other irritants.” To which I say so what? 
Click to expand...
Which none of the protesters said they were told and not one single reporter on the scene heard or was informed of. 

 
timschochet said:
OK I admit I have no idea if you have the option to hold your breath or not. 
Click to expand...
You can try.

It will still stick to your skin and clothing for quite a while and you'd still smell it because it's in your nostrils
If you rubbed your eyes with your hands or clothing...it would hit you.
 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Opie said:
So...you're waiting for a member of the MSM to admit that they lied??

Don't hold your breath.
Click to expand...
So, if there were a dozen reporters there who said there was tear gas fired who were MSM, you still wouldn't accept what they said and said they were all lying, correct?

 
squistion said:
I was watching live and in real time. 
Click to expand...
Link

24 to 28 seconds. Protestors and police walking through the smoke unaffected.  No gas masks. That is not tear gas. Now please provide links I have asked for of people "washing their eyes with milk"or kindly GTFO.  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

dozer
****Official DOJ Investigation into Trump, Fake Electors, Fraud, Etc.****
5 6 7
Replies
348
Views
11K
Sabertooth
Sabertooth
L
McCarthy and McConnell Wanted ‘Son of a B*tch’ Trump Out of Politics After Jan. 6 Riot,
2 3
Replies
124
Views
3K
ignatiusjreilly
ignatiusjreilly
GordonGekko
Revisiting The Young Turks 2016 Election Meltdown Over Trump's Stunning Victory (7/7/2022 9:35 PST)
Replies
16
Views
473
GordonGekko
GordonGekko

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 6 (members: 0, guests: 6)
Top