What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Tush Push - Do the rules apply for this play or not? Doesn't seem like it (5 Viewers)

The Eagles have a 4th and 2 and don't run the stupid "push the tush" play. The run gets stuffed and no 1st down.

How does that happen with such a dominant offensive line? The RB must not squat 600 pounds.
 
The Eagles have a 4th and 2 and don't run the stupid "push the tush" play. The run gets stuffed and no 1st down.

How does that happen with such a dominant offensive line? The RB must not squat 600 pounds.
Yeah the tush-push is a dumb, ugly football but that was smrt & beautiful.

:rolleyes:
 
Great football.

By the way, I saw other teams doing it thins weekend. It worked every time. This is not something the Eagles alone are proficient at or specialize in. It's a stupid arrangement and a stupid play.
 
Is it uglier than a traditional QB sneak? No.

Is it just because it's so effective?

It may not be pretty but it's legal. The outrage in here seems disproportionate to the act.
 
ya know, I'm so sick and tired of teams not being able to get off the filed on 3rd and 22 that it's so refreshing to see a team get a first down with the bunch play/rugby play.
it's awesome.
 
What a trick play off the tush push!!

Like everything else they do with the Tush Push, great execution.
I am surprised it took so long for them to try and run something else out of Tush Push look. The problem is they were too far out to make it believable and they were not in the same formation to sell it.
 
Can't get away from it. Start the car to leave to work and its what my sports radio station is discussing. Smh. They did bring up a good point. It does put the defensive lineman at increased injury risk. They kept saying after the first star defensive player injury the NFL will address this. Maybe I guess.
 
Last edited:
Can't get away from it. Start the car to leave to work and its 1what my sports radio station is discussing. Smh. They did bring up a good point. It does put the defensive lineman at increased injury risk. They kept saying after the first star defensive player injury the NFL will address this. Maybe I guess.
Not gonna happen. Folks in here have already told us that there is no increased injury risk. How do they know? Because it hasn’t happened so far, thus it never will.
 
Can't get away from it. Start the car to leave to work and its 1what my sports radio station is discussing. Smh. They did bring up a good point. It does put the defensive lineman at increased injury risk. They kept saying after the first star defensive player injury the NFL will address this. Maybe I guess.
Not gonna happen. Folks in here have already told us that there is no increased injury risk. How do they know? Because it hasn’t happened so far, thus it never will.

Just because a plane can crash doesn't mean that flying isn't the safest way to travel. The argument that the play isn't safe because someone COULD get hurt is asinine. A player can get hurt running down the field with no contact, what are you going to propose then, speed walking instead of running?
 
Can't get away from it. Start the car to leave to work and its 1what my sports radio station is discussing. Smh. They did bring up a good point. It does put the defensive lineman at increased injury risk. They kept saying after the first star defensive player injury the NFL will address this. Maybe I guess.
Not gonna happen. Folks in here have already told us that there is no increased injury risk. How do they know? Because it hasn’t happened so far, thus it never will.

Just because a plane can crash doesn't mean that flying isn't the safest way to travel. The argument that the play isn't safe because someone COULD get hurt is asinine. A player can get hurt running down the field with no contact, what are you going to propose then, speed walking instead of running?
I do like the analogy of plane travel. Not sure it applies but truly it is a really good point.
 
Can't get away from it. Start the car to leave to work and its 1what my sports radio station is discussing. Smh. They did bring up a good point. It does put the defensive lineman at increased injury risk. They kept saying after the first star defensive player injury the NFL will address this. Maybe I guess.
Not gonna happen. Folks in here have already told us that there is no increased injury risk. How do they know? Because it hasn’t happened so far, thus it never will.
Never is a long time. That isn't the reason for banning it however. It's called leverage. If a defensive player can't climb the back of a lineman to block a field goal, then why should a player be allowed to push someone from behind? Both plays require using another player as leverage.
 
Can't get away from it. Start the car to leave to work and its 1what my sports radio station is discussing. Smh. They did bring up a good point. It does put the defensive lineman at increased injury risk. They kept saying after the first star defensive player injury the NFL will address this. Maybe I guess.
Not gonna happen. Folks in here have already told us that there is no increased injury risk. How do they know? Because it hasn’t happened so far, thus it never will.
Wrong. An injury will occur at some point with this play. Its football. Players are hurt every game, every week. Eventually someone will be hurt during this play and the haters will all yell "AH HA! TOLD YOU!!".

Its football, players get hurt. Same will happen here.
 
Can't get away from it. Start the car to leave to work and its 1what my sports radio station is discussing. Smh. They did bring up a good point. It does put the defensive lineman at increased injury risk. They kept saying after the first star defensive player injury the NFL will address this. Maybe I guess.
Not gonna happen. Folks in here have already told us that there is no increased injury risk. How do they know? Because it hasn’t happened so far, thus it never will.
Never is a long time. That isn't the reason for banning it however. It's called leverage. If a defensive player can't climb the back of a lineman to block a field goal, then why should a player be allowed to push someone from behind? Both plays require using another player as leverage.
Great point Johnny U.
 
Can't get away from it. Start the car to leave to work and its 1what my sports radio station is discussing. Smh. They did bring up a good point. It does put the defensive lineman at increased injury risk. They kept saying after the first star defensive player injury the NFL will address this. Maybe I guess.
Not gonna happen. Folks in here have already told us that there is no increased injury risk. How do they know? Because it hasn’t happened so far, thus it never will.
Never is a long time. That isn't the reason for banning it however. It's called leverage. If a defensive player can't climb the back of a lineman to block a field goal, then why should a player be allowed to push someone from behind? Both plays require using another player as leverage.

So does gang tackling.
 
Can't get away from it. Start the car to leave to work and its 1what my sports radio station is discussing. Smh. They did bring up a good point. It does put the defensive lineman at increased injury risk. They kept saying after the first star defensive player injury the NFL will address this. Maybe I guess.
Not gonna happen. Folks in here have already told us that there is no increased injury risk. How do they know? Because it hasn’t happened so far, thus it never will.
Never is a long time. That isn't the reason for banning it however. It's called leverage. If a defensive player can't climb the back of a lineman to block a field goal, then why should a player be allowed to push someone from behind? Both plays require using another player as leverage.
Having someone climb up and stand on the shoulders of a D-lineman to block a punt is not leverage and is certainly not comparable to the play we're talking about. How about when a RB is running behind a blocker and literally pushes him into an oncoming tackler. You see that all the time. That is the definition of using another player as leverage. Or gang tackling like @Snotbubbles said above.

And regarding the injury thing, I'd submit that you can get injured on any play. However, typically injuries occur when some or all of the players are running at full or near full speed and collide with each other OR someone is being tackled in an awkward way. There is almost no movement on this play and no one is tackling the ball carrier in this scenario.
 
And regarding the injury thing, I'd submit that you can get injured on any play. However, typically injuries occur when some or all of the players are running at full or near full speed and collide with each other OR someone is being tackled in an awkward way. There is almost no movement on this play and no one is tackling the ball carrier in this scenario.
I'm not sure the data support that. Plenty of injuries occur when there are a lot of bodies in small spaces falling into each other at awkward angles.
 
And regarding the injury thing, I'd submit that you can get injured on any play. However, typically injuries occur when some or all of the players are running at full or near full speed and collide with each other OR someone is being tackled in an awkward way. There is almost no movement on this play and no one is tackling the ball carrier in this scenario.
I'm not sure the data support that. Plenty of injuries occur when there are a lot of bodies in small spaces falling into each other at awkward angles.
Link? Bwahahaha
 
If anyone ran this play, I'd hate it. It's changing the whole game. They're now beginning to do it on third and two. What's to stop them from running nearly every play if they get two yards out of it each time?

Awful play for the sport.
 
And someone is going to get sick of it and do something. See what the Jets just did to Mac Jones. They held him up and tried to twist his neck off.

Hurts better watch out when he tries to do this to Quinnen (if the Jets' hearts are still into it by then).
 
It was a good run Eagles, but even one of your own players admitted what they're doing isn't even legal right now.

From PFT:
*Last night, when the Eagles lined up in their trademark formation near the Tampa Bay end zone on third and goal, the effort by Jalen Hurts to score six points included not a push from tight end Dallas Goedert but an effort to pull him across the white stripe. Goedert did it again on fourth down, but it wasn’t as obvious.

“I was yanking him for sure,” Goedert admitted after the game, via Rob Maaddi of the Associated Press. “They say you can’t pull, but I was behind him.”

Goedert was indeed behind Hurts, but Goedert was not pushing. He was, as he put it, “yanking.” He was pulling. He slipped his arms under Hurts’s arms and tried to lift him in.

It’s not classic pulling, but it’s far closer to a pull than a push. And once it becomes a pull, it becomes an illegal play.*

Get rid of this legal, illegal play already.
 
“I was yanking him for sure,” Goedert admitted after the game, via Rob Maaddi of the Associated Press. “They say you can’t pull, but I was behind him.”
Yes, I saw that live and thought it was close to a penalty. If it was called, I wouldn't have complained. That doesn't happen every time they run it.
 
Having someone climb up and stand on the shoulders of a D-lineman to block a punt is not leverage and is certainly not comparable to the play we're talking about.

The penalty called for that is indeed called leverage. It's a personal foul - leverage, because you use the person as leverage to get in the air.
True story, I’m not saying it’s not a penalty, what I’m saying is that standing on someone to make yourself 9 ft tall isn’t the same thing as pushing someone. Even if the word used is leverage.
 
It was a good run Eagles, but even one of your own players admitted what they're doing isn't even legal right now.

From PFT:
*Last night, when the Eagles lined up in their trademark formation near the Tampa Bay end zone on third and goal, the effort by Jalen Hurts to score six points included not a push from tight end Dallas Goedert but an effort to pull him across the white stripe. Goedert did it again on fourth down, but it wasn’t as obvious.

“I was yanking him for sure,” Goedert admitted after the game, via Rob Maaddi of the Associated Press. “They say you can’t pull, but I was behind him.”

Goedert was indeed behind Hurts, but Goedert was not pushing. He was, as he put it, “yanking.” He was pulling. He slipped his arms under Hurts’s arms and tried to lift him in.

It’s not classic pulling, but it’s far closer to a pull than a push. And once it becomes a pull, it becomes an illegal play.*

Get rid of this legal, illegal play already.
Its on the officials to make the calls. The play is actually legal, but the way Goedert did it "this time" was not. I am very shocked an NFL official missed a call though, for the record.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top