Chaka
Footballguy
GET 'EM!!!Giants just did the play now. Had 3 fat guys in the backfield pushing D Jones on the sneak. Zero chance he would have had a first without the push — and he barely had it then. It was dumb to watch.
GET 'EM!!!Giants just did the play now. Had 3 fat guys in the backfield pushing D Jones on the sneak. Zero chance he would have had a first without the push — and he barely had it then. It was dumb to watch.
Giants just did the play now. Had 3 fat guys in the backfield pushing D Jones on the sneak. Zero chance he would have had a first without the push — and he barely had it then. It was dumb to watch.
I'll bet Giants fans were happy.Giants just did the play now. Had 3 fat guys in the backfield pushing D Jones on the sneak. Zero chance he would have had a first without the push — and he barely had it then. It was dumb to watch.
Yeah the tush-push is a dumb, ugly football but that was smrt & beautiful.The Eagles have a 4th and 2 and don't run the stupid "push the tush" play. The run gets stuffed and no 1st down.
How does that happen with such a dominant offensive line? The RB must not squat 600 pounds.
2 yds is too much. They do it at a yard or less.The Eagles have a 4th and 2 and don't run the stupid "push the tush" play. The run gets stuffed and no 1st down.
Best play in NFL history.Just worked again. Suck it haters
Not reallyBest play in NFL history.Just worked again. Suck it haters
It's breathtaking
I am surprised it took so long for them to try and run something else out of Tush Push look. The problem is they were too far out to make it believable and they were not in the same formation to sell it.What a trick play off the tush push!!
Like everything else they do with the Tush Push, great execution.
Not gonna happen. Folks in here have already told us that there is no increased injury risk. How do they know? Because it hasn’t happened so far, thus it never will.Can't get away from it. Start the car to leave to work and its 1what my sports radio station is discussing. Smh. They did bring up a good point. It does put the defensive lineman at increased injury risk. They kept saying after the first star defensive player injury the NFL will address this. Maybe I guess.
Not gonna happen. Folks in here have already told us that there is no increased injury risk. How do they know? Because it hasn’t happened so far, thus it never will.Can't get away from it. Start the car to leave to work and its 1what my sports radio station is discussing. Smh. They did bring up a good point. It does put the defensive lineman at increased injury risk. They kept saying after the first star defensive player injury the NFL will address this. Maybe I guess.
I do like the analogy of plane travel. Not sure it applies but truly it is a really good point.Not gonna happen. Folks in here have already told us that there is no increased injury risk. How do they know? Because it hasn’t happened so far, thus it never will.Can't get away from it. Start the car to leave to work and its 1what my sports radio station is discussing. Smh. They did bring up a good point. It does put the defensive lineman at increased injury risk. They kept saying after the first star defensive player injury the NFL will address this. Maybe I guess.
Just because a plane can crash doesn't mean that flying isn't the safest way to travel. The argument that the play isn't safe because someone COULD get hurt is asinine. A player can get hurt running down the field with no contact, what are you going to propose then, speed walking instead of running?
Never is a long time. That isn't the reason for banning it however. It's called leverage. If a defensive player can't climb the back of a lineman to block a field goal, then why should a player be allowed to push someone from behind? Both plays require using another player as leverage.Not gonna happen. Folks in here have already told us that there is no increased injury risk. How do they know? Because it hasn’t happened so far, thus it never will.Can't get away from it. Start the car to leave to work and its 1what my sports radio station is discussing. Smh. They did bring up a good point. It does put the defensive lineman at increased injury risk. They kept saying after the first star defensive player injury the NFL will address this. Maybe I guess.
Wrong. An injury will occur at some point with this play. Its football. Players are hurt every game, every week. Eventually someone will be hurt during this play and the haters will all yell "AH HA! TOLD YOU!!".Not gonna happen. Folks in here have already told us that there is no increased injury risk. How do they know? Because it hasn’t happened so far, thus it never will.Can't get away from it. Start the car to leave to work and its 1what my sports radio station is discussing. Smh. They did bring up a good point. It does put the defensive lineman at increased injury risk. They kept saying after the first star defensive player injury the NFL will address this. Maybe I guess.
Great point Johnny U.Never is a long time. That isn't the reason for banning it however. It's called leverage. If a defensive player can't climb the back of a lineman to block a field goal, then why should a player be allowed to push someone from behind? Both plays require using another player as leverage.Not gonna happen. Folks in here have already told us that there is no increased injury risk. How do they know? Because it hasn’t happened so far, thus it never will.Can't get away from it. Start the car to leave to work and its 1what my sports radio station is discussing. Smh. They did bring up a good point. It does put the defensive lineman at increased injury risk. They kept saying after the first star defensive player injury the NFL will address this. Maybe I guess.
Never is a long time. That isn't the reason for banning it however. It's called leverage. If a defensive player can't climb the back of a lineman to block a field goal, then why should a player be allowed to push someone from behind? Both plays require using another player as leverage.Not gonna happen. Folks in here have already told us that there is no increased injury risk. How do they know? Because it hasn’t happened so far, thus it never will.Can't get away from it. Start the car to leave to work and its 1what my sports radio station is discussing. Smh. They did bring up a good point. It does put the defensive lineman at increased injury risk. They kept saying after the first star defensive player injury the NFL will address this. Maybe I guess.
Having someone climb up and stand on the shoulders of a D-lineman to block a punt is not leverage and is certainly not comparable to the play we're talking about. How about when a RB is running behind a blocker and literally pushes him into an oncoming tackler. You see that all the time. That is the definition of using another player as leverage. Or gang tackling like @Snotbubbles said above.Never is a long time. That isn't the reason for banning it however. It's called leverage. If a defensive player can't climb the back of a lineman to block a field goal, then why should a player be allowed to push someone from behind? Both plays require using another player as leverage.Not gonna happen. Folks in here have already told us that there is no increased injury risk. How do they know? Because it hasn’t happened so far, thus it never will.Can't get away from it. Start the car to leave to work and its 1what my sports radio station is discussing. Smh. They did bring up a good point. It does put the defensive lineman at increased injury risk. They kept saying after the first star defensive player injury the NFL will address this. Maybe I guess.
I'm not sure the data support that. Plenty of injuries occur when there are a lot of bodies in small spaces falling into each other at awkward angles.And regarding the injury thing, I'd submit that you can get injured on any play. However, typically injuries occur when some or all of the players are running at full or near full speed and collide with each other OR someone is being tackled in an awkward way. There is almost no movement on this play and no one is tackling the ball carrier in this scenario.
Link? BwahahahaI'm not sure the data support that. Plenty of injuries occur when there are a lot of bodies in small spaces falling into each other at awkward angles.And regarding the injury thing, I'd submit that you can get injured on any play. However, typically injuries occur when some or all of the players are running at full or near full speed and collide with each other OR someone is being tackled in an awkward way. There is almost no movement on this play and no one is tackling the ball carrier in this scenario.
Having someone climb up and stand on the shoulders of a D-lineman to block a punt is not leverage and is certainly not comparable to the play we're talking about.
Yes, I saw that live and thought it was close to a penalty. If it was called, I wouldn't have complained. That doesn't happen every time they run it.“I was yanking him for sure,” Goedert admitted after the game, via Rob Maaddi of the Associated Press. “They say you can’t pull, but I was behind him.”
True story, I’m not saying it’s not a penalty, what I’m saying is that standing on someone to make yourself 9 ft tall isn’t the same thing as pushing someone. Even if the word used is leverage.Having someone climb up and stand on the shoulders of a D-lineman to block a punt is not leverage and is certainly not comparable to the play we're talking about.
The penalty called for that is indeed called leverage. It's a personal foul - leverage, because you use the person as leverage to get in the air.
Its on the officials to make the calls. The play is actually legal, but the way Goedert did it "this time" was not. I am very shocked an NFL official missed a call though, for the record.It was a good run Eagles, but even one of your own players admitted what they're doing isn't even legal right now.
From PFT:
*Last night, when the Eagles lined up in their trademark formation near the Tampa Bay end zone on third and goal, the effort by Jalen Hurts to score six points included not a push from tight end Dallas Goedert but an effort to pull him across the white stripe. Goedert did it again on fourth down, but it wasn’t as obvious.
“I was yanking him for sure,” Goedert admitted after the game, via Rob Maaddi of the Associated Press. “They say you can’t pull, but I was behind him.”
Goedert was indeed behind Hurts, but Goedert was not pushing. He was, as he put it, “yanking.” He was pulling. He slipped his arms under Hurts’s arms and tried to lift him in.
It’s not classic pulling, but it’s far closer to a pull than a push. And once it becomes a pull, it becomes an illegal play.*
Get rid of this legal, illegal play already.