What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

US Men's National Team (16 Viewers)

I feel like we need to find a way to get points vs england. if england has six going in to the Wales game they won't have any incentive to go hard at them. we really needed all three today imo
England will have 2 reasons to go hard against them.

1. If Wales win against Iran, they'd be on 4 points. If they beat England, they win the group. England won't want the tougher Round of 16 opponent, so they'd need to win. If Wales doesn't win against Iran, then it doesn't matter if we get points on England.

2. It's England vs. Wales. There's zero chance England is bottling that game.

People keep saying this. But let's pretend we were playing Mexico in our last game and with a knockout berth already clinched and we were in the state we are now. Pulisic just played a hard 100' and has been limping. Weston and Dest are on yellows and another away from suspension.

We really starting those guys and running them the full game to try and run up the score on Mexico?

It's doubtful. And we most likely won't need England to just beat Wales, but keep the pressure on and beat them by multiple goals. I don't think England would turtle up or anything, but they'd not be starting their best lineup and not be pressing hard to score as much as possible.
Let's say you're right. England's backups are still gonna play balls to the wall, that's my point. No way they bottle it and kick it around just "trying to stay healthy". One, because it's Wales. Two, because they'll want to prove they should start the knockout.

Their subs today were Marcus Rashford, Jack Grealish, Phil Foden, Callum Wilson, and Eric Dier. They also have Trent Alexander Arnold, Kyle Walker, Kalvin Phillips, Jordan Henderson, Conor Gallagher, and Aaron Ramsdale sitting on that bench.

That's a $600M squad in transfer dollars.
That's not a backup squad, it's a second wave of heavy hitters.
 
I feel like we need to find a way to get points vs england. if england has six going in to the Wales game they won't have any incentive to go hard at them. we really needed all three today imo
England will have 2 reasons to go hard against them.

1. If Wales win against Iran, they'd be on 4 points. If they beat England, they win the group. England won't want the tougher Round of 16 opponent, so they'd need to win. If Wales doesn't win against Iran, then it doesn't matter if we get points on England.

2. It's England vs. Wales. There's zero chance England is bottling that game.

People keep saying this. But let's pretend we were playing Mexico in our last game and with a knockout berth already clinched and we were in the state we are now. Pulisic just played a hard 100' and has been limping. Weston and Dest are on yellows and another away from suspension.

We really starting those guys and running them the full game to try and run up the score on Mexico?

It's doubtful. And we most likely won't need England to just beat Wales, but keep the pressure on and beat them by multiple goals. I don't think England would turtle up or anything, but they'd not be starting their best lineup and not be pressing hard to score as much as possible.
Let's say you're right. England's backups are still gonna play balls to the wall, that's my point. No way they bottle it and kick it around just "trying to stay healthy". One, because it's Wales. Two, because they'll want to prove they should start the knockout.

Their subs today were Marcus Rashford, Jack Grealish, Phil Foden, Callum Wilson, and Eric Dier. They also have Trent Alexander Arnold, Kyle Walker, Kalvin Phillips, Jordan Henderson, Conor Gallagher, and Aaron Ramsdale sitting on that bench.

That's a $600M squad in transfer dollars.
That's not a backup squad, it's a second wave of heavy hitters.

Every single player you listed would start for Wales (and the US for that matter).
 
There is a lot of hate for Zimmerman and MLS players on the USMNT on twitter today. I think its excessive and I am definitely one that thinks overseas players should be first up, but Zimm earned his spot imo. Calling him out for one mistake and turning that into anti-MLS seems excessive.
It was an obvious mistake but he played decently otherwise.
 
Yeah, I'm not gonna crap on Zim and blame MLS. He was our best defender throughout qualifying(maybe Miles was better at times, but he's not healthy). He has played well and earned his spot.

He made a massive mental mistake. He was in the biggest game of his life and he panicked. Playing in the 2Bundelisga or the Championship wouldn't have prevented it. And none of us have any idea whether CCV or EPB or any of our young guys (none of whom have proven anything for the USMNT) would have done better.

Will be devestated for the guy if it ends up causing us to miss the knockout rounds. Its likely his only World Cup and that would be really tough for him to take. Seems like a good dude.
 
I feel like we need to find a way to get points vs england. if england has six going in to the Wales game they won't have any incentive to go hard at them. we really needed all three today imo
England will have 2 reasons to go hard against them.

1. If Wales win against Iran, they'd be on 4 points. If they beat England, they win the group. England won't want the tougher Round of 16 opponent, so they'd need to win. If Wales doesn't win against Iran, then it doesn't matter if we get points on England.

2. It's England vs. Wales. There's zero chance England is bottling that game.

People keep saying this. But let's pretend we were playing Mexico in our last game and with a knockout berth already clinched and we were in the state we are now. Pulisic just played a hard 100' and has been limping. Weston and Dest are on yellows and another away from suspension.

We really starting those guys and running them the full game to try and run up the score on Mexico?

It's doubtful. And we most likely won't need England to just beat Wales, but keep the pressure on and beat them by multiple goals. I don't think England would turtle up or anything, but they'd not be starting their best lineup and not be pressing hard to score as much as possible.

There’s zero chance we (the US) wouldn’t try to knock Mexico out of the tournament - England will be happy to ruin the dreams of the Welsh.
 
England are either going to need a result or they are going to rotate, either one works from our perspective
 
Now if it’s tied up in the 80th minute and both teams can advance with a draw and it’s 1-1 they may slow things down, sure, but they aren’t going to collude in advance
 
the Iranian players took an enormous risk right before the match by not singing the anthem and I think it reflected in their performance. They are gonna beat Wales
 
Yeah, I'm not gonna crap on Zim and blame MLS. He was our best defender throughout qualifying(maybe Miles was better at times, but he's not healthy). He has played well and earned his spot.

He made a massive mental mistake. He was in the biggest game of his life and he panicked. Playing in the 2Bundelisga or the Championship wouldn't have prevented it. And none of us have any idea whether CCV or EPB or any of our young guys (none of whom have proven anything for the USMNT) would have done better.

Will be devestated for the guy if it ends up causing us to miss the knockout rounds. Its likely his only World Cup and that would be really tough for him to take. Seems like a good dude.

Additionally, the wiser take today is that we dropped points yesterday because we failed to score a second goal, not because we gave up a dumb penalty. The opportunity was clearly on the table for a second goal but the team did not have the mentality to take it.
 
Yeah, I'm not gonna crap on Zim and blame MLS. He was our best defender throughout qualifying(maybe Miles was better at times, but he's not healthy). He has played well and earned his spot.

He made a massive mental mistake. He was in the biggest game of his life and he panicked. Playing in the 2Bundelisga or the Championship wouldn't have prevented it. And none of us have any idea whether CCV or EPB or any of our young guys (none of whom have proven anything for the USMNT) would have done better.

Will be devestated for the guy if it ends up causing us to miss the knockout rounds. Its likely his only World Cup and that would be really tough for him to take. Seems like a good dude.

This is what they are attacking. Qualifying is lower level and not playing top opponents. CONCACAF and MLS do not prepare you for European level competition (or top SA teams).
 
Yeah, I'm not gonna crap on Zim and blame MLS. He was our best defender throughout qualifying(maybe Miles was better at times, but he's not healthy). He has played well and earned his spot.

He made a massive mental mistake. He was in the biggest game of his life and he panicked. Playing in the 2Bundelisga or the Championship wouldn't have prevented it. And none of us have any idea whether CCV or EPB or any of our young guys (none of whom have proven anything for the USMNT) would have done better.

Will be devestated for the guy if it ends up causing us to miss the knockout rounds. Its likely his only World Cup and that would be really tough for him to take. Seems like a good dude.

This is what they are attacking. Qualifying is lower level and not playing top opponents. CONCACAF and MLS do not prepare you for European level competition (or top SA teams).

I mean, that's a somewhat valid point. But again....what healthy player should be in there?

The only logical argument is CCV (unless you're a massive believer in EPB or Mackenzie). He obviously has the UCL experience but his day to day club situation is less desirable than Zim (he plays on a stacked team in a mediocre league).

Hopefully in 2-4 years, our player pool will be beyond the point where a 29 year old MLS lifer is the best option at CB. Maybe if Chris Richards had been healthy and getting consistent PT for the past 18 months we would have been.
 
Will be devestated for the guy if it ends up causing us to miss the knockout rounds. Its likely his only World Cup and that would be really tough for him to take. Seems like a good dude.
I agree. He was such a key part of qualifying and deserved to be starting based on the other options, and he played fine other than that instant.

What's really a might have been for me is when I rewound to watch the PK again (yes I'm a masochist), Turner was so close to saving it. You can hear the sound it makes when it hits his hand - Bale absolutely smashed it and thus Turner couldn't quite deflect it enough. Would have been the save of his life.
 
Yeah, I'm not gonna crap on Zim and blame MLS. He was our best defender throughout qualifying(maybe Miles was better at times, but he's not healthy). He has played well and earned his spot.

He made a massive mental mistake. He was in the biggest game of his life and he panicked. Playing in the 2Bundelisga or the Championship wouldn't have prevented it. And none of us have any idea whether CCV or EPB or any of our young guys (none of whom have proven anything for the USMNT) would have done better.

Will be devestated for the guy if it ends up causing us to miss the knockout rounds. Its likely his only World Cup and that would be really tough for him to take. Seems like a good dude.

Additionally, the wiser take today is that we dropped points yesterday because we failed to score a second goal, not because we gave up a dumb penalty. The opportunity was clearly on the table for a second goal but the team did not have the mentality to take it.

Twitter and wise takes don't usually go hand in hand. :)

I hate to cast large blankets but there is an extraordinarily large amount of people who comment on the team that seem to have less than even a working knowledge of the sport and/or the players.

The MLS vs Europe black and white lunacy takes is, and not to get political here, an off shoot of exactly how too many people view politics, with only "my side is right" with out understanding any level of nuances.

I feel blessed that most every one here in the FFA seems to have a really good sense of balance when discussing our soccer topics and for the one or two that don't, the ignore feature still works great ;)
 
Last edited:
So let's second guess GGG for fun.

Publicly stated and also by use of Musah, Sargent, Haji and Morris, GGG clearly felt physicality was key in the game. And yet our only real scoring chances came off of faster, more athletic type players.

Does the game look different (in a positive way) if Aaronson and Jesus start and if Reyna gets a 30 minute run?
 
i like watching soccer when world cup stuff is going on because im a sucker for the old usa versus anyone else but brohans when i read this thread i realize that i dont know jack crap about soccer you guys are all like speaking greek to me holy smokes has it passed me by take that to the bank bromigos
 
Yeah, I'm not gonna crap on Zim and blame MLS. He was our best defender throughout qualifying(maybe Miles was better at times, but he's not healthy). He has played well and earned his spot.

He made a massive mental mistake. He was in the biggest game of his life and he panicked. Playing in the 2Bundelisga or the Championship wouldn't have prevented it. And none of us have any idea whether CCV or EPB or any of our young guys (none of whom have proven anything for the USMNT) would have done better.

Will be devestated for the guy if it ends up causing us to miss the knockout rounds. Its likely his only World Cup and that would be really tough for him to take. Seems like a good dude.

This is what they are attacking. Qualifying is lower level and not playing top opponents. CONCACAF and MLS do not prepare you for European level competition (or top SA teams).

I mean you can hand pick any player from any league who plays bad and blame the league.

Does Serie A suck because Dest was bad yesterday? Is the EPL bad because Pulisic lost the dribble about 8 different times yesterday? Is the Championship garbage because Sargent touched the ball like 4 times all game? Does the Bundesliga suck because Brooks had so many bad games for the US?

Blame the player, at least in this case IMO. He made a terrible terrible play/decision. What league he plays in had no effect on why he made the decision he did. Hell, I don't think I have ever seen him go to ground like that in all my years watching him play club or country.
 
i like watching soccer when world cup stuff is going on because im a sucker for the old usa versus anyone else but brohans when i read this thread i realize that i dont know jack crap about soccer you guys are all like speaking greek to me holy smokes has it passed me by take that to the bank bromigos

read the World Cup thread instead. More general "watch every 4 years" fans in there. Most of us in here are hard core nuts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SWC
Yeah, I'm not gonna crap on Zim and blame MLS. He was our best defender throughout qualifying(maybe Miles was better at times, but he's not healthy). He has played well and earned his spot.

He made a massive mental mistake. He was in the biggest game of his life and he panicked. Playing in the 2Bundelisga or the Championship wouldn't have prevented it. And none of us have any idea whether CCV or EPB or any of our young guys (none of whom have proven anything for the USMNT) would have done better.

Will be devestated for the guy if it ends up causing us to miss the knockout rounds. Its likely his only World Cup and that would be really tough for him to take. Seems like a good dude.

This is what they are attacking. Qualifying is lower level and not playing top opponents. CONCACAF and MLS do not prepare you for European level competition (or top SA teams).

I mean you can hand pick any player from any league who plays bad and blame the league.

Does Serie A suck because Dest was bad yesterday? Is the EPL bad because Pulisic lost the dribble about 8 different times yesterday? Is the Championship garbage because Sargent touched the ball like 4 times all game? Does the Bundesliga suck because Brooks had so many bad games for the US?

Blame the player, at least in this case IMO. He made a terrible terrible play/decision. What league he plays in had no effect on why he made the decision he did. Hell, I don't think I have ever seen him go to ground like that in all my years watching him play club or country.
:goodposting:

Oh believe me they have already addressed that too: "Brazil only brought one player from their domestic league. Everyone else plays in Europe. Why is the US bringing MLS guys?"
Euro guys can do no wrong I guess.
 
here is how my poor brain functions when watching:

==================

* ok Morris, just hit a cross that finds....****, blocked again

* hmm that is an odd long clearance....oh no Ream is caught one on one in a foot race

*oh good, Turner read it now just don't head it right up the midd......

* oh **** it fell right to Bale's left foot, Turner is caught out!!!...

* Whew, thank you Acosta, that may have saved the entire WC
 
Yeah, I'm not gonna crap on Zim and blame MLS. He was our best defender throughout qualifying(maybe Miles was better at times, but he's not healthy). He has played well and earned his spot.

He made a massive mental mistake. He was in the biggest game of his life and he panicked. Playing in the 2Bundelisga or the Championship wouldn't have prevented it. And none of us have any idea whether CCV or EPB or any of our young guys (none of whom have proven anything for the USMNT) would have done better.

Will be devestated for the guy if it ends up causing us to miss the knockout rounds. Its likely his only World Cup and that would be really tough for him to take. Seems like a good dude.

This is what they are attacking. Qualifying is lower level and not playing top opponents. CONCACAF and MLS do not prepare you for European level competition (or top SA teams).

I mean you can hand pick any player from any league who plays bad and blame the league.

Does Serie A suck because Dest was bad yesterday? Is the EPL bad because Pulisic lost the dribble about 8 different times yesterday? Is the Championship garbage because Sargent touched the ball like 4 times all game? Does the Bundesliga suck because Brooks had so many bad games for the US?

Blame the player, at least in this case IMO. He made a terrible terrible play/decision. What league he plays in had no effect on why he made the decision he did. Hell, I don't think I have ever seen him go to ground like that in all my years watching him play club or country.
:goodposting:

Oh believe me they have already addressed that too: "Brazil only brought one player from their domestic league. Everyone else plays in Europe. Why is the US bringing MLS guys?"
Euro guys can do no wrong I guess.

yeah it is almost laughable but what are you going to do? Twitter imploding might not be the worst thing ever :)
 
Is something like the "Var"-able? People are wondering if the Wales player picked up the ball before it went out of bounds which lead to the PK.

I think it would be, depending on how far back they are allowed to go to find a foul. I am guessing it may not have been obvious enough or close enough to the goal for it to be checked?

I don't think any US player or coach thought to ask. They probably lost all focus when the awful pk happened.
 
Is something like the "Var"-able? People are wondering if the Wales player picked up the ball before it went out of bounds which lead to the PK.

I think it would be, depending on how far back they are allowed to go to find a foul. I am guessing it may not have been obvious enough or close enough to the goal for it to be checked?

I don't think any US player or coach thought to ask. They probably lost all focus when the awful pk happened.
Oh right it was a PK. Then no it isn't reviewable. Whether its a PK or not is, but they can not go back and check to see before that. It's like when a team scores on a corner that should have been a goal kick.
 
Pulisic and Weston are both riding bikes on recovery day. This is a good sign that both are active.

I have this wierd feeling Gio is going to start on Friday but I have nothing to back that up.
 
Last edited:
Pulisic and Weston are both riding bikes on recovery day. This is a good sign that both are active.

I have this wierd feeling Gio is goingbto start on Friday but I have nothing to back that up.
I would totally start Reyna vs. England. They’ve seen relatively little of him (heck we all have, sadly) so we might get a little bit of a ”surprise” factor and get an early goal or force a tactics change.
 
i like watching soccer when world cup stuff is going on because im a sucker for the old usa versus anyone else but brohans when i read this thread i realize that i dont know jack crap about soccer you guys are all like speaking greek to me holy smokes has it passed me by take that to the bank bromigos

read the World Cup thread instead. More general "watch every 4 years" fans in there. Most of us in here are hard core nuts.
naw i like to feel like a big shot so instead i will just read this thread and not understand anything but everyone will think i am soccer jones over here take that to the bank bromigo
 
Is something like the "Var"-able? People are wondering if the Wales player picked up the ball before it went out of bounds which lead to the PK.

I think it would be, depending on how far back they are allowed to go to find a foul. I am guessing it may not have been obvious enough or close enough to the goal for it to be checked?

I don't think any US player or coach thought to ask. They probably lost all focus when the awful pk happened.
Oh right it was a PK. Then no it isn't reviewable. Whether its a PK or not is, but they can not go back and check to see before that. It's like when a team scores on a corner that should have been a goal kick.
While that's technically correct, the Tunisia-Denmark ref today went back and awarded Tunisia a free kick for a foul the ref saw when he was called over to look for possible Tunisia handball in the box today which overrode a Denmark corner.
 
Pulisic and Weston are both riding bikes on recovery day. This is a good sign that both are active.

I have this wierd feeling Gio is going to start on Friday but I have nothing to back that up.
I’ll be shocked if he doesn’t start. I don’t buy any of the BS about Morris being more physical - I think he made the decision to start Gio on Friday and he doesn’t trust him to be out there twice in 5 days.
 
So let's second guess GGG for fun.

Publicly stated and also by use of Musah, Sargent, Haji and Morris, GGG clearly felt physicality was key in the game. And yet our only real scoring chances came off of faster, more athletic type players.

Does the game look different (in a positive way) if Aaronson and Jesus start and if Reyna gets a 30 minute run?
I would definitely prefer different tactics game to game rather than the slow passing around in u-formation but I don't really have starting lineup player selection issues with yesterday at all. It was honestly about as good as I could have hoped for.

Would the game have been different with different players? I imagine so. But I think just a more ruthless streak (either from our coaches or players) would go along way. There were opportunities out there and we checked back way too often all game (and most games we do this and it isn't just one player).
 
Pulisic and Weston are both riding bikes on recovery day. This is a good sign that both are active.

I have this wierd feeling Gio is going to start on Friday but I have nothing to back that up.
I’ll be shocked if he doesn’t start. I don’t buy any of the BS about Morris being more physical - I think he made the decision to start Gio on Friday and he doesn’t trust him to be out there twice in 5 days.

that was my feeling as well when the decision was made, especially when Reyna himself said he was experiencing tightness in recent days.

That being said, I think 30 minutes of Gio against Wales might be more important than 70 minutes of Gio against England. The US Wales game was dying for some one to try "something", which Gio is one of the few willing to do.
 
was thinking about this today......does anyone have any memory of a game where CP actually delivered good corner kicks?

As far as I tell, pretty much all he ever does is hit the first man.
 
was thinking about this today......does anyone have any memory of a game where CP actually delivered good corner kicks?

As far as I tell, pretty much all he ever does is hit the first man.

absolutely. It is not often but he was clutch in one game I remember (there may have been more in this game but I was too lazy to search beyond these two)


but mostly he has been poor at this
 
Last edited:
Fox says its #USMNT vs. Wales broadcast drew 8,306,000 viewers, of which 563,000 watched through Fox's streaming platform.

The peak viewership was 9,434,000 toward the end of the game.

Top 5 ratings markets:

1. Austin
2. Cincinnati
3. Dallas
4. San Diego
5. Philadelphia


Telemundo says:

- 3.2 million viewers across all of its platforms for #USMNT vs. Wales

- 1.0 million were via streaming, including Peacock

- Telemundo beat Fox in Miami (which isn't too surprising)

- 1.2m total for England-Iran, 1.9m total for Senegal-Netherlands

 
do we just lack creativity overall in terms of our players? I can’t really put the second half on the coaches - no coach in the world would tell Pulisic not to hit that pass to Weah. We desperately need Gio imo, and it’s why I wanted Djorde to get a more serious look. Christian is great and we all love him, but it’s clear that being creative in the center of the field ain’t his thing.
 
As weird as Gregg can be with his decisions after watching the second half a couple of times now I’m firmly in the camp that the players weren’t good enough. Don’t tell BassnBrew but if we’re not gonna try a non-traditional player at the 9 I’d be interested to see Gio and Weah flanking the striker with Puli as the super sub.
 
do we just lack creativity overall in terms of our players? I can’t really put the second half on the coaches - no coach in the world would tell Pulisic not to hit that pass to Weah. We desperately need Gio imo, and it’s why I wanted Djorde to get a more serious look. Christian is great and we all love him, but it’s clear that being creative in the center of the field ain’t his thing.

Pulisic is tricky to gauge. There are times he appears to have all the instincts needed to be a good number ten and pull the strings but I think too many times his winger mentality takes over and he loses his vision.

He is what he is I think at this point. A fantastic US player, and should go down as one of the all time greats in US history. At very worst, a top 5 player.

He is 24 now so I doubt we see any big improvement. The question is whether he can find some consistency and raise his level when needed.

Landon was already effecting WC level games when he was 20 with almost none of the extreme high level experience Pulisic has. But Landon also had some bad moments as well.
 
do we just lack creativity overall in terms of our players? I can’t really put the second half on the coaches - no coach in the world would tell Pulisic not to hit that pass to Weah. We desperately need Gio imo, and it’s why I wanted Djorde to get a more serious look. Christian is great and we all love him, but it’s clear that being creative in the center of the field ain’t his thing.

Pulisic is tricky to gauge. There are times he appears to have all the instincts needed to be a good number ten and pull the strings but I think too many times his winger mentality takes over and he loses his vision.

He is what he is I think at this point. A fantastic US player, and should go down as one of the all time greats in US history. At very worst, a top 5 player.

He is 24 now so I doubt we see any big improvement. The question is whether he can find some consistency and raise his level when needed.

Landon was already effecting WC level games when he was 20 with almost none of the extreme high level experience Pulisic has. But Landon also had some bad moments as well.
Yeah, and to be clear before bassnbrew throws a hissy fit, I love Puli and he’s amazing. I just think he’s a complementary piece and should be deployed as such.
 
do we just lack creativity overall in terms of our players? I can’t really put the second half on the coaches - no coach in the world would tell Pulisic not to hit that pass to Weah. We desperately need Gio imo, and it’s why I wanted Djorde to get a more serious look. Christian is great and we all love him, but it’s clear that being creative in the center of the field ain’t his thing.

Pulisic is tricky to gauge. There are times he appears to have all the instincts needed to be a good number ten and pull the strings but I think too many times his winger mentality takes over and he loses his vision.

He is what he is I think at this point. A fantastic US player, and should go down as one of the all time greats in US history. At very worst, a top 5 player.

He is 24 now so I doubt we see any big improvement. The question is whether he can find some consistency and raise his level when needed.

Landon was already effecting WC level games when he was 20 with almost none of the extreme high level experience Pulisic has. But Landon also had some bad moments as well.
Yeah, and to be clear before bassnbrew throws a hissy fit, I love Puli and he’s amazing. I just think he’s a complementary piece and should be deployed as such.

we have been saying for a while that Donovan had Dempsey, but Pulisic has yet to have that other top offensive player to play with and take some heat off of him. This is why Gio's long injury was a crusher. I was really hoping he was going to take the leap these past 15 months but it was not to be for this cycle.
 
do we just lack creativity overall in terms of our players? I can’t really put the second half on the coaches - no coach in the world would tell Pulisic not to hit that pass to Weah. We desperately need Gio imo, and it’s why I wanted Djorde to get a more serious look. Christian is great and we all love him, but it’s clear that being creative in the center of the field ain’t his thing.

Pulisic is tricky to gauge. There are times he appears to have all the instincts needed to be a good number ten and pull the strings but I think too many times his winger mentality takes over and he loses his vision.

He is what he is I think at this point. A fantastic US player, and should go down as one of the all time greats in US history. At very worst, a top 5 player.

He is 24 now so I doubt we see any big improvement. The question is whether he can find some consistency and raise his level when needed.

Landon was already effecting WC level games when he was 20 with almost none of the extreme high level experience Pulisic has. But Landon also had some bad moments as well.
Yeah, and to be clear before bassnbrew throws a hissy fit, I love Puli and he’s amazing. I just think he’s a complementary piece and should be deployed as such.
I agree to some extent. I do believe he’s one of our better players and has to start. The problem is we don’t have a really good full team yet.

I remember someone here posting a clip when Reyna was 17 or so. I said at the time that he was gonna be better than Pulisic. Some of you laughed at me.

Health aside for now I still stand by that. Pulisic is a good player. But to me he looks like he’s regressed. If you are a world class Chelsea player you HAVE to make those passes he missed the other day. Your set pieces HAVE to be world class. You HAVE to lead this team.

Right now we have a lot of nice players. Young for sure. But from what I see this group’s ceiling by 2026 might be advancement to the knockout round. But we are still several age groups away from being a serious contender.

But we are getting better, but if I’m being honest I thought our overall team and skill level would be miles better than where we are right now.
 
I just think he’s a complementary piece and should be deployed as such.
I just wish he'd stay higher and wider. Like in a Salah role -- break early, stretch the defense, get into 1 v 1s, play quick combos 2 v 2, cross into the box when there are few defenders, etc. Not being in midfield or on the ball in the center of the field doesn't have to mean 'complementary' exactly.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top