Ross.Robinson (KC) and Ross (Cin) are available, which one would you grab?
Your*You’re face is also that.
Every time he lined up last year? Payton’s gimmick plays failed more than they succeeded.link?
He baited you into becoming a grammar nazi.. he wins.Your*
Should probably proofread attempted burns.
Yeah he baited me. That’s it.He baited you into becoming a grammar nazi.. he wins.
Or he didn't, and you voluntarily became a grammar nazi, so you lose?Yeah he baited me. That’s it.
Burns are nazi exempt. Come on.Or he didn't, and you voluntarily became a grammar nazi, so you lose?
Even KC guys need their divining rods to figure that one out.Could any KC guys on here give us there opinion on which WR to go with? Robinson or Hardman?
One is a slightly higher drafted rookie that is a bit smaller and the other is a guy with a couple years of experience that is a bit larger but hasnt really shown anything until Sun. But from the highlights I saw Robinson looked amazing. Sleek and fast.Even KC guys need their divining rods to figure that one out.
Yeah, I don't know if you saw the other thread I posted this in, but I listened to the Raiders game with audio on Tony Romo and Jim Nantz. Romo and Nantz both said that in the production meeting with Mahomes, Mahomes specifically mentioned Robinson's ability to get open when Mahomes scrambled or freelanced. He predicted a big day for Robinson. Now, that's to be taken with a grain of salt, and has to be understood in light of the game plan, but that might count for something.One is a slightly higher drafted rookie that is a bit smaller and the other is a guy with a couple years of experience that is a bit larger but hasnt really shown anything until Sun. But from the highlights I saw Robinson looked amazing. Sleek and fast.
I get all of that but there is an article (I will try and find it again) that says despite this weeks production that Hardman has been a Mahommes favorite and can slide into the Hill role in the option so he would be the more valuable pickup.Yeah, I don't know if you saw the other thread I posted this in, but I listened to the Raiders game with audio on Tony Romo and Jim Nantz. Romo and Nantz both said that in the production meeting with Mahomes, Mahomes specifically mentioned Robinson's ability to get open when Mahomes scrambled or freelanced. He predicted a big day for Robinson. Now, that's to be taken with a grain of salt, and has to be understood in light of the game plan, but that might count for something.
And Robinson outsnapped Hardman by about fifteen snaps, if I'm reading right.
Sure. I'm pushing neither. Just adding to the information that one processes. That's why I said even KC homers might need a divining rod. I don't say that lightly when there's info. Remember it=Info.I get all of that but there is an article (I will try and find it again) that says despite this weeks production that Hardman has been a Mahommes favorite and can slide into the Hill role in the option so he would be the more valuable pickup.
That argument is based on their usage when Hill returns.. positing that Robinson at that time will no longer see the field while Mecole would still have a role.https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2853885-sammy-watkins-demarcus-robinson-mecole-hardmans-fantasy-outlook-after-week-2
For what its worth here is a article stating hardman is the man to get
gotchaThat argument is based on their usage when Hill returns.. positing that Robinson at that time will no longer see the field while Mecole would still have a role.
Does nothing to help the guessing game today.
Yep that arm could make a week winner out of anyone.gotcha
Wish I could roster both on general principle
I am still lollering at the bears TRADING UP for Trubusky. How in the hell do you get that so wrong?Yep that arm could make a week winner out of anyone.
Your wire is better than mine.Dalton is the only available of those. I'd grab Allen.I have Brees and guys like Dalton, Allen and Stafford are available. All of these better options IMO than Bridgewater. Now, I'm not sure which one of the 3 I should pick but that's a different question....lol
Makes me feel a lot better than my draft mistakes...I am still lollering at the bears TRADING UP for Trubusky. How in the hell do you get that so wrong?
Well, if it’s a coin toss for now wouldn’t I want the guy that’s going to valuable even when Hill gets back?That argument is based on their usage when Hill returns.. positing that Robinson at that time will no longer see the field while Mecole would still have a role.
Does nothing to help the guessing game today.
I don't think you are going to want either (at least on a weekly basis) when Hill comes back.Well, if it’s a coin toss for now wouldn’t I want the guy that’s going to valuable even when Hill gets back?
Yeah, that’s probably correct if Watkins can stay healthyI don't think you are going to want either (at least on a weekly basis) when Hill comes back.
Others have said it, but Chris Herndon might be a good preemptive stash for when he returns in a handful of weeks.I am in trouble at TE after drafting too injury prone players in Henry and Reed. Tried Vernon Davis as a stop gap last week and it didn't work out well. Going to try for Will Dissly (another injury prone player). He looks to be a red zone target for Wilson and had a good start last season until he got injured.
Yes this is the issue I'm having. Do I want to burn my top waiver priority only to be stuck in this guessing game? Mecole is no longer available anywayI don't think you are going to want either (at least on a weekly basis) when Hill comes back.
Until then, guessing right/wrong is going to win/lose weeks.
But as we just saw this past week that offense is liquid and having a piece of it even for the short term is worth it.I don't think you are going to want either (at least on a weekly basis) when Hill comes back.
Until then, guessing right/wrong is going to win/lose weeks.
Buff still has 2 games left vs Miami....Your wire is better than mine.Dalton is the only available of those. I'd grab Allen.
So what you're saying is it's not correct.Yeah, that’s probably correct if Watkins can stay healthy
In two QB leagues, he's gotta be worth a look with those weapons. A Saquon screen to the house alone might make a 2 QB day, if you're hurting at QB with Big Ben or Brees. Other than that, he's less than a replacement player, IMHO.Any Danny Dimes (Daniel Jones) truthers? Guy was slinging it in preseason.
I'm going to put in for him. The cupboard is pretty barren in my league for backup QBs - would rather take a chance with the unknown upside of Jones versus the better known "upside" of the likes of Keenum, Winston, Mariota, Flacco, etc. Seems like more and more rookie QBs are coming in and doing well - maybe Jones is another.In two QB leagues, he's gotta be worth a look with those weapons. A Saquon screen to the house alone might make a 2 QB day, if you're hurting at QB with Big Ben or Brees. Other than that, he's less than a replacement player, IMHO.
In other words, it depends on your roster and waiver wire.
I’m in the same situation. I picked up Herndon, and will stick it out with Cook for the time being.Think I need a te. Would you guys stick with cook or go after one of these we tes? No one is on my ww. Graham, Dissily that's about it
I am trying to drop Mariota for him. I am rooting for him.Any Danny Dimes (Daniel Jones) truthers? Guy was slinging it in preseason.
Josh Allen was Qb1 overall last year from. Week 12 on.so based on all the QB issues from this past week, if you had to pick one of waivers, who would you pick for the rest of the year? Allen or Dalton. I just have a tough time trusting a QB in Buffalo...especially once the cold days are coming....
I supposed trading up (one spot) was wrong, but almost every GM had him as their #1 ranked QB. Hate when people bash the Bears and say they were dumb for taking the consensus #1 QB when they had a big QB need.I am still lollering at the bears TRADING UP for Trubusky. How in the hell do you get that so wrong?
Wasn't the knock on Trubisky a pretty relevant one, though? That he'd barely started even a whole season+...I supposed trading up (one spot) was wrong, but almost every GM had him as their #1 ranked QB. Hate when people bash the Bears and say they were dumb for taking the consensus #1 QB when they had a big QB need.