What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

War in Israel (2 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
THIS IS NOT A DEFENSE OF WHAT HAMAS DID (feel like that's necessary in this thread) -

But Israel has now cut off food, water, medicine, fuel, and electricity to Gaza. And, of course, killed a bunch of civilians with the bombing. It's awful. It's about to be a humanitarian crisis. Or, more accurately, an even bigger humanitarian crisis.
Terrorist organizations don't have rules of engagement. They thrive on chaos, and brutality. Israel will do what the must to regain order.
 
whatever... this is why there is no political forum. can't even go two pages.

I'm out

In my world, religion <> politics. I’m fine with any group of beliefs dying that are supportive of Hamas - it just so happens that most of these are religious beliefs. It’s totally naive to think otherwise.
Your statement, at a minimum, was extremely judgemental. You are essentially calling anyone who has religious beliefs an idiot. It's an extremely narrow minded view that only focuses on the evils that men do, in the name of religion.

I’m happy to own up to introducing something about religion in the US to the discussion here and as Joe said, it doesn’t really belong. I shouldn’t have done that.

But this is also like the 4th bump I’ve seen which totally misrepresents my posts. I have plenty of religious beliefs myself - and many people in here do too and I don’t think any of you or myself are idiots. I very specifically said there’s a very small number of people who will use religion to justify what Hamas has done. It’s not controversial but the way I went about presenting it was. Again - my mistake and I own it.
 
MSNBC reporter is confirming that Hamas has beheaded some hostage children under the age of two.
It doesn't get any more scorched earth than that. Hamas is asking for a strip of glass. They may yet get it.

Uggh. I just clicked on the BLM link with image. I now see what you are saying. That's horrific. 🙁
Yea, I'm generally supportive of BLM and try to stay neutral on the Palestine/Israel conflict, but WTF is wrong with these people?
There has always been a massive chasm between BLM the movement and the BLM organization that has coopted it. At least for me the former is respected, the latter reviled. This is consistent.
 
Somebody wakes up after hearing about what happened and decides to make a sign that says "Decolonization is not a metaphor" and take to the streets.

Another that says "resistance is not terrorism."

"Israel to hell"

"Zionism is racism"

"By any means necessary"

Just unreal.
 
MSNBC reporter is confirming that Hamas has beheaded some hostage children under the age of two.

JFC

ETA- We cannot expect the Israelis to behave rationally in such a situation. How would we react?

Is there a link to this? I’ve tried multiple news sites including BBC and not seeing anything.
 
MSNBC reporter is confirming that Hamas has beheaded some hostage children under the age of two.

JFC

ETA- We cannot expect the Israelis to behave rationally in such a situation. How would we react?
I haven't commented on this simply because I would probably break a few rules and I've made my position on this well known.

But I just read this a well. It appears from multiple credible sources at the moment. I hope it's not true. But if it is I cannot fault Isreal for any retaliatory measure. At this point, peace is the complete obliteration of the enemy. Nothing else warrants discussion.
Right, it’s hard to fault Israel for anything they do.
But the fact remains that the future of Israel depend on them being cautious and thinking about long term ramifications.
Again, assuming it's true:

There is no future for a country or people who would sit idly by and talk with the people that decapitated babies.

War is awful. Very little good is ever done. The good side and the bad side almost always blur at times and overall throughout the war. Mistakes are always made. The extremes of either side do terrible things. Humans have that propensity and no one in war is ever really wearing a halo of truth and grace. It's evil in every sense.

But this isn't an attack on a military target where there is collateral damage. This isn't a small fraction of a small piece of the enemy attacking Isreal. This wasn't a missed target, drone gone haywire or basic mistake in judgment.

This was a human hand with a knife, standing over a child, and using that hand and knife to destroy any line that creates a tension between good and evil. Hamas is an enemy of mankind. All mankind. Their obliteration is necessary, warranted and now without question, deserved.
I don’t think this is wrong. Yet Hamas likely committed these atrocities for the purpose of causing an overwhelming response from Israel that would disrupt/ruin political progress between Israel and other Arab states.

I would prefer not to reward Hamas by giving them the policy win they sought to achieve with the attacks.
 
Uggh. I just clicked on the BLM link with image. I now see what you are saying. That's horrific. 🙁
Yea, I'm generally supportive of BLM and try to stay neutral on the Palestine/Israel conflict, but WTF is wrong with these people?
There are idiots in any movement. Notice you’re not seeing anything like this from anyone anywhere in leadership. It’s some random clowns in a street protest, some idiots in the Chicago chapter of BLM, fools in Sydney Australia.

Even the most progressive members of the US govt have strongly condemned Hamas’ actions - AOC has been very clear.
 
Somebody wakes up after hearing about what happened and decides to make a sign that says "Decolonization is not a metaphor" and take to the streets.

Another that says "resistance is not terrorism."

"Israel to hell"

"Zionism is racism"

"By any means necessary"

Just unreal.
My take: These folks have likely long been vested in supporting the fate of the Palestinian people and seeing death/destruction is sadly not new. I don’t agree with them - there is no excuse for what we’re seeing w/re to innocent civilians, but I don’t think these people just woke up and suddenly arrived at those positions based on this weekends atrocities.
 
MSNBC reporter is confirming that Hamas has beheaded some hostage children under the age of two.
It doesn't get any more scorched earth than that. Hamas is asking for a strip of glass. They may yet get it.

The more they push the envelope of atrocity, the more I am of the belief that their only goal at this point is to literally get Israel to tactically nuke them and wait for the Arab world to use that as the trigger for a full on destruction of the Jewish state. I simply can't think of another explanation for something like this. Just insane. Simply insane.
 
MSNBC reporter is confirming that Hamas has beheaded some hostage children under the age of two.

JFC

ETA- We cannot expect the Israelis to behave rationally in such a situation. How would we react?
I haven't commented on this simply because I would probably break a few rules and I've made my position on this well known.

But I just read this a well. It appears from multiple credible sources at the moment. I hope it's not true. But if it is I cannot fault Isreal for any retaliatory measure. At this point, peace is the complete obliteration of the enemy. Nothing else warrants discussion.
Right, it’s hard to fault Israel for anything they do.
But the fact remains that the future of Israel depend on them being cautious and thinking about long term ramifications.
Again, assuming it's true:

There is no future for a country or people who would sit idly by and talk with the people that decapitated babies.

War is awful. Very little good is ever done. The good side and the bad side almost always blur at times and overall throughout the war. Mistakes are always made. The extremes of either side do terrible things. Humans have that propensity and no one in war is ever really wearing a halo of truth and grace. It's evil in every sense.

But this isn't an attack on a military target where there is collateral damage. This isn't a small fraction of a small piece of the enemy attacking Isreal. This wasn't a missed target, drone gone haywire or basic mistake in judgment.

This was a human hand with a knife, standing over a child, and using that hand and knife to destroy any line that creates a tension between good and evil. Hamas is an enemy of mankind. All mankind. Their obliteration is necessary, warranted and now without question, deserved.
I don’t think this is wrong. Yet Hamas likely committed these atrocities for the purpose of causing an overwhelming response from Israel that would disrupt/ruin political progress between Israel and other Arab states.

I would prefer not to reward Hamas by giving them the policy win they sought to achieve with the attacks.
It's exactly why they did it. No real debate there.

But they've also now said, unequivocally, that there is no line they will not cross, no humanity they will protect. And there can never again be any faith in Hamas to act with a shred of humanity.
 
Somebody wakes up after hearing about what happened and decides to make a sign that says "Decolonization is not a metaphor" and take to the streets.

Another that says "resistance is not terrorism."

"Israel to hell"

"Zionism is racism"

"By any means necessary"

Just unreal.
My take: These folks have likely long been vested in supporting the fate of the Palestinian people and seeing death/destruction is sadly not new. I don’t agree with them - there is no excuse for what we’re seeing w/re to innocent civilians, but I don’t think these people just woke up and suddenly arrived at those positions based on this weekends atrocities.
Of course they held these positions. They obviously hold them very strongly and very much felt the need to get out there after this happened.

It motivated them to scream who they are louder than ever, rather than give them pause like it should to a rational, moral human.

The distance between Hamas and Palestinians is much smaller than people are pretending it is.
 
It's best not to engage with trolls if you want this thread to stay open.
My ignore list has added a couple new members this morning. Best feature on the board.
I literally just added two to my ignore list right this second as I was catching up.

I refuse to engage with that sort of thing anymore. It’s not worth the energy.
If only that strategy had been more effectively used in the PSF...
 
MSNBC reporter is confirming that Hamas has beheaded some hostage children under the age of two.

JFC

ETA- We cannot expect the Israelis to behave rationally in such a situation. How would we react?

Is there a link to this? I’ve tried multiple news sites including BBC and not seeing anything.
I’m sorry I heard a reporter say “it has been confirmed” but I don’t know her name and I can’t find anything else: I’ve had MSNBC on all day while I work.
 
MSNBC reporter is confirming that Hamas has beheaded some hostage children under the age of two.

JFC

ETA- We cannot expect the Israelis to behave rationally in such a situation. How would we react?

Is there a link to this? I’ve tried multiple news sites including BBC and not seeing anything.
I’m sorry I heard a reporter say “it has been confirmed” but I don’t know her name and I can’t find anything else: I’ve had MSNBC on all day while I work.
 
MSNBC reporter is confirming that Hamas has beheaded some hostage children under the age of two.

JFC

ETA- We cannot expect the Israelis to behave rationally in such a situation. How would we react?
I haven't commented on this simply because I would probably break a few rules and I've made my position on this well known.

But I just read this a well. It appears from multiple credible sources at the moment. I hope it's not true. But if it is I cannot fault Isreal for any retaliatory measure. At this point, peace is the complete obliteration of the enemy. Nothing else warrants discussion.

I feel like Israel is looking to raze Gaza. As horrible as these terrorists are, I am not comfortable watching genocide unfold. If the US sits back and allows that to happen, we're no better than Hamas.
Razing Gaza isn't genocide any more than razing Berlin was genocide. They're trying to root out a violent faction from a very densely-populated area. There will be a lots of destruction and civilian deaths, but those are incidental.

This is why Israel (and Egypt) were okay treating Gaza as an open-air prison. Its either that, or clear everybody out. Up until a few days ago, "open air prison" was the best course of action, but Hamas has now taken that off the table. So now they're going to bulldoze Gaza (most likely) and we'll have a refugee crisis to sort out. That sucks, but it's a normal part of war, and it is not genocide.

I love how we're just treating death as incidental. It's ok, depending on which side of the fence you're on. The Israeli deaths, not incidental. The Palestinians, incidental.
It doesn't depend on which side of the fence you're on. It depends on your intention.

Look, if Hamas wants to launch missiles at Israeli troop locations, those are legit military targets. If a civilian gets hit in the process, that's collateral damage to use the euphemism. It is totally different if you are intentionally targeting civilians, which is what Hamas did this weekend.
 
MSNBC reporter is confirming that Hamas has beheaded some hostage children under the age of two.

JFC

ETA- We cannot expect the Israelis to behave rationally in such a situation. How would we react?
I haven't commented on this simply because I would probably break a few rules and I've made my position on this well known.

But I just read this a well. It appears from multiple credible sources at the moment. I hope it's not true. But if it is I cannot fault Isreal for any retaliatory measure. At this point, peace is the complete obliteration of the enemy. Nothing else warrants discussion.

I feel like Israel is looking to raze Gaza. As horrible as these terrorists are, I am not comfortable watching genocide unfold. If the US sits back and allows that to happen, we're no better than Hamas.
Razing Gaza isn't genocide any more than razing Berlin was genocide. They're trying to root out a violent faction from a very densely-populated area. There will be a lots of destruction and civilian deaths, but those are incidental.

This is why Israel (and Egypt) were okay treating Gaza as an open-air prison. Its either that, or clear everybody out. Up until a few days ago, "open air prison" was the best course of action, but Hamas has now taken that off the table. So now they're going to bulldoze Gaza (most likely) and we'll have a refugee crisis to sort out. That sucks, but it's a normal part of war, and it is not genocide.

I love how we're just treating death as incidental. It's ok, depending on which side of the fence you're on. The Israeli deaths, not incidental. The Palestinians, incidental.
It's not "ok" but it is the cost of war. Do you believe there is no meaningful moral difference between 1) the primary intent to eliminate a terrorist organization; and 2) the primary intent to murder civilians?

Edit: looks like Ivan was making a similar point while I was responding. As usual, he did a better job of it.
 
What do you consider a rational response to someone who wants to commit genocide and just murdered, raped and dragged dead bodies thru the street?
rational? an opening heart, compassion and forgiveness.

likely? i'd bet my life against it.
 
MSNBC reporter is confirming that Hamas has beheaded some hostage children under the age of two.

JFC

ETA- We cannot expect the Israelis to behave rationally in such a situation. How would we react?
I haven't commented on this simply because I would probably break a few rules and I've made my position on this well known.

But I just read this a well. It appears from multiple credible sources at the moment. I hope it's not true. But if it is I cannot fault Isreal for any retaliatory measure. At this point, peace is the complete obliteration of the enemy. Nothing else warrants discussion.

I feel like Israel is looking to raze Gaza. As horrible as these terrorists are, I am not comfortable watching genocide unfold. If the US sits back and allows that to happen, we're no better than Hamas.
Razing Gaza isn't genocide any more than razing Berlin was genocide. They're trying to root out a violent faction from a very densely-populated area. There will be a lots of destruction and civilian deaths, but those are incidental.

This is why Israel (and Egypt) were okay treating Gaza as an open-air prison. Its either that, or clear everybody out. Up until a few days ago, "open air prison" was the best course of action, but Hamas has now taken that off the table. So now they're going to bulldoze Gaza (most likely) and we'll have a refugee crisis to sort out. That sucks, but it's a normal part of war, and it is not genocide.

I love how we're just treating death as incidental. It's ok, depending on which side of the fence you're on. The Israeli deaths, not incidental. The Palestinians, incidental.
It doesn't depend on which side of the fence you're on. It depends on your intention.

Look, if Hamas wants to launch missiles at Israeli troop locations, those are legit military targets. If a civilian gets hit in the process, that's collateral damage to use the euphemism. It is totally different if you are intentionally targeting civilians, which is what Hamas did this weekend.
They attacked the Electric Daisy Carnival and then went after a lot of folks in their homes that had no idea what was unfolding.

-Imagine sending your kids off to a concert or music festival and then this happens...it has in this country and a smaller scale like in Vegas, lot of folks were murdered by the attacker at Mandalay. I mentioned Pulse night club which always seems to get brushed under the rug, we've had horrible tragedies from what were deemed celebrations.

-This should not be hard for most people to understand. Terrorists attacked and took siege including hostages, some of them perhaps Americans who were living it up in Israel.
What did any of these people do wrong?
 
MSNBC reporter is confirming that Hamas has beheaded some hostage children under the age of two.

JFC

ETA- We cannot expect the Israelis to behave rationally in such a situation. How would we react?

Is there a link to this? I’ve tried multiple news sites including BBC and not seeing anything.
I’m sorry I heard a reporter say “it has been confirmed” but I don’t know her name and I can’t find anything else: I’ve had MSNBC on all day while I work.
I believe that was a video replayed from i24, an Israel tv news channel ( we get it on Spectrum service). The news being reported is more current on I24. Our mainstream media is reporting same actions about 3-6 hours later.
 
It almost feels like Hamas wants to see Gaza citizens slaughtered or collateral damage to their goal of bringing in outside countries
Hamas wants Israel to send a loud military response, then the videos from their hospitals start pouring in here and suddenly people will be begging Israel to back down
Remember that in coming days and weeks
 
MSNBC reporter is confirming that Hamas has beheaded some hostage children under the age of two.

JFC

ETA- We cannot expect the Israelis to behave rationally in such a situation. How would we react?
I haven't commented on this simply because I would probably break a few rules and I've made my position on this well known.

But I just read this a well. It appears from multiple credible sources at the moment. I hope it's not true. But if it is I cannot fault Isreal for any retaliatory measure. At this point, peace is the complete obliteration of the enemy. Nothing else warrants discussion.

I feel like Israel is looking to raze Gaza. As horrible as these terrorists are, I am not comfortable watching genocide unfold. If the US sits back and allows that to happen, we're no better than Hamas.
Razing Gaza isn't genocide any more than razing Berlin was genocide. They're trying to root out a violent faction from a very densely-populated area. There will be a lots of destruction and civilian deaths, but those are incidental.

This is why Israel (and Egypt) were okay treating Gaza as an open-air prison. Its either that, or clear everybody out. Up until a few days ago, "open air prison" was the best course of action, but Hamas has now taken that off the table. So now they're going to bulldoze Gaza (most likely) and we'll have a refugee crisis to sort out. That sucks, but it's a normal part of war, and it is not genocide.

I love how we're just treating death as incidental. It's ok, depending on which side of the fence you're on. The Israeli deaths, not incidental. The Palestinians, incidental.
It doesn't depend on which side of the fence you're on. It depends on your intention.

Look, if Hamas wants to launch missiles at Israeli troop locations, those are legit military targets. If a civilian gets hit in the process, that's collateral damage to use the euphemism. It is totally different if you are intentionally targeting civilians, which is what Hamas did this weekend.
They attacked the Electric Daisy Carnival and then went after a lot of folks in their homes that had no idea what was unfolding.

-Imagine sending your kids off to a concert or music festival and then this happens...it has in this country and a smaller scale like in Vegas, lot of folks were murdered by the attacker at Mandalay. I mentioned Pulse night club which always seems to get brushed under the rug, we've had horrible tragedies from what were deemed celebrations.

-This should not be hard for most people to understand. Terrorists attacked and took siege including hostages, some of them perhaps Americans who were living it up in Israel.
What did any of these people do wrong?
Infidels
 
What do you consider a rational response to someone who wants to commit genocide and just murdered, raped and dragged dead bodies thru the street?
rational? an opening heart, compassion and forgiveness.

likely? i'd bet my life against it.
The rational response would be to eliminate the terror threat. There is no coming back from what they did. There is no redemption.

This is like asking parkland families to have a picnic with cruz and just have some compassion and understanding and just hear his side of things. Maybe buy him a cup of coffee and just hear him out.
 
I won't link it but the NY Post is running the "40 Babies" story and it says it happened at a kibbutz
-Some were beheaded it says

Does it matter how the 40 babies were killed and destroyed?
Heads/No Heads, I'm at a loss where people would start arguing about this except if the story is actually true or not

-I like to have some authenticity before I go flying off the handle about things but how the 40 babies were exterminated is moot.
If 40 babies were murdered, the way they were killed seems inconsequential.

-Israeli soldiers confirmed the beheadings when they went to recover the bodies of the people murdered in Israel by Hamas


@Joe Bryant says Link it
 
I was skeptical about the "decapitating babies" story at first, because we've heard that kind of thing in other conflicts too and it always turns out to be false. I only linked to it because it was being reported by an on-the-ground reporter who was right there and talking to people who had seen the bodies.

I know this is a fog-of-war situation and I don't want to link to false stories. If I fall for disinformation, I'll own it and accept some mockery. But I was careful about this one. It's been confirmed by other outlets. If it's wrong, a bunch of people independently got it wrong.

(Edit: Also, to be clear, I hope its obvious that I neither know nor care whether all 40 were decapitated or if it was only some of them. That doesn't matter IMO.)
 
I was skeptical about the "decapitating babies" story at first, because we've heard that kind of thing in other conflicts too and it always turns out to be false. I only linked to it because it was being reported by an on-the-ground reporter who was right there and talking to people who had seen the bodies.

I know this is a fog-of-war situation and I don't want to link to false stories. If I fall for disinformation, I'll own it and accept some mockery. But I was careful about this one. It's been confirmed by other outlets. If it's wrong, a bunch of people independently got it wrong.

(Edit: Also, to be clear, I hope its obvious that I neither know nor care whether all 40 were decapitated or if it was only some of them. That doesn't matter IMO.)
Isn't there video of them decapitating a thai concert goer?
 
Hamas is doing what they are doing because Islam is a religion of self fulfilling prophecy and the Quran has some absolutely brutal "signs" for Muslims to look for when determining if what is happenong is Gods will or not.

In a nutshell, if muslims arent being ridiculed, torchered, killed etc, they arent doing it correctly.
 
I was skeptical about the "decapitating babies" story at first, because we've heard that kind of thing in other conflicts too and it always turns out to be false. I only linked to it because it was being reported by an on-the-ground reporter who was right there and talking to people who had seen the bodies.

I know this is a fog-of-war situation and I don't want to link to false stories. If I fall for disinformation, I'll own it and accept some mockery. But I was careful about this one. It's been confirmed by other outlets. If it's wrong, a bunch of people independently got it wrong.

(Edit: Also, to be clear, I hope its obvious that I neither know nor care whether all 40 were decapitated or if it was only some of them. That doesn't matter IMO.)
Isn't there video of them decapitating a thai concert goer?
I have no idea. Apparently there is a lot of stuff out there, but I am not looking.
 
I have seen some seemingly credible people quoting an Israeli military source saying they aren't aware of any beheadings. Not sure how much it really matters given what we know DID happen, but I think some caution is still in order.
 
I was skeptical about the "decapitating babies" story at first, because we've heard that kind of thing in other conflicts too and it always turns out to be false. I only linked to it because it was being reported by an on-the-ground reporter who was right there and talking to people who had seen the bodies.

I know this is a fog-of-war situation and I don't want to link to false stories. If I fall for disinformation, I'll own it and accept some mockery. But I was careful about this one. It's been confirmed by other outlets. If it's wrong, a bunch of people independently got it wrong.

(Edit: Also, to be clear, I hope its obvious that I neither know nor care whether all 40 were decapitated or if it was only some of them. That doesn't matter IMO.)
These stories are horrible and seem to be getting worse as they discover more. So sad to read about what happened/is happening to all these people. I don't know how Israelis are able to go on with their lives without being in constant fear of another terrorist attack. If I had the means to leave, I have to think I would. They are stronger people than me.
 
I won't link it but the NY Post is running the "40 Babies" story and it says it happened at a kibbutz
-Some were beheaded it says

Does it matter how the 40 babies were killed and destroyed?
Heads/No Heads, I'm at a loss where people would start arguing about this except if the story is actually true or not

-I like to have some authenticity before I go flying off the handle about things but how the 40 babies were exterminated is moot.
If 40 babies were murdered, the way they were killed seems inconsequential.

-Israeli soldiers confirmed the beheadings when they went to recover the bodies of the people murdered in Israel by Hamas


@Joe Bryant says Link it
It does matter in how response is understood.

40 children of any age dying in a war is tragic and a curse up on all adults in the world that can't settle their differences without it happening.

But a mistake can be understood in geopolitics. Collateral damage is a difficult but real cost of war.

This isn't that. Again, Hamas purposely had to do this by hand. Not by drone. Not by missile. Not by mistake. They had to intend to do exactly what they did here.

They get no benefit of any doubt anymore if this is true. Ever.
 
non-religious group, Democratic Socialists of America, holding a pro-hamas rally.


using AAA logic, all socialists are pro-murder. socialism should die in America.
No comment on socialists as that's way too close to the political line.

But I will say, as individuals, these organizers are evil and should be shunned in polite society. I don't see how you plan a rally to cheer killing 250 kids.
I work with people exactly like this. I've typed up like six or seven posts along these lines and had to delete all of them for an assortment of reasons, but people should start listening seriously to people who use terms like "decolonization." This is not a fringe ideology in my world.
Do you think “your world“ is representative of US society as a whole?

I’m certainly no expert, but concepts like decolonization seem pretty out there to me. And it doesn’t surprise me when nutty concepts are embraced on college campuses, but that’ s a far cry from mainstream thought.
Been thinking a lot about how to respond to this, and I apologize if it comes across as if I was blowing you off. I want to respect the "no politics" rule as much as possible.

My experience is definitely not representative of US society as a whole. 20 years ago, people in my world were telling everyone who would listen that "racism is prejudice plus power." Ten years ago, those exact same people (not the same type of person, but literally some of the same individual human beings) started with "trans women are women." Those ideas originated in my world and migrated into yours. Today, those same people (again, literally in some cases) are reminding us that "decolonization is not a metaphor." Remember that phrase. Put a pin in it. You will be hearing it again. It's the name of an article I'm going to link to, but it is also one of those incantations.

I've been blessed* with the opportunity to be in the passenger seat for this stuff. What happens over and over again is that people write it off as dumb college kids being dumb, when (a) it's faculty, not kids and (b) this is all being institutionalized as we speak. I understand that you don't pay careful attention to politics, and that's good. Most people shouldn't spend much time worrying about politics, and I commend you on your life choices in that regard, seriously. You probably figure that the adults are keeping an eye on this stuff. You are wrong about that part.

Read this article.

I had to do a deep dive into this topic about a year and a half ago, and I think this is more or less the most famous, widely-cited article on this topic. It is referenced constantly in this particular community. Understand that these people** mean it. They are telling you what they believe in a straightforward manner. When these people talk about removing settlers from their land, they are talking about you. I mean, especially you, because you are a settler on land that properly belongs to indigenous Hawaiians. A non-insignificant number of decolonization activists will tell you openly that you deserve to have your home and everything you own confiscated from you and given to indigenous people, by violence if necessary. They will not tell you openly what happens to you and your family in that scenario -- that is always left to the imagination.

Read the article if you don't believe me. Listen to what the brightest lights in this movement have to say. Read the people who they cite. These are people who do not care a whit about property rights, except when it comes to very specific ethnic groups inhabiting very specific plots of land. Then it's blood and soil. You should start noticing that.

* If you read that with a tinge of sarcasm, you're on the right track.
** Most of these people are cosplayers and grifters, but some of them aren't. The cosplayers provide cover -- intentionally in most cases -- for the true believers.
Thanks for the education - that paper is extremely painful to read; only made it half-way through. I think I get the point though.

Still not convinced widespread decolonization will be accepted by society outside academia. Sure, there will be subtle influence in language and "PC-ness" regarding indigenous people and oppressors, but not major policy changes. And there's no way "colonizers" are going to be ousted from power, removed from their land, etc. Changing a few sports mascots, or frowning on "cultural appropriation", doesn't really move the needle imo.

Your examples of other "fringe" ideas gaining mainstream acceptance further my point. While trans people are definitely more recognized in contemporary society, they're hardly viewed as equivalent to cisgendered individuals. I acknowledge using terminology in the trans-vernacular that wasn't in my vocabulary a decade ago, but that's a far cry from widespread acceptance.

And native Hawaiians have been demanding sovereignty since well before statehood. As far as I can tell, they've made little headway in over half a century. The government throws money their way as a consolation; I work in a hospital partially funded on the premise of sustaining native Hawaiian health. But nobody is relinquishing property, and the power they yield remains limited.

As an aside, all these discussions are a little contrived, given the definition of indigenous is fairly subjective. Native Hawaiians are typically thought of as descendants of King Kamehameha, who himself thrust a bunch of expat Marquesans off cliffs, when he "unified" the islands. AFAIK, nobody is suggesting those guys regain control, even though they got to Hawaii first. Everyone has blood on their hands, and I don't necessarily believe a policy of "finders, keepers" will create the most harmonious, productive society in any event.

To me, this represents a bunch of old guys lamenting any change which conceivably threatens their position of power. Clearly, I'm not to worried about it. But for you and others like @rockaction, what concrete consequences in the short- and long-term do you fear? In our lifetime, do you believe any of us will be subjugated to literal decolonization? Which indigenous people will rise to power?
 
In any case, if there is any good news, maybe this is a shred of one. The young lady paraded half naked in the truck (and presumed dead) evidently is in a Gaza hospital. That's good to see.

 
In any case, if there is any good news, maybe this is a shred of one. The young lady paraded half naked in the truck (and presumed dead) evidently is in a Gaza hospital. That's good to see.

Hope that's true but find it hard to believe.
 
I was skeptical about the "decapitating babies" story at first, because we've heard that kind of thing in other conflicts too and it always turns out to be false. I only linked to it because it was being reported by an on-the-ground reporter who was right there and talking to people who had seen the bodies.

I know this is a fog-of-war situation and I don't want to link to false stories. If I fall for disinformation, I'll own it and accept some mockery. But I was careful about this one. It's been confirmed by other outlets. If it's wrong, a bunch of people independently got it wrong.

(Edit: Also, to be clear, I hope its obvious that I neither know nor care whether all 40 were decapitated or if it was only some of them. That doesn't matter IMO.)
These stories are horrible and seem to be getting worse as they discover more. So sad to read about what happened/is happening to all these people. I don't know how Israelis are able to go on with their lives without being in constant fear of another terrorist attack. If I had the means to leave, I have to think I would. They are stronger people than me.
The whole history of the modern State of Israel is that they have no other place to go.
 
I think we should be careful in condemning anyone who shows support for Palestinians UNLESS they specifically express support for Hamas’ actions.
 
The whole history of the modern State of Israel is that they have no other place to go.
no other place they wanted to go.

Lot of problems with that assumption, too many to go into here. But remember that there was already a strong Jewish community in Palestine prior to Herzl and the Zionist movement.

But none of that matters now.
 
Palestinians had a chance at a 2 party state. they declined in 1948 . they had a chance at oslo accords, but rejected that when hamas took over which rejects a 2 party state
The Jewish settlers had a chance at a one party state, in multiple locations, where no one would ever screw with them. And they rejected it.

I wasn't sure I was reading this correctly or the way you intend it
Are you referring to Israel as "Jewish Settlers"?
I just want to make sure I was reading that as you intended it,
Not saying I agree/disagree but I want to have clarity when I read what folks are writing

Thanks for the clarification in advance Mass
 
Did Tliab or anyone else state approval of Hamas’ actions?

She claimed they were caused by Israel if you read her full statement. That was the impression I got from reading it, anyway. It was all over reputable news sites.

Here is her statement, taken from House.gov

“I grieve the Palestinian and Israeli lives lost yesterday, today, and every day. I am determined as ever to fight for a just future where everyone can live in peace, without fear and with true freedom, equal rights, and human dignity. The path to that future must include lifting the blockade, ending the occupation, and dismantling the apartheid system that creates the suffocating, dehumanizing conditions that can lead to resistance. The failure to recognize the violent reality of living under siege, occupation, and apartheid makes no one safer. No person, no child anywhere should have to suffer or live in fear of violence. We cannot ignore the humanity in each other. As long as our country provides billions in unconditional funding to support the apartheid government, this heartbreaking cycle of violence will continue."

But I don't want to politic up this thread. I was hoping for reportage and history, not current politics. I got roped in by that statement. I'm going to let it go and not worry about it and apologize for even responding.
 
I won't link it but the NY Post is running the "40 Babies" story and it says it happened at a kibbutz
-Some were beheaded it says

Does it matter how the 40 babies were killed and destroyed?
Heads/No Heads, I'm at a loss where people would start arguing about this except if the story is actually true or not

-I like to have some authenticity before I go flying off the handle about things but how the 40 babies were exterminated is moot.
If 40 babies were murdered, the way they were killed seems inconsequential.

-Israeli soldiers confirmed the beheadings when they went to recover the bodies of the people murdered in Israel by Hamas


@Joe Bryant says Link it
It does matter in how response is understood.

40 children of any age dying in a war is tragic and a curse up on all adults in the world that can't settle their differences without it happening.

But a mistake can be understood in geopolitics. Collateral damage is a difficult but real cost of war.

This isn't that. Again, Hamas purposely had to do this by hand. Not by drone. Not by missile. Not by mistake. They had to intend to do exactly what they did here.

They get no benefit of any doubt anymore if this is true. Ever.
Hamas and benefit of the doubt is an oxymoron.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top