Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Reed. In 2 games with Love, he's had 138 and a TD and 139 and a TD. He's borderline must start every week in my eyes.
Cousins pretty comfortably IMO.
Give me Fields and the rushing.
Give me Daniels. Mahommes missing his go to guy in Rice. He really hasn't been the elite fantasy QB we expect on a weekly basis in a while. Daniels rushing upside and his ridiculous passing so far is too good to pass up.
London by a mile.
Frank Wycheck is available in your leagues?
Jennings led the Niners in targets last week too. With the way Purdy can hit receivers in stride on crossing routes, Jennings seems like a TD waiting to happen.
I realize I'm too late on waivers.
1. Gross. I'd probably take Jennings, but I don't feel good about it
Wicks.
I'm still going Fields and the rushing upside.
Wandale if Nabers is out for sure, probably Wandale regardless.
I think I'm benching Andrews until further notice. Particularly as both Kraft & Otten are on the field so much.
Fields and the rushing upside
Jennings seems like a no brainer here, he led the team in targets and is playing lights out lately. I ride that train until if derails.
I'd say Reed by a wide margin. He's been lights out with Love, Rams secondary is bad, and Watson is out. Honestly, I think Reed might be a top-5 WR play this week.
I think Fields is my call, even with all TD worth 6. Dallas might be the worst defense in the NFL with no Lawrence, and likely no Parsons. Fields is playing the best ball of his career so far, and I'd prefer to avoid Darnold vs Jets, if anyone knows how to stop him its them, they spent years doing it.
I think its almost impossible to sit Daniels right now, and don't see the Browns as a bad matchup.
I'd go London. I get the appeal of Wicks, but London has been very consistent since the week 1 dud.
I'm expecting Taylor to miss at least this week. I'd go Sermon and Mooney. If Taylor does surprise and play, I'd pivot to Doubs.
I get the appeal of Wicks, but I think you'll be fine going with Worthy. I think he'll be a lot bigger part of the gameplan this week, whereas last week I think they pivoted to Kelce just because it was easier.
I'd go Stevenson here. Dolphins are a dumpster fire right now, so NE should be behind much if at all. I think the "benching threats" are more of a motivator than an actual plan. I'd be surprised if Stevenson didn't have at least a 60-40 edge on Gibson.
I wouldn't call Dallas a tough D at all. They are one of the worst in the NFL right now, with no Lawrence, and likely no Parsons. I'd go with Fields.
I'd go Cooper, Wilson, and McLaurin. Don't quite trust Wicks yet, and think JSN could fall victim to Seattle being run heavy, especially if Nabers is out, which it looks like.
This is a scenario where I'd go Wicks.
I think I'd stick with Tyreek here. Thomas is the clear other option.
I'd go with the Bears. Its possible I'm putting too much weight into priors, but Dalton feels likely to fizz out, and the Jets feel likely to get going a little. Pretty much a 51-49 though.
Downs if Flacco plays, Jennings if he doesn't. You could make an argument for Jennings over Downs even if Flacco plays.
In PPR 100% Wan'Dale. I would probably say the same even if Nabers was playing. Personally I think Nabers will miss the game.
I like Baker a lot but I think you have to go with Fields facing a Dallas D that is already missing Lawrence and very likely missing Micah Parsons.
I don't think there is any evidence that Thursday night games have less scoring or yardage than any other games. So if you like Baker, you should start him IMO. Considering how depleted the Bucs defense is this could be a high scoring affair but don't use that as a reason to start anyone. Predicting game scripts is a fools errand.
I'm for sure sitting McCloud.
Moss and Hunt
Hard to sit Reed at this point. Terry has to hit a big play for a TD to be FF viable
I like Fields against a beat up Dallas D. No Parsons, big problems for Dallas
Tough one, but I give Fields a slight edge. Dallas beat up on D and Fields is throwing the ball really well right now. With Patterson and Warren probably out, he should run a bit more too.
any degenerate will tell u u always go unders for TNF. though, that doesn't mean low scoring... just means lower than the line... huh, just realized that. thanks gb.
Sidebar: Is there such a thing as a generate gambler?
Even though I think it looks like Jones is improving weekly and looks like a guy who wants to keep his job. And I think Deshaun looks like he's just collecting a paycheck, I think I play the matchups and go with Deshaun.Bye week hell: Deshaun Watson @WAS or Daniel Jones @SEA?
6pt TDs, -3pt INTs
Even though I think it looks like Jones is improving weekly and looks like a guy who wants to keep his job. And I think Deshaun looks like he's just collecting a paycheck, I think I play the matchups and go with Deshaun.Bye week hell: Deshaun Watson @WAS or Daniel Jones @SEA?
6pt TDs, -3pt INTs
But I can see going with Jones too.
I doubt Nabers plays which is a big part of why I say Deshaun. Even if Nabers does play, Seattle has a better defense than Washington and the Giants have a long cross country trip.Even though I think it looks like Jones is improving weekly and looks like a guy who wants to keep his job. And I think Deshaun looks like he's just collecting a paycheck, I think I play the matchups and go with Deshaun.Bye week hell: Deshaun Watson @WAS or Daniel Jones @SEA?
6pt TDs, -3pt INTs
But I can see going with Jones too.
Also leaning toward Watson but waiting for info on Nabers before locking it in
lol, excellent question. I'd like to think yes.
White for sure
I think I lean towards Javonte. He's leading the backfield in snaps (56%) and touches, most importantly he seems to be the guy Payton trusts to protect Nix so I don't think he's losing his job. Flavor of the week Tyler Badie is trending out and it's a solid matchup against a vulnerable Raiders run defense. There is zero concern that McLaughlin will take over for him either.
Both defenses could be tough, I'd go with the ascending Brown over the descending White as I think Brown has the better TD chance
As electric as Brown was last week it's important to note that, while he received a 40% snap share he had only three opportunities in the first half. The rest of his opportunities came when the Bengals had the lead. There is still some uncertainty to his utilization, particularly in what may be a close game or where the Bengals could be trailing.
