Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Not only are they exceptions, but they were also drafted very highly. Hurns would be way beyond an exception.
With the #1 waiver though?T with T said:
You use it because he is a game changer down the stretch. Just look at last season, I'm sure most people (including me) rode him to fantasy gold. The only performer that might be in FA that I would even consider over Gordon is Moreno. Moreno is rostered in all of my leagues except in my F&F league, of which I dropped him for Gordon -_- but have the number 1 waiver pick anyway.
This is the lazy way to do it though, look at the guys and their situations and decide if you want them.
Robert Woods is primed for a breakout season. He has plenty of weapons around him to help take the heat off of him (Watkins, Williams, Spiller, FJax, Goodwin) and is a very polished route runner. Manuel and him were drafted together so they have an excellent rapport together.The good news: I had the foresight to pick up a Jax WR before the game started.
The bad news: It was Marqise Lee.
In the meantime, I'll throw out Lee's old college teammate: Robert Woods. Many people (myself included) had been assuming that Williams was the sleeper Buffalo WR to own, but he did nothing today. Watkins is still banged up. Woods was Manuel's No. 1 target, and he might have even more value if Orton gets the job.
My rule with WW pickups is to chase situations, not stats. Hurns may be the real deal, but he's still dealing with a crowd at WR. Woods' potential emergence as WR1 seems more significant.
No, probably not - but he's a perfectly adequate WR5/6 and worth a stash. I expect a healthy Watkins draws coverage and Woods can end up with a steady 5+ looks a game.
If you are in dynasty, go for Crowell - I can't believe he isn't rostered in a dynasty league yet.
It depends where you are this season. If you're not going to win, break the bank.
That seems like a huge overdid for a crowded backfield with not a lot of running success
Thought about doing the same thing, and I suppose if you need a starter this week, that might make sense. But long-term, I couldn't pull the trigger. Forsett just doesn't look like he's ever going to be an every-down back. No idea what happened with Ridley, but I feel like he's a higher-value lottery ticket than Forsett.
In 12x25 or deeper if Crowell is unowned, then it's a 100% bid IMO. You're looking early 2nd value for FAAB$. Same for Hurns.
In dynasty you have to go Kelce obviously. There are a lot of stopgap TEs (Niles Paul, Donnell, Cumberland), so no reason to prioritize Gresham
Disagree ... Gresham has top 10 potential 700-800 an 6 tds is not unrealistic if Eifert is out
You buy everything. There's not a single player that you don't like..........except Michael Sam. That's just because you're a homophobe.Eminence said:Getting RZ looks, I'm buying.Grigs Allmoon said:Larry Donnell?
not cool bro.You buy everything. There's not a single player that you don't like..........except Michael Sam. That's just because you're a homophobe.Eminence said:Getting RZ looks, I'm buying.Grigs Allmoon said:Larry Donnell?
