Gr00vus
Footballguy
I believe the term is longjohnsI just wear onesies.
I believe the term is longjohnsI just wear onesies.
Every FFA thing is a fat person thing.Is this a fat person thing?
You mean I can unclench now?For those wondering you don't tuck the undershirt completely down over your entire ***
I wear my ice hockey garter on occasion to keep everything tight!!;If this is a concern, the solution would be to use a garter to connect your shirt to your socks. Voted no, as this is not a concern.
... I bet this is heavily dependent on a person's build and specific vagaries of their underwear (gotta have a heckuva waistband going!).It keeps your undershirt from coming untucked and bunching up under your dress shirt. Very effective BTW.
"How'd you get the beans above the frank?!"If anything is going to show I'd rather it be the shirt than the shorts
I'm having a hard time understanding the advantage of the undie-tuck. Can someone please post a pic so I can see what the point is?
Do those snap in the crotch?I believe the term is longjohnsI just wear onesies.
I'm having a hard time understanding the advantage of the undie-tuck. Can someone please post a pic so I can see what the point is?
Yes. It is standard practice in all military dress uniforms to tuck undershirt into underwear.Some of you guys are ex-military ... don't some of the dress uniforms have (sock?) garters that clip to undershirts to keep them tucked?
Thinking specifically of Navy and Marines here, but I don't see why other services would be different.
Even then I often go sans undershirt. I'm not a sweaty guy so I don't think I need it. Also, 2 buttons undone from the top on every dress shirt if not wearing a tie.an undershirt only when wearing a suit/dress shirt tie
This is dumber than washing new clothes before wearing them
Something I actually learned about here in the FFA. Now a standard practice.
Nothing at all.What's dumb about it?This is dumber than washing new clothes before wearing them
This is dumber than washing new clothes before wearing them
What's dumb about it?
That's like saying pizza is dumb...This is dumber than washing new clothes before wearing them
What's dumb about it?
Seems completely unnecessary.
This is dumber than washing new clothes before wearing them
What's dumb about it?
Seems completely unnecessary.
I'm having a hard time understanding the advantage of the undie-tuck. Can someone please post a pic so I can see what the point is?
If it's underwear-undershirt-dress shirt-pants... you've got two layers of fabric sandwiched between the waistbands. The undershirt and dress shirt will slide against each other as you move through the day and eventually one will work free of the other.
On the other hand, undershirt-underwear-dress shirt-pants, then there's only one layer (dress shirt) with an elastic band on one side and a belt on the other side. It's not moving anywhere.
This could be dangerous unless you also tuck in your sweatshirt. By dangerous, I mean if your sweatshirt rides up, people will see your civviesI'm wearing a t-shirt under a sweatshirt today. I'm gonna try this. Will report back.
OK. Mission aborted.This could be dangerous unless you also tuck in your sweatshirt. By dangerous, I mean if your sweatshirt rides up, people will see your civviesI'm wearing a t-shirt under a sweatshirt today. I'm gonna try this. Will report back.
This technique is really meant for double tuck ins
Is a sweatshirt a dress shirt? That is the actual question, after allI'm wearing a t-shirt under a sweatshirt today. I'm gonna try this. Will report back.
At my office - yes.Is a sweatshirt a dress shirt? That is the actual question, after allI'm wearing a t-shirt under a sweatshirt today. I'm gonna try this. Will report back.
hey, if the public gets a glimpse of his ketchup/mustard boxers, and he is able to avoid undershirt bunching anxiety, I call that a win-winThis could be dangerous unless you also tuck in your sweatshirt. By dangerous, I mean if your sweatshirt rides up, people will see your civvies
This technique is really meant for double tuck ins
Me neither. I wonder if the chubbier guys need more support keeping shirts tucked.I'm having a hard time understanding the advantage of the undie-tuck. Can someone please post a pic so I can see what the point is?
If it's underwear-undershirt-dress shirt-pants... you've got two layers of fabric sandwiched between the waistbands. The undershirt and dress shirt will slide against each other as you move through the day and eventually one will work free of the other.
On the other hand, undershirt-underwear-dress shirt-pants, then there's only one layer (dress shirt) with an elastic band on one side and a belt on the other side. It's not moving anywhere.
Never have tucked into underwear and have never come close to having an issue.
I'm the reverse; why would you want your undershirt bunching up under your dress shirt?I had no idea tucking a T-shirt into your underwear was even a thing. Seems like it would be so uncomfortable to me.
STOP TRYING TO TURN ME ON!!Even then I often go sans undershirt. I'm not a sweaty guy so I don't think I need it. Also, 2 buttons undone from the top on every dress shirt if not wearing a tie.an undershirt only when wearing a suit/dress shirt tie
First day wearing clothes for work since reading this thread. Figured I’d give it a try. Gotta change my answer, I’ll be tucking from now on.
that is a good friend take that to the bank brohanSomething I actually learned about here in the FFA. Now a standard practice.
yeah same - I never did this until seeing that thread, probably 20 years ago, and now do it most all the time. I once mentioned it to a friend and he told me if he saw me doing that, like in a locker room or something, he would immediately punch me in the throat. I made a conscious decision not to teach my son this, or even let him see me in that state of dressing, just to spare him the throat punches in his developing years.