yup it was me, spent a few minutes looking over the schedules and it appears that the Jags having the AFCW and the Bucs having the AFCN on their schedules may be the difference - the JAX schedule is tougher, so they would lose the tiebreakerI believe one of the FBG's tweeted it out this morning that in the event of a tie between the Jaguars and Bucs, right now, the Bucs would get the first pick based on the strength of schedule.
Don't the Bucs have the AFCE & NFCW? (Still tougher for the Jags (AFCW & NFCW)... just fyi).yup it was me, spent a few minutes looking over the schedules and it appears that the Jags having the AFCW and the Bucs having the AFCN on their schedules may be the difference - the JAX schedule is tougher, so they would lose the tiebreakerI believe one of the FBG's tweeted it out this morning that in the event of a tie between the Jaguars and Bucs, right now, the Bucs would get the first pick based on the strength of schedule.
How does the Vikings SOS compare?yup it was me, spent a few minutes looking over the schedules and it appears that the Jags having the AFCW and the Bucs having the AFCN on their schedules may be the difference - the JAX schedule is tougher, so they would lose the tiebreakerI believe one of the FBG's tweeted it out this morning that in the event of a tie between the Jaguars and Bucs, right now, the Bucs would get the first pick based on the strength of schedule.
sorry you're right, AFCE. point is that having KC/DEN on their schedule could doom JAX in any strength schedule tiebreakersDon't the Bucs have the AFCE & NFCW? (Still tougher for the Jags (AFCW & NFCW)... just fyi).yup it was me, spent a few minutes looking over the schedules and it appears that the Jags having the AFCW and the Bucs having the AFCN on their schedules may be the difference - the JAX schedule is tougher, so they would lose the tiebreakerI believe one of the FBG's tweeted it out this morning that in the event of a tie between the Jaguars and Bucs, right now, the Bucs would get the first pick based on the strength of schedule.
If the game is in Arizona that is a for sure loss, the Titans are the same teams as years before both those games should be losses, Houston isn't as bad as their record and those should be losses. That leaves Cleveland and Buffalo. Cleveland is actually a good team when Weeden isn't the quarterback. Buffalo is bad and that could be the game.The Vikes are in the running for the first pick too, they just have 1 win and I doubt any team will go winless.
Having said that, the Bucs have an extremely tough schedule but I think they can get past the Rams, Bills or Phins.
The Jags have a good number of teams they can beat: ARI, TEN x 2, BUF, CLE, HOU x 2. Really almost their whole remaining schedule.
Kind of "Ding, dong, the #### is dead, the wicked, old #### is dead!" kinda thing. Good call.The Bucs will get a win the week Schiano is fired.
Good post, we seem to forget that before these guys quit on their coach they took the Saints to the wire.The Bucs will get a win the week Schiano is fired.
This does happen, team hates HC, they quit on the HC, the HC gets canned, interim coach comes in, team wins first game with interim coach (and then proceeds to tank again for rest of year...).Good post, we seem to forget that before these guys quit on their coach they took the Saints to the wire.The Bucs will get a win the week Schiano is fired.
As long as they play in London and it gets blacked out in the U.S.If both teams end up as 0-16, then Goodell should make them play a game with the winner securing the first overall pick.
Great idea. They could have this in place of the Pro Bowl.If both teams end up as 0-16, then Goodell should make them play a game with the winner securing the first overall pick.
This may be where the 1-0 final based on the reverse conversion safety scenario comes into play.Great idea. They could have this in place of the Pro Bowl.If both teams end up as 0-16, then Goodell should make them play a game with the winner securing the first overall pick.
Typical Jaguars. Only the inept Jacksonville franchise could go 0-16 and still not get first pick. Unreal.yup it was me, spent a few minutes looking over the schedules and it appears that the Jags having the AFCW and the Bucs having the AFCN on their schedules may be the difference - the JAX schedule is tougher, so they would lose the tiebreakerI believe one of the FBG's tweeted it out this morning that in the event of a tie between the Jaguars and Bucs, right now, the Bucs would get the first pick based on the strength of schedule.
And England. They are our allies.As long as they play in London and it gets blacked out in the U.S.If both teams end up as 0-16, then Goodell should make them play a game with the winner securing the first overall pick.
Eight games in Jax is at -178 on the year. I had no idea it was so bad.Considering that the Jags have a historically bad point differential, I'll be surprised if they DO win a game.
Tampa, on the other hand, has enough talent that I could see them winning a couple of meaningless games if Schiano gets axed early.
And England. They are our allies.As long as they play in London and it gets blacked out in the U.S.If both teams end up as 0-16, then Goodell should make them play a game with the winner securing the first overall pick.
post of the year.If both teams end up as 0-16, then Goodell should make them play a game with the winner securing the first overall pick.
Humm.The Bucs will beat the imploding Dolphins in a few weeks so don't worry about it.
Way to go, geniuses. Vikings too.Very nicely done, Jags.
:{Golf Clap}:
![]()
Wonder how much that parlay would have paid?Vikes AND Jags AND Bucs ALL win this weekend.
Quite the trifecta there.
Sweet call.Looking at their respective schedules it looks like both will go 0-16.
daaaaaammmmnnnnn.........Jaguars win at least one against the Titans. Maybe both.
There's no excuse for any team losing to the Bucs or Jags. It took a pathetic rushing game by the Dolphins to lose to the Bucs and 3 fumbles and an INT for the Titans to lose to the Jags.Premier said:Sweet call.Looking at their respective schedules it looks like both will go 0-16.
Houston will probably build up a 20-0 lead on the Jaguars only to lose 30-29. Both games.There's no excuse for any team losing to the Bucs or Jags. It took a pathetic rushing game by the Dolphins to lose to the Bucs and 3 fumbles and an INT for the Titans to lose to the Jags.Premier said:Sweet call.Looking at their respective schedules it looks like both will go 0-16.
The Bucs have had the lead in the second half in like 6 games this year. They have a trio of all pro talented players on defense. They're not as bad as their record, although their coaching staff certainly is. I also love how it's the Dolphins fault only that they got 2 yards on the ground. Nothing to do with the Bucs D.There's no excuse for any team losing to the Bucs or Jags. It took a pathetic rushing game by the Dolphins to lose to the Bucs and 3 fumbles and an INT for the Titans to lose to the Jags.Premier said:Sweet call.Looking at their respective schedules it looks like both will go 0-16.
Based on the post in the game thread, they dropped from the #1 pick if they had lost, all the way down to #4 with the tie.The Vikings really don't want the #1 pick do they?