What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

WR Brandon Aiyuk, SF (5 Viewers)

In Pittsburgh 93.7 The Fan mentioned that the Steeler's have a trade in place with the 49'ers per Micheal Silver San Francisco Chronicle. A 2nd and a 3rd waiting on 49'ers. Personally, I think the Steeler's should walk away. Steelers are the only team in the mix that's not named 49'ers.
 
In Pittsburgh 93.7 The Fan mentioned that the Steeler's have a trade in place with the 49'ers per Micheal Silver San Francisco Chronicle. A 2nd and a 3rd waiting on 49'ers. Personally, I think the Steeler's should walk away. Steelers are the only team in the mix that's not named 49'ers.
This has been in place for 3 days now, reportedly. Maybe not to that level of specificity, but yeah. Nothing’s changed.
 
Can the Niners have the highest paid LT, DE/Edge rusher, DT, RB and also 2 different $25M+ WRs?

They can until they have to pay the QB.
And given the cap rising ever year & the way teams play games with it, even then maybe.
They don't HAVE to pay Purdy until 2026 technically. By then, Hargraves will be gone and possibly Trent Williams as well. CMC will take less if he's still playing at that point. Plus, the cap going up. Plus Paraag is a cap wizard. Not overly worried about it at this point.
 
Can the Niners have the highest paid LT, DE/Edge rusher, DT, RB and also 2 different $25M+ WRs?

They can until they have to pay the QB.
And given the cap rising ever year & the way teams play games with it, even then maybe.
They don't HAVE to pay Purdy until 2026 technically. By then, Hargraves will be gone and possibly Trent Williams as well. CMC will take less if he's still playing at that point. Plus, the cap going up. Plus Paraag is a cap wizard. Not overly worried about it at this point.
The cap is so easily manipulated its almost like it doesn't exist, at least for teams with smart/creative cap gurus.
 
Can the Niners have the highest paid LT, DE/Edge rusher, DT, RB and also 2 different $25M+ WRs?
They can try!
Oh sure, I'm just offering a POV that might be in focus right now by Lynch and the rest of the FO
At some point you gotta say no.
I do think in future drafts you can find a decent replacement for him but he's entering his 5th year option, his cap hit might actually lower if they extend him before skyrocketing next year

Is he worth it? He's pretty good, I think some of his success is the surrounding pieces and the coaching but that's just one opinion
He was a 1st round pick, he's largely been a success, made a nice jump from year 2 to Year 3 and went further last season.

Tough decision for all involved.
 
The Pittsburgh Steelers were reportedly a call away from landing wide receiver Brandon Aiyuk in a trade with the San Francisco 49ers. However, new details about the situation have shed light on the hold-up of the talks. The Steelers offered Aiyuk less than $28 million annually for a new contract. The offer has pushed Aiyuk back to the contract negotiation table with the 49ers. It appears that Aiyuk may not be able to get the top-of-market contract he seeks after all. Aiyuk is coming off a career year in which he caught 75 passes for 1,342 yards and seven touchdowns. He is due for a new contract as he enters the fifth year of his rookie deal. Aiyuk has not participated in training camp or the preseason while he seeks a new contract. For now, fantasy managers will need to monitor whether the Steelers will increase their offer or if Aiyuk will come to terms with the 49ers.--Quincy Milton III - RotoBaller
 
The Pittsburgh Steelers were reportedly a call away from landing wide receiver Brandon Aiyuk in a trade with the San Francisco 49ers. However, new details about the situation have shed light on the hold-up of the talks. The Steelers offered Aiyuk less than $28 million annually for a new contract. The offer has pushed Aiyuk back to the contract negotiation table with the 49ers. It appears that Aiyuk may not be able to get the top-of-market contract he seeks after all. Aiyuk is coming off a career year in which he caught 75 passes for 1,342 yards and seven touchdowns. He is due for a new contract as he enters the fifth year of his rookie deal. Aiyuk has not participated in training camp or the preseason while he seeks a new contract. For now, fantasy managers will need to monitor whether the Steelers will increase their offer or if Aiyuk will come to terms with the 49ers.--Quincy Milton III - RotoBaller
Brilliant negotiating - offer him the same as, or less than the 49ers reportedly offered.
:doh:
 
The Pittsburgh Steelers were reportedly a call away from landing wide receiver Brandon Aiyuk in a trade with the San Francisco 49ers. However, new details about the situation have shed light on the hold-up of the talks. The Steelers offered Aiyuk less than $28 million annually for a new contract. The offer has pushed Aiyuk back to the contract negotiation table with the 49ers. It appears that Aiyuk may not be able to get the top-of-market contract he seeks after all. Aiyuk is coming off a career year in which he caught 75 passes for 1,342 yards and seven touchdowns. He is due for a new contract as he enters the fifth year of his rookie deal. Aiyuk has not participated in training camp or the preseason while he seeks a new contract. For now, fantasy managers will need to monitor whether the Steelers will increase their offer or if Aiyuk will come to terms with the 49ers.--Quincy Milton III - RotoBaller
Not shocked if true. I already stated earlier the Steelers probably had the lowest contract and trade offer on the table.
 
The Pittsburgh Steelers were reportedly a call away from landing wide receiver Brandon Aiyuk in a trade with the San Francisco 49ers. However, new details about the situation have shed light on the hold-up of the talks. The Steelers offered Aiyuk less than $28 million annually for a new contract. The offer has pushed Aiyuk back to the contract negotiation table with the 49ers. It appears that Aiyuk may not be able to get the top-of-market contract he seeks after all. Aiyuk is coming off a career year in which he caught 75 passes for 1,342 yards and seven touchdowns. He is due for a new contract as he enters the fifth year of his rookie deal. Aiyuk has not participated in training camp or the preseason while he seeks a new contract. For now, fantasy managers will need to monitor whether the Steelers will increase their offer or if Aiyuk will come to terms with the 49ers.--Quincy Milton III - RotoBaller
Brilliant negotiating - offer him the same as, or less than the 49ers reportedly offered.
:doh:
Given the difference in taxes, 28 in Pittsburgh is about the same as 31 in SF
 
The Pittsburgh Steelers were reportedly a call away from landing wide receiver Brandon Aiyuk in a trade with the San Francisco 49ers. However, new details about the situation have shed light on the hold-up of the talks. The Steelers offered Aiyuk less than $28 million annually for a new contract. The offer has pushed Aiyuk back to the contract negotiation table with the 49ers. It appears that Aiyuk may not be able to get the top-of-market contract he seeks after all. Aiyuk is coming off a career year in which he caught 75 passes for 1,342 yards and seven touchdowns. He is due for a new contract as he enters the fifth year of his rookie deal. Aiyuk has not participated in training camp or the preseason while he seeks a new contract. For now, fantasy managers will need to monitor whether the Steelers will increase their offer or if Aiyuk will come to terms with the 49ers.--Quincy Milton III - RotoBaller
Brilliant negotiating - offer him the same as, or less than the 49ers reportedly offered.
:doh:
Given the difference in taxes, 28 in Pittsburgh is about the same as 31 in SF
6.07% of 14,000,000 = $849,800

12.3% of 16,500,000 = $1,906,500
 
Can the Niners have the highest paid LT, DE/Edge rusher, DT, RB and also 2 different $25M+ WRs?

They can until they have to pay the QB.
And given the cap rising ever year & the way teams play games with it, even then maybe.
They don't HAVE to pay Purdy until 2026 technically. By then, Hargraves will be gone and possibly Trent Williams as well. CMC will take less if he's still playing at that point. Plus, the cap going up. Plus Paraag is a cap wizard. Not overly worried about it at this point.

Can the Niners have the highest paid LT, DE/Edge rusher, DT, RB and also 2 different $25M+ WRs?

They can until they have to pay the QB.
And given the cap rising ever year & the way teams play games with it, even then maybe.
They don't HAVE to pay Purdy until 2026 technically. By then, Hargraves will be gone and possibly Trent Williams as well. CMC will take less if he's still playing at that point. Plus, the cap going up. Plus Paraag is a cap wizard. Not overly worried about it at this point.
The cap is so easily manipulated its almost like it doesn't exist, at least for teams with smart/creative cap gurus.

The cap can be manipulated, but at the end of the day you have to pay the piper. If it was easy, then Tyreke Hill would still be in KC and Aiyuk would be signed.
 
Can the Niners have the highest paid LT, DE/Edge rusher, DT, RB and also 2 different $25M+ WRs?

They can until they have to pay the QB.
And given the cap rising ever year & the way teams play games with it, even then maybe.
They don't HAVE to pay Purdy until 2026 technically. By then, Hargraves will be gone and possibly Trent Williams as well. CMC will take less if he's still playing at that point. Plus, the cap going up. Plus Paraag is a cap wizard. Not overly worried about it at this point.

Can the Niners have the highest paid LT, DE/Edge rusher, DT, RB and also 2 different $25M+ WRs?

They can until they have to pay the QB.
And given the cap rising ever year & the way teams play games with it, even then maybe.
They don't HAVE to pay Purdy until 2026 technically. By then, Hargraves will be gone and possibly Trent Williams as well. CMC will take less if he's still playing at that point. Plus, the cap going up. Plus Paraag is a cap wizard. Not overly worried about it at this point.
The cap is so easily manipulated its almost like it doesn't exist, at least for teams with smart/creative cap gurus.

The cap can be manipulated, but at the end of the day you have to pay the piper. If it was easy, then Tyreke Hill would still be in KC and Aiyuk would be signed.
Yep. Can't they just sign him to a 4 year 4 million dollar contract with a 100 million dollar signing bonus? His cap hit would be 1 million each year for 4 years, but he gets paid. Technically isn't that correct?
 
Can the Niners have the highest paid LT, DE/Edge rusher, DT, RB and also 2 different $25M+ WRs?

They can until they have to pay the QB.
And given the cap rising ever year & the way teams play games with it, even then maybe.
They don't HAVE to pay Purdy until 2026 technically. By then, Hargraves will be gone and possibly Trent Williams as well. CMC will take less if he's still playing at that point. Plus, the cap going up. Plus Paraag is a cap wizard. Not overly worried about it at this point.

Can the Niners have the highest paid LT, DE/Edge rusher, DT, RB and also 2 different $25M+ WRs?

They can until they have to pay the QB.
And given the cap rising ever year & the way teams play games with it, even then maybe.
They don't HAVE to pay Purdy until 2026 technically. By then, Hargraves will be gone and possibly Trent Williams as well. CMC will take less if he's still playing at that point. Plus, the cap going up. Plus Paraag is a cap wizard. Not overly worried about it at this point.
The cap is so easily manipulated its almost like it doesn't exist, at least for teams with smart/creative cap gurus.

The cap can be manipulated, but at the end of the day you have to pay the piper. If it was easy, then Tyreke Hill would still be in KC and Aiyuk would be signed.
Yep. Can't they just sign him to a 4 year 4 million dollar contract with a 100 million dollar signing bonus? His cap hit would be 1 million each year for 4 years, but he gets paid. Technically isn't that correct?
That is not correct. The signing bonus gets spread to it over the life of the contract.

Sometimes there are extra years that clearly won’t happen at the end of the contract. That lengthens the contract and makes the hit each year less. However, when the player is cut or the contract is manipulated, the rest of the signing bonus that hasn’t hit yet is due. However, the cap is higher at that point because it is years down the line.

You may be thinking of how when a team needs cap space for this year, they change their salary to a signing bonus. The player gets the money up front. And whatever the salary is, say 20 million. It’s spread out of the life of the contract. Say 4 years. Then that is 5 million for the next for years instead of 20 million this year. Creating 15 million this year. It’s essentially, the team kicking the can down the road, hoping the salary cap will get higher so that money is not as big of a deal.
 
Can the Niners have the highest paid LT, DE/Edge rusher, DT, RB and also 2 different $25M+ WRs?

They can until they have to pay the QB.
And given the cap rising ever year & the way teams play games with it, even then maybe.
They don't HAVE to pay Purdy until 2026 technically. By then, Hargraves will be gone and possibly Trent Williams as well. CMC will take less if he's still playing at that point. Plus, the cap going up. Plus Paraag is a cap wizard. Not overly worried about it at this point.

Can the Niners have the highest paid LT, DE/Edge rusher, DT, RB and also 2 different $25M+ WRs?

They can until they have to pay the QB.
And given the cap rising ever year & the way teams play games with it, even then maybe.
They don't HAVE to pay Purdy until 2026 technically. By then, Hargraves will be gone and possibly Trent Williams as well. CMC will take less if he's still playing at that point. Plus, the cap going up. Plus Paraag is a cap wizard. Not overly worried about it at this point.
The cap is so easily manipulated its almost like it doesn't exist, at least for teams with smart/creative cap gurus.

The cap can be manipulated, but at the end of the day you have to pay the piper. If it was easy, then Tyreke Hill would still be in KC and Aiyuk would be signed.
Yep. Can't they just sign him to a 4 year 4 million dollar contract with a 100 million dollar signing bonus? His cap hit would be 1 million each year for 4 years, but he gets paid. Technically isn't that correct?
That is not correct. The signing bonus gets spread to it over the life of the contract.

Sometimes there are extra years that clearly won’t happen at the end of the contract. That lengthens the contract and makes the hit each year less. However, when the player is cut or the contract is manipulated, the rest of the signing bonus that hasn’t hit yet is due. However, the cap is higher at that point because it is years down the line.

You may be thinking of how when a team needs cap space for this year, they change their salary to a signing bonus. The player gets the money up front. And whatever the salary is, say 20 million. It’s spread out of the life of the contract. Say 4 years. Then that is 5 million for the next for years instead of 20 million this year. Creating 15 million this year. It’s essentially, the team kicking the can down the road, hoping the salary cap will get higher so that money is not as big of a deal.
Love the clarification. Its why I hang around here. Now that u mention that it clicks in my brain about spreading the bonus. Thanks.
 
Can the Niners have the highest paid LT, DE/Edge rusher, DT, RB and also 2 different $25M+ WRs?

They can until they have to pay the QB.
And given the cap rising ever year & the way teams play games with it, even then maybe.
They don't HAVE to pay Purdy until 2026 technically. By then, Hargraves will be gone and possibly Trent Williams as well. CMC will take less if he's still playing at that point. Plus, the cap going up. Plus Paraag is a cap wizard. Not overly worried about it at this point.

Can the Niners have the highest paid LT, DE/Edge rusher, DT, RB and also 2 different $25M+ WRs?

They can until they have to pay the QB.
And given the cap rising ever year & the way teams play games with it, even then maybe.
They don't HAVE to pay Purdy until 2026 technically. By then, Hargraves will be gone and possibly Trent Williams as well. CMC will take less if he's still playing at that point. Plus, the cap going up. Plus Paraag is a cap wizard. Not overly worried about it at this point.
The cap is so easily manipulated its almost like it doesn't exist, at least for teams with smart/creative cap gurus.

The cap can be manipulated, but at the end of the day you have to pay the piper. If it was easy, then Tyreke Hill would still be in KC and Aiyuk would be signed.
Yep. Can't they just sign him to a 4 year 4 million dollar contract with a 100 million dollar signing bonus? His cap hit would be 1 million each year for 4 years, but he gets paid. Technically isn't that correct?
That is not correct. The signing bonus gets spread to it over the life of the contract.

Sometimes there are extra years that clearly won’t happen at the end of the contract. That lengthens the contract and makes the hit each year less. However, when the player is cut or the contract is manipulated, the rest of the signing bonus that hasn’t hit yet is due. However, the cap is higher at that point because it is years down the line.

You may be thinking of how when a team needs cap space for this year, they change their salary to a signing bonus. The player gets the money up front. And whatever the salary is, say 20 million. It’s spread out of the life of the contract. Say 4 years. Then that is 5 million for the next for years instead of 20 million this year. Creating 15 million this year. It’s essentially, the team kicking the can down the road, hoping the salary cap will get higher so that money is not as big of a deal.
Love the clarification. Its why I hang around here. Now that u mention that it clicks in my brain about spreading the bonus. Thanks.
No problem. I’m sure the way I understand it is a simplified version of it and its way more complex. But pretty sure I have the basic concept down.
 
Can the Niners have the highest paid LT, DE/Edge rusher, DT, RB and also 2 different $25M+ WRs?

They can until they have to pay the QB.
And given the cap rising ever year & the way teams play games with it, even then maybe.
They don't HAVE to pay Purdy until 2026 technically. By then, Hargraves will be gone and possibly Trent Williams as well. CMC will take less if he's still playing at that point. Plus, the cap going up. Plus Paraag is a cap wizard. Not overly worried about it at this point.

Can the Niners have the highest paid LT, DE/Edge rusher, DT, RB and also 2 different $25M+ WRs?

They can until they have to pay the QB.
And given the cap rising ever year & the way teams play games with it, even then maybe.
They don't HAVE to pay Purdy until 2026 technically. By then, Hargraves will be gone and possibly Trent Williams as well. CMC will take less if he's still playing at that point. Plus, the cap going up. Plus Paraag is a cap wizard. Not overly worried about it at this point.
The cap is so easily manipulated its almost like it doesn't exist, at least for teams with smart/creative cap gurus.
it
The cap can be manipulated, but at the end of the day you have to pay the piper. If it was easy, then Tyreke Hill would still be in KC and Aiyuk would be signed.
Yep. Can't they just sign him to a 4 year 4 million dollar contract with a 100 million dollar signing bonus? His cap hit would be 1 million each year for 4 years, but he gets paid. Technically isn't that correct?
That is not correct. The signing bonus gets spread to it over the life of the contract.

Sometimes there are extra years that clearly won’t happen at the end of the contract. That lengthens the contract and makes the hit each year less. However, when the player is cut or the contract is manipulated, the rest of the signing bonus that hasn’t hit yet is due. However, the cap is higher at that point because it is years down the line.

You may be thinking of how when a team needs cap space for this year, they change their salary to a signing bonus. The player gets the money up front. And whatever the salary is, say 20 million. It’s spread out of the life of the contract. Say 4 years. Then that is 5 million for the next for years instead of 20 million this year. Creating 15 million this year. It’s essentially, the team kicking the can down the road, hoping the salary cap will get higher so that money is not as big of a deal.
I think how they work around it is to make voidable years (player option) at the end of the contract for a low dollar amount. then when they turn some of the big dollars early in the deal to a bonus it spreads to those years that inevitably disappear.

(someone correct me if I got this wrong)
 
So Aiyuk, and Chase and CeeDee are all going to sign after the third preseason game, right?

Right?

NBD - still 5 days away from our draft, everything will be fine, none of these guys will be susceptible to soft tissue injury due to lack of practice

add in CMC's calf and Jah's hammy, we're only talking about 1/3 of the first round

everything will work out
 
So Aiyuk, and Chase and CeeDee are all going to sign after the third preseason game, right?

Right?

NBD - still 5 days away from our draft, everything will be fine, none of these guys will be susceptible to soft tissue injury due to lack of practice

add in CMC's calf and Jah's hammy, we're only talking about 1/3 of the first round

everything will work out

Depending on who you draft with and your league settings and you can add Puka to that list and Jefferson with his qb situation. That is half the first round picks with pretty significant question marks.
 
So Aiyuk, and Chase and CeeDee are all going to sign after the third preseason game, right?

Right?

NBD - still 5 days away from our draft, everything will be fine, none of these guys will be susceptible to soft tissue injury due to lack of practice

add in CMC's calf and Jah's hammy, we're only talking about 1/3 of the first round

everything will work out

Depending on who you draft with and your league settings and you can add Puka to that list and Jefferson with his qb situation. That is half the first round picks with pretty significant question marks.

Nacua isn't climbing into the 1st round, JJ will be fine IMO (*but those do vary amongst us) - as I was going more for absurdist than 1st round analysis, I wasn't clear I had in mind injuires only (first round only.) But you're right, there is uncertainty.

Strikes me this is always true, even blue chip.

Last year:
  • we had the JT injury, and
  • the Cooper Kupp injury, and
  • gosh I hope Joe Burrow's calf is OK that would suck if he re-injured it week 1.
  • Not to catastrophize but just imagine how that affect a one of the two consensus Top 2 WR - maybe take JJ for safety, right?
  • Oh great, Kelce just hyperextended his knee and might miss Week 1

    plus some great mid-to-late August takes that weren't even lukewarm

  • sure is good to have a couple veterans with a great floor in the first round like Ekeler and Diggs
  • man, that Bijan is an absolute mortal lock to be an RB1
  • lot of question if ARSB has hit his ceiling; still can't run deep patterns
  • Garrett Wilson is going to SMASH going from Zach Wilson to Aaron Rodgers
  • isn't it crazy how DeVonta and Jaylen are WR2s on their own team but probably will be WR1s in FF
Same as it ever was, same as it ever was....
 
And you may ask yourself, "How do I draft this?"
And you may ask yourself, "Where is that large wide receiver?"
And you may tell yourself, "This is not my beautiful team"
And you may tell yourself, "This is not my beautiful stud"


Oh, shoot....sorry, just woke up.....had a weird dream I was in a 44 page thread about nothing....
 
And you may ask yourself, "How do I draft this?"
And you may ask yourself, "Where is that large wide receiver?"
And you may tell yourself, "This is not my beautiful team"
And you may tell yourself, "This is not my beautiful stud"


Oh, shoot....sorry, just woke up.....had a weird dream I was in a 44 page thread about nothing....
And then you wake up like this.
 
Can the Niners have the highest paid LT, DE/Edge rusher, DT, RB and also 2 different $25M+ WRs?

They can until they have to pay the QB.
And given the cap rising ever year & the way teams play games with it, even then maybe.
They don't HAVE to pay Purdy until 2026 technically. By then, Hargraves will be gone and possibly Trent Williams as well. CMC will take less if he's still playing at that point. Plus, the cap going up. Plus Paraag is a cap wizard. Not overly worried about it at this point.
I agree that they can sign Aiyuk and Purdy, and I think they will sign both--although I do think it's possible that Aiyuk decides to play out the year, if he wants 30/year. We don't really know how strong his conviction is. One thing we already know is that he isn't purely about money, otherwise he would be in NE right now. We can assume he prefers to stay.

If the 49ers really could not afford Aiyuk, they wouldn't be in negotiations with him. Whether it's 28 or 30 per year, from a cap standpoint, the difference isn't much.

I subscribe to the theory that a team can always sign their studs, and Aiyuk and Purdy are studs.

But in looking at their cap, they absolutely have some issues.Pretty much the entire DB room is coming up on free agency. Greenlaw and Campbell are most likely gone (Dee Winters chilling on my taxi squad......) And they have a dozen guys with Void cap hits on 2026.

If there is one player I would be annoyed with, it is not Aiyuk, it would be Trent WIlliams. Guy signed a monster deal, he's 36 years old. Gets to play out his career with a winner, and is really trying to hold a gun to their head, because he knows it's possible he gets cut next year (clear 20 mill in cap space).
 
Can the Niners have the highest paid LT, DE/Edge rusher, DT, RB and also 2 different $25M+ WRs?

They can until they have to pay the QB.
And given the cap rising ever year & the way teams play games with it, even then maybe.
They don't HAVE to pay Purdy until 2026 technically. By then, Hargraves will be gone and possibly Trent Williams as well. CMC will take less if he's still playing at that point. Plus, the cap going up. Plus Paraag is a cap wizard. Not overly worried about it at this point.

Can the Niners have the highest paid LT, DE/Edge rusher, DT, RB and also 2 different $25M+ WRs?

They can until they have to pay the QB.
And given the cap rising ever year & the way teams play games with it, even then maybe.
They don't HAVE to pay Purdy until 2026 technically. By then, Hargraves will be gone and possibly Trent Williams as well. CMC will take less if he's still playing at that point. Plus, the cap going up. Plus Paraag is a cap wizard. Not overly worried about it at this point.
The cap is so easily manipulated its almost like it doesn't exist, at least for teams with smart/creative cap gurus.
it
The cap can be manipulated, but at the end of the day you have to pay the piper. If it was easy, then Tyreke Hill would still be in KC and Aiyuk would be signed.
Yep. Can't they just sign him to a 4 year 4 million dollar contract with a 100 million dollar signing bonus? His cap hit would be 1 million each year for 4 years, but he gets paid. Technically isn't that correct?
That is not correct. The signing bonus gets spread to it over the life of the contract.

Sometimes there are extra years that clearly won’t happen at the end of the contract. That lengthens the contract and makes the hit each year less. However, when the player is cut or the contract is manipulated, the rest of the signing bonus that hasn’t hit yet is due. However, the cap is higher at that point because it is years down the line.

You may be thinking of how when a team needs cap space for this year, they change their salary to a signing bonus. The player gets the money up front. And whatever the salary is, say 20 million. It’s spread out of the life of the contract. Say 4 years. Then that is 5 million for the next for years instead of 20 million this year. Creating 15 million this year. It’s essentially, the team kicking the can down the road, hoping the salary cap will get higher so that money is not as big of a deal.
I think how they work around it is to make voidable years (player option) at the end of the contract for a low dollar amount. then when they turn some of the big dollars early in the deal to a bonus it spreads to those years that inevitably disappear.

(someone correct me if I got this wrong)
Money that actually gets paid to the player never disappears. So if you add voidable years to the end of the contract, the signing bonus will be spread into those years, but when the contract ends, there will be a salary cap hit to any portion of the signing bonus remaining on the contract. There may still be ways to have that remaining hit spread over two years (post-June 1 cuts), but it will always be accounted for.
 
Nick Bosa last year.
Bosa had kind of a crappy season. Started slow, looked sluggish for much of it. Many attributed this to his holdout.

Bosa had a great 2023 season (all PFF data below from regular season only):
  • Tied for #2 in PFF defense grade (92.7)
  • #3 in PFF pass rush grade (92.6)
  • #3 in pressures (95)
  • #4 in pass rush win percentage (22.3%)
  • Tied for #10 in stops (38)
Bosa had 3 sacks in the first 8 weeks of the season. He admitted that not having training camp set him back several weeks in regard to being in game shape. After the bye in week 9, he had 5 sacks in the next 3 games.

So yeah, it took him a while to get back to his usual self after the holdout.

Per PFF, he had 4 sacks in the first 8 weeks. More importantly, he had 44 pressures, compared to 50 pressures in games 9-16 (ignoring game 17 since he played just 8 snaps). IMO pressures is a much more valuable metric for judging pass rush effectiveness than sacks alone.

He had better game by game PFF grades in the first 8 games than in games 9-16, though it was close 5 of his 8 highest game grades occurred in weeks 1-5.

I'm sure it's true he wasn't as prepared at the start of the season due to the holdout, but he still played very well throughout.
 
Nick Bosa last year.
Bosa had kind of a crappy season. Started slow, looked sluggish for much of it. Many attributed this to his holdout.

Bosa had a great 2023 season (all PFF data below from regular season only):
  • Tied for #2 in PFF defense grade (92.7)
  • #3 in PFF pass rush grade (92.6)
  • #3 in pressures (95)
  • #4 in pass rush win percentage (22.3%)
  • Tied for #10 in stops (38)
That doesn't have anything to do with how Aiyuk will perform, of course.
You must have missed where I said he started slow.

Because he did. And it was attributed to his holdout.

Nope, didn't miss it. I was commenting on your statement that he had a crappy season. He didn't. :shrug:
 
I'm sure it's true he wasn't as prepared at the start of the season due to the holdout, but he still played very well throughout.
He played well.

He looked a step slow, and didn’t look good for one of the highest paid DE in the game.

Many of those pressures would have been sacks in 2022, and most observers attributed it to his holdout.
 
Jiminy Cricket, how bad can the 49ers current offer possibly be? Is it really worth it to Aiyuk to keep dragging this out just to get them to tack on just one more thing?

Aiyuk- “Nope, not good enough. I need the $120M over four years, $80M guaranteed, no trade clause, and free Taco Bell for life.”
 
What’s the O/U on wins for SF? I’m calling my book.

These deep runs take their toll.
11.5

I’m still betting the over
Yep. If I had a million dollar to pick the Superbowl I'd pick Niners and Chiefs. Again
You’ll be wrong. Stuff changes quickly in this league.
Outside losing the million dollars I do hope I'm wrong. Ha ha. I prefer new teams. Give me a Detroit and Miami Superbowl.
that would be sweet but Tua isn't taking a team to the SB.
Stan Humphries and Rex Grossman got their teams to a SB. If Tua doesn't it's not because of talent, it's because there's a buzzsaw in the AFC by the name of the Kansas City Chiefs in the way.
On the back of elite defenses, which Miami is not.
 
What’s the O/U on wins for SF? I’m calling my book.

These deep runs take their toll.
11.5

I’m still betting the over
Yep. If I had a million dollar to pick the Superbowl I'd pick Niners and Chiefs. Again
You’ll be wrong. Stuff changes quickly in this league.
Outside losing the million dollars I do hope I'm wrong. Ha ha. I prefer new teams. Give me a Detroit and Miami Superbowl.
that would be sweet but Tua isn't taking a team to the SB.
Stan Humphries and Rex Grossman got their teams to a SB. If Tua doesn't it's not because of talent, it's because there's a buzzsaw in the AFC by the name of the Kansas City Chiefs in the way.
On the back of elite defenses, which Miami is not.
The 1994 Chargers were 9th in points allowed and 14th in yards allowed. They also gave up 49 points in the Super Bowl. Elite is probably overstating it. The Dolphins defense only needs to be league average as long as their offense is elite (which they were last year, at 2nd in points scored and 1st in total yards).
 
What’s the O/U on wins for SF? I’m calling my book.

These deep runs take their toll.
11.5

I’m still betting the over
Yep. If I had a million dollar to pick the Superbowl I'd pick Niners and Chiefs. Again
You’ll be wrong. Stuff changes quickly in this league.
Outside losing the million dollars I do hope I'm wrong. Ha ha. I prefer new teams. Give me a Detroit and Miami Superbowl.
that would be sweet but Tua isn't taking a team to the SB.
Stan Humphries and Rex Grossman got their teams to a SB. If Tua doesn't it's not because of talent, it's because there's a buzzsaw in the AFC by the name of the Kansas City Chiefs in the way.
On the back of elite defenses, which Miami is not.
The 1994 Chargers were 9th in points allowed and 14th in yards allowed. They also gave up 49 points in the Super Bowl. Elite is probably overstating it. The Dolphins defense only needs to be league average as long as their offense is elite (which they were last year, at 2nd in points scored and 1st in total yards).

The AFC was not very good that year and 2024 AFC is loaded.
 
News that isn't really news and tells us nothing new:


Schefter: Frustrating 49ers - Aiyuk situation nearing a resolution deadline.

With the regular season just around the corner, a deadline is looming for both sides, especially if Aiyuk plans to play in Week 1.

"I think we're at the point now where we're going to start to get a push here to see how this winds up, how it's resolved,"

"And here we are, on Tuesday, August 20, and nothing is still done. Nothing. And I just think that everybody—everybody—is at the point where they know they need to get resolution, whatever that is."

 
Just heard the Shanny presser on 95.7

Asked if there was any update on Aiyuk, his answer was “no update”.

There ya go. It’s official.
 
Schefter: Frustrating 49ers - Aiyuk situation nearing a resolution deadline.

With the regular season just around the corner, a deadline is looming for both sides, especially if Aiyuk plans to play in Week 1.

What's the deadline, exactly? Is there a world where the stalemate doesn't get resolved and he just suits up and plays week 1 without a new deal? Or are we certain he'll continue holding out into the regular season?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top