What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

WR Brandon Aiyuk, SF (4 Viewers)

If you want to play for free, fine; donate your salary to charity and live in a box under the bridge, but don't assume your union brothers want to do the same.
Last I checked $14 million guaranteed dollars isn’t “free”, nor would it require one to “live in a box under a bridge” even in California.

Solid hyperbole though.
If you're going to do that, at least hold enough back to get a decent van. Preferably one with an airbrushed paint job and those little round plastic windows near the back.
And so many oceans - why live under a bridge?

I’m just sayin, be practical, park the van on a beach somewhere.
 
If you want to play for free, fine; donate your salary to charity and live in a box under the bridge, but don't assume your union brothers want to do the same.
Last I checked $14 million guaranteed dollars isn’t “free”, nor would it require one to “live in a box under a bridge” even in California.

Solid hyperbole though.
If you're going to do that, at least hold enough back to get a decent van. Preferably one with an airbrushed paint job and those little round plastic windows near the back.
And so many oceans - why live under a bridge?

I’m just sayin, be practical, park the van on a beach somewhere.
Unless the modern world is very different place than I remember, chicks dig vans.
 
If you want to play for free, fine; donate your salary to charity and live in a box under the bridge, but don't assume your union brothers want to do the same.
Last I checked $14 million guaranteed dollars isn’t “free”, nor would it require one to “live in a box under a bridge” even in California.

Solid hyperbole though.
If you're going to do that, at least hold enough back to get a decent van. Preferably one with an airbrushed paint job and those little round plastic windows near the back.
And so many oceans - why live under a bridge?

I’m just sayin, be practical, park the van on a beach somewhere.
Unless the modern world is very different place than I remember, chicks dig vans.
I feel like I should chime in here from the river...
 
Heard one analyst speculate/raise the question that maybe 49rs have been treading water w Aiyuk negotiations until the deal w Trent Williams gets done.
This has been mentioned locally as well.

In order of priority, it goes:
1. trent
2. Trent
3. That guy, trent
4. Hey, ya know who really, really helps Purdy play well? Trent
5. Aiyuk
 
Last edited:
I also find it disingenuous to say that a player on a rookie deal is "under contract" since their contract has been slotted and that player has little, to no, leverage to negotiate a contract on terms that they want
The NFL is the only system in America where new potential employees do not have at least some ability to choose their employer.

As a country we would go berserk if we tried to mandate this kind of anti-capitalist hiring system in any other industry.

BURN IT DOWN!!!

What's worse is the NFLPA, who negotiated the pay scale for the rookies, did not have their best interest at heart and destroyed their bargaining power for the benefit of their current members.
I mean...that was kind of the right thing to do. Some of those rookie contracts were getting out of hand.

ETA: I mean this from the perspective of what a union should be doing for their members. They should be trying to funnel as many benefits as possible to their existing membership.

I'm trying to figure out what authority the NFLPA had to negotiate on behalf of people who are not members of their organization.
They didn't, really. They negotiated a change of how the revenue they share with the 32 individual teams is distributed. The pie allocated to incoming players was reduced.

They did more than that. They instituted a wage scale based on draft position.
Yes they did. I don't love it but l, again it is a union's responsibility to look after the best interests of their members and seniority absolutely factors into that.

Where they need to push harder is to shorten the length of initial contracts and fight to get rid of the fifth year option. That's going to be a tough fight but that's what unions do.
there is no way ownership will agree to getting rid of the 5th year option. not without a significant concession on the part of the union in another area.

if I were ownership If that was the ask I'd then ask to limit the max length of a contract to 5 years which would cut down on the number of ludicrous long term deals.

then of course the union would say no and there you would sit.
Neither ownership or the NFLPA cares about phony money at the end of deals. They're a "No-harm-no-foul" add on.

The ask is the 18 game season. It's going to happen eventually, the owners are dying for it (because apparently their families will starve if they don't get it). The players will begrudgingly accept it but they need expanded rosters (they also need a second bye week but that's in everyone's best interest).

But the 18 game season is the pain point that may get the NFLPA better contract structures for rookies and, hopefully normalize shorter contracts with more guaranteed money for veterans.
 
Where they need to push harder is to shorten the length of initial contracts and fight to get rid of the fifth year option. That's going to be a tough fight but that's what unions do
That’s what’s been disastrous for sure.

That said, when they do that all the players will start griping at the end of year 3 or beginning of year 4, and we just get the same result a year earlier, no?
It depends honestly. Having bogus back end piles of money that the players will never see is the problem. Shorter, fully (or mostly) guaranteed contracts seems like a reasonable middle ground. But I don't expect to see "reasonable" enter the conversation during these negotiations.
 
His $14M salary is guaranteed. He isn't getting released, because that $14M would become a dead cap hit spread across the 2024 and 2025 caps, and SF would gain nothing. There is no cap hit to SF if he is traded; that would be a $14M cap savings.
Yes, these are the current terms of his contract. My question was rhetorical to the guy saying he isn't under a contract. Thanks for explaining it very succinctly.

Aiyuk has not exercised his option and isn't bound by the terms.
If he doesn't play the required amount of games this year the contract is re-rolled for next year and he is in the same boat under the same contract. Seems like he is bound to the terms. He also loses nearly $1M per game by not reporting and playing.
 
Interesting.

Greg Papa on Brandon Aiyuk:

“The word is that the plan is the 49ers are treating this like the first day of Jets week — that Brandon Aiyuk is going to practice today.”

 
Interesting.

Greg Papa on Brandon Aiyuk:

“The word is that the plan is the 49ers are treating this like the first day of Jets week — that Brandon Aiyuk is going to practice today.”

On Stienny & Guru they said Mike Garafolo reported that Aiyuk is expected to practice.

Whatever that means. lol
He is healthy and under contract so technically he should be expected to practice lol. Of course we know the situation is more complicated than that.
 
Interesting.

Greg Papa on Brandon Aiyuk:

“The word is that the plan is the 49ers are treating this like the first day of Jets week — that Brandon Aiyuk is going to practice today.”

On Stienny & Guru they said Mike Garafolo reported that Aiyuk is expected to practice.

Whatever that means. lol
Yeah, I doubt he will. The same thing was said about Ja'Marr Chase yesterday and he's in street clothes today.
 
Can anyone confirm/deny Schefter reporr/rumor that Aiyuk has cleaned out his locker and left 49'ers facility, expect trade within next 24-36 hours, or is that just more speculative horse crap?
 
Can anyone confirm/deny Schefter reporr/rumor that Aiyuk has cleaned out his locker and left 49'ers facility, expect trade within next 24-36 hours, or is that just more speculative horse crap?
I’ve been driving, listening to the radio all day and haven’t heard one word about that in the San Francisco Bay area.
 
Suit up and play.

If the roles were reversed and Aiyuk was grossly underperforming his contract, would the Niners suit up and pay? Nope.

Give him 4 years, 100 mill guaranteed.

25 mill a year.

But they won't. Because they want to be able to cut them.

So, go get yours Brandon.

When players get contracts like this, and then hold out in yr 4 b/c they are underpaid, I'll then side with the owners.

Maybe an owner should offer a fully-guaranteed contract like this, but with a stipulation that the player cannot hold out or renegotiate for better terms until the contract is fully satisfied.
 
Nick Wagoner
The only variable that *seems* to have changed in the #49ers/Brandon Aiyuk situation: Kyle Shanahan said Aiyuk was cleared by doctors. Aiyuk was said to have back and neck issues early in camp. That would indicate if Aiyuk doesn't practice now, he'd be subject to fines.

Shanahan was asked if he would begin fining Aiyuk if he refuses to practice. He said he would deal with that potential scenario if that happens.
 
A little more detail:

San Francisco 49ers head coach Kyle Shanahan said that the team’s doctors have cleared wide receiver Brandon Aiyuk: “I hope that he’s out there practicing today. We’ll just have him go through individual things like that. Start having him run routes without quarterbacks. Probably won’t let him go against other guys.”

Shanahan said that Aiyuk had told him he was in playing shape, but he wanted to see it firsthand before he threw Aiyuk back into the mix.

If Aiyuk refuses to practice, he could be fined. Shanahan said, “I’ll deal with that when it happens. If it happens.” He alsomade it clear that Aiyuk practicing is not a sign that an extension is around the corner.

 
Will Brandon Aiyuk practice today?

John Lynch: "We'll see. I know he's here today and that's the expectation. At some point you got to play."

What will the 49ers do if Brandon Aiyuk doesn't practice today and moving forward?

John Lynch: “Then we’ll deal with that.”

 
Akash A:

John Lynch sounds pretty fed up with Brandon Aiyuk.

Basically telling him to make a decision — either accept the deal, play on the current deal or accept one of the trade packages the 49ers OK’d.

 
Larry Krueger:

Two quick takeaways from #49ers’ pressers today featuring Kyle Shanahan and John Lynch:

1-Kyle seemed to go out of his way to say “all outcomes are still in play w/Aiyuk” holdout. That sounds like an Aiyuk trade is still a DISTINCT POSSIBILITY. Prepare yourselves, Niners’ fans, for that.

2-John Lynch said there has been “good communication” with Trent. The follow up question was asked, have you had good communication with/Aiyuk? John’s answer: “we’ve had communication”.

Obviously the 49ers/Aiyuk relationship is currently strained.

 
Larry Krueger:

Two quick takeaways from #49ers’ pressers today featuring Kyle Shanahan and John Lynch:

1-Kyle seemed to go out of his way to say “all outcomes are still in play w/Aiyuk” holdout. That sounds like an Aiyuk trade is still a DISTINCT POSSIBILITY. Prepare yourselves, Niners’ fans, for that.

2-John Lynch said there has been “good communication” with Trent. The follow up question was asked, have you had good communication with/Aiyuk? John’s answer: “we’ve had communication”.

Obviously the 49ers/Aiyuk relationship is currently strained.

John Lynch’s omission of the word “good” in response to the “good communication” question with Trent Williams says it all.
 

It's not true. See Spotrac. They project to have ~$31M in available cap space right now, accounting for all contracts currently in effect for 2025 (e.g., Williams, but not Aiyuk). A lot will change, so looking at 2025 salary cap numbers today doesn't really tell you much... but if you want to do that, they have ~$31M available.
Cohen is a pretty reliable reporter.

Not sure why he’d lie. Very confusing.
 

It's not true. See Spotrac. They project to have ~$31M in available cap space right now, accounting for all contracts currently in effect for 2025 (e.g., Williams, but not Aiyuk). A lot will change, so looking at 2025 salary cap numbers today doesn't really tell you much... but if you want to do that, they have ~$31M available.
Cohen is a pretty reliable reporter.

Not sure why he’d lie. Very confusing.

As I have posted previously, OverTheCap and Spotrac are the best sources for NFL salary cap info. Spotrac presents the data in a more user friendly format than OTC. If you go to the Spotrac link I posted and go to the bottom, you can see all of the cost elements broken down and you can see the simple math that gets to ~$31M in available cap space. All the data is there, there is nothing hidden or mysterious... it is all facts.

That said, as of today, they aren't accounting for 2025 NFL draft picks or in-season costs. They will start accounting for that stuff when we get into the 2025 offseason. There will also be plenty of changes (e.g., restructure/extension of Williams' contract, same or trade for Aiyuk, etc.).

I don't know anything about Grant Cohen, but maybe he isn't using the best data available. Regardless, you can use it, because I linked it for you. :shrug:
 
I still nabbed him in one of my leagues since I got him relativly cheap. My only slight worry is that he's "rusty" since he hasn't been practicing. Should I be worried?
I wouldn’t worry as much about that as I wpuld the Jets tough defense if he plays week 1.

If he comes back week 2, he’ll probably be good to go with a full week of practice.
 
Browns rumored to be back in the mix after converting Watson’s salary to bonus money, freeing up $35.8 million against the cap.

3 weeks ago, I was ok w this... Now? Mega mehhhhhh.

Only way I accept it is if Cooper stays a Brown too for the year.

I just don't like this guy anymore, not that I ever truly did
 
Too bad the Browns wasted so much on Jeudy. Although if think he is worth 3/$52M and $41M guaranteed, Aiyuk may land Lamb-like numbers.
 
Let's play GM for the Browns for a minute. After converting Watson's contract to bonus money and setting his 2024 salary at $1.121 million, Cleveland now has the most cap space in the NFL with $62 million for this season. What would the purpose be if they WEREN'T looking to take on a big contract? Granted, it is Cleveland, so logic may in short supply, but why redo Watson's contract for this season if they weren't going to make a splash and bring in a big name?
 
Let's play GM for the Browns for a minute. After converting Watson's contract to bonus money and setting his 2024 salary at $1.121 million, Cleveland now has the most cap space in the NFL with $62 million for this season. What would the purpose be if they WEREN'T looking to take on a big contract? Granted, it is Cleveland, so logic may in short supply, but why redo Watson's contract for this season if they weren't going to make a splash and bring in a big name?
Their CB room is already very nice correct? I have heard Jaire and Lattimore's names in trade rumors it feels like forever.

What other vets are apparently available for trade besides BA?
 
Let's play GM for the Browns for a minute. After converting Watson's contract to bonus money and setting his 2024 salary at $1.121 million, Cleveland now has the most cap space in the NFL with $62 million for this season. What would the purpose be if they WEREN'T looking to take on a big contract? Granted, it is Cleveland, so logic may in short supply, but why redo Watson's contract for this season if they weren't going to make a splash and bring in a big name?
And with the cap implications the next few seasons the Watson restructure is a definite win-now move. Somethings cooking...
 
Let's play GM for the Browns for a minute. After converting Watson's contract to bonus money and setting his 2024 salary at $1.121 million, Cleveland now has the most cap space in the NFL with $62 million for this season. What would the purpose be if they WEREN'T looking to take on a big contract? Granted, it is Cleveland, so logic may in short supply, but why redo Watson's contract for this season if they weren't going to make a splash and bring in a big name?
And with the cap implications the next few seasons the Watson restructure is a definite win-now move. Somethings cooking...
Watson's contract now calls for him to have $73 million cap hits the next two seasons, as well as $27 million in dead money after his contract runs out (in dummy seasons). As you said, you don't make a move like that unless you are trying to put all your chips into the pot.
 
Wish I had just sold my dynasty share for JT when it was offered to me months ago. I’m sure that deals long gone at this point. This is just exhausting.
 
My Spidey Sense is telling me there's deeper issues here than what we've been reading.
Hard feelings? Personality conflicts? Somebody got stiffed paying for dinner?
I don't know what but there's something hiding there in the shadows.
 
My Spidey Sense is telling me there's deeper issues here than what we've been reading.
Hard feelings? Personality conflicts? Somebody got stiffed paying for dinner?
I don't know what but there's something hiding there in the shadows.
Yeah, that’s occurred to me as well.

As all this goes down, I look at that draft where I was on the live NFL draft topic here begging for the Niners to take Lamb.

And they took Kinlaw & got Aiyuk on the way back.

Aiyuk has been solid, but he’s no CeeDee Lamb. Kinlaw was a bust, so yeah.

If Lamb were a Niner asking for a massive restructure, I would personally volunteer to drive the Brinks truck to his doorstep.
 
If Lamb were a Niner asking for a massive restructure, I would personally volunteer to drive the Brinks truck to his doorstep.
Lamb had 1862 YFS and 14 TD on 149 touches last year. Aiyuk had 1342 YFS and 7 TD on 75 touches. I'm not suggesting that Aiyuk is better than Lamb, but projecting Aiyuk's production with a similar amount of touches, he would have had 2666 YFS and 14 TD.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top