Max Power
Footballguy
My issue with not following science is not quarantining vaccinated players who were in close contact. They need to quarantine for 5 days and then test. Doing it the current way isnt efficent and doesnt meet the end goal of reducing spread.There has to be a line at which additional mitigation strategies aren't necessary or worth the additional cost/time/hassle. Maybe that line is "test unvaccinated players more frequently", maybe it's "test all players more frequently", maybe it's "cancel the season". Where the line is will be a matter of opinion and there will be lots of opinions. But, just because the NFL has chosen a different line than you would like does NOT mean the NFL isn't following science, as you keep repeating.
Last I read, approx. 93% of players are vaccinated, or about 13 times the amount of unvaxxed. Note that as cutdowns progress, this number may change, depending on whether more vaxxed or unvaxxed players get cut, but we can probably ignore that for now. When there are 13 times as many vaxxed players as unvaxxed, we would expect more positive tests to occur in vaxxed players than in unvaxxed players, in terms of raw numbers.
Telling all players to test daily is the most effective way to eliminate spread. If the NFL isnt willing to do that, its policy is broken. It's not safe even.
In terms of raw numbers the unvaccinated players are tested at a daily to biweekly ratio. So in theory an vaccinated player needs 14 negative tests to achieve the same results as a vaccinated player. Yet vaccinated players are the majority of positive tests. Makes you think.
The number 1 variable to reducing spread is if someone is positive or not. Pretending vaccination is the leading variable is a dumb policy.