JohnnyU
Footballguy
Little late for that isn’t it?DKM gives me David Boston vibes.
Little late for that isn’t it?DKM gives me David Boston vibes.
No kidding. I get it from the physical freak perspective but metcalf has a longer history of success than Boston did. Although DK hasn’t led the league in yardage, yet. Besides, Boston was pretty good until injured.Little late for that isn’t it?DKM gives me David Boston vibes.
I disagree. Ladd has proven to be a good WR, but JSN is an immensely talented WR and Lockett was very good for a long time. I'd take him 10 out of 10 times over Ladd. Situation and Herbert played a massive role in Ladd's numbers. If Metcalf ends up there, I think Ladd's numbers will take a significant hit and he'll settle in as a WR2/3 PPR type. He's being valued as a top 12 WR right now. That's certainly not undervalued.And McConkey is a cut above JSN or prime Lockett. He's somehow still underrated. In Ladd's last 11 games, he had 11+ PPR points in all but 1 (a win over the Titans where Herbert had 18 passes) and was on a 103-1670-9 pace. He's right there with Nabers and Thomas in my eyes as a top 10 WR.I’m not sure Ladd would dominate targets opposite a Metcalf. Ladd is very good, even better than I anticipated he would be, but DK is quite a cut above Joshua Palmer and Quentin Johnston.Fun fact, with Joey Bosa released, there is now nobody left from the San Diego Chargers. I wonder if SF will try and pair up the brothers, as they've been searching for a bookend opposite Nick for a few years now.Also Chargers just cut Bosa and got a ton of cap space.
I'd hate to give a day 2 pick, and a 30 million contract to a #2 WR, and that's what he'd be behind McConkey, just like he was behind JSN (who McConkey is also much better than) last year. I just have a hard time seeing it, given the offense Harbaugh/Roman want to be. I get they showed interest last offseason, but that was before they knew they had a #1.If I'm predicting which team I'd go with Chargers.
Apparently already tried to trade for him, timeline not provided but guess it was last year? Heard he spends a lot of his off-season in the LA area. The Chargers WR coach worked with him a few years as his WR coach and they apparently tight.
So Chargers have shown interest. Check.
It makes ideal sense for DK. Check.
Just got to work out contract and trade with Seattle.
I'll predict Green Bay. Bigger need, clear #1 opening, and their front office has been getting more aggressive post-Rodgers.
Maybe I have too much recency bias - and maybe last year was just a really good year for WRs - but when I look at last year's WR draft class (MHJ, Nabers, Odunze, BTJ, Worthy, Pearsall, Legette), there aren't that many that I would trade straight up for Metcalf. Certainly Legette - maybe Pearsall (though he was recovering from his gunshot and looked really good at the end of the year) and maybe Odunze. I certainly wouldn't send MHJ or Worthy with a 3rd rounder for DK and I wouldn't trade Nabers or BTJ even if you sent me a 3rd rounder back.Honestly don't know for all of them; Brandin Cooks definitely did though. The Rams signed him to 5 yr $80mil with $50mil guaranteed in addition to paying a 1st and a 6th. Can't quickly find where exactly that fell in WR contracts at the time but it feels very high; and I did find it had him with the 2nd highest cap hit for a WR behind only AB in 2019, and projected to have the highest cap hit for a WR in 2020. It feels like often these trades do occur where a player is coming off a rookie contract, or looking for an extension.Did all of those players immediately need a new contracts? That is just as big of an issue as the draft capital imo.Brandon Cooks, Percy Harvin, Deon Branch, and Roy Williams were all WRs in the past moved for 1st round picks in similar types of packages. And ironically, Harvin, Cooks, and Williams deals all included giving a 1st and 3rd for them. I don't feel like picking nits over comping these players to one another; but I think we can all agree we aren't looking at a history where only top 5 future HoF WRs are getting moved for a 1st round pick. NFL isn't our fantasy leagues.
I'm with Meno, it doesn't seem THAT crazy to me. Highly doubt it's where any deal would settle, but more than likely its the 3rd round pick (or another mid to late pick coming back) that would change in negotiations, not the 1st.
Ok, went back and looked up Harvin too. Yes, another trade plus new contract. Seattle gave up a 1st, a 3rd, a 7th, and signed him 6 years at $64mil and that was back in 2013.
Believe me I'm not arguing these trades, or what Seattle is asking for, are good trades for anyone haha. Just saying it doesn't seem that wild for the NFL and the cost of acquiring a top WR. DK isn't your typical WR1, but his numbers would indicate he's capable of being one. Not one we'd maybe consider elite for fantasy; but definitely a top 15-20 WR in the league (excluding rookies/sophmores on rookie contracts since we are talking about it from a money and availability stand point.)
Again, I disagree.If anything Metcalf helps JSN.I just don't really understand why you think he was being held back by DK.
JSN had a notably bigger target share last season already.
if you are a true alpha WR, it doesnt matter who covers you or if you are facing double coverage.Again, I disagree.If anything Metcalf helps JSN.I just don't really understand why you think he was being held back by DK.
JSN had a notably bigger target share last season already.
DK averaged 7.2 targets per game, and JSN averaged 8.1 targets per game. The super studs average 9-11 targets per game. JSN should see that fairly easily with DK gone.
I think it’s a myth that a very good receiver on the other side helps the other receiver.
I don’t have time now to go do the research, but I’ll get to it.
Yeah, everything you're saying here is my point about McConkey being underrated. Saying he's only a top 12 value because of a lack of competition, saying guys like Lockett or JSN are better talents, saying he was in a good situation, but JSN wasn't (despite Seattle being WAY more pass happy than the Chargers) all of that is stuff I'd argue makes McConkey underrated, even if he's "fantasy valued" at WR12 currently. I don't think he's thought of as a top 12 NFL WR, I'm saying he should be. He's the player people think Garrett Wilson is.I disagree. Ladd has proven to be a good WR, but JSN is an immensely talented WR and Lockett was very good for a long time. I'd take him 10 out of 10 times over Ladd. Situation and Herbert played a massive role in Ladd's numbers. If Metcalf ends up there, I think Ladd's numbers will take a significant hit and he'll settle in as a WR2/3 PPR type. He's being valued as a top 12 WR right now. That's certainly not undervalued.And McConkey is a cut above JSN or prime Lockett. He's somehow still underrated. In Ladd's last 11 games, he had 11+ PPR points in all but 1 (a win over the Titans where Herbert had 18 passes) and was on a 103-1670-9 pace. He's right there with Nabers and Thomas in my eyes as a top 10 WR.I’m not sure Ladd would dominate targets opposite a Metcalf. Ladd is very good, even better than I anticipated he would be, but DK is quite a cut above Joshua Palmer and Quentin Johnston.Fun fact, with Joey Bosa released, there is now nobody left from the San Diego Chargers. I wonder if SF will try and pair up the brothers, as they've been searching for a bookend opposite Nick for a few years now.Also Chargers just cut Bosa and got a ton of cap space.
I'd hate to give a day 2 pick, and a 30 million contract to a #2 WR, and that's what he'd be behind McConkey, just like he was behind JSN (who McConkey is also much better than) last year. I just have a hard time seeing it, given the offense Harbaugh/Roman want to be. I get they showed interest last offseason, but that was before they knew they had a #1.If I'm predicting which team I'd go with Chargers.
Apparently already tried to trade for him, timeline not provided but guess it was last year? Heard he spends a lot of his off-season in the LA area. The Chargers WR coach worked with him a few years as his WR coach and they apparently tight.
So Chargers have shown interest. Check.
It makes ideal sense for DK. Check.
Just got to work out contract and trade with Seattle.
I'll predict Green Bay. Bigger need, clear #1 opening, and their front office has been getting more aggressive post-Rodgers.
I meant it as a legit comp, not an insult.No kidding. I get it from the physical freak perspective but metcalf has a longer history of success than Boston did. Although DK hasn’t led the league in yardage, yet. Besides, Boston was pretty good until injured.Little late for that isn’t it?DKM gives me David Boston vibes.
I mostly agree and I think last year WAS a really good year for rookie WRs; but those guys aren't really on the table for any of the teams in the league who think their WR room is weak currently. Their options are DK, Higgins, and.... well I think it falls off a cliff at that point lol. And odds are Higgins and DK are asking for roughly the same amount in a new contract. It seems I'm in the minority on this thought, but I'd actually say if you HAVE to pay one of them, DK deserves it more than Higgins. Or they can draft a rookie. And as much as I try to rally against people who say this rookie WR class is really bad (though that sentiment has been dying off since the combine), I also don't think it's really good. I don't think one of them will walk on a field and outperform DK in 2025 tbh. Seems like a solid class of a few potential WR2s and a plethora of WR3/4s. The fact I just don't like guys who profile like Tet is certainly coloring my view too. It makes sense he gets comped to London, as I wasn't as high on him as consensus either. I have a hard time buying into guys when one of their major flaws is a lack of ability to separate; at least before they come into the NFL and prove it's not going to be an issue. Also feels they are much more situation dependent as some NFL QBs just will not throw 50/50 balls even with a WR talented enough to make them more like 80/20 balls.Maybe I have too much recency bias - and maybe last year was just a really good year for WRs - but when I look at last year's WR draft class (MHJ, Nabers, Odunze, BTJ, Worthy, Pearsall, Legette), there aren't that many that I would trade straight up for Metcalf. Certainly Legette - maybe Pearsall (though he was recovering from his gunshot and looked really good at the end of the year) and maybe Odunze. I certainly wouldn't send MHJ or Worthy with a 3rd rounder for DK and I wouldn't trade Nabers or BTJ even if you sent me a 3rd rounder back.Honestly don't know for all of them; Brandin Cooks definitely did though. The Rams signed him to 5 yr $80mil with $50mil guaranteed in addition to paying a 1st and a 6th. Can't quickly find where exactly that fell in WR contracts at the time but it feels very high; and I did find it had him with the 2nd highest cap hit for a WR behind only AB in 2019, and projected to have the highest cap hit for a WR in 2020. It feels like often these trades do occur where a player is coming off a rookie contract, or looking for an extension.Did all of those players immediately need a new contracts? That is just as big of an issue as the draft capital imo.Brandon Cooks, Percy Harvin, Deon Branch, and Roy Williams were all WRs in the past moved for 1st round picks in similar types of packages. And ironically, Harvin, Cooks, and Williams deals all included giving a 1st and 3rd for them. I don't feel like picking nits over comping these players to one another; but I think we can all agree we aren't looking at a history where only top 5 future HoF WRs are getting moved for a 1st round pick. NFL isn't our fantasy leagues.
I'm with Meno, it doesn't seem THAT crazy to me. Highly doubt it's where any deal would settle, but more than likely its the 3rd round pick (or another mid to late pick coming back) that would change in negotiations, not the 1st.
Ok, went back and looked up Harvin too. Yes, another trade plus new contract. Seattle gave up a 1st, a 3rd, a 7th, and signed him 6 years at $64mil and that was back in 2013.
Believe me I'm not arguing these trades, or what Seattle is asking for, are good trades for anyone haha. Just saying it doesn't seem that wild for the NFL and the cost of acquiring a top WR. DK isn't your typical WR1, but his numbers would indicate he's capable of being one. Not one we'd maybe consider elite for fantasy; but definitely a top 15-20 WR in the league (excluding rookies/sophmores on rookie contracts since we are talking about it from a money and availability stand point.)
And that's before even considering the contract status. All the guys I mentioned are going to be making $4-8 million for the next 3 years and Metcalf wants $30 per year, most of it guaranteed.
I just don't think it's even in the realm of being realistic.
At 27, this is probably his last big contract. I would assume he will ask to get paid closer to 30 versus 20.I mostly agree and I think last year WAS a really good year for rookie WRs; but those guys aren't really on the table for any of the teams in the league who think their WR room is weak currently. Their options are DK, Higgins, and.... well I think it falls off a cliff at that point lol. And odds are Higgins and DK are asking for roughly the same amount in a new contract. It seems I'm in the minority on this thought, but I'd actually say if you HAVE to pay one of them, DK deserves it more than Higgins. Or they can draft a rookie. And as much as I try to rally against people who say this rookie WR class is really bad (though that sentiment has been dying off since the combine), I also don't think it's really good. I don't think one of them will walk on a field and outperform DK in 2025 tbh. Seems like a solid class of a few potential WR2s and a plethora of WR3/4s. The fact I just don't like guys who profile like Tet is certainly coloring my view too. It makes sense he gets comped to London, as I wasn't as high on him as consensus either. I have a hard time buying into guys when one of their major flaws is a lack of ability to separate; at least before they come into the NFL and prove it's not going to be an issue. Also feels they are much more situation dependent as some NFL QBs just will not throw 50/50 balls even with a WR talented enough to make them more like 80/20 balls.Maybe I have too much recency bias - and maybe last year was just a really good year for WRs - but when I look at last year's WR draft class (MHJ, Nabers, Odunze, BTJ, Worthy, Pearsall, Legette), there aren't that many that I would trade straight up for Metcalf. Certainly Legette - maybe Pearsall (though he was recovering from his gunshot and looked really good at the end of the year) and maybe Odunze. I certainly wouldn't send MHJ or Worthy with a 3rd rounder for DK and I wouldn't trade Nabers or BTJ even if you sent me a 3rd rounder back.Honestly don't know for all of them; Brandin Cooks definitely did though. The Rams signed him to 5 yr $80mil with $50mil guaranteed in addition to paying a 1st and a 6th. Can't quickly find where exactly that fell in WR contracts at the time but it feels very high; and I did find it had him with the 2nd highest cap hit for a WR behind only AB in 2019, and projected to have the highest cap hit for a WR in 2020. It feels like often these trades do occur where a player is coming off a rookie contract, or looking for an extension.Did all of those players immediately need a new contracts? That is just as big of an issue as the draft capital imo.Brandon Cooks, Percy Harvin, Deon Branch, and Roy Williams were all WRs in the past moved for 1st round picks in similar types of packages. And ironically, Harvin, Cooks, and Williams deals all included giving a 1st and 3rd for them. I don't feel like picking nits over comping these players to one another; but I think we can all agree we aren't looking at a history where only top 5 future HoF WRs are getting moved for a 1st round pick. NFL isn't our fantasy leagues.
I'm with Meno, it doesn't seem THAT crazy to me. Highly doubt it's where any deal would settle, but more than likely its the 3rd round pick (or another mid to late pick coming back) that would change in negotiations, not the 1st.
Ok, went back and looked up Harvin too. Yes, another trade plus new contract. Seattle gave up a 1st, a 3rd, a 7th, and signed him 6 years at $64mil and that was back in 2013.
Believe me I'm not arguing these trades, or what Seattle is asking for, are good trades for anyone haha. Just saying it doesn't seem that wild for the NFL and the cost of acquiring a top WR. DK isn't your typical WR1, but his numbers would indicate he's capable of being one. Not one we'd maybe consider elite for fantasy; but definitely a top 15-20 WR in the league (excluding rookies/sophmores on rookie contracts since we are talking about it from a money and availability stand point.)
And that's before even considering the contract status. All the guys I mentioned are going to be making $4-8 million for the next 3 years and Metcalf wants $30 per year, most of it guaranteed.
I just don't think it's even in the realm of being realistic.
We probably are even closer on agreement to it not being realistic than it seems; but when it comes to the NFL I tend to err on the side of "it only takes one team..." and until the NFL becomes the NBA, Seattle holds enough power to demand and likely get a 1st. Or just retain him like someone else pointed out. Which feels like it may just be the most likely outcome here.
Not that I doubt that it's very likely the case; but do we have any source even semi concrete indicating DK truly expects $30mil a year with a huge chunk guaranteed? Because most of the stuff I've read says he wants to play on competitive team, not so much that he "wants to get paid what I deserve" type comments. The talking heads certainly project that's what he's "worth" in the current market, but is it out of the realm of possibility he could look closer to $20-25 a year if it's a destination he wants to go to and is willing to give Seattle a 1st in a package?
The most likely scenario, but if another team values him like Miami did Reek a few years ago, he gone. That's the game. DK, if you think you're that great, go show your value in the market. Door's open for you to come back if going to market served as a reality check though.He ain't leaving, he'll get a raise
GoJo and Golic
What's the latest @DMRussini is hearing on DK Metcalf?
"There's a lot of teams interested, but after I put that (1st and a 3rd report) out, I started to get texts from those teams like, ‘Yeah, right. WAY too much.’…I don't think they land on that. I just think that for right now, that's the asking price and so we'll see if they lower that a little bit to, you know, to move their top receiver."
@mikegolicjr | @golic
@MikeDugar
Dianna here reporting that DK wants to get paid, play somewhere warm and desires a “more stable” quarterback situation.
[insert funny list of "things I want too"]@MikeDugar
Dianna here reporting that DK wants to get paid, play somewhere warm and desires a “more stable” quarterback situation.
@MikeDugar
Dianna here reporting that DK wants to get paid, play somewhere warm and desires a “more stable” quarterback situation.
On paper, it just doesn’t seem like their ideology. Would be a lot of fun seeing Herbert flinging it down the field to him though. Also, would help the running game keeping the defenses honest.@MikeDugar
Dianna here reporting that DK wants to get paid, play somewhere warm and desires a “more stable” quarterback situation.
This has the Chargers written all over it.
Winnipeg@MikeDugar
Dianna here reporting that DK wants to get paid, play somewhere warm and desires a “more stable” quarterback situation.
This has the Chargers written all over it.
Yeah we'd take him on the Bombers. Think he'd take $200k CAD per year?Winnipeg@MikeDugar
Dianna here reporting that DK wants to get paid, play somewhere warm and desires a “more stable” quarterback situation.
This has the Chargers written all over it.
I'm gonna throw it deep corner...DK make sure you take a right cut at the moose.Yeah we'd take him on the Bombers. Think he'd take $200k CAD per year?Winnipeg@MikeDugar
Dianna here reporting that DK wants to get paid, play somewhere warm and desires a “more stable” quarterback situation.
This has the Chargers written all over it.
Does this imply DK would be happier in SEA without Geno?
Along with the likely scenario the Seahawks will sign Sam Darnold at QB, there's some optimism this could alter the conversation with receiver DK Metcalf, who has requested a trade.
Except for the $30M that DK wantsDoes this imply DK would be happier in SEA without Geno?
Along with the likely scenario the Seahawks will sign Sam Darnold at QB, there's some optimism this could alter the conversation with receiver DK Metcalf, who has requested a trade.
Geno is mediocre at throwing the ball downfield. Could it help DK? Sure. Will it? No idea.Does this imply DK would be happier in SEA without Geno?
Along with the likely scenario the Seahawks will sign Sam Darnold at QB, there's some optimism this could alter the conversation with receiver DK Metcalf, who has requested a trade.
For a 2025 2nd round pickPer @TomPeliserro DK to the Steelers
That sounds about right, but by comparison man Washington fleeced the Eagles getting a 3rd for DotsonFor a 2025 2nd round pickPer @TomPeliserro DK to the Steelers
That does seem to be one blind spot of Howie's. Mid season trades. Byard for a 5&6. Robert Quinn for a 4th. Golden Tate for a 3rd.That sounds about right, but by comparison man Washington fleeced the Eagles getting a 3rd for DotsonFor a 2025 2nd round pickPer @TomPeliserro DK to the Steelers![]()
Ya thought for sure the chargers to hit all those wishes. Wild.Warm weather? Settled QB situation? Contender? 0-3?
Money DING DING DING
Good for him![]()
They aren’t all that far from the playoffs I guess but yeah.Warm weather? Settled QB situation? Contender? 0-3?
Money DING DING DING
Good for him![]()
DK is a saint compared to Pickens. Something ain’t right with George.They aren’t all that far from the playoffs I guess but yeah.Warm weather? Settled QB situation? Contender? 0-3?
Money DING DING DING
Good for him![]()
I like DK enough but not sure what he offers that Pickens doesn’t, except maybe health.
Team that has made the playoffs 4 of the last 5 seasons isn't that far from the playoffs?They aren’t all that far from the playoffs I guess but yeah.Warm weather? Settled QB situation? Contender? 0-3?
Money DING DING DING
Good for him![]()
I like DK enough but not sure what he offers that Pickens doesn’t, except maybe health.
Chargers didn't wanna pay 30 million for a #2 WR. Steelers were a lot more desperate.Ya thought for sure the chargers to hit all those wishes. Wild.Warm weather? Settled QB situation? Contender? 0-3?
Money DING DING DING
Good for him![]()
He's not a #2.Chargers didn't wanna pay 30 million for a #2 WR.
No kidding. Jesus.He's not a #2.Chargers didn't wanna pay 30 million for a #2 WR.
Not sure I see the fit here, unless something happens with Pickens. Both players are boundary field stretchers, neither does much over the middle. There just seems like a lot of overlap in how each player wins. Honestly, I don’t love this deal.He's not a #2.Chargers didn't wanna pay 30 million for a #2 WR.
I agree with everything you are saying.Not sure I see the fit here, unless something happens with Pickens. Both players are boundary field stretchers, neither does much over the middle. There just seems like a lot of overlap in how each player wins. Honestly, I don’t love this deal.He's not a #2.Chargers didn't wanna pay 30 million for a #2 WR.
Feel like this also means the Steelers are going to move away from any QB they have now. Russ and DK were great together- 5 years ago.
Thought Kupp would have been, schematically, would the more logical fit. Feel like this may mean more moves are coming.
Don’t want to judge too quickly, but don’t love this deal.
Maybe. Maybe they’re hoping DK’s professionalism rubs off on him.Precursor to trading Pickens?
I mean, if its a run heavy offense (which Arthur Smith, and likely Mike Tomlin, want) where you have 2 big deep threats to make you pay for ever bringing the Safeties up, it makes some sense. Seems like an offense where the guy to own is the RB. Maybe we finally get Jaylen Warren unleashed?Not sure I see the fit here, unless something happens with Pickens. Both players are boundary field stretchers, neither does much over the middle. There just seems like a lot of overlap in how each player wins. Honestly, I don’t love this deal.He's not a #2.Chargers didn't wanna pay 30 million for a #2 WR.
Feel like this also means the Steelers are going to move away from any QB they have now. Russ and DK were great together- 5 years ago.
Thought Kupp would have been, schematically, would the more logical fit. Feel like this may mean more moves are coming.
Don’t want to judge too quickly, but don’t love this deal.
Steelers acquired WR DK Metcalf from the Seahawks in exchange for a second-round pick.
Per ESPN’s Adam Schefter, the deal also includes a Day 3 pick swap with an exchange of sixth- and seventh-rounders. Per NFL Network’s Ian Rapoport, the trade includes a new five-year, $150 million contract for the disgruntled wideout. It’s not the warm weather location Metcalf sought, while the Steelers are also questionable as a contender at this point. There’s also the enormous question of who will be at quarterback. A Metcalf reunion with Russell Wilson wouldn’t exactly be the most exciting fantasy development, though he did have his best season with Russ in 2020. Metcalf is also similar to George Pickens in that he primarily excels down-field. Regardless of who is under center, the Steelers are going to be lethal deep, and more questionable underneath. For now in fantasy, Metcalf remains in the volatile WR2 ranger where he finished in 2024.
@FBG Moderator @Joe Bryant
requesting thread title update please
OP has been inactive for 18+ months