barackdhouse
Footballguy
+1^^^^^^At least the 4th time I've seen him listed at 6'0" in a blurb. Google says 6'4". Combine measured 6'2".
+1^^^^^^At least the 4th time I've seen him listed at 6'0" in a blurb. Google says 6'4". Combine measured 6'2".
I think he goes at the top of the 2nd if the draft was tomorrow, we'll see how things shift by late April. I'm hoping that he lasts to pick 52, but I have a hard time believing he will.Bleacher Report's Matt Miller believes Arizona State WR N'Keal Harry will be a top-36 selection.
Miller adds that Harry (6'0/228) would be a first round pick on his board. Harry's draft stock seems to be anywhere from the middle of the first round to the end of the second. He's met with the Seahawks, Cardinals, Broncos, Lions, Bills, and Saints so far. It's unlikely we receive more clarity on his draft stock in the next few weeks with such a strong and deep wide receiver class.
SOURCE: Matt Miller on Twitter
Apr 7, 2019, 10:38 AM
Tweet Matt Miller to fix it, he just keeps using the same outdated/incorrect spreadsheet it seemsWhat is the deal with this? His combine was clearly 6'2"
Rotoworld's Josh Norris passes along that Arizona State WR N'Keal Harry is taking a predraft visit to the Philadelphia Eagles on Tuesday.
The Phillies are right in range for Harry with the No. 25 pick. The 6-foot, 228-pound wideout figures to be flying off the board late in Round 1 or early in Round 2 later this month. Bleacher Report's Matt Miller, for one, sees Harry off the board within the first 36 picks. Again, right in range for the Eagles should they choose to pull the trigger. Beyond Philly, the Cardinals, Broncos, Lions, Bills and Saints are all teams which have met with Harry during the draft process.
SOURCE: Josh Norris on Twitter
Apr 9, 2019, 12:57 PM
It isn't just him as again evidenced by Josh Norris. It makes me question all of these guys other comments when they can't even get a player's height right.Tweet Matt Miller to fix it, he just keeps using the same outdated/incorrect spreadsheet it seems
lazy social media copy paste reporting. I'm not real surprised tbh. no one fact checks anything anymoreIt isn't just him as again evidenced by Josh Norris. It makes me question all of these guys other comments when they can't even get a player's height right.
N'Keal seems like an afterthought with so many in the draft community which just surprises me given his profile. His profile suggests Julio Jones or AJ Green but I just saw another draft expert put him at WR 10 for the class.lazy social media copy paste reporting. I'm not real surprised tbh. no one fact checks anything anymore
No, it doesn't.N'Keal seems like an afterthought with so many in the draft community which just surprises me given his profile. His profile suggests Julio Jones or AJ Green but I just saw another draft expert put him at WR 10 for the class.
Nobody is Calvin but Harry is up there with there with Julio and AJ Green IMO. Elite breakout age, elite college dominator, elite size, rare combination of size/speed, had one of the best in class 3 cone drills at his pro day, as physically strong as they come, power 5 conferences, young. The only flaws are more subjective things like doesn't separate well or inconsistent routes or feet aren't quick enough. Don't forget people had issues with Julio and AJ too. Some said Julio had inconsistent hands and was a poor route runner. They said AJ struggled to get separation against quick defenders due a lack of suddenness and that AJ might not be strong enough to deal with physical defenders. Objectively, N'Keal Harry is near the top cluster of NFL WR prospects.No, it doesn't.
He's a fine prospect and may turn out to be a probowl player, but he is not close to the level of prospect those two or, say, Calvin Johnson were. That's not an opinion, just a fact.
It all of the above were true, then Harry would be projected as a near concensus top 10 NFL draft selection like Julio and AJG were. Or even discussed as a potential early 1st round wideout. The fact that he’s not even remotely being considered in that realm should put the Harry vs Julio/AJG as an elite prospect comparison to bed IMO. That’s not to say that Harry can’t have that type of career, but I don’t believe he’d be consistently projected as a late 1st to mid 2nd pick if that were the case.Nobody is Calvin but Harry is up there with there with Julio and AJ Green IMO. Elite breakout age, elite college dominator, elite size, rare combination of size/speed, had one of the best in class 3 cone drills at his pro day, as physically strong as they come, power 5 conferences, young. The only flaws are more subjective things like doesn't separate well or inconsistent routes or feet aren't quick enough. Don't forget people had issues with Julio and AJ too. Some said Julio had inconsistent hands and was a poor route runner. They said AJ struggled to get separation against quick defenders due a lack of suddenness and that AJ might not be strong enough to deal with physical defenders. Objectively, N'Keal Harry is near the top cluster of NFL WR prospects.
I don't think the Phillies will be taking himRotoworld's Josh Norris passes along that Arizona State WR N'Keal Harry is taking a predraft visit to the Philadelphia Eagles on Tuesday.
The Phillies are right in range for Harry with the No. 25 pick. The 6-foot, 228-pound wideout figures to be flying off the board late in Round 1 or early in Round 2 later this month. Bleacher Report's Matt Miller, for one, sees Harry off the board within the first 36 picks. Again, right in range for the Eagles should they choose to pull the trigger. Beyond Philly, the Cardinals, Broncos, Lions, Bills and Saints are all teams which have met with Harry during the draft process.
SOURCE: Josh Norris on Twitter
Apr 9, 2019, 12:57 PM
That is fair and I do realize how bold of a statement it is that I am making.He might end up going a lot higher than people think. Look at where John Ross and Mike Williams went. Nobody saw that coming. I do think WRs this year have a depressed draft ranking because of how many 1st round WRs have busted recently and because this class is so deep at WR that many teams will feel they can wait and still get a good WR.It all of the above were true, then Harry would be projected as a near concensus top 10 NFL draft selection like Julio and AJG were. Or even discussed as a potential early 1st round wideout. The fact that he’s not even remotely being considered in that realm should put the Harry vs Julio/AJG as an elite prospect comparison to bed IMO. That’s not to say that Harry can’t have that type of career, but I don’t believe he’d be consistently projected as a late 1st to mid 2nd pick if that were the case.
Thanks for saving me the time.It all of the above were true, then Harry would be projected as a near concensus top 10 NFL draft selection like Julio and AJG were. Or even discussed as a potential early 1st round wideout. The fact that he’s not even remotely being considered in that realm should put the Harry vs Julio/AJG as an elite prospect comparison to bed IMO. That’s not to say that Harry can’t have that type of career, but I don’t believe he’d be consistently projected as a late 1st to mid 2nd pick if that were the case.
mock drafts are worthless I thoughtSayWhat? said:It all of the above were true, then Harry would be projected as a near concensus top 10 NFL draft selection like Julio and AJG were. Or even discussed as a potential early 1st round wideout. The fact that he’s not even remotely being considered in that realm should put the Harry vs Julio/AJG as an elite prospect comparison to bed IMO. That’s not to say that Harry can’t have that type of career, but I don’t believe he’d be consistently projected as a late 1st to mid 2nd pick if that were the case.
They are.mock drafts are worthless I thought
They are. But I didn’t say anything about mock drafts.mock drafts are worthless I thought
none of those are NFL GMs... they're as useless as mock drafts lolThey are.
You guys grade him however you like, but here is a better picture of how he's viewed as a prospect:
AJ Green: 8.65
http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/a.j.-green?id=2495450
Julio Jones: 8.48
http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/julio-jones?id=2495454
N'Keal Harry: 5.87
https://www.nfl.com/prospects/n'keal-harry?id=32194841-5265-4593-d716-d972ec2d4468
He's just not on that level. Sorry, he's not. He may turn out to be taken top 10 and become a fantastic player, who knows, but he's just not that kind of slam dunk, can't miss, superstar prospect.
JuJu Smith Schuster: 5.86They are.
You guys grade him however you like, but here is a better picture of how he's viewed as a prospect:
AJ Green: 8.65
http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/a.j.-green?id=2495450
Julio Jones: 8.48
http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/julio-jones?id=2495454
N'Keal Harry: 5.87
https://www.nfl.com/prospects/n'keal-harry?id=32194841-5265-4593-d716-d972ec2d4468
He's just not on that level. Sorry, he's not. He may turn out to be taken top 10 and become a fantastic player, who knows, but he's just not that kind of slam dunk, can't miss, superstar prospect.
Why are you being so dense? ITS AN EVALUATION OF HIM AS A PROSPECT. It does not fortell how he will perform at the next level. There are guys who outperform their grades all the freaking time. I've said at least 5 times in this thread he could become a pro bowler on the right team. That is something else entirely than labeling him a Julio level prospect.Michael Thomas: 5.81
http://www.nfl.com/draft/2016/profiles/michael-thomas?id=2555347
Odell Beckham Jr: 5.9
http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/odell-beckham?id=2543496
Davante Adam's: 5.96
http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/davante-adams?id=2543495
Harry doesnt stand a chance at being relevant
funny... of the top 5 wrs on the dynasty vue chart for April from Hinderly, 4 dont rate above a 6.0 on their draft profile, and one doesnt have a comparable rating
Wrong again, Dr. Wrong!hinderlys wr1s:
Hopkins: NA
obj: 5.9
JuJu: 5.86
thomas: 5.81
adams: 5.96
Mike evans: 6.15
Cooper: 7.13
Jones: 8.48
Diggs: 5.5
Allen: NA
Brown: NA
Cooks : 5.85
you brought up this metric as a way to make your point that he is not a good prospect. I am showing it doesnt matter at all, and it's as useful as a mock draft
Hilariously, you're actually making my point here btw.hinderlys wr1s:
Hopkins: NA
obj: 5.9
JuJu: 5.86
thomas: 5.81
adams: 5.96
Mike evans: 6.15
Cooper: 7.13
Jones: 8.48
Diggs: 5.5
Allen: NA
Brown: NA
Cooks : 5.85
you brought up this metric as a way to make your point that he is not a good prospect. I am showing it doesnt matter at all, and it's as useful as a mock draft
If you talking about the rotoworld blurb your comment is not accurate, that's all on rotoworld.Tweet Matt Miller to fix it, he just keeps using the same outdated/incorrect spreadsheet it seems
As he should’ve been.none of those are NFL GMs... they're as useless as mock drafts lol
penny was considered a 2nd or 3rd round pick by these expert analysts last year...
I'll wait until the draft.
Awesome, thanks for sharing. I could see Harry being great as a big slot. My only comment there would be 29 and 39 targets that really isn't a big enough sample size to draw real conclusions. All it would take is for Harry to break 1 of those slot plays for a long TD to wildly skew that average.The PFF draft guide has Harry with 130 routes from the slot this year. If we assume that his other routes were all out wide (which is probably at least close to true), then his stats break down into:
Wide: 51/689/6 on 84 targets & 272 routes, 8.2 YPT, 2.53 yards per route run
Slot: 22/399/3 on 29 targets & 130 routes, 13.8 YPT, 3.07 yards per route run
So significantly better production from the slot than out wide.
I posted the breakdown for AJ Brown in his thread:
AJ Wide: 25/507/1 on 39 targets & 180 routes, 13.0 YPT, 2.82 yards per route run
AJ Slot: 59/800/5 on 76 targets & 254 routes, 10.5 YPT, 3.15 yards per route run
So AJ Brown was similarly good from both spots, with higher YPT out wide and more usage & TDs from the slot.
Green Bay. Rodgers can make Adam's a 2nd round start up pick.
this post from Faust puts Harry back on my radar for GB. Very possible if they are moving Adams to slot. They would need an X WR to take Adams' place.Harry would dominate in GB with Rodgers.
That might be reading a bit more into it. My take is that the new offense isn't as stale as McCarthy and will actually move their best receiver around the formation from time to time.this post from Faust puts Harry back on my radar for GB. Very possible if they are moving Adams to slot. They would need an X WR to take Adams' place.
Maybe MVS can do it. Allison sure can't. I'm probably overreacting but I think moving Adams puts GB on the radar for WRs such as Harry, Metcalf, Butler, maybe even JJAW
Exactly. They're not turning Adams into a slot receiver exclusively. They are going to move him around and try to exploit matchups.That might be reading a bit more into it. My take is that the new offense isn't as stale as McCarthy and will actually move their best receiver around the formation from time to time.
Right, but in the past Adams has strictly been an X guy, which is why I said (back at the time Gandalf and clopp said GB was an option ) that GB likely wouldn't be an option. I was completely off the idea of GB taking a X receiver because Adams was used exclusively as an X. I had them pegged to take a slot guy like Brown, Brown, Isabella.That might be reading a bit more into it. My take is that the new offense isn't as stale as McCarthy and will actually move their best receiver around the formation from time to time.
I think a 2nd round WR or TE makes sense for GB. The 3 guys they got last year were what 5th and 6th round picks. They have Rodgers and should probably try to maximize the end of his career by getting some real difference makers.They picked 3 guys who all had varying levels of success (more or less) as rookies. Then you add in Kumerow who seems to be a Rodgers favorite, why would they spend a high pick on a WR this year?
You have a pretty different definition of success than I do. None of those guys played well last year. Hell, Moore barely even played at all.They picked 3 guys who all had varying levels of success (more or less) as rookies. Then you add in Kumerow who seems to be a Rodgers favorite, why would they spend a high pick on a WR this year?
100% agree on the bolded. None of the WRs last year except for Adams had Rodgers' confidence and none of them but Adams played well. There is a reason Adams had so many targets. The 2nd year guys would need to take a big step to justify not taking a WR this draft in the first 2 rounds.You have a pretty different definition of success than I do. None of those guys played well last year. Hell, Moore barely even played at all.
Adams is the only valuable WR on the team at the moment. I don't think it would be a bad idea to spend a 1st(likely the #30) and their 2nd at WR. That said, Harry wouldn't be the guy I'd want for them. Hollywood Brown(and/or Isabella, but I don't assume the NFL likes him as much as I do) makes more sense as a guy to open up space, which they haven't had for years.
Guys taken that late in drafts rarely amount to much. Plus Green Bay was super aggressive in FA and have 10 draft picks. They can afford to target a premier pass catcher.I just think it's extremely unreasonable to expect a rookie to make that much of a difference. These kids need time to learn the pro game, they'll be fine exactly the same way that Adams is fine (well, hopefully).
exactly. Their biggest issue was defense which they helped a lot. IMHO their biggest areas of need now are (in no order) wide receiver, linebacker, offensive line.Guys taken that late in drafts rarely amount to much. Plus Green Bay was super aggressive in FA and have 10 draft picks. They can afford to target a premier pass catcher.
I don't see explosiveness in Michael Thomas or Deandre Hopkins or Allen Robinson either. That hasn't prevented them from fantasy stardom by using their physical strength, size and positioning to catch a ton of passes and a ton of TDs.reggio1 said:When I watch his tape I don't see any spark or explosiveness. Seems like he would be a good WR2 in fantasy, borderline WR1/2 in real football.
You don't? Maybe not Arob so much but I see plenty in Nuk and MT.I don't see explosiveness in Michael Thomas or Deandre Hopkins or Allen Robinson either. That hasn't prevented them from fantasy stardom by using their physical strength, size and positioning to catch a ton of passes and a ton of TDs.
No one really said that.Harry doesnt stand a chance at being relevant
Not really no. I mostly see guys who use their size, coordination, great hands and positioning to make tough catches on the boundary and in the middle of the field. Nuk is the posterboy for a relatively below average athlete being a great WR. Mike Evans is another guy who isn't very explosive and doesn't create separation who has been very successful.You don't? Maybe not Arob so much but I see plenty in Nuk and MT.
Well, you're entitled to that opinion, but I couldn't disagree more. Nuk and Evans leap off the screen to me.Not really no. I mostly see guys who use their size, coordination, great hands and positioning to make tough catches on the boundary and in the middle of the field. Nuk is the posterboy for a relatively below average athlete being a great WR. Mike Evans is another guy who isn't very explosive and doesn't create separation who has been very successful.
They leap off the screen to me too but not because they are explosive or fast. Same with Harry, I watched his games or look at his highlights and I see a guy who clearly stands out as special.Well, you're entitled to that opinion, but I couldn't disagree more. Nuk and Evans leap off the screen to me.