What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

WR N'Keal Harry - CHI (1 Viewer)

Bleacher Report's Matt Miller believes Arizona State WR N'Keal Harry will be a top-36 selection.

Miller adds that Harry (6'0/228) would be a first round pick on his board. Harry's draft stock seems to be anywhere from the middle of the first round to the end of the second. He's met with the Seahawks, Cardinals, Broncos, Lions, Bills, and Saints so far. It's unlikely we receive more clarity on his draft stock in the next few weeks with such a strong and deep wide receiver class.

SOURCE: Matt Miller on Twitter

Apr 7, 2019, 10:38 AM
I think he goes at the top of the 2nd if the draft was tomorrow, we'll see how things shift by late April. I'm hoping that he lasts to pick 52, but I have a hard time believing he will. 

 
Rotoworld's Josh Norris passes along that Arizona State WR N'Keal Harry is taking a predraft visit to the Philadelphia Eagles on Tuesday.

The Phillies are right in range for Harry with the No. 25 pick. The 6-foot, 228-pound wideout figures to be flying off the board late in Round 1 or early in Round 2 later this month. Bleacher Report's Matt Miller, for one, sees Harry off the board within the first 36 picks. Again, right in range for the Eagles should they choose to pull the trigger. Beyond Philly, the Cardinals, Broncos, Lions, Bills and Saints are all teams which have met with Harry during the draft process.

SOURCE: Josh Norris on Twitter

Apr 9, 2019, 12:57 PM
 
Tweet Matt Miller to fix it, he just keeps using the same outdated/incorrect spreadsheet it seems
It isn't just him as again evidenced by Josh Norris. It makes me question all of these guys other comments when they can't even get a player's height right. 

 
It isn't just him as again evidenced by Josh Norris. It makes me question all of these guys other comments when they can't even get a player's height right. 
lazy social media copy paste reporting. I'm not real surprised tbh. no one fact checks anything anymore

 
lazy social media copy paste reporting. I'm not real surprised tbh. no one fact checks anything anymore
N'Keal seems like an afterthought with so many in the draft community which just surprises me given his profile. His profile suggests Julio Jones or AJ Green but I just saw another draft expert put him at WR 10 for the class. 

 
N'Keal seems like an afterthought with so many in the draft community which just surprises me given his profile. His profile suggests Julio Jones or AJ Green but I just saw another draft expert put him at WR 10 for the class. 
No, it doesn't.  

He's a fine prospect and may turn out to be a probowl player, but he is not close to the level of prospect those two or, say, Calvin Johnson were.  That's not an opinion, just a fact.

 
No, it doesn't.  

He's a fine prospect and may turn out to be a probowl player, but he is not close to the level of prospect those two or, say, Calvin Johnson were.  That's not an opinion, just a fact.
Nobody is Calvin but Harry is up there with there with Julio and AJ Green IMO. Elite breakout age, elite college dominator, elite size, rare combination of size/speed, had one of the best in class 3 cone drills at his pro day, as physically strong as they come, power 5 conferences, young. The only flaws are more subjective things like doesn't separate well or inconsistent routes or feet aren't quick enough. Don't forget people had issues with Julio and AJ too. Some said Julio had inconsistent hands and was a poor route runner. They said AJ struggled to get separation against quick defenders due a lack of suddenness and that AJ might not be strong enough to deal with physical defenders. Objectively, N'Keal Harry is near the top cluster of NFL WR prospects. 

Also lets be clear, you saying Harry isn't close to Julio or AJ is the definition of an opinion. What facts do you have to support it?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nobody is Calvin but Harry is up there with there with Julio and AJ Green IMO. Elite breakout age, elite college dominator, elite size, rare combination of size/speed, had one of the best in class 3 cone drills at his pro day, as physically strong as they come, power 5 conferences, young. The only flaws are more subjective things like doesn't separate well or inconsistent routes or feet aren't quick enough. Don't forget people had issues with Julio and AJ too. Some said Julio had inconsistent hands and was a poor route runner. They said AJ struggled to get separation against quick defenders due a lack of suddenness and that AJ might not be strong enough to deal with physical defenders. Objectively, N'Keal Harry is near the top cluster of NFL WR prospects. 
It all of the above were true, then Harry would be projected as a near concensus top 10 NFL draft selection like Julio and AJG were.  Or even discussed as a potential early 1st round wideout.  The fact that he’s not even remotely being considered in that realm should put the Harry vs Julio/AJG as an elite prospect comparison to bed IMO.  That’s not to say that Harry can’t have that type of career, but I don’t believe he’d be consistently projected as a late 1st to mid 2nd pick if that were the case.

 
Rotoworld's Josh Norris passes along that Arizona State WR N'Keal Harry is taking a predraft visit to the Philadelphia Eagles on Tuesday.

The Phillies are right in range for Harry with the No. 25 pick. The 6-foot, 228-pound wideout figures to be flying off the board late in Round 1 or early in Round 2 later this month. Bleacher Report's Matt Miller, for one, sees Harry off the board within the first 36 picks. Again, right in range for the Eagles should they choose to pull the trigger. Beyond Philly, the Cardinals, Broncos, Lions, Bills and Saints are all teams which have met with Harry during the draft process.

SOURCE: Josh Norris on Twitter

Apr 9, 2019, 12:57 PM
I don't think the Phillies will be taking him

 
It all of the above were true, then Harry would be projected as a near concensus top 10 NFL draft selection like Julio and AJG were.  Or even discussed as a potential early 1st round wideout.  The fact that he’s not even remotely being considered in that realm should put the Harry vs Julio/AJG as an elite prospect comparison to bed IMO.  That’s not to say that Harry can’t have that type of career, but I don’t believe he’d be consistently projected as a late 1st to mid 2nd pick if that were the case.
That is fair and I do realize how bold of a statement it is that I am making.He might end up going a lot higher than people think. Look at where John Ross and Mike Williams went. Nobody saw that coming. I do think WRs this year have a depressed draft ranking because of how many 1st round WRs have busted recently and because this class is so deep at WR that many teams will feel they can wait and still get a good WR. 

 
It all of the above were true, then Harry would be projected as a near concensus top 10 NFL draft selection like Julio and AJG were.  Or even discussed as a potential early 1st round wideout.  The fact that he’s not even remotely being considered in that realm should put the Harry vs Julio/AJG as an elite prospect comparison to bed IMO.  That’s not to say that Harry can’t have that type of career, but I don’t believe he’d be consistently projected as a late 1st to mid 2nd pick if that were the case.
Thanks for saving me the time.

 
SayWhat? said:
It all of the above were true, then Harry would be projected as a near concensus top 10 NFL draft selection like Julio and AJG were.  Or even discussed as a potential early 1st round wideout.  The fact that he’s not even remotely being considered in that realm should put the Harry vs Julio/AJG as an elite prospect comparison to bed IMO.  That’s not to say that Harry can’t have that type of career, but I don’t believe he’d be consistently projected as a late 1st to mid 2nd pick if that were the case.
mock drafts are worthless I thought 

 
Listening to some things while I workout that were interesting:

Someone have AJ Brown a positive bump because of the versatility he showed playing in the slot and outside. They then knocked Harry because he might not be a pure outside WR because he worked from the slot a lot. Huh? Someone else said AJ is the only WR to really check all the breakout and dominator ratings- then he corrected himself and said Harry sort of did. Harry is the breakout-dominator darling of the class.

The big knock is obviously a lack of separation. Is that something that is relevant for the NFL? I looked at next gen stats from last year at average separation. Some of the top 10 guys were Engram, Hogan, Chester Rogers, Krupp, Gabriel and Sammy Watkins. Kupp is the highlight of the group. The bottom 10 have busts but also a much stronger sample: AJ Green, Mike Evans, Josh Gordon.I know a lot this has to do with coverage schemes but I do wonder if big string fast jump ball WRs like Green or Evans or Harry really need separation. Ecen Julio, Hopkins and Hilton were close to the bottom. 

 
mock drafts are worthless I thought 
They are.  

You guys grade him however you like, but here is a better picture of how he's viewed as a prospect:

AJ Green: 8.65

http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/a.j.-green?id=2495450

Julio Jones: 8.48

http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/julio-jones?id=2495454

N'Keal Harry: 5.87

https://www.nfl.com/prospects/n'keal-harry?id=32194841-5265-4593-d716-d972ec2d4468

He's just not on that level.  Sorry, he's not.  He may turn out to be taken top 10 and become a fantastic player, who knows, but he's just not that kind of slam dunk, can't miss, superstar prospect.

 
They are.  

You guys grade him however you like, but here is a better picture of how he's viewed as a prospect:

AJ Green: 8.65

http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/a.j.-green?id=2495450

Julio Jones: 8.48

http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/julio-jones?id=2495454

N'Keal Harry: 5.87

https://www.nfl.com/prospects/n'keal-harry?id=32194841-5265-4593-d716-d972ec2d4468

He's just not on that level.  Sorry, he's not.  He may turn out to be taken top 10 and become a fantastic player, who knows, but he's just not that kind of slam dunk, can't miss, superstar prospect.
none of those are NFL GMs... they're as useless as mock drafts lol

penny was considered a 2nd or 3rd round pick by these expert analysts last year... 

I'll wait until the draft. 

 
They are.  

You guys grade him however you like, but here is a better picture of how he's viewed as a prospect:

AJ Green: 8.65

http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/a.j.-green?id=2495450

Julio Jones: 8.48

http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/julio-jones?id=2495454

N'Keal Harry: 5.87

https://www.nfl.com/prospects/n'keal-harry?id=32194841-5265-4593-d716-d972ec2d4468

He's just not on that level.  Sorry, he's not.  He may turn out to be taken top 10 and become a fantastic player, who knows, but he's just not that kind of slam dunk, can't miss, superstar prospect.
JuJu Smith Schuster: 5.86

http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/juju-smith-schuster?id=2558149

yeah... these are never wrong

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Michael Thomas: 5.81

http://www.nfl.com/draft/2016/profiles/michael-thomas?id=2555347

Odell Beckham Jr: 5.9

http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/odell-beckham?id=2543496

Davante Adam's: 5.96

http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/davante-adams?id=2543495

Harry doesnt stand a chance at being relevant 

funny... of the top 5 wrs on the dynasty vue chart for April from Hinderly, 4 dont rate above a 6.0 on their draft profile, and one doesnt have a comparable rating
Why are you being so dense?  ITS AN EVALUATION OF HIM AS A PROSPECT.  It does not fortell how he will perform at the next level.  There are guys who outperform their grades all the freaking time.  I've said at least 5 times in this thread he could become a pro bowler on the right team. That is something else entirely than labeling him a Julio level prospect.

Waiting until the draft does nothing to change what he is AS A PROSPECT.  It didn't change John Ross, didn't change Corey Davis, or anyone else you want to name.  Him going top 5would.not.make.him.an.elite.prospect.in.historical.context.

That book is closed.  Can he outperform his evaluations?  ABSOLUTELY.  He could be a pro bowler.  He could be an all pro.  It doesn't change how he stacks up AS A PROSPECT to some of the very best wide receiver prospects of all time.

Why?  Because they are super duper rare and only come along every handful of years.  Julio and AJ just happened to be in the same draft. If he was one of those guys, there really wouldn't be many, if any, vocal detractors.  Why?  Because when one comes along, it's OBVIOUS.  Everyone knows it.

 
hinderlys wr1s:

Hopkins: NA

obj: 5.9

JuJu: 5.86

thomas: 5.81

adams: 5.96

Mike evans: 6.15

Cooper: 7.13

Jones: 8.48

Diggs: 5.5

Allen: NA

Brown: NA

Cooks : 5.85

you brought up this metric as a way to make your point that he is not a good prospect. I am showing it doesnt matter at all, and it's as useful as a mock draft

 
hinderlys wr1s:

Hopkins: NA

obj: 5.9

JuJu: 5.86

thomas: 5.81

adams: 5.96

Mike evans: 6.15

Cooper: 7.13

Jones: 8.48

Diggs: 5.5

Allen: NA

Brown: NA

Cooks : 5.85

you brought up this metric as a way to make your point that he is not a good prospect. I am showing it doesnt matter at all, and it's as useful as a mock draft
Wrong again, Dr. Wrong!

 
hinderlys wr1s:

Hopkins: NA

obj: 5.9

JuJu: 5.86

thomas: 5.81

adams: 5.96

Mike evans: 6.15

Cooper: 7.13

Jones: 8.48

Diggs: 5.5

Allen: NA

Brown: NA

Cooks : 5.85

you brought up this metric as a way to make your point that he is not a good prospect. I am showing it doesnt matter at all, and it's as useful as a mock draft
Hilariously, you're actually making my point here btw.

 
The PFF draft guide has Harry with 130 routes from the slot this year. If we assume that his other routes were all out wide (which is probably at least close to true), then his stats break down into:

Wide: 51/689/6 on 84 targets & 272 routes, 8.2 YPT, 2.53 yards per route run
Slot: 22/399/3 on 29 targets & 130 routes, 13.8 YPT, 3.07 yards per route run

So significantly better production from the slot than out wide.

I posted the breakdown for AJ Brown in his thread:

AJ Wide: 25/507/1 on 39 targets & 180 routes, 13.0 YPT, 2.82 yards per route run
AJ Slot: 59/800/5 on 76 targets & 254 routes, 10.5 YPT, 3.15 yards per route run

So AJ Brown was similarly good from both spots, with higher YPT out wide and more usage & TDs from the slot.

 
The PFF draft guide has Harry with 130 routes from the slot this year. If we assume that his other routes were all out wide (which is probably at least close to true), then his stats break down into:

Wide: 51/689/6 on 84 targets & 272 routes, 8.2 YPT, 2.53 yards per route run
Slot: 22/399/3 on 29 targets & 130 routes, 13.8 YPT, 3.07 yards per route run

So significantly better production from the slot than out wide.

I posted the breakdown for AJ Brown in his thread:

AJ Wide: 25/507/1 on 39 targets & 180 routes, 13.0 YPT, 2.82 yards per route run
AJ Slot: 59/800/5 on 76 targets & 254 routes, 10.5 YPT, 3.15 yards per route run

So AJ Brown was similarly good from both spots, with higher YPT out wide and more usage & TDs from the slot.
Awesome, thanks for sharing. I could see Harry being great as a big slot. My only comment there would be 29 and 39 targets that really isn't a big enough sample size to draw real conclusions. All it would take is for Harry to break 1 of those slot plays for a long TD to wildly skew that average. 

 
Green Bay. Rodgers can make Adam's a 2nd round start up pick.


Harry would dominate in GB with Rodgers.
this post from Faust puts Harry back on my radar for GB. Very possible if they are moving Adams to slot. They would need an X WR to take Adams' place. 

Maybe MVS can do it. Allison sure can't. I'm probably overreacting but I think moving Adams puts GB on the radar for WRs such as Harry, Metcalf, Butler, maybe even JJAW

 
this post from Faust puts Harry back on my radar for GB. Very possible if they are moving Adams to slot. They would need an X WR to take Adams' place. 

Maybe MVS can do it. Allison sure can't. I'm probably overreacting but I think moving Adams puts GB on the radar for WRs such as Harry, Metcalf, Butler, maybe even JJAW
That might be reading a bit more into it. My take is that the new offense isn't as stale as McCarthy and will actually move their best receiver around the formation from time to time. 

 
That might be reading a bit more into it. My take is that the new offense isn't as stale as McCarthy and will actually move their best receiver around the formation from time to time. 
Exactly.  They're not turning Adams into a slot receiver exclusively.  They are going to move him around and try to exploit matchups.

 
That might be reading a bit more into it. My take is that the new offense isn't as stale as McCarthy and will actually move their best receiver around the formation from time to time. 
Right, but in the past Adams has strictly been an X guy, which is why I said (back at the time Gandalf and clopp said GB was an option ) that GB likely wouldn't be an option. I was completely off the idea of GB taking a X receiver because Adams was used exclusively as an X. I had them pegged to take a slot guy like Brown, Brown, Isabella.

I think this opens up all kinds of options for GB early in the draft. If they are moving WRs around it means all positions at the wr level may he more fair game in the draft than they were if Adams only played outside 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
They picked 3 guys who all had varying levels of success (more or less) as rookies.  Then you add in Kumerow who seems to be a Rodgers favorite, why would they spend a high pick on a WR this year?

 
They picked 3 guys who all had varying levels of success (more or less) as rookies.  Then you add in Kumerow who seems to be a Rodgers favorite, why would they spend a high pick on a WR this year?
I think a 2nd round WR or TE makes sense for GB. The 3 guys they got last year were what 5th and 6th round picks.  They have Rodgers and should probably try to maximize the end of his career by getting some real difference makers. 

 
They picked 3 guys who all had varying levels of success (more or less) as rookies.  Then you add in Kumerow who seems to be a Rodgers favorite, why would they spend a high pick on a WR this year?
You have a pretty different definition of success than I do. None of those guys played well last year. Hell, Moore barely even played at all. 

Adams is the only valuable WR on the team at the moment.  I don't think it would be a bad idea to spend a 1st(likely the #30) and their 2nd at WR. That said, Harry wouldn't be the guy I'd want for them. Hollywood Brown(and/or Isabella, but I don't assume the NFL likes him as much as I do) makes more sense as a guy to open up space, which they haven't had for years.

 
You have a pretty different definition of success than I do. None of those guys played well last year. Hell, Moore barely even played at all. 

Adams is the only valuable WR on the team at the moment.  I don't think it would be a bad idea to spend a 1st(likely the #30) and their 2nd at WR. That said, Harry wouldn't be the guy I'd want for them. Hollywood Brown(and/or Isabella, but I don't assume the NFL likes him as much as I do) makes more sense as a guy to open up space, which they haven't had for years.
100% agree on the bolded. None of the WRs last year except for Adams had Rodgers' confidence and none of them but Adams played well. There is a reason Adams had so many targets. The 2nd year guys would need to take a big step to justify not taking a WR this draft in the first 2 rounds.

I don't agree on the un-bolded... but that's fine. I would like Isabella but I worry Marquis is too small. They do need a speed guy. Jordy was big and fast. Adams is sort of like Harry in a way. I think it would be a good destination for Harry for obvious reasons, but maybe not best for GB.

 
I just think it's extremely unreasonable to expect a rookie to make that much of a difference.  These kids need time to learn the pro game, they'll be fine exactly the same way that Adams is fine (well, hopefully).

 
I just think it's extremely unreasonable to expect a rookie to make that much of a difference.  These kids need time to learn the pro game, they'll be fine exactly the same way that Adams is fine (well, hopefully).
Guys taken that late in drafts rarely amount to much. Plus Green Bay was super aggressive in FA and have 10 draft picks. They can afford to target a premier pass catcher. 

 
Guys taken that late in drafts rarely amount to much. Plus Green Bay was super aggressive in FA and have 10 draft picks. They can afford to target a premier pass catcher. 
exactly. Their biggest issue was defense which they helped a lot. IMHO their biggest areas of need now are (in no order) wide receiver, linebacker, offensive line.

Not to mention having. a luxury 1st rounder at the end of the draft helps. 

 
When I watch his tape I don't see any spark or explosiveness. Seems like he would be a good WR2 in fantasy, borderline WR1/2 in real football. 

 
reggio1 said:
When I watch his tape I don't see any spark or explosiveness. Seems like he would be a good WR2 in fantasy, borderline WR1/2 in real football. 
I don't see explosiveness in Michael Thomas or Deandre Hopkins or Allen Robinson either. That hasn't prevented them from fantasy stardom by using their physical strength, size and positioning to catch a ton of passes and a ton of TDs. 

 
I don't see explosiveness in Michael Thomas or Deandre Hopkins or Allen Robinson either. That hasn't prevented them from fantasy stardom by using their physical strength, size and positioning to catch a ton of passes and a ton of TDs. 
You don't?  Maybe not Arob so much but I see plenty in Nuk and MT.

 
You don't?  Maybe not Arob so much but I see plenty in Nuk and MT.
Not really no. I mostly see guys who use their size, coordination, great hands and positioning to make tough catches on the boundary and in the middle of the field. Nuk is the posterboy for a relatively below average athlete being a great WR. Mike Evans is another guy who isn't very explosive and doesn't create separation who has been very successful.

 
Not really no. I mostly see guys who use their size, coordination, great hands and positioning to make tough catches on the boundary and in the middle of the field. Nuk is the posterboy for a relatively below average athlete being a great WR. Mike Evans is another guy who isn't very explosive and doesn't create separation who has been very successful.
Well, you're entitled to that opinion, but I couldn't disagree more.  Nuk and Evans leap off the screen to me.

 
Well, you're entitled to that opinion, but I couldn't disagree more.  Nuk and Evans leap off the screen to me.
They leap off the screen to me too but not because they are explosive or fast. Same with Harry, I watched his games or look at his highlights and I see a guy who clearly stands out as special. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top