Bamac
Footballguy
Sorry, all. Struggled to find a second to pick, and then completely forgot to PM.Bamac said:####. SorryNo PM received here
?
Sorry, all. Struggled to find a second to pick, and then completely forgot to PM.Bamac said:####. SorryNo PM received here
?
PMing is a courtesy I would believe. He checked in and didn't pick thats what is confusing. I am hoping we all check in a couple times a day anyways to help with these types of situations.Sorry, all. Struggled to find a second to pick, and then completely forgot to PM.Bamac said:####. SorryNo PM received here
?
not a reason to not make a pick though.Sorry, all. Struggled to find a second to pick, and then completely forgot to PM.Bamac said:####. SorryNo PM received here
?
All good. We've always said the pm is nice to have for these but not requisite.Sorry, all. Struggled to find a second to pick, and then completely forgot to PM.Bamac said:####. SorryNo PM received here
?
I guess I disagree.....I always thought PMing the next person was the expectation....not just a courtesy......what's it take....less than 30 seconds...doesn't matter if you are on a phone or not.....even then you ask somebody to do it for you in your pick post....All good. We've always said the pm is nice to have for these but not requisite.Sorry, all. Struggled to find a second to pick, and then completely forgot to PM.Bamac said:####. SorryNo PM received here
?
I would never expect someone to message me to let me know it is my pick in a draft that I wanted to participate in. I do have a phone and it allows me to check in often, I do not need a PM from others to know its my pick or expect one. But when I do get one it is a great courtesy and I appreciate it. How long does it take to check to see if your pick is up, 30 seconds?I guess I disagree.....I always thought PMing the next person was the expectation....not just a courtesy......what's it take....less than 30 seconds...I don't care if you're on a phone or not....All good. We've always said the pm is nice to have for these but not requisite.Sorry, all. Struggled to find a second to pick, and then completely forgot to PM.Bamac said:####. SorryNo PM received here
?
Hyde is too low, Mason is about to be a superstar. No pick in any rookie draft is too early for him, depending on needs he is #1 overall rookie.anyway
I really liked the Tre Mason pick
Personally my rookie RB ranking pre-combine is:
Mason
J.Hill
Sankey
Seastrunk
Hyde
Carey
how many of these have you done...?I would never expect someone to message me to let me know it is my pick in a draft that I wanted to participate in. I do have a phone and it allows me to check in often, I do not need a PM from others to know its my pick or expect one. But when I do get one it is a great courtesy and I appreciate it. How long does it take to check to see if your pick is up, 30 seconds?I guess I disagree.....I always thought PMing the next person was the expectation....not just a courtesy......what's it take....less than 30 seconds...I don't care if you're on a phone or not....All good. We've always said the pm is nice to have for these but not requisite.Sorry, all. Struggled to find a second to pick, and then completely forgot to PM.Bamac said:####. SorryNo PM received here
?![]()
Agree to disagree. Counter argument is how hard is it/how long does it take (30 seconds?) to check in a couple times a day and see where things stand? Especially given the advent of smart phones/fbg mobile? If it's the expectation then let's put it down in the rules so to avoid confusion in the future.I guess I disagree.....I always thought PMing the next person was the expectation....not just a courtesy......what's it take....less than 30 seconds...I don't care if you're on a phone or not....All good. We've always said the pm is nice to have for these but not requisite.Sorry, all. Struggled to find a second to pick, and then completely forgot to PM.Bamac said:####. SorryNo PM received here
?
Does the amount I have done relate to what an expectation and a courtesy from one to another is? I understand you think the PM is an expectation I just think having expectations in a football community is asking a lot. I think the only expectation is to have people check in often. To be honest the PM system is not that great. I have to click your name, once I find it, then click send message. then type it. then send it all from my phone, when someone can just check the site right from their phone. Which if you are like me you have a quick link to this page on the home screen.how many of these have you done...?I would never expect someone to message me to let me know it is my pick in a draft that I wanted to participate in. I do have a phone and it allows me to check in often, I do not need a PM from others to know its my pick or expect one. But when I do get one it is a great courtesy and I appreciate it. How long does it take to check to see if your pick is up, 30 seconds?I guess I disagree.....I always thought PMing the next person was the expectation....not just a courtesy......what's it take....less than 30 seconds...I don't care if you're on a phone or not....All good. We've always said the pm is nice to have for these but not requisite.Sorry, all. Struggled to find a second to pick, and then completely forgot to PM.Bamac said:####. SorryNo PM received here
?![]()
Understandable and you are aloud to have any thoughts you like. It will be back to football discussion once a pick is made I'm sure.sorry to go all ref here....I'm having a crappy morning....but the reason it is probably not a "rule" is because then there would need to be a penalty of some sort attached if you didn't PM...and I don't think we want to try and police/enforce that and go in that direction.....I stand behind my general comment that I believe PMing is the expectation not just a courtesy....
No...it only relates to whether or not you know what you are talking about.....Does the amount I have done relate to what an expectation and a courtesy from one to another is? I understand you think the PM is an expectation I just think having expectations in a football community is asking a lot. I think the only expectation is to have people check in often. To be honest the PM system is not that great. I have to click your name, once I find it, then click send message. then type it. then send it all from my phone, when someone can just check the site right from their phone. Which if you are like me you have a quick link to this page on the home screen.how many of these have you done...?I would never expect someone to message me to let me know it is my pick in a draft that I wanted to participate in. I do have a phone and it allows me to check in often, I do not need a PM from others to know its my pick or expect one. But when I do get one it is a great courtesy and I appreciate it. How long does it take to check to see if your pick is up, 30 seconds?I guess I disagree.....I always thought PMing the next person was the expectation....not just a courtesy......what's it take....less than 30 seconds...I don't care if you're on a phone or not....All good. We've always said the pm is nice to have for these but not requisite.Sorry, all. Struggled to find a second to pick, and then completely forgot to PM.Bamac said:####. SorryNo PM received here
?![]()
So if I did one of these before is the only way I know if PMing is an expectation and not a courtesy? I see a couple other above disagree with you, ask them how long they have been doing these. You think it is an expectation, I think it is a courtesy. Both are fair opinions.No...it only relates to whether or not you know what you are talking about.....Does the amount I have done relate to what an expectation and a courtesy from one to another is? I understand you think the PM is an expectation I just think having expectations in a football community is asking a lot. I think the only expectation is to have people check in often. To be honest the PM system is not that great. I have to click your name, once I find it, then click send message. then type it. then send it all from my phone, when someone can just check the site right from their phone. Which if you are like me you have a quick link to this page on the home screen.how many of these have you done...?I would never expect someone to message me to let me know it is my pick in a draft that I wanted to participate in. I do have a phone and it allows me to check in often, I do not need a PM from others to know its my pick or expect one. But when I do get one it is a great courtesy and I appreciate it. How long does it take to check to see if your pick is up, 30 seconds?I guess I disagree.....I always thought PMing the next person was the expectation....not just a courtesy......what's it take....less than 30 seconds...I don't care if you're on a phone or not....All good. We've always said the pm is nice to have for these but not requisite.Sorry, all. Struggled to find a second to pick, and then completely forgot to PM.Bamac said:####. SorryNo PM received here
?![]()
I love Stills, he is going to be a factor in New Orleans for years to come. Moore will not be retained and Colstons knees are getting real long in the tooth.so yeah.........I thought Kenny Stills was a good pick, and it seemed my pick of Justin Hunter pissed a couple people off
Maybe we just state it as a guideline to reiterate. Either way wsl2 is 4 rounds ahead of wsl1 so something is working overall in this draft.sorry to go all ref here....I'm having a crappy morning....but the reason it is probably not a "rule" is because then there would need to be a penalty of some sort attached if you didn't PM...and I don't think we want to try and police/enforce that and go in that direction.....I stand behind my general comment that I believe PMing is the expectation not just a courtesy....
We'd accept that excuse if you hadn't been dicking around with emenience over in the ffa. Priorties dude.no worries guys. it's January.
I'm sorry for not checking in more, and for not picking last night when I found out I was up. I meant to but then just spaced for a bit and passed out.
I just got back from a trip to Vegas and am still adjusting.
EDIT: I don't always check in to this forum often because I always assumed I'd get a PM when I was up. If not everybody treats them that way, that's fine but I always thought that was the expectation when doing a message board draft.
well, it is much easier to goof off in the FFA on a phone than it is to figure out what the best players available in a draft are.We'd accept that excuse if you hadn't been dicking around with emenience over in the ffa. Priorties dude.![]()
When have you ever drafted the best players available?well, it is much easier to goof off in the FFA on a phone than it is to figure out what the best players available in a draft are.We'd accept that excuse if you hadn't been dicking around with emenience over in the ffa. Priorties dude.![]()
yeah someone has Andre Ellington as his RB1When have you ever drafted the best players available?well, it is much easier to goof off in the FFA on a phone than it is to figure out what the best players available in a draft are.We'd accept that excuse if you hadn't been dicking around with emenience over in the ffa. Priorties dude.![]()
Hey..what's wrong with drafting a backup RB as RB1?yeah someone has Andre Ellington as his RB1When have you ever drafted the best players available?well, it is much easier to goof off in the FFA on a phone than it is to figure out what the best players available in a draft are.We'd accept that excuse if you hadn't been dicking around with emenience over in the ffa. Priorties dude.![]()
good pointWhen have you ever drafted the best players available?
Well, at least he has last year's 14th-ranked QB to fall back on.Hey..what's wrong with drafting a backup RB as RB1?yeah someone has Andre Ellington as his RB1When have you ever drafted the best players available?well, it is much easier to goof off in the FFA on a phone than it is to figure out what the best players available in a draft are.We'd accept that excuse if you hadn't been dicking around with emenience over in the ffa. Priorties dude.![]()
well, he was drafted as QB14 here so not sure I see the problem.Well, at least he has last year's 14th-ranked QB to fall back on.![]()
Hope you know I was just bustin' your stones up there ... or more accurately piling on to the busting that was already on-going.well, he was drafted as QB14 here so not sure I see the problem.Well, at least he has last year's 14th-ranked QB to fall back on.![]()
it's going to be tough for you to last long with last year's 25th ranked RB as your RB1 and drafted in round 2.
Meanwhile, my RB1 outscored your RB1 this year and I got him 2 rounds later. Boom!
I like him as a threat but he'll have to improve on his blocking to stay on the field. If he does that, the sky is the limit. I will be paying attention in that area come preseason time for him.anyway
I really liked the Tre Mason pick
Personally my rookie RB ranking pre-combine is:
Mason
J.Hill
Sankey
Seastrunk
Hyde
Carey
Sorry for delay.Dominion times out at 6:58 EST
I would say that it isn't likely but it is possible and I can see where you are coming from, certainly something to watch.honestly, Ellington probably outscores half these guys in 2014:
2.03 - KRSone21 - Doug Martin - RB9 - TB
2.04 - BSS - DeMarco Murray - RB10 - Dallas
2.08 - False Start - Reggie Bush RB11 - Det
2.10 - Jeaton6 - Arian Foster - RB12 - Hou
2.11 - Fullback Fro - Gio Bernard - RB13 - Cincy
2.12 - Nugget - Ray Rice RB14 - Balt
2.13 - Mr. Irrelevant - CJ Spiller RB15- Buff
2.14 - HellTouppee - Alfred Morris - RB16 - Wash
Ruds your crystal ball maybe better than mine, but I think Arizona could easily draft a RB early as well, Ellington as RB1 is riskyI would say that it isn't likely but it is possible and I can see where you are coming from, certainly something to watch.honestly, Ellington probably outscores half these guys in 2014:
2.03 - KRSone21 - Doug Martin - RB9 - TB
2.04 - BSS - DeMarco Murray - RB10 - Dallas
2.08 - False Start - Reggie Bush RB11 - Det
2.10 - Jeaton6 - Arian Foster - RB12 - Hou
2.11 - Fullback Fro - Gio Bernard - RB13 - Cincy
2.12 - Nugget - Ray Rice RB14 - Balt
2.13 - Mr. Irrelevant - CJ Spiller RB15- Buff
2.14 - HellTouppee - Alfred Morris - RB16 - Wash
Those Fbg emails you get acted like he was unbenchable after the Atlanta game mid seasonish and he slowly phased himself out and outrun by Mendenhall. I am bullish on the guy, but I can remember pulling the olug, meaning not putting him in my flex lineup soon after that big game because he just wasn't getting significant carries.
He's very good for this format where you don't have to figure out when to start him. His receptions and yardage should be a weekly contributor and an occasional TD will make for a big day.
Whats wrong with Taylor? We have not really had a chance to see what he can do.Ruds your crystal ball maybe better than mine, but I think Arizona could easily draft a RB early as well, Ellington as RB1 is riskyI would say that it isn't likely but it is possible and I can see where you are coming from, certainly something to watch.honestly, Ellington probably outscores half these guys in 2014:
2.03 - KRSone21 - Doug Martin - RB9 - TB
2.04 - BSS - DeMarco Murray - RB10 - Dallas
2.08 - False Start - Reggie Bush RB11 - Det
2.10 - Jeaton6 - Arian Foster - RB12 - Hou
2.11 - Fullback Fro - Gio Bernard - RB13 - Cincy
2.12 - Nugget - Ray Rice RB14 - Balt
2.13 - Mr. Irrelevant - CJ Spiller RB15- Buff
2.14 - HellTouppee - Alfred Morris - RB16 - Wash
Those Fbg emails you get acted like he was unbenchable after the Atlanta game mid seasonish and he slowly phased himself out and outrun by Mendenhall. I am bullish on the guy, but I can remember pulling the olug, meaning not putting him in my flex lineup soon after that big game because he just wasn't getting significant carries.
He's very good for this format where you don't have to figure out when to start him. His receptions and yardage should be a weekly contributor and an occasional TD will make for a big day.
3rd on depth chart on pass happy team I'd say is the issue. As for Ellington, I'd say best case he outscores 3 of those guys but with RB injuries who knows.Whats wrong with Taylor? We have not really had a chance to see what he can do.Ruds your crystal ball maybe better than mine, but I think Arizona could easily draft a RB early as well, Ellington as RB1 is riskyI would say that it isn't likely but it is possible and I can see where you are coming from, certainly something to watch.Those Fbg emails you get acted like he was unbenchable after the Atlanta game mid seasonish and he slowly phased himself out and outrun by Mendenhall. I am bullish on the guy, but I can remember pulling the olug, meaning not putting him in my flex lineup soon after that big game because he just wasn't getting significant carries.honestly, Ellington probably outscores half these guys in 2014:
2.03 - KRSone21 - Doug Martin - RB9 - TB
2.04 - BSS - DeMarco Murray - RB10 - Dallas
2.08 - False Start - Reggie Bush RB11 - Det
2.10 - Jeaton6 - Arian Foster - RB12 - Hou
2.11 - Fullback Fro - Gio Bernard - RB13 - Cincy
2.12 - Nugget - Ray Rice RB14 - Balt
2.13 - Mr. Irrelevant - CJ Spiller RB15- Buff
2.14 - HellTouppee - Alfred Morris - RB16 - Wash
He's very good for this format where you don't have to figure out when to start him. His receptions and yardage should be a weekly contributor and an occasional TD will make for a big day.
Don't think Fjax will but bet Fjax will outscore most of these rookie picks by a wide margin. I haven't done many of these survivor type drafts but this one in particular has the feel of a start up dynasty league. A lot of risk taken on players not likely to produce much if at all this year in place of guys that should steadily produce.Hope you know I was just bustin' your stones up there ... or more accurately piling on to the busting that was already on-going.well, he was drafted as QB14 here so not sure I see the problem.it's going to be tough for you to last long with last year's 25th ranked RB as your RB1 and drafted in round 2.Well, at least he has last year's 14th-ranked QB to fall back on.![]()
Meanwhile, my RB1 outscored your RB1 this year and I got him 2 rounds later. Boom!![]()
I'm pretty high on Ellington this year myself, but I couldn't justify him at 3.04, and I knew there was no way he'd fall to 4.13. But barring injury he's not outscoring Spiller next year ... unless you think F-Jax is going to finish as a fantasy RB1 again in 2014.
We had a snag, it is OK we are still doing pretty well.Last 24 hours wsl2 5 picks. Wsl1 19 picks. Ugly.
Fun fact: My team right now has a current average age of 25.6.4.13 - Russell Wilson, QB SEA
7.04 - Sam Bradford, QB STL
2.13 - C.J. Spiller, RB BUF
5.04 - Ben Tate, RB HOU
9.04 - Rashad Jennings, RB OAK
3.04 - Jordy Nelson, WR GBP
6.13 - DeAndre Hopkins, WR HOU
8.13 - Jeremy Maclin, WR PHI
1.04 - Jimmy Graham, TE NOS
10.13 - Travis Kelce, TE KC
Veteran leadership? We don't need no stinkin' veteran leadership!I just checked: mine's 23.5. I actually don't mind because OH LOOK THERE'S A SHINY OBJECT!!! ... What were we talking about?ETA: If anyone was wondering, it was just a gum wrapper (again).Fun fact: My team right now has a current average age of 25.6.![]()
I just checked: mine's 23.5. I actually don't mind because OH LOOK THERE'S A SHINY OBJECT!!! ... What were we talking about?Fun fact: My team right now has a current average age of 25.6.![]()
ETA: If anyone was wondering, it was just a gum wrapper (again).
Though, to be fair, you're using the statistical dodge of having already drafted two rookies.7.12 Teddy Bridgewater, QB 8.05 Ladarius Green, TE5.12 Michael Floyd, WR 6.05 Andy Dalton, QB.1.12 Le'Veon Bell, RB
2.05 Julio Jones, WR
3.12 Michael Crabtree, WR
4.05 Knowshon Moreno, RB
Yeah I was pissed. More at myself for choosing Blount over him but felt like there are still a lot of decent WRs and running backs are really getting thin. That one burns though. Nice one Toupee.That amendolA pick is really good value