Through 14.11....
Last edited by a moderator:
My gosh is this SLOW or what?Where at the kicker and defense stage now. I just want two that start and to fill out my lineup. The slowness of the draft is now overboard. Rather than consuming my time checking in on a regular basis, I figured I'd just post it and go enjoy a couple of days in the mountains.Thanks Bass......I know it's no big deal, but I would have taken a PM..........![]()
Please check on my 12.14 pick. I think it was Dallas D.This has been a huge help Ruff.Through 15.04....
Yes, it was the Cowboys, and I had missed it (now fixed.)Along the course of maintaining the lists, I've found other omissions that are now fixed.Please check on my 12.14 pick. I think it was Dallas D.This has been a huge help Ruff.Through 15.05....
AmenAbout the only thing not disapointing about this draft is thae way you have kept up this thread. THANK YOU
About the only thing not disapointing about this draft is thae way you have kept up this thread. THANK YOU
Well that and me dominating. 
About the only thing I do not like about your team is the doubling up on Cowboy RB's and the poor set of TE's. Otherwise I think you have one of the better suited teams to finish top 3. I am looking forward to giving my views on all of the teams when this is finally over!Through 17.14........BassNBrew said:Well that and me dominating.![]()
About the only thing not disapointing about this draft is thae way you have kept up this thread. THANK YOU
hate to say it, but I've pretty much lost interest at this point. I'll be back to dominate the summer and spring leagues.Well, maybe you learned after you screwed the pooch in WSL1BassNBrew said:About the only thing not disapointing about this draft is thae way you have kept up this thread. THANK YOUWell that and me dominating.
![]()
One of these years I'll have to pay attention earlier and get into the early leagues where people make more mistakes.Well, maybe you learned after you screwed the pooch in WSL1BassNBrew said:About the only thing not disapointing about this draft is thae way you have kept up this thread. THANK YOUWell that and me dominating.
![]()
OK.I'll bite.AmenAbout the only thing not disapointing about this draft is thae way you have kept up this thread. THANK YOU
They are there for a reason....they're roster fodder.You guys are leaving valuable nuggets for me all over the place. LenWhale and Naane will fill out the roster nicely.
Just like Austin last year and Bryant the year before.They are there for a reason....they're roster fodder.You guys are leaving valuable nuggets for me all over the place. LenWhale and Naane will fill out the roster nicely.
I went back in the aftermath and checked out the teams that made the final parings in each League. They had some common points:1) invariably, they had injuries and bombs from guys that didn't live up to their billings (injuries, team mate problems, OFF line problems, etc.) but they all had one thing in common....they all managed to find the needle in the hay stack that balanced the equation.Just like Austin last year and Bryant the year before.They are there for a reason....they're roster fodder.You guys are leaving valuable nuggets for me all over the place. LenWhale and Naane will fill out the roster nicely.
Yeah, I am actually really disappointed with myself that I didn't catch that Naanee was still available because he was someone I was looking at earlier and thought he might be a nice addition to my team. Nice selection BNB!!!!!Through 19.11........(less 19.05)........BassNBrew said:You guys are leaving valuable nuggets for me all over the place. LenWhale and Naanee will fill out the roster nicely.
I considered both White and Naanee, IMO Butler has better potential than Naanee and I wasn't sure I wanted 2 SD WRs. I almost took White over Josh Brown but wanted a 2nd kicker I think can be top 12-15. Good picks but I doubt either makes a difference.BassNBrew said:You guys are leaving valuable nuggets for me all over the place. LenWhale and Naane will fill out the roster nicely.
Killjoy, I was planning on riding them to the title.I considered both White and Naanee, IMO Butler has better potential than Naanee and I wasn't sure I wanted 2 SD WRs. I almost took White over Josh Brown but wanted a 2nd kicker I think can be top 12-15. Good picks but I doubt either makes a difference.BassNBrew said:You guys are leaving valuable nuggets for me all over the place. LenWhale and Naane will fill out the roster nicely.
OK....please explain the "Control F" deal. How does this function account for players already choosen? I'm in this thread, I hit Contol F and then what? What is supposed to happen when I iniatiate "Control F"?Through 17.11..........
On a side note: I'm pretty surprised there have been so many re-picks due to folks NOT USING "Control F". I have been on top of the draft thread each time this happened.....meaning that the players erroneously selected were already on the list and would have been found had folks used "Control F". Also, I've been pretty diligent about correct spelling, so it cannot be said that folks couldn't find the name because it was spelled wrong. Sort of disappointing.......that's all I'm saying.
Carry on.
That's what I talking about, informed decision making and a Draft Dominator make for an easy choice: the TBB-DEF is an easy choice as I've done the week #12-#17 sort from '09 and learned that TBB had the #7 ranked DEF over that span. I can wrestle with the probabilities that Graham Gano can hold off Dave Rayner in WAS or I can play the sure thing: shooting for a third DEF gives me an honest shot at 20+ points/week and is the stastically sound play. It also deprives FUBAR of a #2 DEF and diminshes Stinkin Ref's choices to DET-DEF.I want to discuss the 1PK strategy a bit.
I'm not sure I'm sold on it, to be honest. I understand that if you get a stud you can ride him every week, but the weekly variability of practically every PK in the NFL is just not a great idea. For example, if a team scores 28, the PK gets just 4 despite the above-average scoring by his team. Couple this with the human element where a kicker could get hurt, fall out of favor or even get cut, and I'm not thrilled by this approach.
I decided to look at the numbers and compare PK to D/ST, since that's usually the position where the choose 1 vs. choose 2 debate starts. Looking at last year's PDSLs - 32 defenses and 33 PKs were taken. A reasonable sample for both.
Here's what I found:
D/ST:
Average:
7.65
Standard Deviation:
5.97
Kicker:
Average:
5.58
Standard Deviation:
4.10
So they're reasonably comparable - Defenses score 1-2 more points but they vary more too.
I went further again and just looked at the frequency of subpar performances - scores of 3 or less for PK and 4 or less for defenses - nearly identical (252 for PK, 147 for D/ST) - about 30% each. That means, on average, 5 out of 17 weeks will be a weak link for either PK or D/ST - so if you're comfy with the 1 PK approach, then you should be almost as comfy with the 1 D approach.
I don't know - I think I'd be more conservative to survive.
I welcome the debate on the other side though Bloom (or anyone else who wants to add their opinion)>
"Control F" brings up a search bar in Firefox (or a search window in Internet Explorer).......use it to search for a players name to see if the player has been drafted already.........pretty simpleThrough 20.03.....OK....please explain the "Control F" deal. How does this function account for players already choosen? I'm in this thread, I hit Contol F and then what? What is supposed to happen when I iniatiate "Control F"?![]()
"Control F" brings up a search bar in Firefox (or a search window in Internet Explorer).......use it to search for a players name to see if the player has been drafted already.........pretty simpleThrough 19.15........all caught up.....OK....please explain the "Control F" deal. How does this function account for players already choosen? I'm in this thread, I hit Contol F and then what? What is supposed to happen when I iniatiate "Control F"?![]()
Control F does nothing on my MacBooknow if you're talking Command F thats 
search bar in chrome tooRuffrodys05 said:"Control F" brings up a search bar in Firefox (or a search window in Internet Explorer).......use it to search for a players name to see if the player has been drafted already.........pretty simpleThrough 20.03.....Toads said:OK....please explain the "Control F" deal. How does this function account for players already choosen? I'm in this thread, I hit Contol F and then what? What is supposed to happen when I iniatiate "Control F"?![]()

The problem this early is the bye week deal. The problem with Rookies (and, for that matter any FA) is that you're stuck with the bye week conflict when it occures and you've dimished control of that. The Rookie curve.....one out of 4.5 Rookies play at a level that allows them to be rostered on re-draft teams, is not in your favor.If you end up with bye week conflicts with your top 5-6 players, you have to have a fall back and you've invested heavily in WR's as they are the strength of the team. If you can avoid a Cutler meltdown for 16 weeks, or a bye week conflict for Cutler with the other top five players on your team (Marshal, Gates, Spiller, Moss, Hightower) you've got a shot. Your fall backs are Best, Garcon, Henderson, and Lynch.QB Jay Cutler
QB Sam Bradford
Not a great group, but not necessarily a liability in a 16 team league either. Cutler is a solid QB1 in this format with legitimate top 5 upside. The new trend in the NFL is to make your rookie QB a starter from day one, so I'm hoping that whoever drafts Bradford will get him on the field immediately. He's not an ideal backup for me, but he could be adequate.
RB CJ Spiller
RB Tim Hightower
RB Jahvid Best
RB Marshawn Lynch
RB Le'Ron McClain
I took Spiller several rounds above his ADP, but I'm okay with that. He was nice value as RB15. Hightower is the second best back on his own team, but he had a solid season in 2009 and he'll continue to play a big role in the offense. He's a much better receiver than Wells. Best should get on the field and contribute for whoever drafts him. He has a low floor as a RB3 in a 16 team league and a very big upside. Lynch should get some work even if the Bills don't trade him. McClain had a pretty good season in 2008. He gives me some emergency depth.
WR Brandon Marshall
WR Santana Moss
WR Pierre Garcon
WR Devery Henderson
WR Laurent Robinson
WR Malcolm Kelly
WR Donte Stallworth
Pretty good group. Marshall is a stud. Moss and Garcon are less reliable than the ideal survivor WR, but they should be pretty solid. Henderson will contribute the occasional big game. Robinson and Kelly have breakout potential. At the very least they should give me a couple good weeks. Stallworth was a nice find late in the draft. If he's in shape and ready to play, he'll outperform his draft slot. Overall a pretty nice combination of proven production and upside. My one concern is that I'm lacking a reliable depth guy who will catch 4-5 balls every week. Most of the guys below Marshall are feast-or-famine players.
TE Antonio Gates
TE Marcedes Lewis
Gates is possibly the single most valuable player in these leagues. Having his huge scores every week from the TE spot can help make up for a lot of weaknesses. Lewis is a good backup who should catch 35-45 balls again.
PK Sebastian Janikowski
PK John Kasay
Two reliable veteran kickers with good job security. Kasay is getting old, but he's still playing at a fairly high level.
DEF Titans
DEF Chiefs
The Titans have historically been a pretty good defensive team under Fisher. I'm hoping they step up next season. Kansas City can't get any worse then they were last year. Four games against the Raiders and Broncos should help. This is not an impressive duo, but I've still got two starting defenses that will score points every week.
OVERALL - This is a pretty spotty team on paper, but I think it has the potential to be surprisingly hard to kill. I've got a good group of triplets with Gates, Marshall, and Cutler. I've got a good stable of WRs and a scrappy group of backs with sneaky upside. I took a few rookies, but they're guys who can realistically contribute immediately. This could be a competitive team when it's all said and done.
I'm shocked at the talent being left on the board. My list from last round is still clean 24+ picks later.cont......
Ref's last two picks:
19.10 Damian Williams WR Rookie: Needed to add another WR, saw guys like Camarillo, Crayton, Gage, Avant, B. Johnson, Jenkins, Mush etc still available. None of them seemed much different than the next. I know it is probably safe to try and pick a guy who will at least get you a few catches each week, but I decided to go for the unknown again and take a gamble on a rookie hoping he lands in a good situation and makes an impact. I guess the way I looked at it, Williams will probably at least put up the numbers that these other guys will, but his ceiling may be higher. We pretty much know what we will get from the other fellas, but maybe Williams busts out and gives me rookie year Eddie Royal or DJax numbers.
20.07 Detroit DST: Actually kind of struggled with this pick. Looked at my team and started hating my pick of Aaron Hernandez as my back up TE. Had been staring at Ben Watson for the last few rounds and almost pulled the trigger on him. I will be toast if something happens to Witten. Really hope Hernandez surprises me, because I will probably need him a few times even if Witten stays healthy. Also didn't like the fact that I only had 6 WR's and two of them were rookies, so I thought about pulling the trigger on one of the guys mentioned above. In the end I said screw it. Counting on the Raiders as my only option every week just sounded really pathetic. Actually thinking Detroit as a seconnd option was an improvement actually sounded even more pathetic, but in the end they won out. At least I will have two teams to chose from each week, and I started thinking that the odds of me actually using Detroit on any given week are probably a little better than me using a WR that I pick here. If my team makes it to Thanksgiving at least I will have something to cheer for during the first game of the day.
My QB's/WR's and Witten will need to carry this team..I HAVE to be right about Aromashodu......and a couple of my 5 rookies will have to pan out to even put up a respectable showing here.....
Good luck guys....
Spotty with some potential is correct. Last year the Moreno's, Brown's, Well's, Greene's, and Crabtree's weren't lighting it up for their owners. If you've figured out the rooks and have some luck with their landing spots you'll be competive. You'll also need some luck on the bye weeks when they come out. Overall Grade C-QB Jay Cutler
QB Sam Bradford
Not a great group, but not necessarily a liability in a 16 team league either. Cutler is a solid QB1 in this format with legitimate top 5 upside. The new trend in the NFL is to make your rookie QB a starter from day one, so I'm hoping that whoever drafts Bradford will get him on the field immediately. He's not an ideal backup for me, but he could be adequate.
Risky strategy that can work. Thankfully we don't deduct for INTs. Grade D
RB CJ Spiller
RB Tim Hightower
RB Jahvid Best
RB Marshawn Lynch
RB Le'Ron McClain
I took Spiller several rounds above his ADP, but I'm okay with that. He was nice value as RB15. Hightower is the second best back on his own team, but he had a solid season in 2009 and he'll continue to play a big role in the offense. He's a much better receiver than Wells. Best should get on the field and contribute for whoever drafts him. He has a low floor as a RB3 in a 16 team league and a very big upside. Lynch should get some work even if the Bills don't trade him. McClain had a pretty good season in 2008. He gives me some emergency depth.
You grossly overspent for Spiller. Hightower is not a RB2 even in a 16 team league. Between Best and Spiller you'll likely get something. Lynch is actually my favorite pick of the group. Grade D-
WR Brandon Marshall
WR Santana Moss
WR Pierre Garcon
WR Devery Henderson
WR Laurent Robinson
WR Malcolm Kelly
WR Donte Stallworth
Pretty good group. Marshall is a stud. Moss and Garcon are less reliable than the ideal survivor WR, but they should be pretty solid. Henderson will contribute the occasional big game. Robinson and Kelly have breakout potential. At the very least they should give me a couple good weeks. Stallworth was a nice find late in the draft. If he's in shape and ready to play, he'll outperform his draft slot. Overall a pretty nice combination of proven production and upside. My one concern is that I'm lacking a reliable depth guy who will catch 4-5 balls every week. Most of the guys below Marshall are feast-or-famine players.
Mid tier WR1 and a low tier WR2. Garcon has a good chance of being your WR2 if Gonzo doesn't cloud the picture. I do like your depth. Grade B
TE Antonio Gates
TE Marcedes Lewis
Gates is possibly the single most valuable player in these leagues. Having his huge scores every week from the TE spot can help make up for a lot of weaknesses. Lewis is a good backup who should catch 35-45 balls again.
You got Gates. Grade A
PK Sebastian Janikowski
PK John Kasay
Two reliable veteran kickers with good job security. Kasay is getting old, but he's still playing at a fairly high level.
Grade C+
DEF Titans
DEF Chiefs
The Titans have historically been a pretty good defensive team under Fisher. I'm hoping they step up next season. Kansas City can't get any worse then they were last year. Four games against the Raiders and Broncos should help. This is not an impressive duo, but I've still got two starting defenses that will score points every week.
I love this commentary, "can't get any worse" Grade D+
OVERALL - This is a pretty spotty team on paper, but I think it has the potential to be surprisingly hard to kill. I've got a good group of triplets with Gates, Marshall, and Cutler. I've got a good stable of WRs and a scrappy group of backs with sneaky upside. I took a few rookies, but they're guys who can realistically contribute immediately. This could be a competitive team when it's all said and done.
Overall I like this team. Could have been one of my favorites if you have gone a different direction at RB. Should hang around for a while and with some luck contend. Overall Grade B/B+2.09 - Aaron Rodgers, GB, QB2
6.09 - Carson Palmer, CIN, QB15
I like my combo here. Not as early as Stinkin Ref went but I did not want to be left with the garbage at end for a top scoring position. One of the best combos in the league and I give it an A
I going to go A+ here with you slightly nosing out Punk and Ref for the top QB spot.
4.09 - Joseph Addai, IND, RB20
5.08 - Reggie Bush, NO, RB24
8.09 - LaDainian Tomlinson, FA, RB39
17.08 - Julius Jones, SEA, RB63
19.08 - LeGarrette Blount, ®, RB75
Okay this group is one of my weaker positions. I love Addai in the 4th over alot of guys drafted ahead of him. If he stays healthy than top 7 guy with catches also. Bush is all about the catches in PPR. But health is always a concern. LT I hope and feel goes to a place where he puts up top 30 numbers, top 20 or top 10 as a big plus and I win this thing. Jones was a blah pick but he might get some action and provide a few weeks. Blount was swinging for fences. I was not really paying attention near end and wish I had taken White in 18th and Dillard in 19th instead. Grade C
I like players with high week to week deviations in this format, but they must be surrounded by guys who can consistantly score. None of your guys fit this bill. You may hang a 35 spot one week and struggle for 15 pts the next week. Byes could be very scary for you. The fate of you team could rest on LT. Grade D+
1.08 - Reggie Wayne, IND, WR2
3.08 - Anquan Boldin, ARI, WR15
10.09 - Malcom Floyd, SD, WR57
11.08 - Bernard Berrian, MIN, WR64
12.09 - Early Doucet, ARI, WR70
18.09 - Jarett Dillard, JAC, WR79
20.09 - Torry Holt, JAC, WR94
I like my 1-2 tandem as well as anyones in the league. I like my WR in PPR for sure. I think the rest of the crew could provide some nice punch here and there. I like Dillards chances to replace Holt over both Thomas and Williamson. Doucet could be a real surprise as I feel he more replaces Boldin in Arizona than Breaston does who is more like Fitz and could really surprise. Floyd/Berrian could make nice #3. Wish I had gotten another good one but that is the price you pay in 16 teamer Grade B+
Pretty much agree with you here. Floyd was a bargain, Holt probably a wasted pick. Grade B+
7.08 - Dustin Keller, NYJ, TE14
9.08 - Brandon Pettigrew, DET, TE17
Okay I like this group but know it is not nearly acceptable in this format and could be the killer. I like both young players and feel they could provide me nice scoring. Grade C+
You'll bleed a bit to the guys with studs, but this is a serviceable combo. Grade C-
14.09 - Mason Crosby, GB, K3
15.08 - Jeff Reed, PIT, K12
One thing about PK. Is they are inconsistent from week to week and having 2 is key to get the 10 points per week. But there is so much change and getting 2 you can rely on is huge. Neither play in warm or inside but they are both good on good scoring teams. I like it Grade A
A/A-, not worth the time to nail it down.
13.08 - 49ers, SF, D9
16.09 - Bills, BUF, D23
D. It is not great but not bad either. I like Stinkin Ref that perfect is only 10 pts. Of course I dont look at scoring very often to start and just go by whatever. Not like I prepare for these things in the end and just go by my guts. SF could have some big plays and Buffalo sucks expect for the DB's which seem to make big plays all the time for TD's. Grade B-
Not great but not bad = a C, not a B-
I think this team is rock solid in the end. Messed up down the line as I kept losing my sheets that I wrote on by the computer with preparation and forgot names than. Not that I spent much time in the end. This team with good running back play especially if LT can still play like I believe, than this Canadian can have more success here.
Avant was drafted. Without looking at the rosters I'd assume I'm as weak at WR as anyone and I did look at all of those players. But if I look at it in terms of the last WR I picked, Jacoby Ford, I'd rather gamble that he might be worth something as a rook over the fact that group of players has shown either nothing or very very limited upside. I strongly considered Jenkins over Ford as well as Crayton who went right after I took Ford. If Jenkins can keep his starting job no reason to not think he can't give you 50 catches again so he had a degree of dependability on his side and I'd say if I knew he was assured of remaining a starter I probably would have taken him over Ford. IMO the other guys are a poo-poo platter of WR's. Gage had his chance to be the starter and lost it. Assuming everyone is healthy he looks to be no better than the 3rd WR on the team but no better than 5th option in the passing game on a run orientated team. Johnson was in a great spot playing opposite Calvin and did nothing with it. After 7 seasons he has shown himself to be someone who won't catch a high rate of targets or have any consistency. Heyward Bey- 9 catches in 40 targets is one of the most disgusting percentages I've ever seen and it can't be all blamed on the QB play because Schilens was near 60% on the catch rate. Now compare Heyward Bey to Ford who I picked last. Both are fast as heck and Ford's last two years he displayed similar numbers to Heyward Bey. One of them I already know sucks in the NFL and while the other one might suck I thought I'd rather have the guy who has not already shown he's terrible on the next level and I also did not want to have both Raider Wr's. I guess at this point I'd just rather go with someone whose potential is unknown versus players who have shown to be less than impressive already.Guys that should have been drafted...GageAvantB. JohnsonJenkinsHeyward Bey
I thought the Scaife pickup was huge for you as I think he is a great grab for a TE needy team. In general you did pounce on good value at the right time. Felix, Barber, Burleson, and Morgan were all outstanding value picks. It seems like a solid deep team to me with the only real concerns being you don't have any marquee guys at QB/TE with the question being is what you have going to be enough? I think you are fine at QB and while even with Scaife I see your team near the bottom of the TE production I think you have at other positions to offset it.6.14 - Matt Leinart, ARI, QB168.14 - David Garrard, JAC, QB209.03 - Alex Smith, SF, QB21Hard to grade out this group. Having three supposed starters makes this an above average group. Rolling out three each week should make up for the lack of top end production. Last year Garrand and the SF QBs posted 11 weeks of 20+ point production. 9 of those weeks were 25+ point weeks. Leinart potential is the wildcard that could make this an elite group. I only see five teams I'd trade QBs with. Grade B-1.03 - Ray Rice, BAL, RB35.03 - Felix Jones, DAL, RB237.03 - Marion Barber III, DAL, RB3318.14 - LenDale White, TEN, RB70Probably the second or third best RB stable in the league with menobrown taking top honors. I've got my stud and Jones/Barber will easily combine to be a strong RB2 in this league with upside for RB1 numbers. Both were absolute steals where they were drafted. Here's hoping Fatdale goes back to 2008 numbers. Chris Johnson can't continue with the insane numbers of touches. Biggest weakness is the potential for Dallas and Baltimore to share a bye week. That said, I was drafting to win and going any deeper at RB would be a waste most every week with the top end talent I had secured. Grade B+2.14 - DeSean Jackson, PHI, WR123.03 - Sidney Rice, MIN, WR144.14 - Dwayne Bowe, KC, WR2111.03 - Nate Burleson, SEA, WR6213.03 - Josh Morgan, SF, WR7319.03 - Legedu Naanee, SD, WR83I Favre comes back, look out. Two middleish WR1s with a very solid WR2 with that has WR1 upside. Burleson was basically larceney where I got him...2009 #34 WR drafted at WR62. Nothing better than getting a WR3 in the 11th round. Morgan finished 53rd last year was another bargain at WR73. Naanee is a longshot roll of the dice. Likely won't crack into my lineup, but has the QB throwing to him that allows for upside. There are about 4-5 guys that give my WR corps a run for the money for top spot in the league, but I think I just nudge them out. Grade A 10.14 - Todd Heap, BAL, TE2217.03 - Dante Rosario, CAR, TE3320.14 - Bo Scaife, TEN TE34How can I soft coat the fact that this trio isn't scaring anyone? Actually I got very lucky to even have a group this good given the lack of draft capital I spent on them. First of all, Heap finished last year at #13. If he can repeat, I won't be giving up too much ground to the field. I you guys hadn't left him hanging out there I would have been royally screwed. Scaife and Rosario finished 20th and 31st last year. Starting three most weeks should cover some of my weakness. Grade F14.14 - Stephen Gostkowski, NE, K515.03 - Ryan Longwell, MIN, K9Two very good kickers with solid holds on their jobs. Grade A12.14 - Cowboys, DAL, D716.14 - Seahawks, SEA, D24Looks like an average D1 and D2 to me. Grade CThis draft came together perfectly for me. I saw a lot of value fall to me and it fell at precisely the time I needed to fill that position. Luck plays a huge role in these drafts and I certainly got my fair share. I'm well above average at the QB/RB/WR/K positions. TE while not being great probably won't be enough of an abortion to hinder my chances. A lot of things can change between now and Setember kickoff, but this team should be one of the top 4 scoring teams this year and a contender for the survivor title.
I agree with you in theory, but the reality is that Jenkins will likely outproduce 7 out of the 10 Fords drafted. A lot depends on the make up of your roster. owners with boom-bust guys at the top end could use a guy like Jenkins with owners with consistent producers with lower ceilings should definately be swinging for the fences. Guys like Austin and Bryant were in the ranks of the poo-poo and passed over in previous years. Even after one year of suckiness, a guy like Bey has to have more potential than half of the rookies drafted.Avant was drafted. Without looking at the rosters I'd assume I'm as weak at WR as anyone and I did look at all of those players. But if I look at it in terms of the last WR I picked, Jacoby Ford, I'd rather gamble that he might be worth something as a rook over the fact that group of players has shown either nothing or very very limited upside. I strongly considered Jenkins over Ford as well as Crayton who went right after I took Ford. If Jenkins can keep his starting job no reason to not think he can't give you 50 catches again so he had a degree of dependability on his side and I'd say if I knew he was assured of remaining a starter I probably would have taken him over Ford. IMO the other guys are a poo-poo platter of WR's. Gage had his chance to be the starter and lost it. Assuming everyone is healthy he looks to be no better than the 3rd WR on the team but no better than 5th option in the passing game on a run orientated team. Johnson was in a great spot playing opposite Calvin and did nothing with it. After 7 seasons he has shown himself to be someone who won't catch a high rate of targets or have any consistency. Heyward Bey- 9 catches in 40 targets is one of the most disgusting percentages I've ever seen and it can't be all blamed on the QB play because Schilens was near 60% on the catch rate. Now compare Heyward Bey to Ford who I picked last. Both are fast as heck and Ford's last two years he displayed similar numbers to Heyward Bey. One of them I already know sucks in the NFL and while the other one might suck I thought I'd rather have the guy who has not already shown he's terrible on the next level and I also did not want to have both Raider Wr's. I guess at this point I'd just rather go with someone whose potential is unknown versus players who have shown to be less than impressive already.Guys that should have been drafted...GageAvantB. JohnsonJenkinsHeyward Bey
Don't get too excited about Heyward Bey: 40 targets, 9 catches = 22.5 percent catch rate.At that rate, he needs 200 + targets to make 50 catches.Guys that should have been drafted...GageAvantB. JohnsonJenkinsHeyward Bey
If I had gone RB instead of one of my later WRs, I would have taken Jenkins, Scaife or DHB in the 20th. Scaife just makes me somewhat nervous not knowing where he's going, could be a great value.BassNBrew said:Guys that should have been drafted...
Gage - meh, he isn't going to do much now
Avant - as stated, he was
B. Johnson - maybe but doesn't offer much upside
Jenkins - agreed, I almost took him instead of Gilyard, probably should have
Heyward Bey - agreed, but opted for Butler as my deep threat instead and Gilyard as my hopeful slot WR
I'll go back to the old logo after the TV draft is rolled up, it's an inside joke over there. Part of the reason for posting hindsight picks is seeing how we could improve and whether the immediate hindsight actually is better than the original pick, it very well might not be.FUBAR goes for the new logo and lays out the "Hindsight" analysis.In retrospect, consider keeping the old logo and don't look back.
You don't get mulligans in this deal; they just reside on other guys rosters.
![]()